Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2211.04456 · Quantum Economics and Finance

Quantum Risk Analysis: Beyond (Conditional) Value-at-Risk

Christian Laudagé, Ivica Turkalj

Published Sep 22, 2025• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Risk measures are important key figures to measure the adequacy of the reserves of a company. The most common risk measures in practice are Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). Recently, quantum-based algorithms are introduced to calculate them. These procedures are based on the so-called quantum amplitude estimation algorithm, which leads to a quadratic speed-up compared to classical Monte-Carlo based methods. Based on these ideas, we construct quantum-based algorithms to calculate alternatives for VaR and CVaR, namely the Expectile Value-at-Risk (EVaR) and the Range Value-at-Risk (RVaR). These algorithms are also based on quantum amplitude estimation. In two case studies, we compare their performance with the quantum-based algorithms for VaR and CVaR. We find that all of the algorithms perform sufficiently well on a quantum simulator. Further, the calculations of EVaR and VaR are robust against noise on a real quantum device. This is not the case for CVaR and RVaR.

DOI
10.1177/29767032251377083

Related papers

Quantum Risk Analysis of Financial Derivatives

Nikitas Stamatopoulos, B. D. Clader, Stefan Woerner +1 more

We introduce two quantum algorithms to compute the Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) of financial derivatives using quantum computers: the first by applying existing ideas from quantum risk analysis to derivative pricing, and the second based on a novel approach using Quantum Signal Processing (QSP). Previous work in the literature has shown that quantum advantage is possible in the context of individual derivative pricing and that advantage can be leveraged in a straightforward manner in the estimation of the VaR and CVaR. The algorithms we introduce in this work aim to provide an additional advantage by encoding the derivative price over multiple market scenarios in superposition and computing the desired values by applying appropriate transformations to the quantum system. We perform complexity and error analysis of both algorithms, and show that while the two algorithms have the same asymptotic scaling the QSP-based approach requires significantly fewer quantum resources for the same target accuracy. Additionally, by numerically simulating both quantum and classical VaR algorithms, we demonstrate that the quantum algorithm can extract additional advantage from a quantum computer compared to individual derivative pricing. Specifically, we show that under certain conditions VaR estimation can lower the latest published estimates of the logical clock rate required for quantum advantage in derivative pricing by up to $\sim 30$x. In light of these results, we are encouraged that our formulation of derivative pricing in the QSP framework may be further leveraged for quantum advantage in other relevant financial applications, and that quantum computers could be harnessed more efficiently by considering problems in the financial sector at a higher level.

arXiv:2404.10088•Apr 15, 2024•3 citations

Quantum Subgradient Estimation for Conditional Value-at-Risk Optimization

Vasilis Skarlatos, Nikos Konofaos

Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) is a leading tail-risk measure in finance, central to both regulatory and portfolio optimization frameworks. Classical estimation of CVaR and its gradients relies on Monte Carlo simulation, incurring $O(1/ε^2)$ sample complexity to achieve $ε$-accuracy. In this work, we design and analyze a quantum subgradient oracle for CVaR minimization based on amplitude estimation. Via a tripartite proposition, we show that CVaR subgradients can be estimated with $O(1/ε)$ quantum queries, even when the Value-at-Risk (VaR) threshold itself must be estimated. We further quantify the propagation of estimation error from the VaR stage to CVaR gradients and derive convergence rates of stochastic projected subgradient descent using this oracle. Our analysis establishes a near-quadratic improvement in query complexity over classical Monte Carlo. Numerical experiments with simulated quantum circuits confirm the theoretical rates and illustrate robustness to threshold estimation noise. This constitutes the first rigorous complexity analysis of quantum subgradient methods for tail-risk minimization.

arXiv:2510.04736•Oct 6, 2025•1 citation

Quantum Monte Carlo Integration for Simulation-Based Optimisation

Jingjing Cui, de Brouwer, Philippe J. S., Steven Herbert +7 more

We investigate the feasibility of integrating quantum algorithms as subroutines of simulation-based optimisation problems with relevance to and potential applications in mathematical finance. To this end, we conduct a thorough analysis of all systematic errors arising in the formulation of quantum Monte Carlo integration in order to better understand the resources required to encode various distributions such as a Gaussian, and to evaluate statistical quantities such as the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional-Value-at-Risk (CVaR) of an asset. Finally, we study the applicability of quantum Monte Carlo integration for fundamental financial use cases in terms of simulation-based optimisations, notably Mean-Conditional-Value-at-Risk (Mean-CVaR) and (risky) Mean-Variance (Mean-Var) optimisation problems. In particular, we study the Mean-Var optimisation problem in the presence of noise on a quantum device, and benchmark a quantum error mitigation method that applies to quantum amplitude estimation -- a key subroutine of quantum Monte Carlo integration -- showcasing the utility of such an approach.

arXiv:2410.03926•Oct 4, 2024•0 citations

A Quantum Risk Management Framework (QRMF): Quantum Amplitude Estimation for VaR/CVaR, Entanglement-Based Systemic Risk Analytics, and Variational Risk Optimization

Yalla Jnan Devi Satya Prasad

We present a rigorously derived Quantum Risk Management Framework (QRMF) integrating quantum amplitude estimation for tail risk metrics, entanglement-based systemic risk analytics, and variational quantum risk optimization. Our comprehensive approach encompasses three novel modules: (i) Quantum Risk Amplitude Estimation (QRAE) achieving quadratic sample complexity improvements over classical Monte Carlo for Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional VaR (CVaR) computation through binary search with amplitude estimation subroutines; (ii) Quantum Systemic Risk Analysis (QSRA) encoding financial exposure networks into entangled bipartite states with purity-based early warning observables and QAOA partitioning for cascade mitigation; and (iii) Variational Quantum Risk Optimizer (VQRO) implementing constraint-aware portfolio optimization using risk-adjusted Hamiltonians with feasible-state ansätze and penalty-based formulations. We establish formal complexity theorems under explicit QRAM/QROM cost models, prove convergence guarantees for variational components under convex surrogate conditions, and demonstrate theoretical correspondence between entanglement purity responses and classical contagion path-sum sensitivities in linearized network models. The hybrid framework combines gate-model quantum circuits for amplitude estimation and entanglement encoding with variational quantum eigensolvers for optimization, validated through comprehensive simulations on synthetic financial networks and real market data. Extensive ablation studies on circuit depth versus accuracy trade-offs, noise resilience analysis, and resource scaling complement theoretical results, with all quantum amplitude estimation and entanglement simulations performed using Qiskit on classical hardware while baseline classical Monte Carlo and network centrality methods provide benchmarking baselines. This distinction ensures accurate interpretation of quantum advantages across the integrated risk management pipeline.

•Oct 7, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Computing for Option Portfolio Analysis

Yusen Wu, Jingbo B. Wang, Yuying Li

In this paper, we introduce an efficient and end-to-end quantum algorithm tailored for computing the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and conditional Value-at-Risk (CVar) for a portfolio of European options. Our focus is on leveraging quantum computation to overcome the challenges posed by high dimensionality in VaR and CVaR estimation. While our innovative quantum algorithm is designed primarily for estimating portfolio VaR and CVaR for European options, we also investigate the feasibility of applying a similar quantum approach to price American options. Our analysis reveals a quantum 'no-go' theorem within the current algorithm, highlighting its limitation in pricing American options. Our results indicate the necessity of investigating alternative strategies to resolve the complementarity challenge in pricing American options in future research.

arXiv:2406.00486•Jun 1, 2024•0 citations

Quantum risk analysis

Stefan Woerner, Daniel J. Egger

Abstract We present a quantum algorithm that analyzes risk more efficiently than Monte Carlo simulations traditionally used on classical computers. We employ quantum amplitude estimation to price securities and evaluate risk measures such as Value at Risk and Conditional Value at Risk on a gate-based quantum computer. Additionally, we show how to implement this algorithm and how to trade-off the convergence rate of the algorithm and the circuit depth. The shortest possible circuit depth—growing polynomially in the number of qubits representing the uncertainty—leads to a convergence rate of O ( M −2/3 ), where M is the number of samples. This is already faster than classical Monte Carlo simulations which converge at a rate of O ( M −1/2 ). If we allow the circuit depth to grow faster, but still polynomially, the convergence rate quickly approaches the optimum of O ( M −1 ). Thus, for slowly increasing circuit depths our algorithm provides a near quadratic speed-up compared to Monte Carlo methods. We demonstrate our algorithm using two toy models. In the first model we use real hardware, such as the IBM Q Experience, to price a Treasury-bill (T-bill) faced by a possible interest rate increase. In the second model, we simulate our algorithm to illustrate how a quantum computer can determine financial risk for a two-asset portfolio made up of government debt with different maturity dates. Both models confirm the improved convergence rate over Monte Carlo methods. Using simulations, we also evaluate the impact of cross-talk and energy relaxation errors.

arXiv:1806.06893•npj Quantum Information•Feb 8, 2019•298 citations
Risk measures are important key figures to measure the adequacy of the reserves of a company. The most common risk measures in practice are Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). Recently, quantum-based algorithms are introduced to calculate them. These procedures are based on the so-called quantum amplitude estimation algorithm, which leads to a quadratic speed-up compared to classical Monte-Carlo based methods. Based on these ideas, we construct quantum-based algorithms to calculate alternatives for VaR and CVaR, namely the Expectile Value-at-Risk (EVaR) and the Range Value-at-Risk (RVaR). These algorithms are also based on quantum amplitude estimation. In two case studies, we compare their performance with the quantum-based algorithms for VaR and CVaR. We find that all of the algorithms perform sufficiently well on a quantum simulator. Further, the calculations of EVaR and VaR are robust against noise on a real quantum device. This is not the case for CVaR and RVaR.
We introduce two quantum algorithms to compute the Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) of financial derivatives using quantum computers: the first by applying existing ideas from quantum risk analysis to derivative pricing, and the second based on a novel approach using Quantum Signal Processing (QSP). Previous work in the literature has shown that quantum advantage is possible in the context of individual derivative pricing and that advantage can be leveraged in a straightforward manner in the estimation of the VaR and CVaR. The algorithms we introduce in this work aim to provide an additional advantage by encoding the derivative price over multiple market scenarios in superposition and computing the desired values by applying appropriate transformations to the quantum system. We perform complexity and error analysis of both algorithms, and show that while the two algorithms have the same asymptotic scaling the QSP-based approach requires significantly fewer quantum resources for the same target accuracy. Additionally, by numerically simulating both quantum and classical VaR algorithms, we demonstrate that the quantum algorithm can extract additional advantage from a quantum computer compared to individual derivative pricing. Specifically, we show that under certain conditions VaR estimation can lower the latest published estimates of the logical clock rate required for quantum advantage in derivative pricing by up to ∼30\sim 30∼30x. In light of these results, we are encouraged that our formulation of derivative pricing in the QSP framework may be further leveraged for quantum advantage in other relevant financial applications, and that quantum computers could be harnessed more efficiently by considering problems in the financial sector at a higher level.
Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) is a leading tail-risk measure in finance, central to both regulatory and portfolio optimization frameworks. Classical estimation of CVaR and its gradients relies on Monte Carlo simulation, incurring O(1/ε2)O(1/ε^2)O(1/ε2) sample complexity to achieve εεε-accuracy. In this work, we design and analyze a quantum subgradient oracle for CVaR minimization based on amplitude estimation. Via a tripartite proposition, we show that CVaR subgradients can be estimated with O(1/ε)O(1/ε)O(1/ε) quantum queries, even when the Value-at-Risk (VaR) threshold itself must be estimated. We further quantify the propagation of estimation error from the VaR stage to CVaR gradients and derive convergence rates of stochastic projected subgradient descent using this oracle. Our analysis establishes a near-quadratic improvement in query complexity over classical Monte Carlo. Numerical experiments with simulated quantum circuits confirm the theoretical rates and illustrate robustness to threshold estimation noise. This constitutes the first rigorous complexity analysis of quantum subgradient methods for tail-risk minimization.
We investigate the feasibility of integrating quantum algorithms as subroutines of simulation-based optimisation problems with relevance to and potential applications in mathematical finance. To this end, we conduct a thorough analysis of all systematic errors arising in the formulation of quantum Monte Carlo integration in order to better understand the resources required to encode various distributions such as a Gaussian, and to evaluate statistical quantities such as the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional-Value-at-Risk (CVaR) of an asset. Finally, we study the applicability of quantum Monte Carlo integration for fundamental financial use cases in terms of simulation-based optimisations, notably Mean-Conditional-Value-at-Risk (Mean-CVaR) and (risky) Mean-Variance (Mean-Var) optimisation problems. In particular, we study the Mean-Var optimisation problem in the presence of noise on a quantum device, and benchmark a quantum error mitigation method that applies to quantum amplitude estimation -- a key subroutine of quantum Monte Carlo integration -- showcasing the utility of such an approach.
We present a rigorously derived Quantum Risk Management Framework (QRMF) integrating quantum amplitude estimation for tail risk metrics, entanglement-based systemic risk analytics, and variational quantum risk optimization. Our comprehensive approach encompasses three novel modules: (i) Quantum Risk Amplitude Estimation (QRAE) achieving quadratic sample complexity improvements over classical Monte Carlo for Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional VaR (CVaR) computation through binary search with amplitude estimation subroutines; (ii) Quantum Systemic Risk Analysis (QSRA) encoding financial exposure networks into entangled bipartite states with purity-based early warning observables and QAOA partitioning for cascade mitigation; and (iii) Variational Quantum Risk Optimizer (VQRO) implementing constraint-aware portfolio optimization using risk-adjusted Hamiltonians with feasible-state ansätze and penalty-based formulations. We establish formal complexity theorems under explicit QRAM/QROM cost models, prove convergence guarantees for variational components under convex surrogate conditions, and demonstrate theoretical correspondence between entanglement purity responses and classical contagion path-sum sensitivities in linearized network models. The hybrid framework combines gate-model quantum circuits for amplitude estimation and entanglement encoding with variational quantum eigensolvers for optimization, validated through comprehensive simulations on synthetic financial networks and real market data. Extensive ablation studies on circuit depth versus accuracy trade-offs, noise resilience analysis, and resource scaling complement theoretical results, with all quantum amplitude estimation and entanglement simulations performed using Qiskit on classical hardware while baseline classical Monte Carlo and network centrality methods provide benchmarking baselines. This distinction ensures accurate interpretation of quantum advantages across the integrated risk management pipeline.
In this paper, we introduce an efficient and end-to-end quantum algorithm tailored for computing the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and conditional Value-at-Risk (CVar) for a portfolio of European options. Our focus is on leveraging quantum computation to overcome the challenges posed by high dimensionality in VaR and CVaR estimation. While our innovative quantum algorithm is designed primarily for estimating portfolio VaR and CVaR for European options, we also investigate the feasibility of applying a similar quantum approach to price American options. Our analysis reveals a quantum 'no-go' theorem within the current algorithm, highlighting its limitation in pricing American options. Our results indicate the necessity of investigating alternative strategies to resolve the complementarity challenge in pricing American options in future research.
Abstract We present a quantum algorithm that analyzes risk more efficiently than Monte Carlo simulations traditionally used on classical computers. We employ quantum amplitude estimation to price securities and evaluate risk measures such as Value at Risk and Conditional Value at Risk on a gate-based quantum computer. Additionally, we show how to implement this algorithm and how to trade-off the convergence rate of the algorithm and the circuit depth. The shortest possible circuit depth—growing polynomially in the number of qubits representing the uncertainty—leads to a convergence rate of O ( M −2/3 ), where M is the number of samples. This is already faster than classical Monte Carlo simulations which converge at a rate of O ( M −1/2 ). If we allow the circuit depth to grow faster, but still polynomially, the convergence rate quickly approaches the optimum of O ( M −1 ). Thus, for slowly increasing circuit depths our algorithm provides a near quadratic speed-up compared to Monte Carlo methods. We demonstrate our algorithm using two toy models. In the first model we use real hardware, such as the IBM Q Experience, to price a Treasury-bill (T-bill) faced by a possible interest rate increase. In the second model, we simulate our algorithm to illustrate how a quantum computer can determine financial risk for a two-asset portfolio made up of government debt with different maturity dates. Both models confirm the improved convergence rate over Monte Carlo methods. Using simulations, we also evaluate the impact of cross-talk and energy relaxation errors.