Quantum Monte Carlo Integration for Simulation-Based Optimisation
Jingjing Cui, de Brouwer, Philippe J. S., Steven Herbert, Philip Intallura, Cahit Kargı, Georgios Korpas, Alexandre Krajenbrink, William Shoosmith, Ifan Williams, Ban Zheng
We investigate the feasibility of integrating quantum algorithms as subroutines of simulation-based optimisation problems with relevance to and potential applications in mathematical finance. To this end, we conduct a thorough analysis of all systematic errors arising in the formulation of quantum Monte Carlo integration in order to better understand the resources required to encode various distributions such as a Gaussian, and to evaluate statistical quantities such as the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional-Value-at-Risk (CVaR) of an asset. Finally, we study the applicability of quantum Monte Carlo integration for fundamental financial use cases in terms of simulation-based optimisations, notably Mean-Conditional-Value-at-Risk (Mean-CVaR) and (risky) Mean-Variance (Mean-Var) optimisation problems. In particular, we study the Mean-Var optimisation problem in the presence of noise on a quantum device, and benchmark a quantum error mitigation method that applies to quantum amplitude estimation -- a key subroutine of quantum Monte Carlo integration -- showcasing the utility of such an approach.
We investigate the feasibility of integrating quantum algorithms as subroutines of simulation-based optimisation problems with relevance to and potential applications in mathematical finance. To this end, we conduct a thorough analysis of all systematic errors arising in the formulation of quantum Monte Carlo integration in order to better understand the resources required to encode various distributions such as a Gaussian, and to evaluate statistical quantities such as the Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional-Value-at-Risk (CVaR) of an asset. Finally, we study the applicability of quantum Monte Carlo integration for fundamental financial use cases in terms of simulation-based optimisations, notably Mean-Conditional-Value-at-Risk (Mean-CVaR) and (risky) Mean-Variance (Mean-Var) optimisation problems. In particular, we study the Mean-Var optimisation problem in the presence of noise on a quantum device, and benchmark a quantum error mitigation method that applies to quantum amplitude estimation -- a key subroutine of quantum Monte Carlo integration -- showcasing the utility of such an approach.
Quantum computing has emerged as a transformative computational paradigm, offering novel capabilities to tackle complex problems in finance—most notably in derivative pricing, risk management, and portfolio optimization. This review synthesizes recent advances in quantum algorithms and hybrid quantum–classical frameworks as applied to financial services, examining how technologies such as quantum-annealing, quantum amplitude estimation, and variational quantum circuits can improve efficiency, accuracy, and scalability over classical methods. The study provides a systematic assessment of key use-cases: (1) derivative pricing and greeks computation via quantum Monte Carlo and amplitude estimation; (2) risk management enhancements, including Value-at-Risk (VaR) and conditional VaR through quantum gradient estimation; and (3) portfolio optimization via QUBO (quadratic unconstrained binary optimization) mapping, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and quantum annealing approaches. In addition to reviewing technological potential, the paper addresses critical barriers—hardware noise, coherence limitations, data integration, regulatory considerations—and outlines future research directions, including quantum-resilient cryptography in finance and industry coupling. By bringing together algorithmic, financial and regulatory perspectives, this review seeks to guide academics and practitioners toward the next frontier in financial computing.
Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are widely used in financial risk management, from estimating value-at-risk (VaR) to pricing over-the-counter derivatives. However, they come at a significant computational cost due to the number of scenarios required for convergence. If a probability distribution is available, Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) algorithms can provide a quadratic speed-up in measuring its properties as compared to their classical counterparts. Recent studies have explored the calculation of common risk measures and the optimisation of QAE algorithms by initialising the input quantum states with pre-computed probability distributions. If such distributions are not available in closed form, however, they need to be generated numerically, and the associated computational cost may limit the quantum advantage. In this paper, we bypass this challenge by incorporating scenario generation – i.e. simulation of the risk factor evolution over time to generate probability distributions – into the quantum computation; we refer to this process as Quantum MC (QMC) simulations. Specifically, we assemble quantum circuits that implement stochastic models for equity (geometric Brownian motion), interest rate (mean-reversion models), and credit (structural, reduced-form, and rating migration credit models) risk factors. We then integrate these models with QAE to provide end-to-end examples for both market and credit risk use cases.
Financial modeling and risk analysis involve computationally intensive tasks -- Monte Carlo simulation for derivative pricing, portfolio optimisation over high-dimensional asset spaces, and Value-at-Risk estimation from complex multivariate distributions -- where quantum computing offers potential polynomial-to-quadratic speedups. This paper proposes the Quantum Financial Computation Framework (QFCF), a systematic evaluation of quantum algorithms for four core financial computing tasks: option pricing (quantum amplitude estimation for Monte Carlo), portfolio optimisation (QAOA and VQE on quadratic unconstrained binary optimisation formulations), credit risk assessment (quantum Bayesian inference), and Value-at-Risk estimation (quantum arithmetic circuits). QFCF is evaluated on 16 financial benchmark problems spanning European and Asian option pricing, 50-500 asset portfolio optimisation, and credit portfolio loss distributions on near-term (NISQ) and fault-tolerant quantum hardware models. Key results: quantum amplitude estimation achieves quadratic speedup over classical Monte Carlo for option pricing with circuit depth scaling as O(1/ε) versus classical O(1/ε2); QAOA achieves portfolio optimisation solution quality within 4.8% of classical branch-and-bound for 50-asset problems; quantum Bayesian credit scoring reduces inference time by 38x for 200-variable credit networks. The framework introduces the Quantum Financial Utility Index (QFUI) and quantitative quantum advantage thresholds for each financial task.
Quantum computing is revolutionizing computational methods in finance by enhancing efficiency and accuracy in financial modeling and risk management. This review explores the impact of quantum computing in finance, focusing on derivative pricing, risk management, and portfolio optimization. It analyzes the benefits, limitations, and future implications of integrating quantum technologies with classical financial systems. A comprehensive review of quantum Monte Carlo methods, quantum algorithms, and their financial applications was conducted. Theoretical foundations, including Chebyshev’s inequality and Grover’s search method, were evaluated for their role in enhancing sampling efficiency and predictive accuracy. Empirical studies and use cases demonstrate the practical implications of quantum computing in pricing financial derivatives and managing risk through Value at Risk and Conditional Value at Risk assessments. The critical findings reveal that Quantum Monte Carlo algorithms provide substantial efficiency gains, reducing sample size requirements by up to fourfold compared to classical methods. Techniques employed in prior studies highlight the effectiveness of Quantum Amplitude Estimation for derivative pricing and risk analysis. However, challenges persist in scalability, data quality, integration with classical systems, and compliance with regulatory standards. This research contributes to the current body of knowledge by providing a comprehensive analysis of quantum algorithms’ practical applications in derivative pricing, risk management, and portfolio optimization, demonstrating the efficiency gains and limitations of quantum approaches. Future research should explore hybrid quantum–classical frameworks, quantum applications in blockchain, and enhanced quantum cryptography to ensure secure and efficient financial transactions.
Risk measures are important key figures to measure the adequacy of the reserves of a company. The most common risk measures in practice are Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). Recently, quantum-based algorithms are introduced to calculate them. These procedures are based on the so-called quantum amplitude estimation algorithm, which leads to a quadratic speed-up compared to classical Monte-Carlo based methods. Based on these ideas, we construct quantum-based algorithms to calculate alternatives for VaR and CVaR, namely the Expectile Value-at-Risk (EVaR) and the Range Value-at-Risk (RVaR). These algorithms are also based on quantum amplitude estimation. In two case studies, we compare their performance with the quantum-based algorithms for VaR and CVaR. We find that all of the algorithms perform sufficiently well on a quantum simulator. Further, the calculations of EVaR and VaR are robust against noise on a real quantum device. This is not the case for CVaR and RVaR.
We introduce two quantum algorithms to compute the Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) of financial derivatives using quantum computers: the first by applying existing ideas from quantum risk analysis to derivative pricing, and the second based on a novel approach using Quantum Signal Processing (QSP). Previous work in the literature has shown that quantum advantage is possible in the context of individual derivative pricing and that advantage can be leveraged in a straightforward manner in the estimation of the VaR and CVaR. The algorithms we introduce in this work aim to provide an additional advantage by encoding the derivative price over multiple market scenarios in superposition and computing the desired values by applying appropriate transformations to the quantum system. We perform complexity and error analysis of both algorithms, and show that while the two algorithms have the same asymptotic scaling the QSP-based approach requires significantly fewer quantum resources for the same target accuracy. Additionally, by numerically simulating both quantum and classical VaR algorithms, we demonstrate that the quantum algorithm can extract additional advantage from a quantum computer compared to individual derivative pricing. Specifically, we show that under certain conditions VaR estimation can lower the latest published estimates of the logical clock rate required for quantum advantage in derivative pricing by up to ∼30x. In light of these results, we are encouraged that our formulation of derivative pricing in the QSP framework may be further leveraged for quantum advantage in other relevant financial applications, and that quantum computers could be harnessed more efficiently by considering problems in the financial sector at a higher level.