Abstract We present a quantum algorithm that analyzes risk more efficiently than Monte Carlo simulations traditionally used on classical computers. We employ quantum amplitude estimation to price securities and evaluate risk measures such as Value at Risk and Conditional Value at Risk on a gate-based quantum computer. Additionally, we show how to implement this algorithm and how to trade-off the convergence rate of the algorithm and the circuit depth. The shortest possible circuit depth—growing polynomially in the number of qubits representing the uncertainty—leads to a convergence rate of O ( M −2/3 ), where M is the number of samples. This is already faster than classical Monte Carlo simulations which converge at a rate of O ( M −1/2 ). If we allow the circuit depth to grow faster, but still polynomially, the convergence rate quickly approaches the optimum of O ( M −1 ). Thus, for slowly increasing circuit depths our algorithm provides a near quadratic speed-up compared to Monte Carlo methods. We demonstrate our algorithm using two toy models. In the first model we use real hardware, such as the IBM Q Experience, to price a Treasury-bill (T-bill) faced by a possible interest rate increase. In the second model, we simulate our algorithm to illustrate how a quantum computer can determine financial risk for a two-asset portfolio made up of government debt with different maturity dates. Both models confirm the improved convergence rate over Monte Carlo methods. Using simulations, we also evaluate the impact of cross-talk and energy relaxation errors.
Abstract We present a quantum algorithm that analyzes risk more efficiently than Monte Carlo simulations traditionally used on classical computers. We employ quantum amplitude estimation to price securities and evaluate risk measures such as Value at Risk and Conditional Value at Risk on a gate-based quantum computer. Additionally, we show how to implement this algorithm and how to trade-off the convergence rate of the algorithm and the circuit depth. The shortest possible circuit depth—growing polynomially in the number of qubits representing the uncertainty—leads to a convergence rate of O ( M −2/3 ), where M is the number of samples. This is already faster than classical Monte Carlo simulations which converge at a rate of O ( M −1/2 ). If we allow the circuit depth to grow faster, but still polynomially, the convergence rate quickly approaches the optimum of O ( M −1 ). Thus, for slowly increasing circuit depths our algorithm provides a near quadratic speed-up compared to Monte Carlo methods. We demonstrate our algorithm using two toy models. In the first model we use real hardware, such as the IBM Q Experience, to price a Treasury-bill (T-bill) faced by a possible interest rate increase. In the second model, we simulate our algorithm to illustrate how a quantum computer can determine financial risk for a two-asset portfolio made up of government debt with different maturity dates. Both models confirm the improved convergence rate over Monte Carlo methods. Using simulations, we also evaluate the impact of cross-talk and energy relaxation errors.
Financial modeling and risk analysis involve computationally intensive tasks -- Monte Carlo simulation for derivative pricing, portfolio optimisation over high-dimensional asset spaces, and Value-at-Risk estimation from complex multivariate distributions -- where quantum computing offers potential polynomial-to-quadratic speedups. This paper proposes the Quantum Financial Computation Framework (QFCF), a systematic evaluation of quantum algorithms for four core financial computing tasks: option pricing (quantum amplitude estimation for Monte Carlo), portfolio optimisation (QAOA and VQE on quadratic unconstrained binary optimisation formulations), credit risk assessment (quantum Bayesian inference), and Value-at-Risk estimation (quantum arithmetic circuits). QFCF is evaluated on 16 financial benchmark problems spanning European and Asian option pricing, 50-500 asset portfolio optimisation, and credit portfolio loss distributions on near-term (NISQ) and fault-tolerant quantum hardware models. Key results: quantum amplitude estimation achieves quadratic speedup over classical Monte Carlo for option pricing with circuit depth scaling as O(1/ε) versus classical O(1/ε2); QAOA achieves portfolio optimisation solution quality within 4.8% of classical branch-and-bound for 50-asset problems; quantum Bayesian credit scoring reduces inference time by 38x for 200-variable credit networks. The framework introduces the Quantum Financial Utility Index (QFUI) and quantitative quantum advantage thresholds for each financial task.
Monte Carlo (MC) simulations are widely used in financial risk management, from estimating value-at-risk (VaR) to pricing over-the-counter derivatives. However, they come at a significant computational cost due to the number of scenarios required for convergence. If a probability distribution is available, Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) algorithms can provide a quadratic speed-up in measuring its properties as compared to their classical counterparts. Recent studies have explored the calculation of common risk measures and the optimisation of QAE algorithms by initialising the input quantum states with pre-computed probability distributions. If such distributions are not available in closed form, however, they need to be generated numerically, and the associated computational cost may limit the quantum advantage. In this paper, we bypass this challenge by incorporating scenario generation – i.e. simulation of the risk factor evolution over time to generate probability distributions – into the quantum computation; we refer to this process as Quantum MC (QMC) simulations. Specifically, we assemble quantum circuits that implement stochastic models for equity (geometric Brownian motion), interest rate (mean-reversion models), and credit (structural, reduced-form, and rating migration credit models) risk factors. We then integrate these models with QAE to provide end-to-end examples for both market and credit risk use cases.
We present a methodology to price options and portfolios of options on a gate-based quantum computer using amplitude estimation, an algorithm which provides a quadratic speedup compared to classical Monte Carlo methods. The options that we cover include vanilla options, multi-asset options and path-dependent options such as barrier options. We put an emphasis on the implementation of the quantum circuits required to build the input states and operators needed by amplitude estimation to price the different option types. Additionally, we show simulation results to highlight how the circuits that we implement price the different option contracts. Finally, we examine the performance of option pricing circuits on quantum hardware using the IBM Q Tokyo quantum device. We employ a simple, yet effective, error mitigation scheme that allows us to significantly reduce the errors arising from noisy two-qubit gates.
Monte Carlo simulations underpin computational quantitative finance, where they are used for derivative pricing, risk quantification and scenario analysis whenever closed-form solutions are unavailable. Their main limitation is the slow O(N^-1/2) convergence of classical sampling. Quantum amplitude estimation promises a quadratic improvement in query complexity over classical Monte Carlo, reducing the sample requirement from O(eps^-2) to O(eps^-1) under idealised conditions. This thesis measures the extent to which the quadratic improvement in query complexity survives a concrete risk task under gate noise when compared to classical Monte Carlo. A four-obligor correlated portfolio, whose loss distribution can be computed exactly, is encoded into quantum circuits, and its value at risk and expected shortfall are estimated by iterative amplitude estimation under exactly simulated depolarising noise on every two-qubit gate. Six configurations of 11 to 15 qubits vary the portfolio, the factor grid and the arithmetic construction. At matched loss-model evaluation budgets and without noise, amplitude estimation reduces the RMSE of the tail probability against classical Monte Carlo by a factor of 13.6 at the largest budget tested. The error budget is dominated by the circuit encoding, not the estimator. As a result, the value at risk at the 95% level picks the wrong loss level in none of the noiseless repetitions, while the encoding understates expected shortfall by 0.177 loss units. Under noise, the signal decays with every amplification round. The number of rounds that still help falls from 64 at an error rate of 3x10^-6 to none at 3x10^-2. This work concludes that amplification benefits only while the product of gate count and error rate stays small against one. Because every obligor added enlarges the circuit, the error rate at which amplification remains useful falls as the portfolio grows, and advantage starts depending on circuit compression instead of estimator design.
Quantum computing is revolutionizing computational methods in finance by enhancing efficiency and accuracy in financial modeling and risk management. This review explores the impact of quantum computing in finance, focusing on derivative pricing, risk management, and portfolio optimization. It analyzes the benefits, limitations, and future implications of integrating quantum technologies with classical financial systems. A comprehensive review of quantum Monte Carlo methods, quantum algorithms, and their financial applications was conducted. Theoretical foundations, including Chebyshev’s inequality and Grover’s search method, were evaluated for their role in enhancing sampling efficiency and predictive accuracy. Empirical studies and use cases demonstrate the practical implications of quantum computing in pricing financial derivatives and managing risk through Value at Risk and Conditional Value at Risk assessments. The critical findings reveal that Quantum Monte Carlo algorithms provide substantial efficiency gains, reducing sample size requirements by up to fourfold compared to classical methods. Techniques employed in prior studies highlight the effectiveness of Quantum Amplitude Estimation for derivative pricing and risk analysis. However, challenges persist in scalability, data quality, integration with classical systems, and compliance with regulatory standards. This research contributes to the current body of knowledge by providing a comprehensive analysis of quantum algorithms’ practical applications in derivative pricing, risk management, and portfolio optimization, demonstrating the efficiency gains and limitations of quantum approaches. Future research should explore hybrid quantum–classical frameworks, quantum applications in blockchain, and enhanced quantum cryptography to ensure secure and efficient financial transactions.
Abstract In recent years a CRA (Credit Risk Analysis) quantum algorithm with a quadratic speedup over classical analogous methods has been introduced [1]. We propose a new variant of this quantum algorithm with the intent of overcoming some of the most significant limitations (according to business domain experts) of this approach. In particular, we describe a method to implement a more realistic and complex risk model for the default probability of each portfolio’s asset, capable of taking into account multiple systemic risk factors. In addition, we present a solution to increase the flexibility of one of the model’s inputs, the Loss Given Default, removing the constraint to use integer values. This specific improvement addresses the need to use real data coming from the financial sector in order to establish fair benchmarking protocols. Although these enhancements come at a cost in terms of circuit depth and width, they nevertheless show a path towards a more realistic software solution. Recent progress in quantum technology shows that eventually, the increase in the number and reliability of qubits will allow for useful results and meaningful scales for the financial sector, also on real quantum hardware, paving the way for a concrete quantum advantage in the field. The paper also describes experiments conducted on simulators to test the circuit proposed and contains an assessment of the scalability of the approach presented.