We present a methodology to price options and portfolios of options on a gate-based quantum computer using amplitude estimation, an algorithm which provides a quadratic speedup compared to classical Monte Carlo methods. The options that we cover include vanilla options, multi-asset options and path-dependent options such as barrier options. We put an emphasis on the implementation of the quantum circuits required to build the input states and operators needed by amplitude estimation to price the different option types. Additionally, we show simulation results to highlight how the circuits that we implement price the different option contracts. Finally, we examine the performance of option pricing circuits on quantum hardware using the IBM Q Tokyo quantum device. We employ a simple, yet effective, error mitigation scheme that allows us to significantly reduce the errors arising from noisy two-qubit gates.
We present a methodology to price options and portfolios of options on a gate-based quantum computer using amplitude estimation, an algorithm which provides a quadratic speedup compared to classical Monte Carlo methods. The options that we cover include vanilla options, multi-asset options and path-dependent options such as barrier options. We put an emphasis on the implementation of the quantum circuits required to build the input states and operators needed by amplitude estimation to price the different option types. Additionally, we show simulation results to highlight how the circuits that we implement price the different option contracts. Finally, we examine the performance of option pricing circuits on quantum hardware using the IBM Q Tokyo quantum device. We employ a simple, yet effective, error mitigation scheme that allows us to significantly reduce the errors arising from noisy two-qubit gates.
Options are financial instruments whose payoffs are determined by the value of an underlying asset. These underlying assets are typically stocks, interest rates, or exchange rates, but can also include commodities such as energy or agricultural products. Options serve diverse purposes, including hedging against price volatility and speculating on market movements. Additionally, they play a critical role in assessing certain positions on the balance sheets of insurance companies, particularly in the context of solvency capital requirement calculations. As an option’s payoff lies in the future and is stochastic in nature, finding a fair price today is a non-trivial task. The focus of this work is finding quantum algorithms for calculating these prices and compare them to algorithms designed for classical computers. This work follows two different directions on how to improve on classical methods for option pricing. The first direction is improving on Monte-Carlo (MC) methods and the second one is adapting Fourier based pricing algorithms. The Amplitude Estimation (AE) algorithm promises a quadratic speedup compared to classical MC. This fact makes this algorithm an interesting candidate for improvements by quantum algorithms. It was shown in the literature, that simple options with very crude discretization of the underlying stochastic models, can be implemented on a quantum device and evaluated with AE. One big challenge is the efficient implementation of the option’s payoff profile. To solve this problem colleagues and I have introduced a multi-objective genetic algorithm to automatically find well performing and efficient circuits to implement the payoff of non-path-dependent European options on one or more underlyings. Another strategy for pricing options is based on the fact, that in many models the characteristic function of the underlying is numerically more tractable than its distribution function. There are methods that make use of this fact and the performance of the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to efficiently calculate prices for European call options for many strikes in one go. The quantum version of the FFT, the Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT), is in some sense, even faster than its classical counterpart. We have adapted the existing classical method to make use of QFT, to benefit from its performance. Finally, the different strategies are benchmarked and compared regarding their accuracy, their potential for scaling and their adaptability to different styles of derivatives and models. The result of this comparison are requirements on the quantum hardware for the methods to be viable as well as use cases where each method has its benefits over the others.
The article provides a literature review and analysis of quantum computing methods in the context of option pricing, comparing them against a strict classical benchmark and recommending a viable way forward to quantum computing implementation. We assess the capabilities and the weaknesses of Windows-choice models closed-form legacy formulae of vanillas, lattice/PDE true hockeygoal models of early exercise, and Monte Carlo models of flexibleness and point out where classical run attracted and precision restraints are shown to apply in the new generation(s): complexity of variables, in this path dependence, in a portfolio composing. We proceed to describe quantum algorithms that are based on quantum Monte Carlo which is centered on amplitude-estimation-based algorithms to cut down on contact with sampling; avoiding the scale of classical Monte Carlo and are particularly appealing to complex derivatives; we describe circuit components to prepare states, encode payoffs, and approximate expectations. The study establishes research priorities that achieve scale implies: depth frequently used to design loaders in, and variants of payoff circuits, workflow standardizations that exchange the exchange of error-resilient quantum modules and technological risk engines in the NISQ age. In general, the paper offers a single source of information on classical-quantum option pricing, clean insertion architecture to deploy hybrids and a roadmap between demonstrations and reliable production.
This work introduces a novel approach to price rainbow options, a type of path-independent multi-asset derivatives, with quantum computers. Leveraging the Iterative Quantum Amplitude Estimation method, we present an end-to-end quantum circuit implementation, emphasizing efficiency by delaying the transition to price space. Moreover, we analyze two different amplitude loading techniques for handling exponential functions. Experiments on the IBM QASM simulator validate our quantum pricing model, contributing to the evolving field of quantum finance.
Option pricing is a fundamental problem in quantitative finance, where the accuracy and efficiency of valuation methods directly affect investment and risk management decisions. While the Black-Scholes model provides a closed-form solution for European options, numerical approaches such as Monte Carlo simulation are widely used when analytical methods are intractable. However, Monte Carlo suffers from slow convergence with complexity O(1/ε2).Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE), an algorithm in quantum computing, promises a quadratic speedup with complexity O(1/ε). This paper implements QAE, specifically Iterative Amplitude Estimation (IAE), for European call option pricing and compares its performance against Monte Carlo simulation and the Black-Scholes model. Experiments are conducted on both Qiskit simulators and IBM Quantum hardware (ibm_brisbane).Results show that QAE achieves estimates close to Monte Carlo and analytical benchmarks, with mean payoff deviations of less than 0.01. While QAE produces wider confidence intervals due to noise and discretization, the findings demonstrate its potential scalability advantage for future quantum finance applications.
Abstract We present a quantum algorithm that analyzes risk more efficiently than Monte Carlo simulations traditionally used on classical computers. We employ quantum amplitude estimation to price securities and evaluate risk measures such as Value at Risk and Conditional Value at Risk on a gate-based quantum computer. Additionally, we show how to implement this algorithm and how to trade-off the convergence rate of the algorithm and the circuit depth. The shortest possible circuit depth—growing polynomially in the number of qubits representing the uncertainty—leads to a convergence rate of O ( M −2/3 ), where M is the number of samples. This is already faster than classical Monte Carlo simulations which converge at a rate of O ( M −1/2 ). If we allow the circuit depth to grow faster, but still polynomially, the convergence rate quickly approaches the optimum of O ( M −1 ). Thus, for slowly increasing circuit depths our algorithm provides a near quadratic speed-up compared to Monte Carlo methods. We demonstrate our algorithm using two toy models. In the first model we use real hardware, such as the IBM Q Experience, to price a Treasury-bill (T-bill) faced by a possible interest rate increase. In the second model, we simulate our algorithm to illustrate how a quantum computer can determine financial risk for a two-asset portfolio made up of government debt with different maturity dates. Both models confirm the improved convergence rate over Monte Carlo methods. Using simulations, we also evaluate the impact of cross-talk and energy relaxation errors.
As one of the major methods for the simulation of option pricing, Monte Carlo method assumes random fluctuations in the distribution of asset prices. Under certain uncertainties process, different evolution paths could be simulated so as to finally yield the expectation value of the asset price, which requires a lot of simulations to ensure the accuracy based on huge and expensive calculations. In order to solve the above computational problem, quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) has been established and applied in the relevant systems such as European call options. In this work, both MC and QM methods are adopted to simulate European call options. Based on the preparation of quantum states in QMC algorithm and the construction of quantum circuits by simulating a quantum hardware environment on a traditional computer, the amplitude estimation (AE) algorithm is found to play a secondary role in accelerating the pricing of European options. More importantly, the payoff function and the time required for the simulation in QMC method show some improvements than those in MC method.