Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2210.10361

Reply to `Comment on "Absence versus Presence of Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions"'

Kanta Masuki, Sudo, Hiroyuki, Masaki Oshikawa, Yuto Ashida

Published Oct 19, 2022• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Théo Sépulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2210.10361

Related papers

Comment on “Absence of a Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions”

Pertti Juhani Hakonen, Edouard B Sonin

| openaire: EC/H2020/670743/EU//QuDeT

Physical Review X•Mar 12, 2021•19 citations

Absence of a Dissipative Quantum Phase Transition in Josephson Junctions

P. Joyez

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 17, 2021•0 citations

Reply to Comment on "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED"

Oliver Viehmann, Jan von Delft, Florian Marquardt

A Reply to the Comment by C. Ciuti and P. Nataf [arXiv:1112.0986v1] on our Letter "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113602 (2011)].

arXiv:1202.2916•Feb 14, 2012•3 citations

Reply to Comment on: "Fluctuation Theorem for Many-Body Pure Quantum States"

Eiki Iyoda, Kazuya Kaneko, Takahiro Sagawa

We reply to Comment by J. Gemmer, L. Knipschild, R. Steinigeweg (arXiv:1712.02128) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100601 (2017).

arXiv:1712.05172•Dec 14, 2017•1 citation

Reply to Comment on "Multitime Quantum Communication: Interesting But Not Counterfactual" by L. Vaidman

Robert B. Griffiths

This is a Reply to the Comment by Vaidman in arXiv:2306.16756 on the paper: R. B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. A 107, 062219 (2023)

arXiv:2310.05968•Sep 23, 2023•0 citations

Bell inequalities versus quantum physics: A reply to Lambare

Robert B. Griffiths

In Phys. Rev. A 101 (2020) 022117 it was argued that Bell inequalities are based on classical, not quantum, physics, and hence their violation in experiments provides no support for the claimed existence of peculiar nonlocal and superluminal influences in the real (quantum) world. Following a brief review of some aspects of the Consistent Histories approach used in that work, the objections raised in Lambare's Comment, arXiv:2102.075243v3, are examined and shown to rest on serious misunderstandings, and as a result fail to identify any errors in, or problems with, the work being criticized.

•Jun 17, 2021•0 citations
In Phys. Rev. A 101 (2020) 022117 it was argued that Bell inequalities are based on classical, not quantum, physics, and hence their violation in experiments provides no support for the claimed existence of peculiar nonlocal and superluminal influences in the real (quantum) world. Following a brief review of some aspects of the Consistent Histories approach used in that work, the objections raised in Lambare's Comment, arXiv:2102.075243v3, are examined and shown to rest on serious misunderstandings, and as a result fail to identify any errors in, or problems with, the work being criticized.