Richard Feynman’s method of path integrals is based on the fundamental assumption that a system starting at a point 𝐴𝐴 and arriving at a point 𝐵𝐵 takes all possible paths from 𝐴𝐴 to 𝐵𝐵, with each path contributing its own (complex) probability amplitude. The sum of the amplitudes over all these paths then yields the overall probability amplitude that the system starting at 𝐴𝐴 would end up at 𝐵𝐵. We apply Feynman’s method to several optical systems of practical interest and discuss the nuances of the method as well as instances where the predicted outcomes agree or disagree with those of classical optical theory. Examples include the properties of beam-splitters, passage of single photons through Mach-Zehnder and Sagnac interferometers, electric and magnetic dipole scattering, reciprocity, time-reversal symmetry, the optical theorem, the Ewald-Oseen extinction theorem, far field diffraction, and the two-photon interference phenomenon known as the Hong-Ou-Mandel effect.
Compared to classical optical coherence theory based on Maxwell's electromagnetic theory and Glauber's quantum optical coherence theory based on matrix mechanics formulation of quantum mechanics, quantum optical coherence theory based on Feynman's path integral formulation of quantum mechanics provides a novel tool to study optical coherence. It has the advantage of understanding the connection between mathematical calculations and physical interpretations better. Quantum optical coherence theory based on Feynman's path integral is introduced and reviewed in this paper. Based on the results of transient first-order interference of two independent light beams, it is predicted that the classical model for electric field of thermal light introduced by classical optical textbooks may not be accurate. The physics of two-photon bunching of thermal light and Hong-Ou-Mandel dip of entangled photon pairs is the same, which can be interpreted by constructive and destructive two-photon interference, respectively. Quantum optical coherence theory based on Feynman's path integral is helpful to understand the coherence properties of light, which may eventually lead us to the answer of the question: what is a photon?
A lossless beamsplitter has certain (complex-valued) probability amplitudes for sending an incoming photon into one of two possible directions. We use elementary laws of classical and quantum optics to obtain general relations among the magnitudes and phases of these probability amplitudes. Proceeding to examine a pair of (nearly) single-mode wavepackets in the number-states n1 and n2 that simultaneously arrive at the splitter's input ports, we find the distribution of photon-number states at the output ports using an argument inspired by Feynman's scattering analysis of indistinguishable Bose particles. The result thus obtained coincides with that of the standard quantum-optical treatment of beamsplitters via annihilation and creation operators â and â†. A simple application of the Feynman method provides a form of justification for the Bose enhancement implicit in the well-known formulas ân=nn−1 and â†n=n+1n+1.
The nature of light, extending from the optical to the x-ray regime, is reviewed from a diffraction point of view by comparing field-based statistical optics and photon-based quantum optics approaches. The topic is introduced by comparing historical diffraction concepts based on wave interference, Dirac’s notion of photon self-interference, Feynman’s interference of space–time photon probability amplitudes, and Glauber’s formulation of coherence functions based on photon detection. The concepts are elucidated by a review of how the semiclassical combination of the disparate photon and wave concepts have been used to describe light creation, diffraction, and detection. The origin of the fundamental diffraction limit is then discussed in both wave and photon pictures. By use of Feynman’s concept of probability amplitudes associated with independent photons, we show that quantum electrodynamics, the complete theory of light, reduces in lowest order to the conventional wave formalism of diffraction. As an introduction to multi-photon effects, we then review fundamental one- and two-photon experiments and detection schemes, in particular the seminal Hanbury Brown–Twiss experiment. The formal discourse of the paper starts with a treatment of first-order coherence theory. In first order, the statistical optics and quantum optics formulations of coherence are shown to be equivalent. This is elucidated by a discussion of Zernike’s powerful theorem of partial coherence propagation, a cornerstone of statistical optics, followed by its quantum derivation based on the interference of single-photon probability amplitudes. The treatment is then extended to second-order coherence theory, where the equivalence of wave and particle descriptions is shown to break down. This is illustrated by considering two photons whose space–time probability amplitudes are correlated through nonlinear birth processes, resulting in entanglement or cloning. In both cases, the two-photon diffraction patterns are shown to exhibit resolution below the conventional diffraction limit, defined by the one-photon diffraction patterns. The origin of the reduction is shown to arise from the interference of two-photon probability amplitudes. By comparing first- and second-order diffraction, it is shown that the conventional first-order concept of partial coherence with its limits of chaoticity and first-order coherence has the second-order analogue of partial entanglement, with its limits corresponding to two entangled photons (“entangled biphotons”) and two cloned photons (“cloned biphotons”), the latter being second-order coherent. The concept of cloned biphotons is extended to the case of
n cloned photons, resulting in a
1/n reduction of the diffraction limit. In the limit of
nth-order collective state are shown to propagate on particle like trajectories, reproducing the 0th-order ray-optics picture. These results are discussed in terms of the linearity of quantum mechanics and Heisenberg’s space–momentum uncertainty principle. Finally, a general concept of coherence based on photon density is developed that in first order is equivalent to the conventional wave-based picture.
Based on the Sum-over-Paths approach of Richard Feynman, an integration method for calculating wave phase vectors is derived. The diffraction and interference patterns of various slit masks can be calculated from such phase vectors. The results obtained match with those computed using the more complex Fresnel integrals. Babinet's principle for phases is presented for the first time. As an example, the diffraction pattern of a double slit can also be calculated by subtracting the phase vectors of a smaller slit from those of a larger one. This method is also demonstrated by using a diffraction calculation tool when an obstacle is positioned behind a double slit. The approach of phase vector integration is expanded to calculate the quantum probability current. Based on the Hamilton-Jacobi- and the stationary Schrödinger- equation, the quantum probability current is calculated and its continuity is shown. The time-dependent differential equation of the probabilty current velocity is numerically solved. For a large number of integrations it is statistically shown that the distribution of the flux per area is consistent with the probability density profile. The quantum probability current is also simulated for photons traversing an asymmetrical double slit and the special results are discussed.
A path , in general, is defined by a determinate trajectory in time, from an initial to a final point. The classical trajectory is only one of the possible trajectories, and in quantum mechanics all the possible paths between the initial and final point come into play. Recall that the probability amplitude is a complex number that is assigned to each determinate path. Indeterminate paths are defined as a collection of determinate paths that are experimentally indistinguishable . In the Dirac–Feynman approach, the inherent indeterminacy of the quantum entity is realized by the degree of freedom – in undergoing time evolution – “taking” indeterminate paths [Baaquie (2013e)]. For a quantum degree of freedom evolving from an observed initial state to the observed final state – and with no other observations made – the Feynman path integral is a mathematical construction that computes the probability amplitudes by summing over all the allowed determinate paths of the degree of freedom – discussed in Feynman and Hibbs (1965), Zinn-Justin (1993), Zinn-Justin (2005) and Baaquie (2013e). Probability amplitude and time evolution Recall that the description of a quantum system, at a particular instant,isgiven by its state vector, namely |ψ>. To avoid confusion with the concept of a state vector, the term probability amplitude is used for describing a quantum entity undergoing transitions in time.
The photon in the interferometer This chapter introduces many of the ideas of quantum theory by exploring three specific “case studies” of quantum systems. Each is an example of a qubit , a generic name for the simplest type of quantum system. The concepts we develop will be incorporated into a rigorous mathematical framework in the next chapter. Our business here is to provide some intuition about why that mathematical framework is reasonable and appropriate for dealing with the quantum facts of life. Interferometers In Section 1.2 we discussed the two-slit interference experiment with a single photon. In that experiment, the partial waves of probability amplitude were spread throughout the entire region of space beyond the two slits. It is much easier to analyze the situation in an interferometer , an optical apparatus in which the light is restricted to a finite number of discrete beams . The beams may be guided from one point to another, split apart or recombined as needed, and when two beams are recombined into one, the result may show interference effects. At the end of the interferometer, one or more sensors can measure the intensity of various beams. (A beam is just a possible path for the light, so there is nothing paradoxical in talking about a beam of zero intensity.) Figure 2.1 shows the layout of a Mach–Zehnder interferometer , which is an example of this kind of apparatus.