Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Qubits

Benjamin W. Schumacher, Michael D. Westmoreland

Published Mar 25, 2010• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The photon in the interferometer This chapter introduces many of the ideas of quantum theory by exploring three specific “case studies” of quantum systems. Each is an example of a qubit , a generic name for the simplest type of quantum system. The concepts we develop will be incorporated into a rigorous mathematical framework in the next chapter. Our business here is to provide some intuition about why that mathematical framework is reasonable and appropriate for dealing with the quantum facts of life. Interferometers In Section 1.2 we discussed the two-slit interference experiment with a single photon. In that experiment, the partial waves of probability amplitude were spread throughout the entire region of space beyond the two slits. It is much easier to analyze the situation in an interferometer , an optical apparatus in which the light is restricted to a finite number of discrete beams . The beams may be guided from one point to another, split apart or recombined as needed, and when two beams are recombined into one, the result may show interference effects. At the end of the interferometer, one or more sensors can measure the intensity of various beams. (A beam is just a possible path for the light, so there is nothing paradoxical in talking about a beam of zero intensity.) Figure 2.1 shows the layout of a Mach–Zehnder interferometer , which is an example of this kind of apparatus.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511814006.003

Related papers

States and observables

Benjamin W. Schumacher, Michael D. Westmoreland

Hilbert space The prototype qubit systems of the last chapter are very simple, but they can be generalized to more complicated versions. We can send a photon through an interferometer with three, four or more distinct beams. We can perform experiments on particles with higher intrinsic angular momentum than the spin-½ particles we have discussed. And we can analyze atomic systems in situations that involve more than two different energy levels. For these cases and others, we will need a more general version of quantum theory. That theory will include two pieces. First, we will have a general mathematical structure that is applicable to many kinds of system. Here the qubit case will be our guide, since many of the basic concepts for other quantum systems are already present in the qubit case. Second, we will have to describe how to apply the quantum formalism to specific physical situations. Though the quantum systems we discuss will appear quite various, they share strong family resemblances that are expressed in the common mathematical framework. Keeping the framework in mind will help us understand specific examples; keeping the examples in mind will help us understand the framework. The states of a quantum system are described by kets |ψ〉, which obey the principle of superposition. This means that the kets are elements of an abstract vector space ℋ called a Hilbert space .

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 25, 2010•0 citations

Which way are the photons pointing?

Alastair I. M. Rae

The previous chapter surveyed part of the rich variety of physical phenomena that can be understood using the ideas of quantum physics. Now that we are beginning the task of looking more deeply into the subject we shall find it useful to concentrate on examples that are comparatively simple to understand but which still illustrate the fundamental principles and highlight the basic conceptual problems. Some years ago most writers discussing such topics would probably have turned to the example of a ‘particle’ passing through a two-slit apparatus (as in Figure 1.2), whose wave properties are revealed in the interference pattern. Much of the discussion would have been in terms of wave–particle duality and the problems involved in position and momentum measurements, as in the discussion of the uncertainty principle in the last chapter. However, there are essentially an infinite number of places where the particle can be and an infinite number of possible values of its momentum, and this complicates the discussion considerably. We can illustrate all the points of principle we want to discuss by considering situations where a measurement has only a small number of possible outcomes. One such quantity relating to the physics of light beams and photons is known as polarisation . In the next section we discuss it in the context of the classical wave theory of light, and the rest of the chapter extends the concept to situations where the photon nature of light is important.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 26, 2012•0 citations

Which way are the photons pointing?

Alastair I. M. Rae

The previous chapter surveyed part of the rich variety of physical phenomena that can be understood using the ideas of quantum physics. Now that we are beginning the task of looking more deeply into the subject we shall find it useful to concentrate on examples that are comparatively simple to understand but which still illustrate the fundamental principles and highlight the basic conceptual problems. Some years ago most writers discussing such topics would probably have turned to the example of a ‘particle’ passing through a two-slit apparatus (as in Figure 1.2), whose wave properties are revealed in the interference pattern. Much of the discussion would have been in terms of wave–particle duality and the problems involved in position and momentum measurements, as in the discussion of the uncertainty principle in the last chapter. However, there are essentially an infinite number of places where the particle can be and an infinite number of possible values of its momentum, and this complicates the discussion considerably. We can illustrate all the points of principle we want to discuss by considering situations where a measurement has only a small number of possible outcomes. One such quantity relating to the physics of light beams and photons is known as polarisation . In the next section we discuss it in the context of the classical wave theory of light, and the rest of the chapter extends the concept to situations where the photon nature of light is important.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Oct 7, 2004•0 citations

Quantum Optics and Informatics

Davıd L. Andrews, David S. Bradshaw

3.1 Interference of a Single Photon The kinds of study originally conducted by Thomas Young - in particular, the celebrated "double slit" experiment that we briefly examined in Chapter 1 (see Fig. 1) - provide a capacity to reveal far more than the wave nature of light, important as that is. True enough, the observed characteristic fringe pattern, when monochromatic light passes through two closely spaced slits onto a screen, appears to be simply explicable on the basis of waves from each slit undergoing constructive and destructive interference at different positions on the screen. Yet, astonishingly, these patterns of interference are still exhibited when individual photons of a low-intensity input beam reach the screen one at a time, showing that it cannot in fact be a matter of different photons having to interfere with each other. Indeed, Dirac enunciated the general principle that photons can never directly interact with each other. The double slit and other such experiments indicate that each photon interacts in a delocalized, wave-like manner with both slits at the same time. Successive experiments build interference patterns that conform to an exact mathematical distribution formula, but the position at which an individual photon is detected in any particular instance cannot be predicted; this is a quintessential illustration of quantum uncertainty. Using the path integral approach of quantum theory, the phenomenon is more accurately represented by introducing a summation over all possible routes between the source and the screen on which the pattern appears, signifying an entire "lifetime" for each photon involved in the experiment. This relates to the fact that the actual trajectory is unknown without an observation, and thus we only obtain the probabilities of the photon striking the screen at different positions and times; all trajectories (potentialities) must be considered in a superposition. Each route is considered equally probable, and the variation in phase produces quantum interference. The differences in phase of each trajectory, at varying positions on the screen, generates the fringe pattern. An intriguing variation on this experiment involves "marking" the photons so that the actual route of each photon to the screen is known. Remarkably, in such a case, the fringe patterns do not appear because quantum interference cannot occur. A consequence of the observation of the photon route is an effect that, in other quantum mechanical connections, is known as a collapse of the wavefunction. However, it is possible for the fringe patterns to reappear when information on the route of the photons is lost; this is known as a quantum eraser.

SPIE eBooks•Aug 1, 2018•0 citations

Interferometry via the Dirac Notation

F.J. Duarte

The genesis of quantum optics can be found in the Dirac discussion on interference as disclosed in The Principles of Quantum Mechanics . This is a masterful and prophetic discussion that begins by considering a roughly monochromatic light source. The discussion continues by considering a beam of light consisting of a large number of photons. Besides Dirac, useful references on interferometry include Steel, Meaburn and Born and Wolf. The Hanbury Brown–Twiss effect originates in interferometric measurements performed by an “intensity interferometer” used for astronomical observations. A diagram of the stellar intensity interferometer used to determine the diameter of stars is depicted. Two-beam interferometers are optical devices that divide and then recombine a light beam. It is on recombination of the beams that interference occurs. The most well-known two-beam interferometers are the Sagnac interferometer, the Mach–Zehnder interferometer, and the Michelson interferometer.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 29, 2013•0 citations

Interference of interference effects

Kevin Randles, S. J. van Enk

We analyze the interference of individual photons in two overlapping Mach–Zehnder interferometers joined via a common beam splitter. We show how two kinds of interference effects—single-photon Mach–Zehnder interference and two-photon Hong–Ou–Mandel interference—interfere with one another, partially canceling each other out. This configuration illustrates how quantum effects can combine nontrivially and, moreover, emphasizes that quantum interference happens at measurement. This work can serve as a bridge to more advanced quantum mechanical concepts, such as testing the predictions of quantum mechanics vs local realism.

arXiv:2501.03505•American Journal of Physics•Aug 21, 2025•0 citations
The photon in the interferometer This chapter introduces many of the ideas of quantum theory by exploring three specific “case studies” of quantum systems. Each is an example of a qubit , a generic name for the simplest type of quantum system. The concepts we develop will be incorporated into a rigorous mathematical framework in the next chapter. Our business here is to provide some intuition about why that mathematical framework is reasonable and appropriate for dealing with the quantum facts of life. Interferometers In Section 1.2 we discussed the two-slit interference experiment with a single photon. In that experiment, the partial waves of probability amplitude were spread throughout the entire region of space beyond the two slits. It is much easier to analyze the situation in an interferometer , an optical apparatus in which the light is restricted to a finite number of discrete beams . The beams may be guided from one point to another, split apart or recombined as needed, and when two beams are recombined into one, the result may show interference effects. At the end of the interferometer, one or more sensors can measure the intensity of various beams. (A beam is just a possible path for the light, so there is nothing paradoxical in talking about a beam of zero intensity.) Figure 2.1 shows the layout of a Mach–Zehnder interferometer , which is an example of this kind of apparatus.
Hilbert space The prototype qubit systems of the last chapter are very simple, but they can be generalized to more complicated versions. We can send a photon through an interferometer with three, four or more distinct beams. We can perform experiments on particles with higher intrinsic angular momentum than the spin-½ particles we have discussed. And we can analyze atomic systems in situations that involve more than two different energy levels. For these cases and others, we will need a more general version of quantum theory. That theory will include two pieces. First, we will have a general mathematical structure that is applicable to many kinds of system. Here the qubit case will be our guide, since many of the basic concepts for other quantum systems are already present in the qubit case. Second, we will have to describe how to apply the quantum formalism to specific physical situations. Though the quantum systems we discuss will appear quite various, they share strong family resemblances that are expressed in the common mathematical framework. Keeping the framework in mind will help us understand specific examples; keeping the examples in mind will help us understand the framework. The states of a quantum system are described by kets |ψ〉, which obey the principle of superposition. This means that the kets are elements of an abstract vector space ℋ called a Hilbert space .
The previous chapter surveyed part of the rich variety of physical phenomena that can be understood using the ideas of quantum physics. Now that we are beginning the task of looking more deeply into the subject we shall find it useful to concentrate on examples that are comparatively simple to understand but which still illustrate the fundamental principles and highlight the basic conceptual problems. Some years ago most writers discussing such topics would probably have turned to the example of a ‘particle’ passing through a two-slit apparatus (as in Figure 1.2), whose wave properties are revealed in the interference pattern. Much of the discussion would have been in terms of wave–particle duality and the problems involved in position and momentum measurements, as in the discussion of the uncertainty principle in the last chapter. However, there are essentially an infinite number of places where the particle can be and an infinite number of possible values of its momentum, and this complicates the discussion considerably. We can illustrate all the points of principle we want to discuss by considering situations where a measurement has only a small number of possible outcomes. One such quantity relating to the physics of light beams and photons is known as polarisation . In the next section we discuss it in the context of the classical wave theory of light, and the rest of the chapter extends the concept to situations where the photon nature of light is important.
The previous chapter surveyed part of the rich variety of physical phenomena that can be understood using the ideas of quantum physics. Now that we are beginning the task of looking more deeply into the subject we shall find it useful to concentrate on examples that are comparatively simple to understand but which still illustrate the fundamental principles and highlight the basic conceptual problems. Some years ago most writers discussing such topics would probably have turned to the example of a ‘particle’ passing through a two-slit apparatus (as in Figure 1.2), whose wave properties are revealed in the interference pattern. Much of the discussion would have been in terms of wave–particle duality and the problems involved in position and momentum measurements, as in the discussion of the uncertainty principle in the last chapter. However, there are essentially an infinite number of places where the particle can be and an infinite number of possible values of its momentum, and this complicates the discussion considerably. We can illustrate all the points of principle we want to discuss by considering situations where a measurement has only a small number of possible outcomes. One such quantity relating to the physics of light beams and photons is known as polarisation . In the next section we discuss it in the context of the classical wave theory of light, and the rest of the chapter extends the concept to situations where the photon nature of light is important.
3.1 Interference of a Single Photon The kinds of study originally conducted by Thomas Young - in particular, the celebrated "double slit" experiment that we briefly examined in Chapter 1 (see Fig. 1) - provide a capacity to reveal far more than the wave nature of light, important as that is. True enough, the observed characteristic fringe pattern, when monochromatic light passes through two closely spaced slits onto a screen, appears to be simply explicable on the basis of waves from each slit undergoing constructive and destructive interference at different positions on the screen. Yet, astonishingly, these patterns of interference are still exhibited when individual photons of a low-intensity input beam reach the screen one at a time, showing that it cannot in fact be a matter of different photons having to interfere with each other. Indeed, Dirac enunciated the general principle that photons can never directly interact with each other. The double slit and other such experiments indicate that each photon interacts in a delocalized, wave-like manner with both slits at the same time. Successive experiments build interference patterns that conform to an exact mathematical distribution formula, but the position at which an individual photon is detected in any particular instance cannot be predicted; this is a quintessential illustration of quantum uncertainty. Using the path integral approach of quantum theory, the phenomenon is more accurately represented by introducing a summation over all possible routes between the source and the screen on which the pattern appears, signifying an entire "lifetime" for each photon involved in the experiment. This relates to the fact that the actual trajectory is unknown without an observation, and thus we only obtain the probabilities of the photon striking the screen at different positions and times; all trajectories (potentialities) must be considered in a superposition. Each route is considered equally probable, and the variation in phase produces quantum interference. The differences in phase of each trajectory, at varying positions on the screen, generates the fringe pattern. An intriguing variation on this experiment involves "marking" the photons so that the actual route of each photon to the screen is known. Remarkably, in such a case, the fringe patterns do not appear because quantum interference cannot occur. A consequence of the observation of the photon route is an effect that, in other quantum mechanical connections, is known as a collapse of the wavefunction. However, it is possible for the fringe patterns to reappear when information on the route of the photons is lost; this is known as a quantum eraser.
The genesis of quantum optics can be found in the Dirac discussion on interference as disclosed in The Principles of Quantum Mechanics . This is a masterful and prophetic discussion that begins by considering a roughly monochromatic light source. The discussion continues by considering a beam of light consisting of a large number of photons. Besides Dirac, useful references on interferometry include Steel, Meaburn and Born and Wolf. The Hanbury Brown–Twiss effect originates in interferometric measurements performed by an “intensity interferometer” used for astronomical observations. A diagram of the stellar intensity interferometer used to determine the diameter of stars is depicted. Two-beam interferometers are optical devices that divide and then recombine a light beam. It is on recombination of the beams that interference occurs. The most well-known two-beam interferometers are the Sagnac interferometer, the Mach–Zehnder interferometer, and the Michelson interferometer.
We analyze the interference of individual photons in two overlapping Mach–Zehnder interferometers joined via a common beam splitter. We show how two kinds of interference effects—single-photon Mach–Zehnder interference and two-photon Hong–Ou–Mandel interference—interfere with one another, partially canceling each other out. This configuration illustrates how quantum effects can combine nontrivially and, moreover, emphasizes that quantum interference happens at measurement. This work can serve as a bridge to more advanced quantum mechanical concepts, such as testing the predictions of quantum mechanics vs local realism.