arXiv:2209.04367 · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Dynamical invariant formalism of shortcuts to adiabaticity

Kazutaka Takahashi

Published Nov 6, 2022• 4 citations

Abstract

We give a pedagogical introduction to dynamical invariant formalism of shortcuts to adiabaticity. For a given operator form of the Hamiltonian with undetermined coefficients, the dynamical invariant is introduced to design the coefficients. We discuss how the method allows us to mimic adiabatic dynamics and describe a relation to the counterdiabatic formalism. The equation for the dynamical invariant takes a familiar form and is often used in various fields of physics. We introduce examples of Lax pair, quantum brachistochrone and flow equation. This article is part of the theme issue 'Shortcuts to adiabaticity: theoretical, experimental and interdisciplinary perspectives'.

DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0301

Related papers

Counterdiabatic formalism of shortcuts to adiabaticity

Mikio Nakahara

A pedagogical introduction to counterdiabatic formalism of shortcuts to adiabaticity is given so that readers can access some of the more specialized articles in the rest of this theme issue without any barriers. A guide to references is given so that this article also serves as a mini-review. This article is part of the theme issue 'Shortcuts to adiabaticity: theoretical, experimental and interdisciplinary perspectives'.

arXiv:2208.07346Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesNov 6, 202210 citations

Shortcuts to adiabaticity: theoretical framework, relations between different methods, and versatile approximations

Takuya Hatomura

Abstract Shortcuts to adiabaticity guide given systems to final destinations of adiabatic control via fast tracks. Various methods have been proposed as shortcuts to adiabaticity. The basic theory of shortcuts to adiabaticity was established in the 2010s, but it has still been developing and many fundamental findings have been reported. In this topical review, we give a pedagogical introduction to the theory of shortcuts to adiabaticity and revisit relations between different methods. Some versatile approximations in counterdiabatic driving, which is one of the methods of shortcuts to adiabaticity, will be explained in detail. We also summarize the recent progress in studies of shortcuts to adiabaticity.

arXiv:2311.09720Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical PhysicsMar 28, 202428 citations

Bridging quantum, classical and stochastic shortcuts to adiabaticity

Ayoti Patra

Adiabatic invariants -- quantities that are preserved under the slow driving of a system's external parameters -- are important in classical mechanics, quantum mechanics and thermodynamics. Adiabatic processes allow a system to be guided to evolve to a desired final state. However, the slow driving of a quantum system makes it vulnerable to environmental decoherence, and for both quantum and classical systems, it is often desirable and time-efficient to speed up a process. {\it Shortcuts to adiabaticity} are strategies for preserving adiabatic invariants under rapid driving, typically by means of an auxiliary field that suppresses excitations, otherwise generated during rapid driving. Several theoretical approaches have been developed to construct such shortcuts. In this dissertation we focus on two different approaches, namely {\it counterdiabatic} driving and {\it fast-forward} driving, which were originally developed for quantum systems. The counterdiabatic approach introduced independently by Dermirplak and Rice [{\it J. Phys. Chem. A}, 107:9937, 2003], and Berry [{\it J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.}, 42:365303, 2009] formally provides an exact expression for the auxiliary Hamiltonian, which however is abstract and difficult to translate into an experimentally implementable form. By contrast, the fast-forward approach developed by Masuda and Nakamura [{\it Proc. R. Soc. A}, 466(2116):1135, 2010] provides an auxiliary potential that may be experimentally implementable but generally applies only to ground states. The central theme of this dissertation is that classical shortcuts to adiabaticity can provide useful physical insights and lead to experimentally implementable shortcuts for analogous quantum systems. We start by studying a model system of a tilted piston to provide a proof of principle that quantum shortcuts can successfully be constructed from their classical counterparts. In the remainder of the dissertation, we develop a general approach based on {\it flow-fields} which produces simple expressions for auxiliary terms required for both counterdiabatic and fast-forward driving. We demonstrate the applicability of this approach for classical, quantum as well as stochastic systems. We establish strong connections between counterdiabatic and fast-forward approaches, and also between shortcut protocols required for classical, quantum and stochastic systems. In particular, we show how the fast-forward approach can be extended to highly excited states of quantum systems.

Jan 1, 20170 citations

Hamiltonian Engineering for Adiabatic Quantum Computation: Lessons from Shortcuts to Adiabaticity

Kazutaka Takahashi

We discuss applications of shortcuts to adiabaticity (STA) to adiabatic quantum computation. After reviewing the fundamental properties and the present status of STA from the author's personal point of view, we apply the method to the adiabatic algorithm of the Grover's problem. We discuss two possible implementations of STA for the adiabatic quantum computations: the method of quantum adiabatic brachistochrone and the Lewis-Riesenfeld invariant-based inverse engineering.

arXiv:1808.07177Journal of the Physical Society of JapanFeb 28, 201930 citations

Hamiltonian engineering via invariants and dynamical algebra

E. Torrontegui, S. Martínez-Garaot, Juan Gonzalo Muga

We use the dynamical algebra of a quantum system and its dynamical invariants to inverse engineer feasible Hamiltonians for implementing shortcuts to adiabaticity. These are speeded up processes that end up with the same populations as slow, adiabatic ones. As application examples, we design families of shortcut Hamiltonians that drive two- and three-level systems between initial and final configurations, imposing physically motivated constraints on the terms (generators) allowed in the Hamiltonian.

arXiv:1402.5695Physical Review AApr 14, 2014105 citations

Shortcuts to Adiabaticity in Krylov Space

Kazutaka Takahashi, Adolfo del Campo

Shortcuts to adiabaticity provide fast protocols for quantum state preparation in which the use of auxiliary counterdiabatic controls circumvents the requirement of slow driving in adiabatic strategies. While their development is well established in simple systems, their engineering and implementation are challenging in many-body quantum systems with many degrees of freedom. We show that the equation for the counterdiabatic term—equivalently, the adiabatic gauge potential—is solved by introducing a Krylov basis. The Krylov basis spans the minimal operator subspace in which the dynamics unfolds and provides an efficient way to construct the counterdiabatic term. We apply our strategy to paradigmatic single- and many-particle models. The properties of the counterdiabatic term are reflected in the Lanczos coefficients obtained in the course of the construction of the Krylov basis by an algorithmic method. We examine how the expansion in the Krylov basis incorporates many-body interactions in the counterdiabatic term. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2302.05460Physical Review XFeb 28, 202450 citations