Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1402.5695 · Physical Review A

Hamiltonian engineering via invariants and dynamical algebra

E. Torrontegui, S. Martínez-Garaot, Juan Gonzalo Muga

Published Apr 14, 2014• 105 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We use the dynamical algebra of a quantum system and its dynamical invariants to inverse engineer feasible Hamiltonians for implementing shortcuts to adiabaticity. These are speeded up processes that end up with the same populations as slow, adiabatic ones. As application examples, we design families of shortcut Hamiltonians that drive two- and three-level systems between initial and final configurations, imposing physically motivated constraints on the terms (generators) allowed in the Hamiltonian.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.89.043408

Related papers

Lewis-Riesenfeld invariants and transitionless quantum driving

Xi Chen, E. Torrontegui, Juan Gonzalo Muga

Different methods have been recently put forward and implemented experimentally to inverse engineer the time-dependent Hamiltonian of a quantum system and accelerate slow adiabatic processes via nonadiabatic shortcuts. In the ``transitionless quantum driving'' proposed by Berry, shortcut Hamiltonians are designed so that the system follows exactly, in an arbitrarily short time, the approximate adiabatic path defined by a reference Hamiltonian. A different approach is based on first designing a Lewis-Riesenfeld invariant to carry the eigenstates of a Hamiltonian from specified initial to final configurations, again in an arbitrary time, and then constructing from the invariant the transient Hamiltonian that connects these boundary configurations. We show that the two approaches, apparently quite different in form and so far in results, are, in fact, strongly related and potentially equivalent, so that the inverse-engineering operations in one of them can be reinterpreted and understood in terms of the concepts and operations of the other one. We study, as explicit examples, expansions of time-dependent harmonic traps and the state preparation of two-level systems.

arXiv:1102.3449•Physical Review A•Jun 22, 2011•377 citations

Shortcuts To Adiabaticity: Theory and Application

Xi Chen

By definition, quantum adiabatic process means a slow process which allows the state to follow the instantaneous eigenstates of time-dependent Hamiltonian. For some reasons, for example, to avoid the decoherence effects, or to implement large-scale quantum information processing, we may want to speed up the adiabatic process, that is, to achieve the adiabatic-like control but in very short time. In this talk, we present new methods to speeded-up expansion and transport of cold atoms in a harmonic trap. Such shortcuts to adiabaticity provide the fast expansion or transport, in which the final atomic state is the same as in the adiabatic process, but in arbitrarily short time, keeping the same populations of vibrational levels in the initial and final trap. These methods can also be generalized to Bose-Einstein Condensates. Moreover, we present shortcuts to adiabatic passage from one internal atomic state to another in twoor three-level atoms. In detail, we can apply Berry’s transitionless quantum driving method and invariant-based inverse engineering method to accelerate the Rapid Adiabatic Passage (RAP) and Stimulated Raman Adiabatic Passage (STIRAP) in twoand three-level atomic systems, respectively. We also examine and compare the stability of different schemes concerning different types of noise and system errors. Finally, we show that the technique of shortcuts to adiabaticity in two-level system can be applied in fast and robust spin flip in a quantum dot, to avoid the decoherent effects.

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Shortcuts to adiabaticity for non-Hermitian systems

Sara Ibañez, S. Martínez-Garaot, Xi Chen +2 more

Adiabatic processes driven by non-Hermitian, time-dependent Hamiltonians may be sped up by generalizing inverse engineering techniques based on counter-diabatic (transitionless driving) algorithms or on dynamical invariants. We work out the basic theory and examples described by two-level Hamiltonians: the acceleration of rapid adiabatic passage with a decaying excited level and of the dynamics of a classical particle on an expanding harmonic oscillator.

arXiv:1106.2776•Physical Review A•Aug 29, 2011•123 citations

Shortcuts to adiabaticity in three-level systems using Lie transforms

S. Martínez-Garaot, E. Torrontegui, Xi Chen +1 more

Sped-up protocols that drive a system quickly to the same populations that can be reached by a slow adiabatic process may involve Hamiltonian terms which are difficult to realize. We use the dynamical symmetry of the Hamiltonian to find, by means of Lie transforms, alternative Hamiltonians that achieve the same goals without the problematic terms. We apply this technique to three-level systems (two interacting bosons in a double well, and beam splitters with two and three output channels) driven by Hamiltonians that belong to the four-dimensional algebra U3S3.

arXiv:1403.2593•Physical Review A•May 7, 2014•114 citations

Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Fast-forward approach

E. Torrontegui, S. Martínez-Garaot, A. Ruschhaupt +1 more

The ``fast-forward''approach by Masuda and Nakamura generates driving potentials to accelerate slow quantum adiabatic dynamics. First we present a streamlined version of the formalism that produces the main results in a few steps. Then we show the connection between this approach and inverse engineering based on Lewis-Riesenfeld invariants. We identify in this manner applications in which the engineered potential does not depend on the initial state. Finally we discuss more general applications exemplified by wave splitting processes.

arXiv:1204.3594•Physical Review A•Jul 3, 2012•129 citations

Optimally robust shortcuts to population inversion in two-level quantum systems

A. Ruschhaupt, Xi Chen, Daniel Alonso +1 more

We examine the stability versus different types of perturbations of recently proposed shortcuts to adiabaticity to speed up the population inversion of a two-level quantum system. We find the optimally robust processes by using invariant-based engineering of the Hamiltonian. Amplitude noise and systematic errors require different optimal protocols.

arXiv:1206.1691•New Journal of Physics•Sep 21, 2012•362 citations
We use the dynamical algebra of a quantum system and its dynamical invariants to inverse engineer feasible Hamiltonians for implementing shortcuts to adiabaticity. These are speeded up processes that end up with the same populations as slow, adiabatic ones. As application examples, we design families of shortcut Hamiltonians that drive two- and three-level systems between initial and final configurations, imposing physically motivated constraints on the terms (generators) allowed in the Hamiltonian.
Different methods have been recently put forward and implemented experimentally to inverse engineer the time-dependent Hamiltonian of a quantum system and accelerate slow adiabatic processes via nonadiabatic shortcuts. In the ``transitionless quantum driving'' proposed by Berry, shortcut Hamiltonians are designed so that the system follows exactly, in an arbitrarily short time, the approximate adiabatic path defined by a reference Hamiltonian. A different approach is based on first designing a Lewis-Riesenfeld invariant to carry the eigenstates of a Hamiltonian from specified initial to final configurations, again in an arbitrary time, and then constructing from the invariant the transient Hamiltonian that connects these boundary configurations. We show that the two approaches, apparently quite different in form and so far in results, are, in fact, strongly related and potentially equivalent, so that the inverse-engineering operations in one of them can be reinterpreted and understood in terms of the concepts and operations of the other one. We study, as explicit examples, expansions of time-dependent harmonic traps and the state preparation of two-level systems.
By definition, quantum adiabatic process means a slow process which allows the state to follow the instantaneous eigenstates of time-dependent Hamiltonian. For some reasons, for example, to avoid the decoherence effects, or to implement large-scale quantum information processing, we may want to speed up the adiabatic process, that is, to achieve the adiabatic-like control but in very short time. In this talk, we present new methods to speeded-up expansion and transport of cold atoms in a harmonic trap. Such shortcuts to adiabaticity provide the fast expansion or transport, in which the final atomic state is the same as in the adiabatic process, but in arbitrarily short time, keeping the same populations of vibrational levels in the initial and final trap. These methods can also be generalized to Bose-Einstein Condensates. Moreover, we present shortcuts to adiabatic passage from one internal atomic state to another in twoor three-level atoms. In detail, we can apply Berry’s transitionless quantum driving method and invariant-based inverse engineering method to accelerate the Rapid Adiabatic Passage (RAP) and Stimulated Raman Adiabatic Passage (STIRAP) in twoand three-level atomic systems, respectively. We also examine and compare the stability of different schemes concerning different types of noise and system errors. Finally, we show that the technique of shortcuts to adiabaticity in two-level system can be applied in fast and robust spin flip in a quantum dot, to avoid the decoherent effects.
Sped-up protocols that drive a system quickly to the same populations that can be reached by a slow adiabatic process may involve Hamiltonian terms which are difficult to realize. We use the dynamical symmetry of the Hamiltonian to find, by means of Lie transforms, alternative Hamiltonians that achieve the same goals without the problematic terms. We apply this technique to three-level systems (two interacting bosons in a double well, and beam splitters with two and three output channels) driven by Hamiltonians that belong to the four-dimensional algebra U3S3.
The ``fast-forward''approach by Masuda and Nakamura generates driving potentials to accelerate slow quantum adiabatic dynamics. First we present a streamlined version of the formalism that produces the main results in a few steps. Then we show the connection between this approach and inverse engineering based on Lewis-Riesenfeld invariants. We identify in this manner applications in which the engineered potential does not depend on the initial state. Finally we discuss more general applications exemplified by wave splitting processes.