arXiv:2207.08623

Quantum Bayes' Rule Affirms Consistency in Measurement Inferences in Quantum Mechanics

Mohit Lal Bera, Manabendra Nath Bera

Published Jul 18, 2022• 0 citations

Abstract

Classical Bayes' rule lays the foundation for the classical causal relation between cause (input) and effect (output). This causal relation is believed to be universally true for all physical processes. Here we show, on the contrary, that it is inadequate to establish correct correspondence between cause and effect in quantum mechanics. In fact, there are instances within the framework of quantum mechanics where the use of classical Bayes' rule leads to inconsistencies in quantum measurement inferences, such as Frauchiger-Renner's paradox. Similar inconsistency also appears in the context of Hardy's setup even after assuming quantum mechanics as a non-local theory. As a remedy, we introduce an input-output causal relation based on quantum Bayes' rule. It applies to general quantum processes even when a cause (or effect) is in coherent superposition with other causes (or effects), involves nonlocal correlations as allowed by quantum mechanics, and in the cases where causes belonging to one system induce effects in some other system as it happens in quantum measurement processes. This enables us to propose a resolution to the contradictions that appear in the context of Frauchiger-Renner's and Hardy's setups. Our results thereby affirm that quantum mechanics, equipped with quantum Bayes' rule, can indeed consistently explain the use of itself.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2207.08623

Related papers

Quantum Bayes' rule affirming consistency in measurement inferences in quantum mechanics

Mohit Lal Bera, Manabendra Nath Bera

The traditional Bayes' rule lays the foundation for causal reasoning and finding relations between cause (input) and effect (output). This causal reasoning is universally applied to all physical processes to establish causal relations. Here we show that it does not establish correct causal correspondence between quantum causes and effects in general. In fact, there are instances within the framework of quantum mechanics where the use of the traditional Bayes' rule leads to inconsistencies in quantum measurement inferences. We consider two such cases, inspired by Frauchiger-Renner's and Hardy's setups, where the traditional Bayes' rule results in paradoxical situations even after assuming quantum mechanics as a nonlocal theory. As a remedy, we introduce an input-output causal relation using the reasoning based on a quantum Bayes' rule. It applies to general quantum processes even when a cause (or effect) is in coherent superposition with other causes (or effects), involves nonlocal correlations as allowed by quantum mechanics, and applies in the cases where causes belonging to one system induce effects in some other system as happens in quantum measurement processes. This enables us to propose a resolution to the contradictions that appear in the context of Frauchiger-Renner's and Hardy's setups. Our results thereby affirm that quantum mechanics, equipped with a quantum Bayes' rule, can indeed consistently describe the use of itself.

Physical Review AJul 31, 20230 citations

A Causality-First Framework for Quantum Measurement

Serkan Eksioglu

Quantum measurement is widely regarded as paradoxical due to the apparent role of observers, wave function collapse, and mutually inconsistent descriptions of reality. We argue that these paradoxes are not intrinsic to quantum mechanics, but arise from a category error: treating observer-dependent inferences as observer-independent physical facts.We introduce a causality-first framework in which quantum states represent open causal structures, and measurement corresponds to a scale-dependent transition to causal closure. No privileged observer, stochastic collapse mechanism, or many-worlds ontology is required. Within this framework, celebrated paradoxes such as Wigner’s Friend and the Frauchiger–Renner no-go theorem dissolve, as their contradictions rely on an implicit violation of causal consistency.Our proposal does not modify quantum dynamics nor introduce new postulates. Instead, it clarifies when quantum processes may enter causal chains. The result is a realist, observer-independent account of measurement that preserves standard quantum theory while eliminating its most persistent conceptual pathologies.

Dec 19, 20250 citations

Consistency in the description of quantum measurement: Quantum theory can consistently describe the use of itself

Joseph M. Renes

Recent extended formulations of the Wigner's friend thought experiment throw the measurement problem of quantum mechanics into sharper relief. Here I respond to an invitation by Renner to provide a consistent and concrete set of rules for quantum mechanics which can avoid the apparent paradox formulated by Frauchiger and Renner [Nat. Comm. 9, 3711 (2018)]. I propose a slight addition to standard textbook quantum mechanics, in the form of two rules, which avoids the paradox. The first specifies when a given quantum dynamics can be interpreted as a measurement. Potentially any dynamics can, but doing so depends on the context of other performed operations. The second requires that a joint context be used to determine whether several different dynamical evolutions can all be interpreted as measurement. The paradox is then avoided because not every participant in the Frauchiger-Renner thought experiment regards the stated dynamical descriptions of the experiment as measurements.

arXiv:2107.02193Jul 5, 202134 citations

Maximum and Minimum Causal Effects of Physical Processes

Giulio Chiribella, Kaumudibikash Goswami

We introduce two quantitative measures of the strength of causal relations in quantum theory and more general physical theories. These two measures, called the maximum and minimum causal effect, quantify the maximum and minimum changes in the output of a quantum process induced by changes in its input. The maximum and minimum causal effect possesses useful properties, such as continuity and data-processing inequality. In quantum theory, they have close connections with quantum information tasks. The maximum quantum causal effect can be used to detect quantum channels with nonzero capacity for transmitting classical information. The minimum causal effect can be used to guarantee the recoverability of quantum information: every quantum process with a high value of the minimum quantum causal effect can be approximately inverted. Moreover, we show that the quantum causal effects satisfy a duality relation: if the minimum causal effect of a quantum system A on another quantum system B is high, then A must have a low value of the maximum causal effect on any other quantum system B ′ that is spacelike separated with B . This duality implies a monogamy relation for quantum causal effects, and represents a fundamental difference between quantum and classical causal relations. We illustrate the application of the maximum causal effect to the analysis of two paradigmatic examples, the first involving a coherent superposition of direct cause and common cause, and the second involving a coherent superposition of multiple quantum processes.

arXiv:2404.07683PRX QuantumMay 22, 20253 citations

Consistent quantum counterfactuals

Robert B. Griffiths

An analysis using classical stochastic processes is used to construct a consistent system of quantum counterfactual reasoning. When applied to a counterfactual version of Hardy's paradox, it shows that the probabilistic character of quantum reasoning together with the ``one framework'' rule prevents a logical contradiction, and there is no evidence within this approach for any nonlocal influences. Counterfactual reasoning can support a realistic interpretation of standard quantum theory (measurements reveal what is actually there) under appropriate circumstances.

arXiv:quant-ph/9805056Physical Review AJul 1, 199973 citations

How Quantum Mechanics can consistently describe the use of itself

Dustin Lazarovici, Mario Hubert

We discuss the no-go theorem of Frauchiger and Renner based on an "extended Wigner's friend" thought experiment which is supposed to show that any single-world interpretation of quantum mechanics leads to inconsistent predictions if it is applicable on all scales. We show that no such inconsistency occurs if one considers a complete description of the physical situation. We then discuss implications of the thought experiment that have not been clearly addressed in the original paper, including a tension between relativity and nonlocal effects predicted by quantum mechanics. Our discussion applies in particular to Bohmian mechanics.

Scientific ReportsJan 24, 2019113 citations