Kernel methods are the basis of most classical machine learning algorithms such as Gaussian Process (GP) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Computing kernels using noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) devices has attracted considerable attention due to recent progress in the design of NISQ devices. However noise and errors on current NISQ devices can negatively affect the predicted kernels. In this paper we utilize two quantum kernel machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the labels of a Breast Cancer dataset on two different NISQ devices: quantum kernel Gaussian Process (qkGP) and quantum kernel Support Vector Machine (qkSVM). We estimate the quantum kernels on the 11 qubit IonQ and the 5 qubit IBMQ Belem quantum devices. Our results demonstrate that the predictive performances of the error mitigated quantum kernel machine learning algorithms improve significantly compared to their non-error mitigated counterparts. On both NISQ devices the predictive performances became comparable to those of noiseless quantum simulators and their classical counterparts
Kernel methods are the basis of most classical machine learning algorithms such as Gaussian Process (GP) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Computing kernels using noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) devices has attracted considerable attention due to recent progress in the design of NISQ devices. However noise and errors on current NISQ devices can negatively affect the predicted kernels. In this paper we utilize two quantum kernel machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the labels of a Breast Cancer dataset on two different NISQ devices: quantum kernel Gaussian Process (qkGP) and quantum kernel Support Vector Machine (qkSVM). We estimate the quantum kernels on the 11 qubit IonQ and the 5 qubit IBMQ Belem quantum devices. Our results demonstrate that the predictive performances of the error mitigated quantum kernel machine learning algorithms improve significantly compared to their non-error mitigated counterparts. On both NISQ devices the predictive performances became comparable to those of noiseless quantum simulators and their classical counterparts
Abstract Support vector machine(SVM) is one of the most popular machine learning(ML) methods which are widely used as the methodology of choice in Breast Cancer detection because of its unique advantages in critical features detection from complex breast cancer datasets. Quantum support vector machine(QSVM) uses the power of quantum mechanics to improve the performance of classical support vector machine(SVM) algorithms with theoretical acceleration advantage. However, it still suffers from the wide error problem and hardware limits in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum computing(NISQ). Consequently, we propose a quantum kernel estimation method with measurement error mitigation and test it using the Wisconsin Breast Cancer database first on the IBM quantum processors. The experimental results show that we can achieve remarkable performance improvement in accuracy for solving such binary classification problems compared to state-of-the-art models, which shows the great potential for the design and implementation of machine learning algorithms with quantum advantages in the future.
Breast cancer is a major health concern, and early detection can make a great difference in treatment and survival rates for breast cancer patients. Machine learning methods have noticeably improved prediction accuracy on high-dimensional medical datasets and have become widely used tools in medical diagnostics. The transition to a quantum computational framework has opened new directions in machine learning research. By using qubits instead of classical bits, quantum models may provide new ways to represent and process complex medical data. In medical diagnostics, this has led to a growing interest in whether quantum approaches can improve classification performance more effectively than classical methods. The purpose of this paper is to compare classical and quantum machine learning models on the task of breast cancer classification and to determine whether quantum models can achieve higher accuracy and faster prediction on a selected dataset. Alongside the main simulator-based experiment, a smaller experiment was performed on a real IBM quantum computer to demonstrate the practical execution of the same task under current hardware constraints. In the practical part of the study, the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset was used. This dataset consists of 569 samples with 30 numerical features extracted from digitized fine needle aspirate images and provides a reliable basis for evaluating model performance. A comparative analysis was conducted between classical and quantum machine learning models, including a support vector machine (SVM), an artificial neural network (ANN), a quantum support vector machine (QSVM), and a hybrid quantum-classical neural network (QNN). In the simulator-based experiment, both SVM and ANN achieved an accuracy of 0.956 with an F1-score of 0.965 on the test set, while QSVM reached an accuracy of 0.807 with an F1-score of 0.866 and the Hybrid QNN achieved 0.623 accuracy with an F1-score of 0.677. These quantum and hybrid models also required substantially longer training times than the classical baselines. A small hardware experiment on an IBM quantum device further illustrates both the practical feasibility and the current limitations of executing this classification task on noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware.
The integration of classical machine learning with quantum computing has sparked a remarkable revolution, opening avenues to tackle previously insurmountable challenges in diverse fields, particularly in clinical applications. One such challenging task is to predict lung cancer with minimal clinical samples and features. The prominent objective of this proposed research is to introduce a novel Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QKSVM) constructed with the Quantum Kernel Circuit (QKC) enriched with Quantum Approximation Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) embedding circuit to classify highly complex lung cancer using a minimal number of samples and minimal feature dimensions. In this context, to compare the classification performance of the transformative potential of the proposed QAOA embedding QKSVM classifier model, we implemented two other variants of the QKC leveraging Angle embedding (Angle Embedding QKSVM) and Instantaneous Quantum Polynomial embedding (IQP Embedding QKSVM). We also compared their performance with that of a classical SVM classifier. In this study, we delve into the transformative potential classification performance of the proposed QAOA Embedding-based QKSVM classifier, which is contrasted particularly in scenarios with limited sample size and feature dimensions. Our investigation reveals the quantum kernel’s superiority, even when operating with smaller datasets. This remarkable performance is attributed to the quantum models’ robustness in extracting intricate diagnosing features, enabling it to extract more pertinent insights from fewer data points. Notably, the QKSVM model trained with a significantly selected feature vector of 4-Dimensions (4D) with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) emerges as the frontrunner in lung cancer predictions, achieving an outstanding test accuracy of 94.64% and the highest area under curve (AUC) metric of 82.33%.
The rapid advancement of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices necessitates a systematic evaluation of quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms to determine their feasibility for near-term applications. This study aims to benchmark the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC)and the Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QSVM) under realistic noise conditions modeled using Qiskit Aer. The primary objective is to investigate the impact of depolarizing and amplitude damping noise on the classification performance of these algorithms. Using the Iris binary classification task, we simulated four noise levels (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1) and evaluated accuracy across 1024 measurement shots. Results show that QSVM achieves superior accuracy (70%) under ideal and lownoise conditions, while VQC exhibits higher resilience at moderate noise (50% at 0.05 noise level) due to its adaptive Variational parameters. At higher noise levels (0.1), both models converge to ~35–40% accuracy, indicating significant degradation. These findings provide actionable insights for algorithm selection on NISQ hardware, with VQC favored for moderately noisy devices and QSVM preferable for low-noise or error-mitigated systems. The study concludes by highlighting the need for noise-aware ansatz design and error mitigation techniques to enhance QML performance in NISQ regimes.
Quantum Support Vector Regression (QSVR) has emerged as one of the most promising quantum machine learning algorithms for nonlinear regression on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. However, despite numerous simulation-based studies, experimental evaluations on physical quantum hardware remain relatively scarce. This work presents a comparative analysis of three regression approaches: classical Support Vector Regression (SVR) with a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel, classical SVR utilizing precomputed quantum kernels, and the native QSVR implementation available in the qiskit-machine-learning framework. Experiments were conducted on three benchmark regression datasets using three execution environments: a noiseless Qiskit Aer simulator, the IQM Adonis hardware-aware simulator, and the physical 5-qubit IQM Spark superconducting quantum computer (Odra 5) located at Wrocław University of Science and Technology. Multiple quantum feature maps and circuit depths were investigated, while model hyperparameters were optimized using grid search. The obtained results demonstrate that QSVR can be successfully executed on contemporary superconducting quantum hardware and, for selected datasets, achieves prediction accuracy comparable to or exceeding that of a classical RBF-based SVR. The experiments further reveal the significant influence of quantum hardware noise, feature map selection, and circuit depth on regression quality. Moreover, the implementation based on precomputed quantum kernels generally exhibits greater robustness on physical hardware than the native QSVR implementation. The presented benchmark provides an experimental assessment of QSVR under realistic execution conditions and contributes to the ongoing evaluation of quantum machine learning algorithms on current NISQ-era quantum computers.
Quantum machine learning has experienced significant progress in both software and hardware development in the recent years and has emerged as an applicable area of near-term quantum computers. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of utilizing quantum machine learning (QML) on real clinical datasets. We propose two QML algorithms for data classification on IBM quantum hardware: a quantum distance classifier (qDS) and a simplified quantum-kernel support vector machine (sqKSVM). We utilize these different methods using the linear time quantum data encoding technique ([Formula: see text]) for embedding classical data into quantum states and estimating the inner product on the 15-qubit IBMQ Melbourne quantum computer. We match the predictive performance of our QML approaches with prior QML methods and with their classical counterpart algorithms for three open-access clinical datasets. Our results imply that the qDS in small sample and feature count datasets outperforms kernel-based methods. In contrast, quantum kernel approaches outperform qDS in high sample and feature count datasets. We demonstrate that the [Formula: see text] encoding increases predictive performance with up to + 2% area under the receiver operator characteristics curve across all quantum machine learning approaches, thus, making it ideal for machine learning tasks executed in Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum computers.