The rapid advancement of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices necessitates a systematic evaluation of quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms to determine their feasibility for near-term applications. This study aims to benchmark the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC)and the Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QSVM) under realistic noise conditions modeled using Qiskit Aer. The primary objective is to investigate the impact of depolarizing and amplitude damping noise on the classification performance of these algorithms. Using the Iris binary classification task, we simulated four noise levels (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1) and evaluated accuracy across 1024 measurement shots. Results show that QSVM achieves superior accuracy (70%) under ideal and lownoise conditions, while VQC exhibits higher resilience at moderate noise (50% at 0.05 noise level) due to its adaptive Variational parameters. At higher noise levels (0.1), both models converge to ~35–40% accuracy, indicating significant degradation. These findings provide actionable insights for algorithm selection on NISQ hardware, with VQC favored for moderately noisy devices and QSVM preferable for low-noise or error-mitigated systems. The study concludes by highlighting the need for noise-aware ansatz design and error mitigation techniques to enhance QML performance in NISQ regimes.
The rapid advancement of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices necessitates a systematic evaluation of quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms to determine their feasibility for near-term applications. This study aims to benchmark the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC)and the Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QSVM) under realistic noise conditions modeled using Qiskit Aer. The primary objective is to investigate the impact of depolarizing and amplitude damping noise on the classification performance of these algorithms. Using the Iris binary classification task, we simulated four noise levels (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1) and evaluated accuracy across 1024 measurement shots. Results show that QSVM achieves superior accuracy (70%) under ideal and lownoise conditions, while VQC exhibits higher resilience at moderate noise (50% at 0.05 noise level) due to its adaptive Variational parameters. At higher noise levels (0.1), both models converge to ~35–40% accuracy, indicating significant degradation. These findings provide actionable insights for algorithm selection on NISQ hardware, with VQC favored for moderately noisy devices and QSVM preferable for low-noise or error-mitigated systems. The study concludes by highlighting the need for noise-aware ansatz design and error mitigation techniques to enhance QML performance in NISQ regimes.
Near-term quantum machine learning (QML) models operate in environments wherein noise is unavoidable, arising from both imperfect classical data acquisition and the limitations of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. Although most existing studies have focused primarily on quantum circuit noise in isolation, the combined influence of corrupted classical inputs and quantum hardware noise has received comparatively little attention.
In this work, we present a systematic experimental study of the robustness of a variational quantum classifier under realistic multi-level noise conditions. Using the Titanic dataset as a benchmark, a range of dataset-level noise models-including speckle noise, impulse noise, quantization noise, and feature dropout are applied to classical features prior to quantum encoding using a ZZ feature map. In parallel, hardware-inspired quantum noise channels such as depolarizing noise, amplitude damping, phase damping, Pauli errors, and readout errors are incorporated at the circuit level using the Qiskit Aer simulator.
The experimental results indicate that noise in classical input data can significantly intensify the effects of quantum decoherence, resulting in less stable training and noticeably lower classification accuracy. Together, these observations emphasize the importance of designing and evaluating quantum machine learning pipelines with noise in mind, and highlight the need to consider classical and quantum noise simultaneously when assessing QML performance in the NISQ era
With the advancement of quantum computing in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, hybrid quantum-classical algorithms have emerged as promising approaches for addressing certain machine learning tasks. This study investigates the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC), a hybrid model that integrates parameterized quantum circuits with classical optimization routines, implemented via IBM’s Qiskit framework. We provide a detailed account of the VQC architecture, including feature encoding, ansatz construction, and optimization methodology. To assess its performance, we conduct a comparative analysis between VQC and classical Support Vector Classifiers (SVC) across synthetic and real-world datasets, including Iris and a binary-filtered version of MNIST. Experimental results reveal that classical models consistently achieve higher accuracy and faster training times. However, the VQC demonstrates functional viability, particularly under noise-free conditions and reduced-dimensionality settings. These findings underscore the current limitations of quantum models while highlighting the potential of VQC as a proof-of-concept for quantum-enhanced learning as quantum hardware matures.
This thesis presents a systematic empirical evaluation of quantum machine learning performance under noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era constraints. Through 670 controlled experiments, it evaluated quantum kernel support vector machines and variational quantum classifiers against classical baselines on MNIST binary and multiclass classification tasks with systematic variation of problem difficulty, feature dimensionality (4, 8 qubits), and training set size (n ∈{100, 250, 400, 500, 2000, 4000}). Statistical rigor was ensured through five random seeds per condition and comprehensive significance testing. During the testing with binary datasets, classical methods (SVM, logistic regression, k-NN, neural networks) achieved 85.9% to 99.6% accuracy with training times under one second across all sample sizes. Quantum kernel methods utilizing ZZ feature maps yielded 70.5% to 96.0% accuracy, requiring 129 to 2,140 seconds training with quadratic sample size scaling. Larger scale quantum experiments (n = 4000 for both architectures, 8-qubit encoding with n = 2000 for quantum kernels) proved computationally impossible on available hardware leading to out of memory errors, highlighting practical NISQ-era scalability constraints. Variational quantum classifiers exhibited persistent performance stagnation, failing to exceed 66.5% accuracy despite increases in training data and feature dimensionality. Performance gaps ranged from 3.3 to 35.2 percentage points. All quantum classical differences achieved statistical significance (p< 0.05, with 13 of 14 comparisons meeting p< 0.01) and exhibited large to very large efect sizes (d> 1.0, with 13 of 14 comparisons exceeding d> 2.0). To further evaluate performance and scalability, a 4 class classification experiment was conducted following an identical experimental protocol, with training set sizes of n ∈{100, 250, 400}. Across 180 runs, classical baselines achieved mean accuracies between 87.2% and 95% across both 4 and 8 dimensional data. Quantum Kernel SVM struggled during runs with 4 dimensions, accuracy varying between 64.6% and 74%. Quantum Kernel SVM accuracy declined 16%-25% when the dimension and qubit count were increased to 8, showing findings of exponential kernel concentration. The Variational Quantum Classifier also performed poorly, with accuracy ranging from 43.4% to 44.6% across all runs, providing further evidence that it failed to leverage additional features or training data. Experiments employed noiseless statevector simulation, establishing that quantum underperformance stems from fundamental algorithmic limitations independent of hardware noise. A further extension to 8 class classification (digits 0–7) confirmed and amplified these findings: classical methods maintained 65–83% accuracy while Quantum Kernel SVM degraded to 34–47% and VQC collapsed to 21–23%, approaching the 12.5% random baseline. Supplementary appendix experiments further examined amplitude encoding on raw 784 dimensional pixel features and an alternative angle encoding scheme on the 8-class task; the latter demonstrated that replacing the ZZ Feature Map with simple per qubit rotations substantially recovered quantum kernel performance, suggesting feature map design as a more consequential variable than circuit depth or qubit count in near-term quantum classification.
This study investigates classification performance and trainability of variational quantum classifiers on near-term noisy quantum hardware across circuit depth and qubit count regimes within the context of quantum computing and machine learning, an area of growing scientific importance given its implications for hybrid quantum-classical algorithm design and practical NISQ hardware benchmarking for near-term quantum advantage assessment. Using gradient-based parameter optimization of parameterized quantum circuits with hardware noise modeling via density matrix simulation and physical execution on IBM Eagle processors, we examine expressibility of parameterized circuits enabling nonlinear decision boundaries in feature Hilbert space, with trainability constrained by barren plateau gradients at large qubit counts in 96 circuit architectures (4 qubit counts x 4 depths x 6 ansatz families) evaluated across 5 classification datasets with 20 random initialization seeds each drawn from IBM Quantum Eagle (127-qubit) and Falcon (27-qubit) processors with noise mitigation via zero-noise extrapolation. Results indicate that 10-qubit, 4-layer VQC achieves 84.2% classification accuracy on the best benchmark, within 3.8 percentage points of classical SVM, but gradient variance decays exponentially with qubit count (variance halving per 2 added qubits), confirming barren plateau scaling (p < 0.001), with 84.2% accuracy, 3.8 pp gap to classical SVM baseline as the primary quantitative benchmark. Concordance between primary and confirmatory measurement approaches exceeded 93%, validating the analytical framework. These findings contribute empirically to quantum computing and machine learning and carry actionable implications for the design of programs and policies targeting hybrid quantum-classical algorithm design and practical NISQ hardware benchmarking for near-term quantum advantage assessment.
This study presents a noise-aware evaluation framework for hybrid quantum–classical machine learning models applied to medical binary classification. Using three healthcare datasets—Pima Indians Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Breast Cancer Wisconsin—the performance of a Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) was analyzed under multiple depolarizing noise levels (0.00–0.10). Classical baselines, Logistic Regression (LR) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), were implemented for comparison. The research investigates the impact of noise on predictive accuracy, F1-score, and training time, highlighting the computational overhead of hybrid quantum–classical models. Zero Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), using linear and Richardson methods, was applied to mitigate noise effects, revealing that while ZNE improves performance under certain conditions, extrapolation instability can occur. Transpiler optimization also contributed to improved VQC stability by reducing circuit complexity. Results show that classical models consistently outperformed the VQC in accuracy, stability, and training efficiency. VQC exhibited fluctuating performance under noise, requiring significantly higher training time, and increasing SPSA iterations did not always yield stable accuracy improvements. These findings underscore the challenges of noise robustness, optimization instability, and computational cost in the NISQ era, and suggest directions for future work, including alternative optimizers, adaptive ansatz design, advanced error mitigation, and real hardware benchmarking. This research provides a systematic benchmarking framework for evaluating training time versus noise-level trade-offs, contributing to the development of more reliable quantum machine learning models for medical applications. Keywords: Quantum Machine Learning, Variational Quantum Classifier, Depolarizing Noise, Zero Noise Extrapolation, Medical Classification, Hybrid Quantum–Classical Models, Training Time Analysis
Quantum machine learning faces a big problem with noise in quantum computers. When quantum algorithms run on real devices or emulators with noise, accuracy becomes very bad compared to classical methods. This paper shows implementation of quantum classifiers that work better in noisy conditions using the Qiskit framework. The method combines three simple techniques. First technique compares different feature maps like ZZFeatureMap and PauliFeatureMap to find which one is more stable when noise exists. Second technique adds measurement error mitigation inside the training loop of the variational quantum classifier. Third technique uses a Qiskit transpiler for making circuits shorter which reduces noise effects. Testing happened on a Qiskit Aer simulator with a noise model taken from an IBM quantum computer. Three datasets used for testing-Iris data with 4 features, Wine data with 13 features, and a small part of breast cancer data. Results show that good feature map choice plus error mitigation give about 15% more accuracy than normal VQC in noisy environments. Circuit optimization makes the circuit 40% less deep than the original. The research demonstrates noise resilient quantum machine learning. Our Qiskit implementation achieves reproducible results while accurately modeling real quantum noise on classical simulators.