Quantum Support Vector Regression (QSVR) has emerged as one of the most promising quantum machine learning algorithms for nonlinear regression on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. However, despite numerous simulation-based studies, experimental evaluations on physical quantum hardware remain relatively scarce. This work presents a comparative analysis of three regression approaches: classical Support Vector Regression (SVR) with a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel, classical SVR utilizing precomputed quantum kernels, and the native QSVR implementation available in the qiskit-machine-learning framework. Experiments were conducted on three benchmark regression datasets using three execution environments: a noiseless Qiskit Aer simulator, the IQM Adonis hardware-aware simulator, and the physical 5-qubit IQM Spark superconducting quantum computer (Odra 5) located at Wrocław University of Science and Technology. Multiple quantum feature maps and circuit depths were investigated, while model hyperparameters were optimized using grid search. The obtained results demonstrate that QSVR can be successfully executed on contemporary superconducting quantum hardware and, for selected datasets, achieves prediction accuracy comparable to or exceeding that of a classical RBF-based SVR. The experiments further reveal the significant influence of quantum hardware noise, feature map selection, and circuit depth on regression quality. Moreover, the implementation based on precomputed quantum kernels generally exhibits greater robustness on physical hardware than the native QSVR implementation. The presented benchmark provides an experimental assessment of QSVR under realistic execution conditions and contributes to the ongoing evaluation of quantum machine learning algorithms on current NISQ-era quantum computers.
Quantum Support Vector Regression (QSVR) has emerged as one of the most promising quantum machine learning algorithms for nonlinear regression on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. However, despite numerous simulation-based studies, experimental evaluations on physical quantum hardware remain relatively scarce. This work presents a comparative analysis of three regression approaches: classical Support Vector Regression (SVR) with a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel, classical SVR utilizing precomputed quantum kernels, and the native QSVR implementation available in the qiskit-machine-learning framework. Experiments were conducted on three benchmark regression datasets using three execution environments: a noiseless Qiskit Aer simulator, the IQM Adonis hardware-aware simulator, and the physical 5-qubit IQM Spark superconducting quantum computer (Odra 5) located at Wrocław University of Science and Technology. Multiple quantum feature maps and circuit depths were investigated, while model hyperparameters were optimized using grid search. The obtained results demonstrate that QSVR can be successfully executed on contemporary superconducting quantum hardware and, for selected datasets, achieves prediction accuracy comparable to or exceeding that of a classical RBF-based SVR. The experiments further reveal the significant influence of quantum hardware noise, feature map selection, and circuit depth on regression quality. Moreover, the implementation based on precomputed quantum kernels generally exhibits greater robustness on physical hardware than the native QSVR implementation. The presented benchmark provides an experimental assessment of QSVR under realistic execution conditions and contributes to the ongoing evaluation of quantum machine learning algorithms on current NISQ-era quantum computers.
Quantum Support Vector Regression (QSVR) has become an exciting prospect of modeling the nonlinear relationship of high-dimensional data by using a kernel method. Nevertheless, the overall assessment of the whole QSVR pipeline, including preprocessing and dimensionality reduction, quantum embedding, shot-based kernel estimation, and noise-aware analysis, is not widespread. This paper introduces a working Python implementation of the QSVR framework that combines a principal component analysis (PCA)-to-qubit embedding, a 1024-shot quantum kernel implementation, and 1024-shot 1/2-SVR optimization on financial time-series and credit transaction regression problems. Classical features are normalized and minimized to around 20 major features that capture 95% of the variance in the data before being angle-based RY embedded using a depth-3 entangling circuit. Quantum kernels are built through state-overlap estimation on finite-shot constraints, and they are trained by cross-validated optimization. The robustness of the proposed framework is measured in both noise-free and simulator-generated noise conditions in case of controlled noise approximations. Experimentation indicates improved regression performance than that of an RBF-SVR baseline with the same preprocessing and validation conditions. The suggested workflow designates the concept of reproducibility, benchmarking control, and feasible noise-conscious evaluation, which offers a systematic reference structure to subsequent research within near-term quantum machine learning.
Abstract Quantum machine learning is a rapidly growing field at the intersection of quantum computing and machine learning. In this work, we examine our quantum machine learning models, which are based on quantum support vector classification (QSVC) and quantum support vector regression (QSVR). We investigate these models using a quantum-circuit simulator, both with and without noise, as well as the IonQ Harmony quantum processor. For the QSVC tasks, we use a dataset containing fraudulent credit card transactions and image datasets (the MNIST and the Fashion-MNIST datasets); for the QSVR tasks, we use a financial dataset and a materials dataset. For the classification tasks, the performance of our QSVC models using 4 qubits of the trapped-ion quantum computer was comparable to that obtained from noiseless quantum-circuit simulations. The result is consistent with the analysis of our device-noise simulations with varying qubit-gate error rates. For the regression tasks, applying a low-rank approximation to the noisy quantum kernel, in combination with hyperparameter tuning in ε-SVR, improved the performance of the QSVR models on the near-term quantum device. Our results suggest that the quantum kernel, as described by our shallow quantum circuit, can be effectively used for both QSVC and QSVR tasks, indicating its resistance to noise and its adaptability to various datasets.
Anomaly detection, an important task in data analysis, involves identifying observations or events that deviate in some way from the rest of the data. Machine learning techniques have shown success in automating this process by detecting hidden patterns and deviations in large-scale data. The potential of quantum computing for machine learning has been widely recognized, leading to extensive research efforts to develop suitable quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms. In particular, the search for QML algorithms for near-term NISQ devices is in full swing. However, NISQ devices pose additional challenges due to their limited qubit coherence times, low number of qubits, and high error rates. Kernel methods based on quantum kernel estimation have emerged as a promising approach to QML on NISQ devices, offering theoretical guarantees, versatility, and compatibility with NISQ constraints. Especially support vector machines (SVM) utilizing quantum kernel estimation have shown success in various supervised learning tasks. However, in the context of anomaly detection, semisupervised learning is of great relevance, and yet there is limited research published in this area. This paper introduces an approach to semisupervised anomaly detection based on the reconstruction loss of a support vector regression (SVR) with quantum kernel. This novel model is an alternative to the variational quantum and quantum kernel one-class classifiers, and is compared to a quantum autoencoder as quantum baseline and a SVR with radial-basis-function (RBF) kernel as well as a classical autoencoder as classical baselines. The models are benchmarked extensively on 10 real-world anomaly detection data sets and one toy data set and it is shown that our SVR model with quantum kernel performs better than the SVR with RBF kernel as well as all other models, achieving highest mean AUC over all data sets. In addition, our QSVR outperforms the Quantum autoencoder on 9 out of 11 data sets.
Quantum kernel methods have been proposed as a promising approach for leveraging near-term quantum computers for supervised learning, yet rigorous benchmarks against strong classical baselines remain scarce. We present a comprehensive empirical study of quantum kernel support vector machines (QSVMs) across nine binary classification datasets, four quantum feature maps, three classical kernels, and multiple noise models, totalling 970 experiments with strict nested cross-validation.
Our analysis spans four phases: (i) statistical significance testing, revealing that none of 29 pairwise quantum-classical comparisons reach significance at α=0.05; (ii) learning curve analysis over six training fractions, showing steeper quantum slopes on six of eight datasets that nonetheless fail to close the gap to the best classical baseline; (iii) hardware validation on IBM ibm_fez (Heron r2), demonstrating kernel fidelity r≥0.976 across six experiments; and (iv) seed sensitivity analysis confirming reproducibility (mean CV 1.4%).
A Kruskal-Wallis factorial analysis reveals that dataset choice dominates performance variance (ε2=0.73), while kernel type accounts for only 9%. Spectral analysis offers a mechanistic explanation: current quantum feature maps produce eigenspectra that are either too flat or too concentrated, missing the intermediate profile of the best classical kernel, the radial basis function (RBF). Quantum kernel training (QKT) via kernel-target alignment yields the single competitive result -- balanced accuracy 0.968 on breast cancer -- but with ~2,000x computational overhead.
Our findings provide actionable guidelines for quantum kernel research. The complete benchmark suite is publicly available to facilitate reproduction and extension.
Anomaly Detection (AD) is critical in data analysis, particularly within the domain of IT security. In this study, we explore the potential of Quantum Machine Learning for application to AD with special focus on the robustness to noise and adversarial attacks. We build upon previous work on Quantum Support Vector Regression (QSVR) for semisupervised AD by conducting a comprehensive benchmark on IBM quantum hardware using eleven datasets. Our results demonstrate that QSVR achieves strong classification performance and even outperforms the noiseless simulation on two of these datasets. Moreover, we investigate the influence of - in the NISQ-era inevitable - quantum noise on the performance of the QSVR. Our findings reveal that the model exhibits robustness to depolarizing, phase damping, phase flip, and bit flip noise, while amplitude damping and miscalibration noise prove to be more disruptive. Finally, we explore the domain of Quantum Adversarial Machine Learning by demonstrating that QSVR is highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks, with neither quantum noise nor adversarial training improving the model's robustness against such attacks.
The rapid advancement of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices necessitates a systematic evaluation of quantum machine learning (QML) algorithms to determine their feasibility for near-term applications. This study aims to benchmark the Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC)and the Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QSVM) under realistic noise conditions modeled using Qiskit Aer. The primary objective is to investigate the impact of depolarizing and amplitude damping noise on the classification performance of these algorithms. Using the Iris binary classification task, we simulated four noise levels (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1) and evaluated accuracy across 1024 measurement shots. Results show that QSVM achieves superior accuracy (70%) under ideal and lownoise conditions, while VQC exhibits higher resilience at moderate noise (50% at 0.05 noise level) due to its adaptive Variational parameters. At higher noise levels (0.1), both models converge to ~35–40% accuracy, indicating significant degradation. These findings provide actionable insights for algorithm selection on NISQ hardware, with VQC favored for moderately noisy devices and QSVM preferable for low-noise or error-mitigated systems. The study concludes by highlighting the need for noise-aware ansatz design and error mitigation techniques to enhance QML performance in NISQ regimes.