Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2204.08796 · Physical Review C

Velocity-like maximum polarization: Irreversibility and quantum measurements

Oleg V Teryaev

Published Jul 28, 2022• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The polarization emerging in the subsequent scattering processes can never exceed 1 which corresponds to the fully polarized pure state. This property is shown to be provided by the addition rule similar to that for relativistic velocities never exceeding the speed of light. The cases of spin $1/2$ and 1 are considered. The photon linear polarization in subsequent Thomson scattering processes is monotonically increasing. This directness is shown to be a consequence of spin measurement procedure and may be the particular example of the anticipated relation between quantum measurement and time irreversibility. The emergent polarization may be considered as a case of the opposing time's arrows corresponding to microscopic (spin) and macroscopic (momentum) degrees of freedom, respectively.

DOI
10.1103/physrevc.106.l012201

Related papers

Irreversibility and Quantum Measurement

Julio R. Gea-Banacloche

The role played by irreversible processes, at the microscopic scale, in several examples of quantum measurements is studied within a "minimally realist" interpretation of the quantum formalism introduced in a recent publication. The analysis extends and confirms the basic results of the earlier work: separation of the collapse and amplification phases of the measurement, and decoherence and collapse happening already as a consequence of irreversible microscopic processes at the level of the "probe" itself (typically an atom in the examples considered). Additionally, the proposed interpretation of the formalism is shown to be consistent with previous interpretations, and a case for true irreversibility in physics is argued in some detail.

Entropy•Sep 12, 2026•0 citations

Disquisitions on quantum-enhanced polarimetry

Aaron Z. Goldberg

It takes some convincing to realize that light has a polarization degree of freedom, as our eyes are usually ignorant of light's polarization. Since overcoming this hurdle of intuition, polarization has become a fantastic resource that can be easily manipulated both physically and mathematically, opening the door to a wide variety of applications. We have only recently begun to appreciate how many more doors are opened by the quantum mechanical degrees of freedom inherent to optical polarization. One use of optical polarization is for polarimetry: measuring the changes in light's polarization after it interacts with a material is an excellent procedure for nondestructively probing the characteristics and composition of the intervening material. More sensitive measurements require brighter probe light; however, sufficiently intense light will begin to destroy the sample being probed. In this thesis, we seek to provide more sensitive polarimetry without resorting to bright beams of light. Tailoring the quantum properties of various states of light has been shown to increase their usefulness for other estimation protocols and we show how to extend this paradigm to quantum enhancements in polarimetry. We begin by finding the quantum states underlying classical polarization. Each particular set of classical polarization properties corresponds to a large variety of quantum states. Next, we establish quantum descriptions of classical polarization transformations corresponding to arbitrary Jones and Mueller matrices, including quantum mechanical insights into the distinction between processes that can and cannot be described by Jones matrices. We propose candidates for the most likely quantum states underlying classical decompositions into polarized and unpolarized fractions, carefully inspecting how these quantum states behave under polarization transformations. This language allows us to inspect quantum-enhanced sensing in the multiparameter context of polarimetry. We show the dramatic possibilities for quantum enhancements in any metrological scenario that is mathematically equivalent to a rotation, of which polarization rotations are a primary example; in contrast, we also show most attenuating and depolarizing polarization transformations to forbid such dramatic enhancements. Finally, we discuss polarization and its generalizations in the context of generating quantum entanglement via linear optics. These applications serve as mere examples of the usefulness promised by light’s quantum polarization degrees of freedom.

•Jun 1, 2021•0 citations

Quantum measurement arrow of time and fluctuation relations for measuring spin of ultracold atoms

Maitreyi Jayaseelan, Sreenath K. Manikandan, Andrew N. Jordan +1 more

The origin of macroscopic irreversibility from microscopically time-reversible dynamical laws-often called the arrow-of-time problem-is of fundamental interest in both science and philosophy. Experimentally probing such questions in quantum theory requires systems with near-perfect isolation from the environment and long coherence times. Ultracold atoms are uniquely suited to this task. We experimentally demonstrate a striking parallel between the statistical irreversibility of wavefunction collapse and the arrow of time problem in the weak measurement of the quantum spin of an atomic cloud. Our experiments include statistically rare events where the arrow of time is inferred backward; nevertheless we provide evidence for absolute irreversibility and a strictly positive average arrow of time for the measurement process, captured by a fluctuation theorem. We further demonstrate absolute irreversibility for measurements performed on a quantum many-body entangled wavefunction-a unique opportunity afforded by our platform-with implications for studying quantum many-body dynamics and quantum thermodynamics.

Nature Communications•Mar 23, 2021•21 citations

Quantum-Entropy Physics

Davi Geiger, Zvi M. Kedem

All the laws of physics are time-reversible. Time arrow emerges only when ensembles of classical particles are treated probabilistically, outside of physics laws, and the entropy and the second law of thermodynamics are introduced. In quantum physics, no mechanism for a time arrow has been proposed despite its intrinsic probabilistic nature. In consequence, one cannot explain why an electron in an excited state will "spontaneously" transition into a ground state as a photon is created and emitted, instead of continuing in its reversible unitary evolution. To address such phenomena, we introduce an entropy for quantum physics, which will conduce to the emergence of a time arrow. The entropy is a measure of randomness over the degrees of freedom of a quantum state. It is dimensionless; it is a relativistic scalar, it is invariant under coordinate transformation of position and momentum that maintain conjugate properties and under CPT transformations; and its minimum is positive due to the uncertainty principle. To excogitate why some quantum physical processes cannot take place even though they obey conservation laws, we partition the set of all evolutions of an initial state into four blocks, based on whether the entropy is (i) increasing but not a constant, (ii) decreasing but not a constant, (iii) a constant, (iv) oscillating. We propose a law that in quantum physics entropy (weakly) increases over time. Thus, evolutions in the set (ii) are disallowed, and evolutions in set (iv) are barred from completing an oscillation period by instantaneously transitioning to a new state. This law for quantum physics limits physical scenarios beyond conservation laws, providing causality reasoning by defining a time arrow.

arXiv:2103.07996•Mar 14, 2021•2 citations

Time-symmetric quantum mechanics questioned and defended

Michael Nauenberg

In their feature article "A Time-Symmetric Formulation of Quantum Mechanics" (PHYSICS TODAY, November 2010, page 27), Yakir Aharonov, Sandu Popescu, and Jeff Tollaksen state that there exists a "freedom to impose independent initial and final conditions on the evolution of a quantum system" without having to modify quantum mechanics "by an iota." The supporting illustrations they give, however, are based on an inadequate analysis of the measurement process in quantum mechanics.Consider their gedanken experiment in which measurements are made at two successive times, t and t 1, after the system has been prepared in a state Ψ at t 0 < t < t 1. Now suppose that the experiment is repeated, but without any measurements made at t 1. Then the standard statistical prediction of quantum mechanics for the outcome at the intermediate time t is identical in both experiments, contradicting the authors' claim that "the results at [the intermediary time] t depend not only on what happened earlier at t 0, but also on what happens later at t 1."To illustrate their arguments, the authors describe some measurements of polarization with spin-1⁄2 particles as follows: "We could, for example, start at t 0 with an ensemble of spin-1⁄2 particles, each one polarized 'up' in the z-direction. Then at t 1 we measure each spin in the x-direction and select only the particles for which the spin turned out to be up again, but in the new direction. Thus, at any intermediate time t, the spin components in both the z and the x directions—two noncommuting observables—would seem to be completely determined." The rationale given for that strange conclusion is that "if at t we measure the spin along x, we must also find it up [along x], because otherwise the measurement at t 1 wouldn't find it up [along x]." But that claim is incorrect. Selecting, after a measurement, a subset of particles with spin up along a given axis does not imply that before the measurement such particles had spin up along that axis. On the contrary, if some particles at t 1 also emerge with spin down along x, then, according to quantum mechanics, the state Ψ at t < t 1 does not represent particles polarized along the x-direction. To find that state, the axis of the measurement device—for example, a Stern–Gerlach magnet—must be rotated until all particles emerge with the same direction of polarization. For the example under consideration, that would be the direction of the z-axis, which corresponds to the polarization at t 0 and t. Hence, a measurement at any later time t 1 is not lost information; instead, it is redundant information about the outcome of a measurement at an intermediate time t when at the initial time t 0 the particles are in a state Ψ.The claim by Aharonov and coauthors that at various stages of the measurement process ensembles can be separated into subensembles that can be associated with quantum states leads to contradictions with the principles of quantum mechanics, and gives rise to the paradoxes of "impossible ensembles" discussed in the article. Their unphysical description of the measurement process leads them to the false conclusion that "quantum mechanics offers a place to specify both an initial and an independent final state," and to such outlandish statements as the idea "that quantum mechanics lets one impose . . . a putative final state of the universe."© 2011 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•May 1, 2011•10 citations

Relationship between quantum walks and relativistic quantum mechanics

C. M. Chandrashekar, Subhashish Banerjee, R. Srikanth

Quantum walk models have been used as an algorithmic tool for quantum computation and to describe various physical processes. This article revisits the relationship between relativistic quantum mechanics and the quantum walks. We show the similarities of the mathematical structure of the decoupled and coupled forms of the discrete-time quantum walk to that of the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations, respectively. In the latter case, the coin emerges as an analog of the spinor degree of freedom. Discrete-time quantum walk as a coupled form of the continuous-time quantum walk is also shown by transforming the decoupled form of the discrete-time quantum walk to the Schr\"odinger form. By showing the coin to be a means to make the walk reversible and that the Dirac-like structure is a consequence of the coin use, our work suggests that the relativistic causal structure is a consequence of conservation of information. However, decoherence (modeled by projective measurements on position space) generates entropy that increases with time, making the walk irreversible and thereby producing an arrow of time. The Lieb-Robinson bound is used to highlight the causal structure of the quantum walk to put in perspective the relativistic structure of the quantum walk, the maximum speed of walk propagation, and earlier findings related to the finite spread of the walk probability distribution. We also present a two-dimensional quantum walk model on a two-state system to which the study can be extended.

arXiv:1003.4656•Physical Review A•Jun 25, 2010•108 citations
The polarization emerging in the subsequent scattering processes can never exceed 1 which corresponds to the fully polarized pure state. This property is shown to be provided by the addition rule similar to that for relativistic velocities never exceeding the speed of light. The cases of spin 1/21/21/2 and 1 are considered. The photon linear polarization in subsequent Thomson scattering processes is monotonically increasing. This directness is shown to be a consequence of spin measurement procedure and may be the particular example of the anticipated relation between quantum measurement and time irreversibility. The emergent polarization may be considered as a case of the opposing time's arrows corresponding to microscopic (spin) and macroscopic (momentum) degrees of freedom, respectively.
The role played by irreversible processes, at the microscopic scale, in several examples of quantum measurements is studied within a "minimally realist" interpretation of the quantum formalism introduced in a recent publication. The analysis extends and confirms the basic results of the earlier work: separation of the collapse and amplification phases of the measurement, and decoherence and collapse happening already as a consequence of irreversible microscopic processes at the level of the "probe" itself (typically an atom in the examples considered). Additionally, the proposed interpretation of the formalism is shown to be consistent with previous interpretations, and a case for true irreversibility in physics is argued in some detail.
It takes some convincing to realize that light has a polarization degree of freedom, as our eyes are usually ignorant of light's polarization. Since overcoming this hurdle of intuition, polarization has become a fantastic resource that can be easily manipulated both physically and mathematically, opening the door to a wide variety of applications. We have only recently begun to appreciate how many more doors are opened by the quantum mechanical degrees of freedom inherent to optical polarization. One use of optical polarization is for polarimetry: measuring the changes in light's polarization after it interacts with a material is an excellent procedure for nondestructively probing the characteristics and composition of the intervening material. More sensitive measurements require brighter probe light; however, sufficiently intense light will begin to destroy the sample being probed. In this thesis, we seek to provide more sensitive polarimetry without resorting to bright beams of light. Tailoring the quantum properties of various states of light has been shown to increase their usefulness for other estimation protocols and we show how to extend this paradigm to quantum enhancements in polarimetry. We begin by finding the quantum states underlying classical polarization. Each particular set of classical polarization properties corresponds to a large variety of quantum states. Next, we establish quantum descriptions of classical polarization transformations corresponding to arbitrary Jones and Mueller matrices, including quantum mechanical insights into the distinction between processes that can and cannot be described by Jones matrices. We propose candidates for the most likely quantum states underlying classical decompositions into polarized and unpolarized fractions, carefully inspecting how these quantum states behave under polarization transformations. This language allows us to inspect quantum-enhanced sensing in the multiparameter context of polarimetry. We show the dramatic possibilities for quantum enhancements in any metrological scenario that is mathematically equivalent to a rotation, of which polarization rotations are a primary example; in contrast, we also show most attenuating and depolarizing polarization transformations to forbid such dramatic enhancements. Finally, we discuss polarization and its generalizations in the context of generating quantum entanglement via linear optics. These applications serve as mere examples of the usefulness promised by light’s quantum polarization degrees of freedom.
The origin of macroscopic irreversibility from microscopically time-reversible dynamical laws-often called the arrow-of-time problem-is of fundamental interest in both science and philosophy. Experimentally probing such questions in quantum theory requires systems with near-perfect isolation from the environment and long coherence times. Ultracold atoms are uniquely suited to this task. We experimentally demonstrate a striking parallel between the statistical irreversibility of wavefunction collapse and the arrow of time problem in the weak measurement of the quantum spin of an atomic cloud. Our experiments include statistically rare events where the arrow of time is inferred backward; nevertheless we provide evidence for absolute irreversibility and a strictly positive average arrow of time for the measurement process, captured by a fluctuation theorem. We further demonstrate absolute irreversibility for measurements performed on a quantum many-body entangled wavefunction-a unique opportunity afforded by our platform-with implications for studying quantum many-body dynamics and quantum thermodynamics.
All the laws of physics are time-reversible. Time arrow emerges only when ensembles of classical particles are treated probabilistically, outside of physics laws, and the entropy and the second law of thermodynamics are introduced. In quantum physics, no mechanism for a time arrow has been proposed despite its intrinsic probabilistic nature. In consequence, one cannot explain why an electron in an excited state will "spontaneously" transition into a ground state as a photon is created and emitted, instead of continuing in its reversible unitary evolution. To address such phenomena, we introduce an entropy for quantum physics, which will conduce to the emergence of a time arrow. The entropy is a measure of randomness over the degrees of freedom of a quantum state. It is dimensionless; it is a relativistic scalar, it is invariant under coordinate transformation of position and momentum that maintain conjugate properties and under CPT transformations; and its minimum is positive due to the uncertainty principle. To excogitate why some quantum physical processes cannot take place even though they obey conservation laws, we partition the set of all evolutions of an initial state into four blocks, based on whether the entropy is (i) increasing but not a constant, (ii) decreasing but not a constant, (iii) a constant, (iv) oscillating. We propose a law that in quantum physics entropy (weakly) increases over time. Thus, evolutions in the set (ii) are disallowed, and evolutions in set (iv) are barred from completing an oscillation period by instantaneously transitioning to a new state. This law for quantum physics limits physical scenarios beyond conservation laws, providing causality reasoning by defining a time arrow.
In their feature article "A Time-Symmetric Formulation of Quantum Mechanics" (PHYSICS TODAY, November 2010, page 27), Yakir Aharonov, Sandu Popescu, and Jeff Tollaksen state that there exists a "freedom to impose independent initial and final conditions on the evolution of a quantum system" without having to modify quantum mechanics "by an iota." The supporting illustrations they give, however, are based on an inadequate analysis of the measurement process in quantum mechanics.Consider their gedanken experiment in which measurements are made at two successive times, t and t 1, after the system has been prepared in a state Ψ at t 0 < t < t 1. Now suppose that the experiment is repeated, but without any measurements made at t 1. Then the standard statistical prediction of quantum mechanics for the outcome at the intermediate time t is identical in both experiments, contradicting the authors' claim that "the results at [the intermediary time] t depend not only on what happened earlier at t 0, but also on what happens later at t 1."To illustrate their arguments, the authors describe some measurements of polarization with spin-1⁄2 particles as follows: "We could, for example, start at t 0 with an ensemble of spin-1⁄2 particles, each one polarized 'up' in the z-direction. Then at t 1 we measure each spin in the x-direction and select only the particles for which the spin turned out to be up again, but in the new direction. Thus, at any intermediate time t, the spin components in both the z and the x directions—two noncommuting observables—would seem to be completely determined." The rationale given for that strange conclusion is that "if at t we measure the spin along x, we must also find it up [along x], because otherwise the measurement at t 1 wouldn't find it up [along x]." But that claim is incorrect. Selecting, after a measurement, a subset of particles with spin up along a given axis does not imply that before the measurement such particles had spin up along that axis. On the contrary, if some particles at t 1 also emerge with spin down along x, then, according to quantum mechanics, the state Ψ at t < t 1 does not represent particles polarized along the x-direction. To find that state, the axis of the measurement device—for example, a Stern–Gerlach magnet—must be rotated until all particles emerge with the same direction of polarization. For the example under consideration, that would be the direction of the z-axis, which corresponds to the polarization at t 0 and t. Hence, a measurement at any later time t 1 is not lost information; instead, it is redundant information about the outcome of a measurement at an intermediate time t when at the initial time t 0 the particles are in a state Ψ.The claim by Aharonov and coauthors that at various stages of the measurement process ensembles can be separated into subensembles that can be associated with quantum states leads to contradictions with the principles of quantum mechanics, and gives rise to the paradoxes of "impossible ensembles" discussed in the article. Their unphysical description of the measurement process leads them to the false conclusion that "quantum mechanics offers a place to specify both an initial and an independent final state," and to such outlandish statements as the idea "that quantum mechanics lets one impose . . . a putative final state of the universe."© 2011 American Institute of Physics.
Quantum walk models have been used as an algorithmic tool for quantum computation and to describe various physical processes. This article revisits the relationship between relativistic quantum mechanics and the quantum walks. We show the similarities of the mathematical structure of the decoupled and coupled forms of the discrete-time quantum walk to that of the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations, respectively. In the latter case, the coin emerges as an analog of the spinor degree of freedom. Discrete-time quantum walk as a coupled form of the continuous-time quantum walk is also shown by transforming the decoupled form of the discrete-time quantum walk to the Schr\"odinger form. By showing the coin to be a means to make the walk reversible and that the Dirac-like structure is a consequence of the coin use, our work suggests that the relativistic causal structure is a consequence of conservation of information. However, decoherence (modeled by projective measurements on position space) generates entropy that increases with time, making the walk irreversible and thereby producing an arrow of time. The Lieb-Robinson bound is used to highlight the causal structure of the quantum walk to put in perspective the relativistic structure of the quantum walk, the maximum speed of walk propagation, and earlier findings related to the finite spread of the walk probability distribution. We also present a two-dimensional quantum walk model on a two-state system to which the study can be extended.