Simulations and analytical calculations that aim to describe flux-tunable transmons are usually based on effective models of the corresponding lumped-element model. However, when a control pulse is applied, in most cases it is not known how much the predictions made with the effective models deviate from the predictions made with the original lumped-element model. In this work we compare the numerical solutions of the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation for both the effective and the lumped-element models, for microwave and unimodal control pulses (external fluxes). These control pulses are used to model single-qubit (X) and two-qubit gate (iswap and cz) transitions. First, we derive a nonadiabatic effective Hamiltonian for a single flux-tunable transmon and compare the pulse response of this model to the one of the corresponding circuit Hamiltonian. Here we find that both models predict similar outcomes for similar control pulses. Then, we study how different approximations affect single-qubit (X) and two-qubit gate (iswap and cz) transitions in two different two-qubit systems. For this purpose we consider three different systems in total: a single flux-tunable transmon and two two-qubit systems. In summary, we find that a series of commonly applied approximations (individually and/or in combination) can change the response of a system substantially, when a control pulse is applied.
Simulations and analytical calculations that aim to describe flux-tunable transmons are usually based on effective models of the corresponding lumped-element model. However, when a control pulse is applied, in most cases it is not known how much the predictions made with the effective models deviate from the predictions made with the original lumped-element model. In this work we compare the numerical solutions of the time-dependent Schr"odinger equation for both the effective and the lumped-element models, for microwave and unimodal control pulses (external fluxes). These control pulses are used to model single-qubit (X) and two-qubit gate (iswap and cz) transitions. First, we derive a nonadiabatic effective Hamiltonian for a single flux-tunable transmon and compare the pulse response of this model to the one of the corresponding circuit Hamiltonian. Here we find that both models predict similar outcomes for similar control pulses. Then, we study how different approximations affect single-qubit (X) and two-qubit gate (iswap and cz) transitions in two different two-qubit systems. For this purpose we consider three different systems in total: a single flux-tunable transmon and two two-qubit systems. In summary, we find that a series of commonly applied approximations (individually and/or in combination) can change the response of a system substantially, when a control pulse is applied.
Single-flux-quantum (SFQ) digital circuitry has great potential in building a scalable control system of superconducting qubits. In this work, we describe a practical SFQ-based two-qubit gate for transmon qubits. The controlled-Z (CZ) gate is activated by near-resonant SFQ-pulse trains near the target transition involving the second excited state. Numerical simulations show that the fidelity of a SFQ-activated CZ gate in excess of 99.9% is achievable within 100-ns gate time. We evaluate the CZ gate error caused by leakage and SFQ-pulse width. Combined with the proposed feasible expansion methods, this work is a supplement to the scalable and integratable superconducting-qubit control system based on SFQ digital logic.
The main source of error for superconducting quantum processors today is two-qubit gates, so understanding what limits their fidelity is central to improving these devices. This thesis studies the controlled-Z (CZ) gate between two transmon qubits, realized by tuning the ∣11⟩ and ∣20⟩ states through an avoided crossing with a flux pulse. There are two primary errors inherent to this approach. The first is leakage into non-computational states like ∣20⟩; the second is an exchange error from population transferring between the single-excitation states ∣01⟩ and ∣10⟩. Using a closed-system simulation, this work compares four flux-pulse shapes (unipolar, net-zero bipolar, Gaussian-filtered bipolar, and adiabatic) and constructs a CNOT from each CZ. The central question is which error channel sets the gate fidelity, and whether the widely used net-zero pulse, known to protect neighboring qubits, also helps inside the gate itself. An important finding of this research is that every type of flux pulse has an average gate fidelity limited by exchange error rather than leakage. While the exchange error is not apparent in the return of the ∣11⟩ population, because excitation-number conservation prevents ∣11⟩ from entering the single-excitation sector, it does appear as an off-diagonal term in the CZ unitary, and subsequently in the CNOT. A second finding concerns the net-zero pulse: although its zero net flux integral cancels the first-order phase imprinted on neighboring qubits, it does not suppress the exchange error. The strong suppression observed in the analytic bipolar gate happens because its idle time leaves the exchange oscillation near a cancellation point at the end of the gate, not because the pulse is net-zero. The flux operating point predicted by the simulation was tested on a physical transmon device accessed remotely, where a square pulse produced a 180∘ conditional phase close to the simulated flux and duration. Because the model is closed-system, the reported fidelities describe the coherent error of each pulse rather than the total infidelity of a physical device.
Superconducting qubits have emerged as a leading platform for realizing quantum computers. Accurate modeling of these devices is essential for predicting performance, improving design, and optimizing control. Many modeling approaches currently rely on lumped circuit approximations or other simplified treatments that can be limited in resolving the interplay between the qubit dynamics and the electromagnetic circuitry, leading to significant experimental deviations from numerical predictions at times. To address many of these limitations, methods that self-consistently solve the Schrödinger equation for qubit dynamics with the classical Maxwell's equations have been developed and shown to accurately predict a wide range of effects related to superconducting qubit control and readout. Despite these successes, these methods have not been able to consider multi-qubit effects that give rise to qubit-qubit entanglement. Here, we address this by rigorously deriving how multi-qubit coupling effects between transmon qubits can be embedded into Maxwell-Schrödinger methods. To support this, we build on earlier first-principles derivations of Maxwell-Schrödinger methods for the specific case of two transmon qubits coupled together through a common electromagnetic system in the dispersive regime. To aid in validating aspects of the Maxwell-Schrödinger framework, we also provide a new interpretation of Maxwell-Schrödinger methods as an efficient simulation strategy to capture the class of non-Markovian open quantum system dynamics. Our results demonstrate that these effects can give rise to strong classical crosstalk that can significantly alter multi-qubit dynamics, which we demonstrate for the cross-resonance gate. These classical crosstalk effects have been noted in cross-resonance experiments, but previous quantum theory and device analysis could not explain their origin.
Pulse-level simulators are the lowest-level, most widely used abstraction layer for studying how quantum hardware responds to control signals, but they can be built on Hamiltonian models with very different fidelity and cost. This raises the question: which level of physical abstraction is sufficient for a given simulation objective? We study this question for a flux-tunable two-qubit superconducting device with a fixed bus coupler by comparing three Hamiltonian descriptions of the same hardware: an effective two-level model, a three-mode Duffing model, and a circuit-based transmon model in the charge basis. Using a realistic parameter set, we evaluate these models on a common benchmark suite spanning flux-dependent spectra, extracted two-qubit interaction terms, driven single-qubit dynamics, CZ gate dynamics, leakage outside the computational subspace, and runtime. Across the tested flux range, the Duffing model follows the circuit-based reference more closely than the effective model for static spectra and reduced two-qubit quantities, while in driven benchmarks, the multilevel models reveal effects absent in the effective description. Overall, the results support a layered use of abstraction in pulse-level simulation: effective models for reduced analyses, Duffing models as a practical multilevel default, and circuit-based models for high-fidelity reference simulation or detailed leakage analysis.
Pulse-level simulators are the lowest-level, most widely used abstraction layer for studying how quantum hardware responds to control signals, but they can be built on Hamiltonian models with very different fidelity and cost. This raises the question: which level of physical abstraction is sufficient for a given simulation objective? We study this question for a flux-tunable two-qubit superconducting device with a fixed bus coupler by comparing three Hamiltonian descriptions of the same hardware: an effective two-level model, a three-mode Duffing model, and a circuit-based transmon model in the charge basis. Using a realistic parameter set, we evaluate these models on a common benchmark suite spanning flux-dependent spectra, extracted two-qubit interaction terms, driven single-qubit dynamics, CZ gate dynamics, leakage outside the computational subspace, and runtime. Across the tested flux range, the Duffing model follows the circuit-based reference more closely than the effective model for static spectra and reduced two-qubit quantities, while in driven benchmarks, the multilevel models reveal effects absent in the effective description. Overall, the results support a layered use of abstraction in pulse-level simulation: effective models for reduced analyses, Duffing models as a practical multilevel default, and circuit-based models for high-fidelity reference simulation or detailed leakage analysis.
This dissertation examines the design, fabrication, and characterization of a superconducting lumped-element tunable LC resonator that is used to vary the coupling between two superconducting qubits. Some level of qubit-qubit coupling is needed to perform gating operations. However, with fixed coupling, single qubit operations become considerably more difficult due to dispersive shifts in their energy levels transitions that depend on the state of the other qubit. Ideally, one wants a system in which the qubit-qubit coupling can be turned off to allow for single qubit operations, and then turned back on to allow for multi-qubit gate operations. I present results on a device that has two fixed-frequency transmon qubits capacitively coupled to a tunable thin-film LC resonator. The resonator can be tuned in situ over a range of 4.14 GHz to 4.94 GHz by applying an external magnetic flux to two single-Josephson junction loops, which are incorporated into the resonator’s inductance. The qubits have 0-to-1 transition frequencies of 5.10 GHz and 4.74 GHz. To isolate the system and provide a means for reading out the state of the qubit readout, the device was mounted in a 3D Al microwave cavity with a TE101 mode resonance frequency of about 6.1 GHz. The flux-dependent transition frequencies of the system were measured and fit to results from a coupled Hamiltonian model. With the LC resonator tuned to its minimum resonance frequency, I observed a qubit-qubit dispersive shift of 2χ_qq≈ 0.1 MHz, which was less than the linewidth of the qubit transitions. This dispersive shift was sufficiently small to consider the coupling “off”, allowing single qubit operations. The qubit-qubit dispersive shift varied with the applied flux up to a maximum dispersive shift of 2χ_qq≈ 6 MHz. As a proof-of-principle, I present preliminary results on performing a CNOT gate operation on the qubits when the coupling was “on” with 2χ_qq≈ 4 MHz. This dissertation also includes observations of the temperature dependence of the relaxation time T1 of three Al/AlOx/Al transmons. We found that, in some cases, T1 increased by almost a factor of two as the temperature increased from 30 mK to 100 mK. We found that this anomalous behavior was consistent with loss due to non-equilibrium quasiparticles in a transmon where one electrode in the tunnel junction had a smaller volume and slightly smaller superconducting energy gap than the other electrode. At sufficiently low temperatures, non-equilibrium quasiparticles accumulate in the electrode with a smaller gap, leading to an increased density of quasiparticles at the junction and a corresponding decrease in the relaxation time. I present a model of this effect, use the model to extract the density of non-equilibrium quasiparticles in the device, and find the values of the two superconducting energy gaps.