Flux-Pulsed Two-Qubit Gates in Transmons: Simulation, Pulse Shaping, and Calibration
Göktuğ Yavasoglu
Abstract
The main source of error for superconducting quantum processors today is two-qubit gates, so understanding what limits their fidelity is central to improving these devices. This thesis studies the controlled-Z (CZ) gate between two transmon qubits, realized by tuning the $|11\rangle$ and $|20\rangle$ states through an avoided crossing with a flux pulse. There are two primary errors inherent to this approach. The first is leakage into non-computational states like $|20\rangle$; the second is an exchange error from population transferring between the single-excitation states $|01\rangle$ and $|10\rangle$. Using a closed-system simulation, this work compares four flux-pulse shapes (unipolar, net-zero bipolar, Gaussian-filtered bipolar, and adiabatic) and constructs a CNOT from each CZ. The central question is which error channel sets the gate fidelity, and whether the widely used net-zero pulse, known to protect neighboring qubits, also helps inside the gate itself. An important finding of this research is that every type of flux pulse has an average gate fidelity limited by exchange error rather than leakage. While the exchange error is not apparent in the return of the $|11\rangle$ population, because excitation-number conservation prevents $|11\rangle$ from entering the single-excitation sector, it does appear as an off-diagonal term in the CZ unitary, and subsequently in the CNOT. A second finding concerns the net-zero pulse: although its zero net flux integral cancels the first-order phase imprinted on neighboring qubits, it does not suppress the exchange error. The strong suppression observed in the analytic bipolar gate happens because its idle time leaves the exchange oscillation near a cancellation point at the end of the gate, not because the pulse is net-zero. The flux operating point predicted by the simulation was tested on a physical transmon device accessed remotely, where a square pulse produced a $180^\circ$ conditional phase close to the simulated flux and duration. Because the model is closed-system, the reported fidelities describe the coherent error of each pulse rather than the total infidelity of a physical device.