Abstract We present a discussion of recent progress in excited‐state‐specific quantum chemistry and quantum Monte Carlo alongside a demonstration of how a combination of methods from these two fields can offer reliably accurate excited state predictions across singly excited, doubly excited, and charge transfer states. Both of these fields have seen important advances supporting excited state simulation in recent years, including the introduction of more effective excited‐state‐specific optimization methods, improved handling of complicated wave function forms, and ways of explicitly balancing the quality of wave functions for ground and excited states. To emphasize the promise that exists at this intersection, we provide demonstrations using a combination of excited‐state‐specific complete active space self‐consistent field theory, selected configuration interaction, and state‐specific variance minimization. These demonstrations show that combining excited‐state‐specific quantum chemistry and variational Monte Carlo can be more reliably accurate than either equation of motion coupled cluster theory or multi‐reference perturbation theory, and that it can offer new clarity in cases where existing high‐level methods do not agree. This article is categorized under: Electronic Structure Theory > Ab Initio Electronic Structure Methods Software > Quantum Chemistry
Abstract We present a discussion of recent progress in excited‐state‐specific quantum chemistry and quantum Monte Carlo alongside a demonstration of how a combination of methods from these two fields can offer reliably accurate excited state predictions across singly excited, doubly excited, and charge transfer states. Both of these fields have seen important advances supporting excited state simulation in recent years, including the introduction of more effective excited‐state‐specific optimization methods, improved handling of complicated wave function forms, and ways of explicitly balancing the quality of wave functions for ground and excited states. To emphasize the promise that exists at this intersection, we provide demonstrations using a combination of excited‐state‐specific complete active space self‐consistent field theory, selected configuration interaction, and state‐specific variance minimization. These demonstrations show that combining excited‐state‐specific quantum chemistry and variational Monte Carlo can be more reliably accurate than either equation of motion coupled cluster theory or multi‐reference perturbation theory, and that it can offer new clarity in cases where existing high‐level methods do not agree. This article is categorized under: Electronic Structure Theory > Ab Initio Electronic Structure Methods Software > Quantum Chemistry
Obtaining accurate ground and low-lying excited states of electronic systems is crucial in a multitude of important applications. One ab initio method for solving the Schrödinger equation that scales favorably for large systems is variational quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). The recently introduced deep QMC approach uses ansatzes represented by deep neural networks and generates nearly exact ground-state solutions for molecules containing up to a few dozen electrons, with the potential to scale to much larger systems where other highly accurate methods are not feasible. In this paper, we extend one such ansatz (PauliNet) to compute electronic excited states. We demonstrate our method on various small atoms and molecules and consistently achieve high accuracy for low-lying states. To highlight the method's potential, we compute the first excited state of the much larger benzene molecule, as well as the conical intersection of ethylene, with PauliNet matching results of more expensive high-level methods.
We present a new method for modeling electronically excited states that overcomes a key failing of linear response theory by allowing the underlying ground state ansatz to relax in the presence of an excitation. The method is variational, has a cost similar to ground state variational Monte Carlo, and admits both open and periodic boundary conditions. We present preliminary numerical results showing that, when paired with the Jastrow antisymmetric geminal power ansatz, the variation-after-response formalism delivers accuracies for valence and charge transfer single excitations on par with equation of motion coupled cluster, while surpassing coupled cluster's accuracy for excitations with significant doubly excited character.
to develop quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) approaches for excited states and for more systematic and accurate treatment of ground states of strongly correlated sytems and heavier elements. We use the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) framework, which is a many-body total energy method that looks like many coupled mean-field calculations. I will discuss this method’s relations and dierences with traditional density-functional and quantum chemistry methods, and with other forms of QMC. The AFQMC method uses importance-sampled random walks in the space of nonorthogonal Slater determinants to project out the many-body ground state, or excited state. The random walks are constrained by a trial wave function (TWF) to remove the so-called sign problem, giving approximate (but non-perturbative) results. With singledeterminant TWFs from Hartree-Fock or density-functional theory (DFT), this approach can be thought of as a post-DFT method with no parameter. In this form, the accuracy is typically comparable to the quantum chemistry coupled-cluster CCSD(T) method near equilibrium geometries, and better than CCSD(T) when bonds are stretched. The computational cost of AFQMC scales as N 3 with characteristic size of the system. Its accuracy can be further improved at the cost of increased computing (releasing the constraint) or better TWF. With AFQMC, we can systematically target selected orbitals to correlate. This allows many-body calculations in solids with a frozen core, with down-folded Hamiltonians, or possibly embeded in a DFT calculations to extend scales. Results from a few on-going applications will be presented, including band structures in simple solids, magnetic phases in MnO, and Cobalt adsoption on graphene.
We present a simple and efficient wave function ansatz for the treatment of excited charge-transfer states in real-space quantum Monte Carlo methods. Using the recently introduced variation-after-response method [E. Neuscamman, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 081103 (2016)], this ansatz allows a crucial orbital optimization step to be performed beyond a configuration interaction singles expansion, while only requiring calculation of two Slater determinant objects. We demonstrate this ansatz for the illustrative example of the stretched LiF molecule, for a range of excited states of formaldehyde, and finally for the more challenging ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene molecule.
Studying complex molecular systems, whether in the gas or a condensed phase, requires highly accurate quantum chemistry methods whose computational effort remains tractable when treating realistic systems. Commonly used ab initio methods such as Coupled Cluster (CC) or Density Functional Theory (DFT) generally provide reliable results when the underlying approximations and parameterizations are appropriate for the systems being studied. Among the less popular quantum chemistry methods, Valence Bond (VB) theory and Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods, each provides different unique advantages and disadvantages. Ab initio VB, while usually only qualitative for energetic properties such as enthalpies of formation, has the distinct advantage of providing very compact wave functions that can be readily mapped into the intuitive Lewis structures that chemists very often use when qualitatively describing the valence electronic structure of atoms and molecules. QMC using trial wave functions based on multireference ab initio quantum methods can give some of the most accurate energies and related properties, however, this is often at a great computational cost. Furthermore, the large wave function expansions in the trial function are often difficult to qualitatively interpret. In this lecture, we will present the Valence-Bond Quantum Monte Carlo methods (VB-QMC) which retain the interpretability of VB and the high accuracy of QMC. We will show a few applications which demonstrate their accuracy for molecules in the gas phase and we will examine areas where innovations could be made.
We investigate the use of different variational principles in quantum Monte Carlo, namely, energy and variance minimization, prompted by the interest in the robust and accurate estimation of electronic excited states. For two prototypical, challenging molecules, we readily reach the accuracy of the best available reference excitation energies using energy minimization in a state-specific or state-average fashion for states of different or equal symmetry, respectively. On the other hand, in variance minimization, where the use of suitable functionals is expected to target specific states regardless of the symmetry, we encounter severe problems for a variety of wave functions: as the variance converges, the energy drifts away from that of the selected state. This unexpected behavior is sometimes observed even when the target is the ground state and generally prevents the robust estimation of total and excitation energies. We analyze this problem using a very simple wave function and infer that the optimization finds little or no barrier to escape from a local minimum or local plateau, eventually converging to a lower-variance state instead of the target state. For the increasingly complex systems becoming in reach of quantum Monte Carlo simulations, variance minimization with current functionals appears to be an impractical route.