Studying complex molecular systems, whether in the gas or a condensed phase, requires highly accurate quantum chemistry methods whose computational effort remains tractable when treating realistic systems. Commonly used ab initio methods such as Coupled Cluster (CC) or Density Functional Theory (DFT) generally provide reliable results when the underlying approximations and parameterizations are appropriate for the systems being studied. Among the less popular quantum chemistry methods, Valence Bond (VB) theory and Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods, each provides different unique advantages and disadvantages. Ab initio VB, while usually only qualitative for energetic properties such as enthalpies of formation, has the distinct advantage of providing very compact wave functions that can be readily mapped into the intuitive Lewis structures that chemists very often use when qualitatively describing the valence electronic structure of atoms and molecules. QMC using trial wave functions based on multireference ab initio quantum methods can give some of the most accurate energies and related properties, however, this is often at a great computational cost. Furthermore, the large wave function expansions in the trial function are often difficult to qualitatively interpret. In this lecture, we will present the Valence-Bond Quantum Monte Carlo methods (VB-QMC) which retain the interpretability of VB and the high accuracy of QMC. We will show a few applications which demonstrate their accuracy for molecules in the gas phase and we will examine areas where innovations could be made.
Studying complex molecular systems, whether in the gas or a condensed phase, requires highly accurate quantum chemistry methods whose computational effort remains tractable when treating realistic systems. Commonly used ab initio methods such as Coupled Cluster (CC) or Density Functional Theory (DFT) generally provide reliable results when the underlying approximations and parameterizations are appropriate for the systems being studied. Among the less popular quantum chemistry methods, Valence Bond (VB) theory and Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods, each provides different unique advantages and disadvantages. Ab initio VB, while usually only qualitative for energetic properties such as enthalpies of formation, has the distinct advantage of providing very compact wave functions that can be readily mapped into the intuitive Lewis structures that chemists very often use when qualitatively describing the valence electronic structure of atoms and molecules. QMC using trial wave functions based on multireference ab initio quantum methods can give some of the most accurate energies and related properties, however, this is often at a great computational cost. Furthermore, the large wave function expansions in the trial function are often difficult to qualitatively interpret. In this lecture, we will present the Valence-Bond Quantum Monte Carlo methods (VB-QMC) which retain the interpretability of VB and the high accuracy of QMC. We will show a few applications which demonstrate their accuracy for molecules in the gas phase and we will examine areas where innovations could be made.
Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods have received considerable attention over past decades due to their great promise for providing a direct solution to the many-body Schrodinger equation in electronic systems. Thanks to their low scaling with the number of particles, QMC methods present a compelling competitive alternative for the accurate study of large molecular systems and solid state calculations. In spite of such promise, the method has not permeated the quantum chemistry community broadly, mainly because of the fixed-node error, which can be large and whose control is difficult. In this Perspective, we present a systematic application of large scale multideterminant expansions in QMC and report on its impressive performance with first row dimers and the 55 molecules of the G1 test set. We demonstrate the potential of this strategy for systematically reducing the fixed-node error in the wave function and for achieving chemical accuracy in energy predictions. When compared to traditional quantum chemistry methods like MP2, CCSD(T), and various DFT approximations, the QMC results show a marked improvement over all of them. In fact, only the explicitly correlated CCSD(T) method with a large basis set produces more accurate results. Further developments in trial wave functions and algorithmic improvements appear promising for rendering QMC as the benchmark standard in large electronic systems.
Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods have received considerable attention over the last decades due to their great promise for providing a direct solution to the many-body Schrodinger equation in electronic systems.Thanks to their low scaling with number of particles, QMC methods present a compelling competitive alternative for the accurate study of large molecular systems and solid state calculations.In spite of such promise, the method has not permeated the quantum chemistry community broadly, mainly because of the fixed-node error, which can be large and whose control is difficult.In this Perspective, we present a systematic application of large scale multi-determinant expansions in QMC, and report on its impressive performance with first row dimers and the 55 molecules of the G1 test set.We demonstrate the potential of this strategy for systematically reducing the fixed-node error in the wave function and for achieving chemical accuracy in energy predictions.When compared to traditional quantum chemistry methods like MP2, CCSD(T), and various DFT approximations, the QMC results show a marked improvement over all of them.In fact, only the explicitly-correlated CCSD(T) method with a large basis set produces more accurate results.Further developments in trial wave functions and algorithmic improvements appear promising for rendering QMC as the benchmark standard in large electronic systems.
to develop quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) approaches for excited states and for more systematic and accurate treatment of ground states of strongly correlated sytems and heavier elements. We use the auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) framework, which is a many-body total energy method that looks like many coupled mean-field calculations. I will discuss this method’s relations and dierences with traditional density-functional and quantum chemistry methods, and with other forms of QMC. The AFQMC method uses importance-sampled random walks in the space of nonorthogonal Slater determinants to project out the many-body ground state, or excited state. The random walks are constrained by a trial wave function (TWF) to remove the so-called sign problem, giving approximate (but non-perturbative) results. With singledeterminant TWFs from Hartree-Fock or density-functional theory (DFT), this approach can be thought of as a post-DFT method with no parameter. In this form, the accuracy is typically comparable to the quantum chemistry coupled-cluster CCSD(T) method near equilibrium geometries, and better than CCSD(T) when bonds are stretched. The computational cost of AFQMC scales as N 3 with characteristic size of the system. Its accuracy can be further improved at the cost of increased computing (releasing the constraint) or better TWF. With AFQMC, we can systematically target selected orbitals to correlate. This allows many-body calculations in solids with a frozen core, with down-folded Hamiltonians, or possibly embeded in a DFT calculations to extend scales. Results from a few on-going applications will be presented, including band structures in simple solids, magnetic phases in MnO, and Cobalt adsoption on graphene.
Quantum chemistry is a useful tool that provides insight into the properties and behavior of chemical systems. Modern software packages have made quantum chemistry methods more easily accessible, and the continued increase in available computational resources has allowed them to be applied to larger systems at higher levels of theory. Two significant problems that the field faces are the high computational complexity of high-level methods and the shift toward parallelism in high performance computing architectures. This work examines the treatment of weakly interacting molecular systems with the fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) method. DMC and other quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods offer a possible solution to both of the aforementioned problems: they can produce near-exact results with a lower scaling (with respect to problem size) than other similarly-accurate methods, and they are inherently parallel, so there is little additional cost associated with distributing the work of a single QMC calculation across a large number of processing units. The only error in DMC that is not systematically improvable is the constraint of a fixed nodal surface of the many-particle wave function of the system being studied. There are many cases in which a single Slater determinant trial function is sufficient to obtain accurate results, but there are others in which more sophisticated multi-determinant trial functions are necessary. Furthermore, it is non-trivial to generate nodal surfaces of similar quality for isolated and interacting molecules, so cancellation of errors is not guaranteed. We examine the use of different single- and multi-determinant trial functions in DMC calculations on small chemical systems with the goal of further understanding how to construct appropriate trial functions for molecules and clusters.
Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) is one of the most promising methods for solving quantum many-body problems. QMC combines known analytical properties of wave functions, results from other methods, and stochastic techniques, into a powerful tool for investigation of the electronic structure of real materials. Furthermore, the method has a favorable scaling ( O[N3] in the number of electrons), perfect scalability on parallel architectures, and can be applied to a wide range of systems. Our work has focused both on expanding the capabilities of QMC for calculation of quantities beyond energies, such as interatomic forces, and on application of the method to challenging problems in nanostructure materials research. For the calculation of interatomic forces we have implemented a finite difference correlated sampling method. The correlated sampling enables us to avoid the problem of statistical noise in evaluating the energy differences and allows us to obtain forces with an average 1% error. We have analyzed the effect of the method's main approximations on the estimate of the forces, both by theoretical arguments and by performing a variety of tests on small systems. Furthermore, we have used this newly developed method for estimating equilibrium geometries in a problem where other methods have failed. QMC enabled us to treat the electron correlation effects with high accuracy and to provide accurate predictions in a number of interesting applications. In particular, for carbon rings of C4N+2 stoichiometry we have resolved a long-standing problem regarding the competition between the aromaticity and second order Jahn-Teller effects. We have found that the dominant mechanism at small and intermediate sizes, which stabilizes the bond angle and bond length alternated geometries, is the secondorder Jahn-Teller effect while the aromatic isomer is always found to be a transition state. These high accuracy calculations which have involved multi-reference wave functions, extensive variational optimizations, and the use of massively parallel platforms demonstrate clearly the unique capabilities of the QMC approach.