We investigate the use of different variational principles in quantum Monte Carlo, namely, energy and variance minimization, prompted by the interest in the robust and accurate estimation of electronic excited states. For two prototypical, challenging molecules, we readily reach the accuracy of the best available reference excitation energies using energy minimization in a state-specific or state-average fashion for states of different or equal symmetry, respectively. On the other hand, in variance minimization, where the use of suitable functionals is expected to target specific states regardless of the symmetry, we encounter severe problems for a variety of wave functions: as the variance converges, the energy drifts away from that of the selected state. This unexpected behavior is sometimes observed even when the target is the ground state and generally prevents the robust estimation of total and excitation energies. We analyze this problem using a very simple wave function and infer that the optimization finds little or no barrier to escape from a local minimum or local plateau, eventually converging to a lower-variance state instead of the target state. For the increasingly complex systems becoming in reach of quantum Monte Carlo simulations, variance minimization with current functionals appears to be an impractical route.
We investigate the use of different variational principles in quantum Monte Carlo, namely, energy and variance minimization, prompted by the interest in the robust and accurate estimation of electronic excited states. For two prototypical, challenging molecules, we readily reach the accuracy of the best available reference excitation energies using energy minimization in a state-specific or state-average fashion for states of different or equal symmetry, respectively. On the other hand, in variance minimization, where the use of suitable functionals is expected to target specific states regardless of the symmetry, we encounter severe problems for a variety of wave functions: as the variance converges, the energy drifts away from that of the selected state. This unexpected behavior is sometimes observed even when the target is the ground state and generally prevents the robust estimation of total and excitation energies. We analyze this problem using a very simple wave function and infer that the optimization finds little or no barrier to escape from a local minimum or local plateau, eventually converging to a lower-variance state instead of the target state. For the increasingly complex systems becoming in reach of quantum Monte Carlo simulations, variance minimization with current functionals appears to be an impractical route.
We investigate Monte Carlo energy and variance-minimization techniques for optimizing many-body wave functions. Several variants of the basic techniques are studied, including limiting the variations in the weighting factors that arise in correlated sampling estimations of the energy and its variance. We investigate the numerical stability of the techniques and identify two reasons why variance minimization exhibits superior numerical stability to energy minimization. The characteristics of each method are studied using a noninteracting 64-electron model of crystalline silicon. While our main interest is in solid-state systems, the issues investigated are relevant to Monte Carlo studies of atoms, molecules, and solids. We identify a robust and efficient variance-minimization scheme for optimizing wave functions for large systems.
A new algorithm for the variational quantum Monte Carlo (VMC) is proposed. This algorithm takesthe internal structure of a local energy as starting point, and directly reduces its fluctuation, making the variance decrease to the minimum. An analytical expression of the local energy is presented. The principle of variance minimization for the VMC is deduced, and the steps of variance minimization are established. This new algorithm was used to compute the energies of the ground states for molecules H2, LiH, Li2 and H2O. The Calculated results show that this novel algorithm is superior to the usual VMC in both accuracy and statistical error, with but very little increase in computational cost.
Quantum Averages and Statistical Samplings In this chapter, we discuss the general framework in which the variational Monte Carlo methods are defined and few important implementations for interacting systems of bosons and fermions on the lattice. The main advantage of considering this approach relies on the variational principle that has been shown in section 1.4: the energy of a given quantum state is always bounded from below by the exact ground-state one, giving us the route to obtain the best possible solution to the problem. In most cases, a suitable parametrization of the variational wave function allows us to consider a wide range of different quantum phases (e.g., metals, superconductors, and insulators). By performing an optimization of the parameters, we can reach the lowest-energy state, which is expected to capture the correct ground-state behavior. Therefore, variational wave functions represent a flexible and valuable approach to get important insights into the low-energy properties of models that cannot be solved by exact methods. By contrast, the main limitation of this approach is the fact that it is based on a given Ansatz , which may contain a relevant bias that cannot be removed within the chosen parametrization. We also mention that variational wave functions can be easily defined and treated for a wide class of models, irrespective of the range of interactions and the dimension of the local (i.e., single-site) Hilbert space, which can be even infinite and does not need the use of an uncontrolled cutoff to work with a finite-dimensional space. In this respect, variational Monte Carlo is better than other methods, like densitymatrix renormalization group or tensor-network methods in which the complexity dramatically increases with both the range of the interaction and the dimension of the local Hilbert space (White, 1992; Schollwöck, 2005, 2011). Let us start by describing the general framework in which variational Monte Carlo methods are defined. First of all, we fix a complete basis set in the Hilbert space, in which (for simplicity) the states are taken to be orthogonal and normalized such that: Then, any quantum state can be written as: In turn, the expectation value of an operator over a given variational wave function takes the following form: The main problem in evaluating the expectation value is that the number of configurations in the sum is exponentially large with the number of particles.
We study three wave function optimization methods based on energy minimization in a variational Monte Carlo framework: the Newton, linear, and perturbative methods. In the Newton method, the parameter variations are calculated from the energy gradient and Hessian, using a reduced variance statistical estimator for the latter. In the linear method, the parameter variations are found by diagonalizing a nonsymmetric estimator of the Hamiltonian matrix in the space spanned by the wave function and its derivatives with respect to the parameters, making use of a strong zero-variance principle. In the less computationally expensive perturbative method, the parameter variations are calculated by approximately solving the generalized eigenvalue equation of the linear method by a nonorthogonal perturbation theory. These general methods are illustrated here by the optimization of wave functions consisting of a Jastrow factor multiplied by an expansion in configuration state functions (CSFs) for the C2 molecule, including both valence and core electrons in the calculation. The Newton and linear methods are very efficient for the optimization of the Jastrow, CSF, and orbital parameters. The perturbative method is a good alternative for the optimization of just the CSF and orbital parameters. Although the optimization is performed at the variational Monte Carlo level, we observe for the C2 molecule studied here, and for other systems we have studied, that as more parameters in the trial wave functions are optimized, the diffusion Monte Carlo total energy improves monotonically, implying that the nodal hypersurface also improves monotonically.
In the regime where traditional approaches to electronic structure cannot afford to achieve accurate energy differences via exhaustive wave function flexibility, rigorous approaches to balancing different states’ accuracies become desirable. As a direct measure of a wave function’s accuracy, the energy variance offers one route to achieving such a balance. Here, we develop and test a variance matching approach for predicting excitation energies within the context of variational Monte Carlo and selective configuration interaction. In a series of tests on small but difficult molecules, we demonstrate that the approach is effective at delivering accurate excitation energies when the wave function is far from the exhaustive flexibility limit. Results in C3, where we combine this approach with variational Monte Carlo orbital optimization, are especially encouraging.
Abstract The optimization of parameters in trial wavefunctions by minimizing the variance in local energy was used for some of the earliest variationala and diffusionb QMC calculations, and it has been used ever since by most practitioners of QMC. Perhaps the best known examples are given in the paper by Schmidt and Moskowitzc for optimizing their nine-parameter Jastrow functions for first-row atoms. An alternative method of optimization, leading to lower variational energies for these atoms, is reported in this paper.