I revisit Jordan's derivation of Einstein's formula for energy fluctuations in the black body in thermal equilibrium. This formula is usually taken to represent the unification of the wave and the particle aspects of the electromagnetic field since the fluctuations can be shown to be the sum of wave-like and particle-like contributions. However, in Jordan's treatment there is no mention of the Planck distribution and all averages are performed with respect to pure number states of radiation (mixed states had not yet been discovered!). The chief reason why Jordan does reproduce Einstein's result despite not using thermal states of radiation is that he focuses on fluctuations in a small (compared to the whole) volume of the black body. The state of radiation in a small volume is highly entangled to the rest of the black body which leads to the correct fluctuations even though the overall state might, in fact, be assumed to be pure (i.e. at zero temperature). I present a simple derivation of the fluctuations formula as an instance of mixed states being reductions of higher level pure states, a representation that is affectionately known as "Church of the Higher Hilbert Space". According to this view of mixed states, temperature is nothing but the amount of entanglement between the system and its environment. Quanta 2022; 11: 1–4.
I revisit Jordan's derivation of Einstein's formula for energy fluctuations in the black body in thermal equilibrium. This formula is usually taken to represent the unification of the wave and the particle aspects of the electromagnetic field since the fluctuations can be shown to be the sum of wave-like and particle-like contributions. However, in Jordan's treatment there is no mention of the Planck distribution and all averages are performed with respect to pure number states of radiation (mixed states had not yet been discovered!). The chief reason why Jordan does reproduce Einstein's result despite not using thermal states of radiation is that he focuses on fluctuations in a small (compared to the whole) volume of the black body. The state of radiation in a small volume is highly entangled to the rest of the black body which leads to the correct fluctuations even though the overall state might, in fact, be assumed to be pure (i.e. at zero temperature). I present a simple derivation of the fluctuations formula as an instance of mixed states being reductions of higher level pure states, a representation that is affectionately known as "Church of the Higher Hilbert Space". According to this view of mixed states, temperature is nothing but the amount of entanglement between the system and its environment. Quanta 2022; 11: 1–4.
A historical overview is given on the basic results which appeared by the year 1926 concerning Einstein's fluctuation formula of black-body radiation, in the context of light-quanta and wave-particle duality. On the basis of the original publications – from Planck's derivation of the black-body spectrum and Einstein's introduction of the photons up to the results of Born, Heisenberg and Jordan on the quantization of a continuum – a comparative study is presented on the first lines of thoughts that led to the concept of quanta. The nature of the particle-like fluctuations and the wave-like fluctuations are analysed by using several approaches. With the help of classical probability theory, it is shown that the infinite divisibility of the Bose distribution leads to the new concept of classical "poissonian photo-multiplets" or to the "binary photo-multiplets" of fermionic character. As an application, Einstein's fluctuation formula is derived as a sum of fermion type fluctuations of the binary photo-multiplets.
A historical overview is given on the basic results which appeared by the year 1926 concerning Einstein's fluctuation formula of black-body radiation, in the context of light-quanta and wave-particle duality. On the basis of the original publications (from Planck's derivation of the black-body spectrum and Einstein's introduction of the photons up to the results of Born, Heisenberg and Jordan on the quantization of a continuum) a comparative study is presented on the first line of thoughts that led to the concept of quanta. The nature of the particle-like fluctuations and the wave-like fluctuations are analysed by using several approaches. With the help of the classical probability theory, it is shown that the infinite divisibility of the Bose distribution leads to the new concept of classical poissonian photo-multiplets or to the binary photo-multiplets of fermionic character. As an application, Einstein's fluctuation formula is derived as a sum of fermion type fluctuations of the binary photo-multiplets.
Quantum Mechanics and its Interpretations Peter E. Hodgson (bio) Quantum Mechanics is an elegant and indeed beautiful formalism, and enables the results of many physical measurements to be calculated with great accuracy. But from the earliest days there has been intense debate about the interpretation of quantum mechanics, and it shows no signs of being settled; if anything, it is becoming more intense over the years. It should therefore be evident that the most that can be done here is to try to show where the real difficul-ties lie, and how the failure to recognize that quantum mechanics is an essentially statistical theory has led to a series of confusing quantum paradoxes. It is just these paradoxes that have often been used to support theological speculations. The Discovery of the Quantum The quantum nature of the physical world was discovered by Max Planck in the early years of the twentieth century. He was studying thermodynamics and his attention was drawn to the frequency distribution of black-body radiation. This radiation is emitted from a small hole in a heated enclosure with rough walls, which ensures [End Page 62] that the radiation reaches statistical equilibrium before emission. The frequency distribution is found to be independent of the material lining the walls of the oven, so Planck realized that it must be a fundamental characteristic of all matter. This frequency distribution had been measured by several experimentalists, and Planck resolved to try to see how it can be derived theoretically. Already Rayleigh and Jeans had used classical radiation theory to derive an expression that fitted the data well at low frequencies but tended to infinity at high energies, which was of course unacceptable. The physicist Wien had derived a formula that fitted the data at high frequencies but failed at low frequencies. Planck used an ingenious argument based on entropy to interpolate between these two formulae and obtained a formula, now known as the Planck distribution, that fitted the data perfectly. His next task was to understand the physics behind his formula. He used the familiar technique of assuming that the energy is emitted in small finite amounts, and then let their size tend to zero, so as to represent a continuous distribution. To his great surprise, the intermediate formula with discrete amounts of energy, called quanta, gave the Planck distribution, but the final result, with infinitely small quanta, did not. All his instincts as a physicist rebelled against this conclusion. Surely energy must be emitted continuously. He tried hard to find a way to avoid this unwelcome conclusion, but without success. He had to admit that it is a feature of the world. Soon it was confirmed by Einstein’s interpretation of the photoelectric effect. This story shows clearly that physicists do not impose their ideas on the world, but recognize and accept what they find, whether or not it agrees with their original ideas. The world is made by God in ways that often we cannot imagine. [End Page 63] The Old Quantum Theory A few years later Rutherford discovered that the atom has a small central nucleus containing most of its mass surrounded by a number of electrons. Bohr used the idea of the quantum to build his model of the atom. He assumed that the electrons go around the nucleus in discrete orbits, and that radiation is emitted when an electron falls from one orbit to a lower one. With this model, he was able to calculate to high accuracy the frequencies of the radiation emitted from an excited hydrogen atom. This was a great achievement, but to get his result he had to assume that the electrons stayed in their orbits, whereas classical theory predicted that they would continuously lose energy and rapidly spiral into the nucleus. Quantum Mechanics and its Interpretations These problems were solved by the development of quantum mechanics in the 1920s by Heisenberg, Schrodinger, Dirac, and others. This enabled what is called the wave function to be calculated for any physical system, and from the wave function the probabilities of occurrence of measurable quantities can be found. It is a beautiful theory, and is the indispensable means of calculation for atomic, nuclear...
Classical electromagnetics in free space leaves no room for accommodation of a light particle. To underline this, it is sufficient to remember that Einstein in order to reach his lightquantum (energy-quantum) hypothesis had to mix classical theoretical physics with a piece of experimental information that defies description in classical terms. In his 1905-paper Einstein concluded [60]:Monochromatic radiation of low density (within the range of validity of Wien’s radiation formula) behaves thermodynamically as though it consisted of a number of mutually independent energy quanta of magnitude hν. The introduction of light quanta in the Wien regime (the high-frequency part of the Planck blackbody radiation law) is the first step toward the concept of electromagnetic radiation as a Bose gas of photons [180, 39, 68, 69]. Although a photon gas obeys Bose-Einstein statistics for all frequencies the statistical independence assumed by Einstein in 1905 is not true in general. Einstein used Boltzmann statistics when he conjectured the existence of light quanta. In the Wien regime Boltzmann and Bose-Einstein statistics lead to the same conclusion since the mean number of particles (photons) with a given energy is much less than one. The circumstance that the light quanta are not statistically independent in Bose-Einstein counting finds its explanation in quantum mechanics. Hence, the statistical correlation is induced by the requirement of totally symmetric wave functions.
Classical statistical mechanics tries to derive the macroscopic properties of matter starting from the mechanical laws that rule the behaviour of single particles. To describe equilibrium states, only observables accounting for correlations among states are considered, and only systems consisting of a large number of particles are taken into account. The observables are described by continuous functions on phase space, and the states are represented by linear assignments of a number to each observable. Within the framework of the canonical ensemble, one deals with mechanical systems in thermal equilibrium with a thermal reservoir, and the equilibrium state is reached as a result of the interaction with the external world. The external world may be really external, or equally well, the unrecognized internal degrees of freedom, like in the calculation of viscosity or thermal conductivity. If really only the external world is the cause we may expect some surface dependence while an internal unrecognized degree of freedom would have a volume effect, unless the interactions are long range. The microcanonical ensemble is instead introduced to study isolated mechanical systems, and the equilibrium is viewed as a temporal average, rather than as a limit. Attention is then focused on partition functions, the theorem of equipartition of energy and an elementary theory of specific heats. In the second part, the Planck derivation of the law of black-body radiation is analysed, presenting in chronological order the Kirchhoff theorem, the Stefan law, the Wien displacement law, the Rayleigh–Jeans formula and the Planck hypothesis. Further topics discussed are the Einstein and Debye quantum models for specific heats of solids. These topics prepare the ground for the introduction of quantum statistical mechanics. The third part is, in fact, devoted to the analysis of identical particles in quantum mechanics.
The origin of the wave-part ic le dual ism of quantum theory can be t raced back to Einstein 's analysis of the fluctuations of b lack-body radia t ion in 1909 (1-3). Based on this invest igat ion EINSTEIlq proposed the in te rpre ta t ion tha t the electromagnetic field in thermal equil ibrium has as well par t ic le as wave propert ies . In his analysis concerning the ideal quantum gas of 1925 he came to the conclusion tha t this dualist ic in te rpre ta t ion applies to the par t ic les of the gas as well (a). Recent ly we have shown tha t the fluctuations of b lack-body radia t ion can be explained from the assumption of s ta t i s t ica l ly dependent indist inguishable part icles (5). Moreover, i t tu rned out tha t the so-called wave contr ibut ions to the var iance are ent i re ly due to the s ta t is t ical dependence of these part icles. F rom this viewpoint Einstein 's dualist ic in te rpre ta t ion is incomprehensible. I t is the aim of this note to explain a weak point in Einstein 's analysis in detai l and to show tha t wave proper t ies emerge in the classical l imi t only. Planck 's formula gives the mean value of the energy densi ty g* (with respect to dco) of b lack-body rad ia t ion :