Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2104.06442 · Foundations of Physics

Localizable Particles in the Classical Limit of Quantum Field Theory

Benjamin H. Feintzeig, J.T. Librande, Rory Soiffer

Published Apr 1, 2021• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-021-00458-5

Related papers

Multiple classical limits in relativistic and nonrelativistic quantum mechanics

Nelson Yokomizo, J. C. A. Barata

The existence of a classical limit describing the interacting particles in a second-quantized theory of identical particles with bosonic symmetry is proved. This limit exists in addition to the previously established classical limit with a classical field behavior, showing that the limit ℏ→0 of the theory is not unique. An analogous result is valid for a free massive scalar field: two distinct classical limits are proved to exist, describing a system of particles or a classical field. The introduction of local operators in order to represent kinematical properties of interest is shown to break the permutation symmetry under some localizability conditions, allowing the study of individual particle properties.

arXiv:0907.3943•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 2009•2 citations

Particle localization in field theory

O. Steinmann

Communications in Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1968•20 citations

Objects or Events?: Towards an Ontology for Quantum Field Theory

Andreas Bartels

The recent work of Paul Teller and Sunny Auyang in the philosophy of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) has stimulated the search for the fundamental entities in this theory. In QFT, the classical notion of a particle collapses. The theory does not only exclude classical, i.e., spatiotemporally identifiable particles, but it makes particles of the same type conceptually indistinguishable. Teller and Auyang have proposed competing ersatz-ontologies to account for the ‘loss of particles’: field quanta vs. field events. Both ontologies, however, suffer from serious defects. While quanta lack numerical identity, spatiotemporal localizability, and independence of basis-representations, events—if understood as concrete measurement events—are related to the theory only statistically. I propose an alternative solution: The entities of QFT are events of the type ‘Quantum system, S, is in quantum state, Ψ‘. These are not point events, but Davidsonian events, i.e., they can be identified by their location within thecausalnet of the world.

Philosophy of Science•Jan 1, 1999•23 citations

Classical Limit(s) of Quantum Field Theories

Charis Anastopoulos

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Nov 1, 1999•0 citations

Impact of relativity on particle localizability and ground state entanglement

Maria Papageorgiou, Jason Pye

Abstract Can a relativistic quantum field theory be consistently described as a theory of localizable particles? There are many known issues with such a description, indicating an answer in the negative. In this paper, we examine these obstructions by tracing how they (partially) subside in passing to an approximation of ordinary quantum mechanics in the non-relativistic regime. We undertake a recovery of the characteristic features of non-relativistic quantum mechanics beyond simply the Schrödinger equation. We find that once this is achieved, there are persisting issues in the localizability of particle states. A major focus is on the lingering discrepancy between two different localization schemes in quantum field theory. The non-relativistic approximation of the quantum field theory is achieved by introducing an ultraviolet cutoff set by the Compton scale. The other main undertaking of this paper is to quantify the fate of ground state entanglement and the Unruh effect in the non-relativistic regime. Observing that the Unruh temperature vanishes in the naive limit as the speed of light is taken to infinity motivates the question: is the Unruh effect relativistic? It happens that this is closely related to the former issues, as ground state entanglement causes obstructions to localizability through the Reeh–Schlieder theorem.

arXiv:1902.10684•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jul 25, 2019•13 citations

Particle Position in Quantum Field Theories

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Apr 1, 2020•0 citations
The existence of a classical limit describing the interacting particles in a second-quantized theory of identical particles with bosonic symmetry is proved. This limit exists in addition to the previously established classical limit with a classical field behavior, showing that the limit ℏ→0 of the theory is not unique. An analogous result is valid for a free massive scalar field: two distinct classical limits are proved to exist, describing a system of particles or a classical field. The introduction of local operators in order to represent kinematical properties of interest is shown to break the permutation symmetry under some localizability conditions, allowing the study of individual particle properties.
The recent work of Paul Teller and Sunny Auyang in the philosophy of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) has stimulated the search for the fundamental entities in this theory. In QFT, the classical notion of a particle collapses. The theory does not only exclude classical, i.e., spatiotemporally identifiable particles, but it makes particles of the same type conceptually indistinguishable. Teller and Auyang have proposed competing ersatz-ontologies to account for the ‘loss of particles’: field quanta vs. field events. Both ontologies, however, suffer from serious defects. While quanta lack numerical identity, spatiotemporal localizability, and independence of basis-representations, events—if understood as concrete measurement events—are related to the theory only statistically. I propose an alternative solution: The entities of QFT are events of the type ‘Quantum system, S, is in quantum state, Ψ‘. These are not point events, but Davidsonian events, i.e., they can be identified by their location within thecausalnet of the world.
Abstract Can a relativistic quantum field theory be consistently described as a theory of localizable particles? There are many known issues with such a description, indicating an answer in the negative. In this paper, we examine these obstructions by tracing how they (partially) subside in passing to an approximation of ordinary quantum mechanics in the non-relativistic regime. We undertake a recovery of the characteristic features of non-relativistic quantum mechanics beyond simply the Schrödinger equation. We find that once this is achieved, there are persisting issues in the localizability of particle states. A major focus is on the lingering discrepancy between two different localization schemes in quantum field theory. The non-relativistic approximation of the quantum field theory is achieved by introducing an ultraviolet cutoff set by the Compton scale. The other main undertaking of this paper is to quantify the fate of ground state entanglement and the Unruh effect in the non-relativistic regime. Observing that the Unruh temperature vanishes in the naive limit as the speed of light is taken to infinity motivates the question: is the Unruh effect relativistic? It happens that this is closely related to the former issues, as ground state entanglement causes obstructions to localizability through the Reeh–Schlieder theorem.