Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0907.3943 · Journal of Mathematical Physics

Multiple classical limits in relativistic and nonrelativistic quantum mechanics

Nelson Yokomizo, J. C. A. Barata

Published Dec 1, 2009• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The existence of a classical limit describing the interacting particles in a second-quantized theory of identical particles with bosonic symmetry is proved. This limit exists in addition to the previously established classical limit with a classical field behavior, showing that the limit ℏ→0 of the theory is not unique. An analogous result is valid for a free massive scalar field: two distinct classical limits are proved to exist, describing a system of particles or a classical field. The introduction of local operators in order to represent kinematical properties of interest is shown to break the permutation symmetry under some localizability conditions, allowing the study of individual particle properties.

DOI
10.1063/1.3263939

Related papers

Statistical Description of Nonrelativistic Classical Systems

G. H. Goedecke

We prove that any nonrelativistic classical system must obey a statistical wave equation that is exactly the same as the Schrödinger equation for the system, including the usual “canonical quantization” and Hamiltonian operator, provided an unknown constant is set equal to . We show why the two equations must have exactly the same sets of solutions, whereby this classical statistical theory (CST) and nonrelativistic quantum mechanics may differ only in their interpretations of the same quantitative results. We identify some of the different interpretations. We show that the results also imply nonrelativistic Lagrangian classical mechanics and the associated Newtonian laws of motion. We prove that the CST applied to a nonrelativistic rigid rotator yields spin angular momentum operators that obey the quantum commutation rules and allow both integer and half-odd-integer spin. We also note that the CST applied to systems of identical massive particles is mathematically equivalent to nonrelativistic quantum field theory for those particles.

Journal of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 2017•2 citations

Lorentz-invariant potentials and the nonrelativistic limit

Ingram Bloch, Horace W. Crater

We discuss a relativistic particle affected simultaneously by two static potentials, a Lorentz scalar and the time component of a four-vector. We show that the scalar potential has effects on the motion of a particle that are distinctively different from those of a four-vector potential. With the aid of an example we show that, in both classical and quantum mechanics, there are two inequivalent but compatible criteria of nonrelativistic behavior: (mean) kinetic energy much smaller than rest energy and nonrelativistic potential energy independent of total energy. The second of these is the correct condition for use of nonrelativistic methods, but it is the first that is usually invoked to justify their use. The two criteria are equivalent only when the scalar potential has a (mean) value much less in magnitude than the particle’s rest energy. If this condition is not satisfied, nonrelativistic formalisms such as ordinary Newtonian mechanics and the Schrödinger equation may be inadequate even if v/c is small. On the other hand, it is possible that a large S may permit relativistic energy relations to be written in a nonrelativistic form even if v/c is not small. Such an influence of the size of the scalar potential on what is considered nonrelativistic behavior is unfamiliar and is rarely mentioned in textbooks and other publications. In our opinion, it should be better known.

American Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1981•3 citations

Second quantization in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics

Donald H. Kobe

Second quantization in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is given in a simplified way using eigenstates of the number operator. The field creation operator is shown to be the operator which adds a particle with a delta-function wave function to the system, while the field annihilation operator removes a particle with a delta-function wave function from the system. The field creation operator is proved to be the Hermitian conjugate of the annihilation operator. The commutation (anticommutation) relations for boson (fermion) field operators are proved from the symmetry (antisymmetry) of the many-particle wave function. The second quantized form of one- and two-particle operators is obtained from their form in wave mechanics using the definition of the field creation and annihilation operators.

American Journal of Physics•Apr 1, 1983•4 citations

Kinematic Relativity of Quantum Mechanics: Free Particle with Different Boundary Conditions

Gintautas Kamuntavičius, Gintautas Kamuntavičius

An investigation of origins of the quantum mechanical momentum operator has shown that it corresponds to the nonrelativistic momentum of classical special relativity theory rather than the relativistic one, as has been unconditionally believed in traditional relativistic quantum mechanics until now. Taking this correspondence into account, relativistic momentum and energy operators are defined. Schrödinger equations with relativistic kinematics are introduced and investigated for a free particle and a particle trapped in the deep potential well.

Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics•Jan 1, 2017•3 citations

From quantum field theory to quantum mechanics

Nuno Barros e Sá, Cláudio Gomes

Abstract The purpose of this article is to construct an explicit relation between the field operators in Quantum Field Theory and the relevant operators in Quantum Mechanics for a system of N identical particles, which are the symmetrised functions of the canonical operators of position and momentum, thus providing a clear relation between Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Mechanics. This is achieved in the context of the non-interacting Klein–Gordon field. Though this procedure may not be extendible to interacting field theories, since it relies crucially on particle number conservation, we find it nevertheless important that such an explicit relation can be found at least for free fields. It also comes out that whatever statistics the field operators obey (either commuting or anticommuting), the position and momentum operators obey commutation relations. The construction of position operators raises the issue of localizability of particles in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, as the position operator for a single particle turns out to be the Newton–Wigner position operator. We make some clarifications on the interpretation of Newton–Wigner localized states and we consider the transformation properties of position operators under Lorentz transformations, showing that they do not transform as tensors, rather in a manner that preserves the canonical commutation relations. From a complex Klein–Gordon field, position and momentum operators can be constructed for both particles and antiparticles.

arXiv:2107.11724•The European Physical Journal C•Oct 1, 2021•4 citations

Particles of half-integral or integral helicity by quantization of a nonrelativistic free particle, and related topics

A. P. Balachandran, T. R. Govindarajan, B. K. Vijayalakshmi

It is known that the equations of motion of a classical system do not in general determine its canonical description uniquely. Thus the corresponding quantum system obtained by canonical quantization is also ambiguous. We use this freedom to quantize a free nonrelativistic particle so that the corresponding quantum particle has half-integral or integral helicity. Methods are developed for finding inequivalent canonical descriptions of a given classical system. It is emphasized that classical symmetries can be broken at the quantum level by a suitable choice of the canonical formalism prior to quantization. It is suggested that this may provide a new mechanism for breaking internal symmetries at the quantum level.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Sep 15, 1978•23 citations
The existence of a classical limit describing the interacting particles in a second-quantized theory of identical particles with bosonic symmetry is proved. This limit exists in addition to the previously established classical limit with a classical field behavior, showing that the limit ℏ→0 of the theory is not unique. An analogous result is valid for a free massive scalar field: two distinct classical limits are proved to exist, describing a system of particles or a classical field. The introduction of local operators in order to represent kinematical properties of interest is shown to break the permutation symmetry under some localizability conditions, allowing the study of individual particle properties.
We prove that any nonrelativistic classical system must obey a statistical wave equation that is exactly the same as the Schrödinger equation for the system, including the usual “canonical quantization” and Hamiltonian operator, provided an unknown constant is set equal to . We show why the two equations must have exactly the same sets of solutions, whereby this classical statistical theory (CST) and nonrelativistic quantum mechanics may differ only in their interpretations of the same quantitative results. We identify some of the different interpretations. We show that the results also imply nonrelativistic Lagrangian classical mechanics and the associated Newtonian laws of motion. We prove that the CST applied to a nonrelativistic rigid rotator yields spin angular momentum operators that obey the quantum commutation rules and allow both integer and half-odd-integer spin. We also note that the CST applied to systems of identical massive particles is mathematically equivalent to nonrelativistic quantum field theory for those particles.
We discuss a relativistic particle affected simultaneously by two static potentials, a Lorentz scalar and the time component of a four-vector. We show that the scalar potential has effects on the motion of a particle that are distinctively different from those of a four-vector potential. With the aid of an example we show that, in both classical and quantum mechanics, there are two inequivalent but compatible criteria of nonrelativistic behavior: (mean) kinetic energy much smaller than rest energy and nonrelativistic potential energy independent of total energy. The second of these is the correct condition for use of nonrelativistic methods, but it is the first that is usually invoked to justify their use. The two criteria are equivalent only when the scalar potential has a (mean) value much less in magnitude than the particle’s rest energy. If this condition is not satisfied, nonrelativistic formalisms such as ordinary Newtonian mechanics and the Schrödinger equation may be inadequate even if v/c is small. On the other hand, it is possible that a large S may permit relativistic energy relations to be written in a nonrelativistic form even if v/c is not small. Such an influence of the size of the scalar potential on what is considered nonrelativistic behavior is unfamiliar and is rarely mentioned in textbooks and other publications. In our opinion, it should be better known.
Second quantization in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics is given in a simplified way using eigenstates of the number operator. The field creation operator is shown to be the operator which adds a particle with a delta-function wave function to the system, while the field annihilation operator removes a particle with a delta-function wave function from the system. The field creation operator is proved to be the Hermitian conjugate of the annihilation operator. The commutation (anticommutation) relations for boson (fermion) field operators are proved from the symmetry (antisymmetry) of the many-particle wave function. The second quantized form of one- and two-particle operators is obtained from their form in wave mechanics using the definition of the field creation and annihilation operators.
An investigation of origins of the quantum mechanical momentum operator has shown that it corresponds to the nonrelativistic momentum of classical special relativity theory rather than the relativistic one, as has been unconditionally believed in traditional relativistic quantum mechanics until now. Taking this correspondence into account, relativistic momentum and energy operators are defined. Schrödinger equations with relativistic kinematics are introduced and investigated for a free particle and a particle trapped in the deep potential well.
Abstract The purpose of this article is to construct an explicit relation between the field operators in Quantum Field Theory and the relevant operators in Quantum Mechanics for a system of N identical particles, which are the symmetrised functions of the canonical operators of position and momentum, thus providing a clear relation between Quantum Field Theory and Quantum Mechanics. This is achieved in the context of the non-interacting Klein–Gordon field. Though this procedure may not be extendible to interacting field theories, since it relies crucially on particle number conservation, we find it nevertheless important that such an explicit relation can be found at least for free fields. It also comes out that whatever statistics the field operators obey (either commuting or anticommuting), the position and momentum operators obey commutation relations. The construction of position operators raises the issue of localizability of particles in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, as the position operator for a single particle turns out to be the Newton–Wigner position operator. We make some clarifications on the interpretation of Newton–Wigner localized states and we consider the transformation properties of position operators under Lorentz transformations, showing that they do not transform as tensors, rather in a manner that preserves the canonical commutation relations. From a complex Klein–Gordon field, position and momentum operators can be constructed for both particles and antiparticles.
It is known that the equations of motion of a classical system do not in general determine its canonical description uniquely. Thus the corresponding quantum system obtained by canonical quantization is also ambiguous. We use this freedom to quantize a free nonrelativistic particle so that the corresponding quantum particle has half-integral or integral helicity. Methods are developed for finding inequivalent canonical descriptions of a given classical system. It is emphasized that classical symmetries can be broken at the quantum level by a suitable choice of the canonical formalism prior to quantization. It is suggested that this may provide a new mechanism for breaking internal symmetries at the quantum level.