Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Classical Limit(s) of Quantum Field Theories

Charis Anastopoulos

Published Nov 1, 1999• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1026631409888

Related papers

Localizable Particles in the Classical Limit of Quantum Field Theory

Benjamin H. Feintzeig, J.T. Librande, Rory Soiffer

arXiv:2104.06442•Foundations of Physics•Apr 1, 2021•6 citations

Nonequilibrium quantum fields and the classical field theory limit

Jürgen Berges

arXiv:hep-ph/0201204•Nuclear Physics A•May 1, 2002•7 citations

The large-n limit of quantum field theories^

J. Alfaro, Luis Huerta

•Jan 1, 1988•0 citations

Title: Hybrid Quantum-Classical Simulation for Quantum Field Theory

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum field theory (QFT) encompasses a vast and complex landscape of physical phenomena, making accurate simulation a significant challenge. Classical computers struggle to handle the exponential scaling of the computational cost with increasing system size, limiting the exploration of these theories. Hybrid quantum-classical simulation offers a promising path toward overcoming these limitations by intelligently leveraging the strengths of both paradigms. This research investigates a novel hybrid solver, the 'Quantum-Classical Hybrid Solver,' designed to efficiently simulate complex QFTs. We demonstrate the method's ability to surpass classical simulation capabilities in certain regimes while maintaining computational efficiency, offering a significant advancement in the field. The core mechanism centers around a dynamic switching between classical and quantum techniques, tailored to the specific problem at hand. This paper details the design, implementation, and preliminary results of the Hybrid Quantum-Classical Solver, highlighting its potential for accelerating QFT research.

•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations

2000]: ‘Entanglement and Open Systems in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory

Rob Clifton, Hans Halvorson

Entanglement has long been the subject of discussion by philosophers of quantum theory, and has recently come to play an essential role for physicists in their development of quantum information theory. In this paper we show how the formalism of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT) provides a rigorous framework within which to analyze entanglement in the context of a fully relativistic formulation of quantum theory. What emerges from the analysis are new practical and theoretical limitations on an experimenter’s ability to perform operations on a field in one spacetime region that can disentangle its state from the state of the field in other spacelike-separated regions. These limitations show just how deeply entrenched entanglement is in relativistic quantum field theory, and yield a fresh perspective on the ways in which the theory differs conceptually from both standard nonrelativistic quantum theory and classical relativistic field theory. “...despite its conservative way of dealing with physical principles, algebraic QFT leads to a radical change of paradigm. Instead of the Newtonian view of a space-time filled with a material content one enters the reality of Leibniz created by relation (in particular inclusions) between ‘monads ’ (∼ the hyperfinite type III1 local von Neumann factors A(O) which as single algebras are nearly void of physical meaning) ” Schroer (1998, p. 302).

•Jan 31, 2000•73 citations

The classical limit of quantum theory

John T. Bruer

Synthese•Feb 1, 1982•15 citations
Quantum field theory (QFT) encompasses a vast and complex landscape of physical phenomena, making accurate simulation a significant challenge. Classical computers struggle to handle the exponential scaling of the computational cost with increasing system size, limiting the exploration of these theories. Hybrid quantum-classical simulation offers a promising path toward overcoming these limitations by intelligently leveraging the strengths of both paradigms. This research investigates a novel hybrid solver, the 'Quantum-Classical Hybrid Solver,' designed to efficiently simulate complex QFTs. We demonstrate the method's ability to surpass classical simulation capabilities in certain regimes while maintaining computational efficiency, offering a significant advancement in the field. The core mechanism centers around a dynamic switching between classical and quantum techniques, tailored to the specific problem at hand. This paper details the design, implementation, and preliminary results of the Hybrid Quantum-Classical Solver, highlighting its potential for accelerating QFT research.
Entanglement has long been the subject of discussion by philosophers of quantum theory, and has recently come to play an essential role for physicists in their development of quantum information theory. In this paper we show how the formalism of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT) provides a rigorous framework within which to analyze entanglement in the context of a fully relativistic formulation of quantum theory. What emerges from the analysis are new practical and theoretical limitations on an experimenter’s ability to perform operations on a field in one spacetime region that can disentangle its state from the state of the field in other spacelike-separated regions. These limitations show just how deeply entrenched entanglement is in relativistic quantum field theory, and yield a fresh perspective on the ways in which the theory differs conceptually from both standard nonrelativistic quantum theory and classical relativistic field theory. “...despite its conservative way of dealing with physical principles, algebraic QFT leads to a radical change of paradigm. Instead of the Newtonian view of a space-time filled with a material content one enters the reality of Leibniz created by relation (in particular inclusions) between ‘monads ’ (∼ the hyperfinite type III1 local von Neumann factors A(O) which as single algebras are nearly void of physical meaning) ” Schroer (1998, p. 302).