Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2102.01808

Schrödinger's Cat

Brown, Matthew F.

Published Feb 3, 2021• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The basic idea here is that observation (or one's experience) is fundamental and the `atomic world' is postulated as the source of such observation. Once this source has been inferred to exist one may attempt to explicitly derive its structure in such a way that the observation itself can be reproduced. And so here is a purely quantum mechanical model of observation coupled to its supposed source, and the observation itself is realised as a projection of this quantum system.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2102.01808

Related papers

An Algorithmic Interpretation of Quantum Probability

Allan F. Randall

The Everett (or relative-state, or many-worlds) interpretation of quantum mechanics has come under fire for inadequately dealing with the Born rule (the formula for calculating quantum probabilities). Numerous attempts have been made to derive this rule from the perspective of observers within the quantum wavefunction. These are not really analytic proofs, but are rather attempts to derive the Born rule as a synthetic a priori necessity, given the nature of human observers (a fact not fully appreciated even by all of those who have attempted such proofs). I show why existing attempts are unsuccessful or only partly successful, and postulate that Solomonoff's algorithmic approach to the interpretation of probability theory could clarify the problems with these approaches. The Sleeping Beauty probability puzzle is used as a springboard from which to deduce an objectivist, yet synthetic a priori framework for quantum probabilities, that properly frames the role of self-location and self-selection (anthropic) principles in probability theory. I call this framework "algorithmic synthetic unity" (or ASU). I offer no new formal proof of the Born rule, largely because I feel that existing proofs (particularly that of Gleason) are already adequate, and as close to being a formal proof as one should expect or want. Gleason's one unjustified assumption--known as noncontextuality--is, I will argue, completely benign when considered within the algorithmic framework that I propose. I will also argue that, to the extent the Born rule can be derived within ASU, there is no reason to suppose that we could not also derive all the other fundamental postulates of quantum theory, as well. There is nothing special here about the Born rule, and I suggest that a completely successful Born rule proof might only be possible once all the other postulates become part of the derivation. As a start towards this end, I show how we can already derive the essential content of the fundamental postulates of quantum mechanics, at least in outline, and especially if we allow some educated and well-motivated guesswork along the way. The result is some steps towards a coherent and consistent algorithmic interpretation of quantum mechanics.

•Jan 31, 2014•1 citation

Can We Consider Quantum Mechanics to Be a Description of Reality?

Hervé Zwirn C

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2008•2 citations

Subjective foundations of quantum mechanics

A.V. Kaminsky

It is shown that the self-referential model of the world (in such a model the world is an observer of itself) generates a quantum-like description of reality.

•Mar 28, 2025•0 citations

The system with discrete interactions I: Some comments about the principles of quantum theory

Yudin, M

The model of the physical system with discrete interactions is based on the postulates that (i) parameters of the physical system are defined in process of its interaction; (ii) the process of interaction is discrete. Consequently ordering of the events in the system is not automatically implied based on the values of time, but must be specified explicitly. This suggests the specific logic of events as well as complex character of the function, which describes stochastic behavior of the system, hence the parameters of the system are defined by Hermitian operators in the Hilbert space of functions. The model gives an essential way to introduce the basic notions and obtain the results of the quantum theory, to derive the meaning of the main physical parameters, such as momentum or electric charge. Based on the proposed postulates, Schrodinger equation for the particle is deduced in a way similar to inferring of Smoluchowski equation in the classical statistical mechanics. Similarly, the equations of motion of linear fields are established by considering Smoluchowski-type equations for amplitudes of harmonics. The concept of discrete interaction gives a way to de-couple the object of experiment and a testing device (the traditional source of controversy in quantum theory), though at expense of limitation of the principle of locality.

arXiv:quant-ph/0202082•Feb 15, 2002•0 citations

Reconstruction of Schrödinger's Cat in Many Worlds 1; Six Interpretations on Whether Schrödinger's Cat Is Dead or Alive

changzheng zhou, ZIQING zhou

Schrödinger’s cat thought experiment profoundly reveals the fundamental tension between the principle of quantum superposition and macroscopic classicalreality. This paper systematically elaborates six emerging mathematical-physicalframeworks aimed at reconstructing this paradox: Dynamic Time Algebra, PostMarkovian Paradigm, Temporal Layer Causal Evolution Theory, Chronogroup Framework, Chronological Fiber Category Theory, and Origin of Order Theory. Thesetheories respectively start from algebraic, logical, homological, group-theoretic, categorical, and thermodynamic structures, demonstrating the essential reasons whymacroscopic systems cannot maintain quantum superpositions. They collectivelypoint to a core viewpoint: the classical state of the cat is not determined by theexternal observer’s ”looking”, but is spontaneously completed by an internal ”selfstabilization mechanism” initiated by the system itself before the observer’s intervention, in order to repair the ”structural fracture” at the micro-macro interface.The core contribution of this paper is to reveal that these six theories are not isolated but are manifestations of the same underlying physical process under differentmathematical projections. By analyzing their unification theorems, core mechanisms, and experimentally testable predictions (such as entropy production pulses,logical afterimages, critical slowing down, etc.), this paper provides a self-consistentstructural answer to the quantum measurement problem without introducing thecollapse postulate or many-world branches.

•Mar 4, 2026•0 citations

A New Interpretation on Quantum Mechanics

Guang-jiong Ni

Based on new experiments about the "macroscopic Schrodinger's cat state" etc., a self-consistent interpretation on quantum mechanics is presented from the new point of view combining physics, philosophy and mathematics together.

arXiv:hep-ph/0206103•Jun 12, 2002•48 citations
The basic idea here is that observation (or one's experience) is fundamental and the `atomic world' is postulated as the source of such observation. Once this source has been inferred to exist one may attempt to explicitly derive its structure in such a way that the observation itself can be reproduced. And so here is a purely quantum mechanical model of observation coupled to its supposed source, and the observation itself is realised as a projection of this quantum system.
The Everett (or relative-state, or many-worlds) interpretation of quantum mechanics has come under fire for inadequately dealing with the Born rule (the formula for calculating quantum probabilities). Numerous attempts have been made to derive this rule from the perspective of observers within the quantum wavefunction. These are not really analytic proofs, but are rather attempts to derive the Born rule as a synthetic a priori necessity, given the nature of human observers (a fact not fully appreciated even by all of those who have attempted such proofs). I show why existing attempts are unsuccessful or only partly successful, and postulate that Solomonoff's algorithmic approach to the interpretation of probability theory could clarify the problems with these approaches. The Sleeping Beauty probability puzzle is used as a springboard from which to deduce an objectivist, yet synthetic a priori framework for quantum probabilities, that properly frames the role of self-location and self-selection (anthropic) principles in probability theory. I call this framework "algorithmic synthetic unity" (or ASU). I offer no new formal proof of the Born rule, largely because I feel that existing proofs (particularly that of Gleason) are already adequate, and as close to being a formal proof as one should expect or want. Gleason's one unjustified assumption--known as noncontextuality--is, I will argue, completely benign when considered within the algorithmic framework that I propose. I will also argue that, to the extent the Born rule can be derived within ASU, there is no reason to suppose that we could not also derive all the other fundamental postulates of quantum theory, as well. There is nothing special here about the Born rule, and I suggest that a completely successful Born rule proof might only be possible once all the other postulates become part of the derivation. As a start towards this end, I show how we can already derive the essential content of the fundamental postulates of quantum mechanics, at least in outline, and especially if we allow some educated and well-motivated guesswork along the way. The result is some steps towards a coherent and consistent algorithmic interpretation of quantum mechanics.
The model of the physical system with discrete interactions is based on the postulates that (i) parameters of the physical system are defined in process of its interaction; (ii) the process of interaction is discrete. Consequently ordering of the events in the system is not automatically implied based on the values of time, but must be specified explicitly. This suggests the specific logic of events as well as complex character of the function, which describes stochastic behavior of the system, hence the parameters of the system are defined by Hermitian operators in the Hilbert space of functions. The model gives an essential way to introduce the basic notions and obtain the results of the quantum theory, to derive the meaning of the main physical parameters, such as momentum or electric charge. Based on the proposed postulates, Schrodinger equation for the particle is deduced in a way similar to inferring of Smoluchowski equation in the classical statistical mechanics. Similarly, the equations of motion of linear fields are established by considering Smoluchowski-type equations for amplitudes of harmonics. The concept of discrete interaction gives a way to de-couple the object of experiment and a testing device (the traditional source of controversy in quantum theory), though at expense of limitation of the principle of locality.
Schrödinger’s cat thought experiment profoundly reveals the fundamental tension between the principle of quantum superposition and macroscopic classicalreality. This paper systematically elaborates six emerging mathematical-physicalframeworks aimed at reconstructing this paradox: Dynamic Time Algebra, PostMarkovian Paradigm, Temporal Layer Causal Evolution Theory, Chronogroup Framework, Chronological Fiber Category Theory, and Origin of Order Theory. Thesetheories respectively start from algebraic, logical, homological, group-theoretic, categorical, and thermodynamic structures, demonstrating the essential reasons whymacroscopic systems cannot maintain quantum superpositions. They collectivelypoint to a core viewpoint: the classical state of the cat is not determined by theexternal observer’s ”looking”, but is spontaneously completed by an internal ”selfstabilization mechanism” initiated by the system itself before the observer’s intervention, in order to repair the ”structural fracture” at the micro-macro interface.The core contribution of this paper is to reveal that these six theories are not isolated but are manifestations of the same underlying physical process under differentmathematical projections. By analyzing their unification theorems, core mechanisms, and experimentally testable predictions (such as entropy production pulses,logical afterimages, critical slowing down, etc.), this paper provides a self-consistentstructural answer to the quantum measurement problem without introducing thecollapse postulate or many-world branches.