arXiv:2003.05843 · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)

Critical faults of leakage errors on the surface code

Natalie C. Brown, Andrew W. Cross, Kenneth R. Brown

Published Oct 1, 2020• 14 citations

Abstract

Leakage is a particularly damaging error that occurs when a qubit leaves the defined computational subspace. Leakage errors limit the effectiveness of quantum error correcting codes by spreading additional errors to other qubits and corrupting syndrome measurements. The effects of leakage errors on the surface code has been studied in various contexts. However, the effects of a leaked data qubit versus a leaked ancilla qubit can be quite different. Here, we study the effects of data leakage and ancilla leakage separately. We find that data leakage is much less damaging. We show that the surface code maintains its distance in the presence of leakage by either confining leakage to data qubits or eliminating ancilla qubit leakage at the critical fault location. To demonstrate this, we introduce new techniques for handling leakage: taking advantage of gates with one-sided leakage, effectively isolating leakage events to data qubits alone and mixing two types of leakage reducing circuits, to handle data leakage and ancilla leakage separately.

DOI: 10.1109/qce49297.2020.00043

Related papers

Handling leakage with subsystem codes

Natalie C. Brown, Michael Newman, Kenneth R. Brown

Abstract Leakage is a particularly damaging error that occurs when a qubit state falls out of its two-level computational subspace. Compared to independent depolarizing noise, leaked qubits may produce many more configurations of harmful correlated errors during error-correction. In this work, we investigate different local codes in the low-error regime of a leakage gate error model. When restricting to bare-ancilla extraction, we observe that subsystem codes are good candidates for handling leakage, as their locality can limit damaging correlated errors. As a case study, we compare subspace surface codes to the subsystem surface codes introduced by Bravyi et al. In contrast to depolarizing noise, subsystem surface codes outperform same-distance subspace surface codes below error rates as high as ⪅ 7.5 × 10−4 while offering better per-qubit distance protection. Furthermore, we show that at low to intermediate distances, Bacon–Shor codes offer better per-qubit error protection against leakage in an ion-trap motivated error model below error rates as high as ⪅ 1.2 × 10−3. For restricted leakage models, this advantage can be extended to higher distances by relaxing to unverified two-qubit cat state extraction in the surface code. These results highlight an intrinsic benefit of subsystem code locality to error-corrective performance.

arXiv:1903.03937New Journal of PhysicsJul 1, 201933 citations

Leakage and Paralysis in Ancilla-assisted Qubit Measurement: Consequences for Topological Error Correction in Superconducting Architectures

Joydip Ghosh, Austin G. Fowler, John M. Martinis +1 more

Abstract : Although topological error-correcting codes offer a promising paradigm for fault- tolerant quantum computation, their robustness in the presence of leakage to non- computational states is unclear. Here we explore the signature and consequences of leakage errors on ancilla-assisted Pauli operator measurement in superconducting devices. We consider a realistic coupled-qutrit model and simulate the repeated measurement of a single sigma z operator. Typically, a data-qubit leakage event manifests itself by producing a noisy ancilla qubit that randomly reads /0/ or /1/ from cycle to cycle. Although the measurement operation is compromised, the presence of the leakage event is apparent and detectable. However, there is also the possibility of a less typical but more dangerous type of leakage event, where the ancilla becomes paralyzed rendering it oblivious to data-qubit errors for many consecutive measurement cycles and compromising the fault-tolerance. Certain dynamical phases associated with the entangling gate determine which type of leakage event will occur in practice. Leakage errors occur in most qubit realizations and our model and results are relevant for many stabilizer-based error correction protocols.

Jun 4, 20131 citation

Leakage-resilient approach to fault-tolerant quantum computing with superconducting elements

Joydip Ghosh, Austin G. Fowler

Superconducting qubits, while promising for scalability and long coherence times, contain more than two energy levels, and therefore are susceptible to errors generated by the leakage of population outside of the computational subspace. Such leakage errors constitute a prominent roadblock towards fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC) with superconducting qubits. FTQC using topological codes is based on sequential measurements of multiqubit stabilizer operators. Here, we first propose a leakage-resilient procedure to perform repetitive measurements of multiqubit stabilizer operators, and then use this scheme as an ingredient to develop a leakage-resilient approach for surface code quantum error correction with superconducting circuits. Our protocol is based on swap operations between data and ancilla qubits at the end of every cycle, requiring read-out and reset operations on every physical qubit in the system, and thereby preventing persistent leakage errors from occurring.

arXiv:1406.2404Physical Review AFeb 20, 201542 citations

Understanding the effects of leakage in superconducting quantum-error-detection circuits

Joydip Ghosh, Austin G. Fowler, John M. Martinis +1 more

The majority of quantum-error-detection and correction protocols assume that the population in a qubit does not leak outside of its computational subspace. For many existing approaches, however, the physical qubits do possess more than two energy levels and consequently are prone to such leakage events. Analyzing the effects of leakage is therefore essential to devise optimal protocols for quantum gates, measurement, and error correction. In this article, we present a detailed study of leakage in a two-qubit superconducting stabilizer measurement circuit. We simulate the repeated ancilla-assisted measurement of a single ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}^{z}$ operator for a data qubit, record the outcome at the end of each measurement cycle, and explore the signature of leakage events in the obtained readout statistics. An analytic model is also developed that closely approximates the results of our numerical simulations. We find that leakage leads to destructive features in the quantum-error-detection scheme, making additional hardware and software protocols necessary.

arXiv:1306.0925Physical Review ADec 23, 201370 citations

A Silicon Surface Code Architecture Resilient Against Leakage Errors

Zhenyu Cai, Michael A. Fogarty, Simon Schaal +3 more

Spin qubits in silicon quantum dots are one of the most promising building blocks for large scale quantum computers thanks to their high qubit density and compatibility with the existing semiconductor technologies. High fidelity single-qubit gates exceeding the threshold of error correction codes like the surface code have been demonstrated, while two-qubit gates have reached 98% fidelity and are improving rapidly. However, there are other types of error --- such as charge leakage and propagation --- that may occur in quantum dot arrays and which cannot be corrected by quantum error correction codes, making them potentially damaging even when their probability is small. We propose a surface code architecture for silicon quantum dot spin qubits that is robust against leakage errors by incorporating multi-electron mediator dots. Charge leakage in the qubit dots is transferred to the mediator dots via charge relaxation processes and then removed using charge reservoirs attached to the mediators. A stabiliser-check cycle, optimised for our hardware, then removes the correlations between the residual physical errors. Through simulations we obtain the surface code threshold for the charge leakage errors and show that in our architecture the damage due to charge leakage errors is reduced to a similar level to that of the usual depolarising gate noise. Spin leakage errors in our architecture are constrained to only ancilla qubits and can be removed during quantum error correction via reinitialisations of ancillae, which ensure the robustness of our architecture against spin leakage as well. Our use of an elongated mediator dots creates spaces throughout the quantum dot array for charge reservoirs, measuring devices and control gates, providing the scalability in the design.

arXiv:1904.10378QuantumDec 9, 201918 citations

EFFECT OF ANCILLA LOSSES ON FAULT-TOLERANT QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTION IN THE [[7,1,3]] STEANE CODE

Sameer Nawaf

Fault tolerant quantum error correction is a procedure which satisfies the feature that if one of the gates in the procedure has failed then the failure causes at most one error in the output qubits of the encoded block. Quantum computer is based on the idea of two quantum state systems (Qubits). However, the majority of systems are constructed from higher than two- level subspace. Bad control and environmental interactions in these systems lead to leakage fault. Leakage errors are errors that couple the states inside a code subspace to the states outside a code subspace. One example for leakage fault is loss errors. Since the fault tolerant procedure may be unable to recognize the leakage fault because it was designed to deal with Pauli errors. In that case a single leakage fault might disrupt the fault tolerant technique. In this thesis we investigate the effect of ancilla losses on fault-tolerant quantum error correction in the [[7,1,3]] Steane code. We proved that both Shor and Steane methods are still fault tolerant if loss errors occur.

Jan 1, 20130 citations