Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1912.10222 · Physical Review A

Operational formulation of weak values without probe systems

Kazuhisa Ogawa, H. Kobayashi, Akihisa Tomita

Published Apr 17, 2020• 15 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Weak values are the fundamental values for observables in a pre- and postselected system. Weak values are typically measured by weak measurement, in which weak values appear in the change of not the pre- and postselected system but the probe system. This indirect characteristic of weak measurement obscures the meaning of weak values for the pre- and postselected system, in contrast to conventional physical quantities, which have a clear operational meaning. In this study, we operationally formulate weak values as the sensitivity of postselection probability amplitude to small transformation in a pre- and postselected system. This formulation of weak values, which is free from the concept of probe shift assumed in weak measurement, gives a direct interpretation of strange weak values for the pre- and postselected system. Furthermore, this formulation can simplify weak-value measurement experiments because the associated measurements appearing in the modulus change of the postselection probability amplitude do not require external degrees of freedom.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.101.042117

Related papers

Weak measurement with orthogonal preselection and postselection

Shengshi Pang, Shengjun Wu, Zeng‐Bing Chen

Weak measurement is a novel quantum measurement scheme, which is usually characterized by the weak value formalism. To guarantee the validity of the weak value formalism, the fidelity between the preselection and the postselection should not be too small generally. In this work, we study the weak measurement on a qubit system with exactly or asymptotically orthogonal pre- and postselections. We shall establish a general rigorous framework for the weak measurement beyond the weak value formalism, and obtain the average output of a weak measurement when the pre- and postselections are exactly orthogonal. We shall also study the asymptotic behavior of a weak measurement in the limiting process that the pre- and postselections tend to be orthogonal.

arXiv:1205.0619•Physical Review A•Aug 17, 2012•30 citations

Weak values in a classical theory with an epistemic restriction

Angela Karanjai, Eric G. Cavalcanti, Stephen D. Bartlett +1 more

Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a subsequent strong measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value : a complex number for which the interpretation has long been debated. We analyse the procedure of weak measurement and postselection, and the interpretation of the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics supplemented by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a subtheory of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the weak value appear as phase space displacements in the postselected expectation values of the measurement device's position and momentum distributions, and we recover the same displacements as in the quantum case by studying the corresponding evolution in our theory of classical mechanics with an epistemic restriction. By using this epistemically restricted theory, we gain insight into the appearance of the weak value as a result of the statistical effects of post selection, and this provides us with an operational interpretation of the weak value, both its real and imaginary parts. We find that the imaginary part of the weak value is a measure of how much postselection biases the mean phase space distribution for a given amount of measurement disturbance. All such biases proportional to the imaginary part of the weak value vanish in the limit where disturbance due to measurement goes to zero. Our analysis also offers intuitive insight into how measurement disturbance can be minimized and the limits of weak measurement.

arXiv:1503.05203•New Journal of Physics•Jul 14, 2015•15 citations

Weak value beyond conditional expectation value of the pointer readings

Lev Vaidman A, Alon Ben-Israel, Jan Dziewior +6 more

It is argued that a weak value of an observable is a robust property of a single pre- and postselected quantum system rather than a statistical property. During an infinitesimal time a system with a given weak value affected other systems as if it had been in an eigenstate with eigenvalue equal to the weak value. This differs significantly from the action of a system preselected only and possessing a numerically equal expectation value. The weak value has a physical meaning beyond a conditional average of a pointer in the weak measurement procedure. The difference between the weak value and the expectation value has been demonstrated on the example of photon polarization. In addition, the weak values for systems pre- and postselected in mixed states are considered.

arXiv:1611.03989•Physical Review A•Sep 19, 2017•83 citations

Weak values and weak measurements in quantum mechanics

Ludvík Vízdal

The main goal of this thesis is to introdude to readers the concept of weak measure- ments in quantum mechanics. Firstly a model of indirect measuremnts is established as an alternative to Von Neumann measurement postulate. This model leads to a possible generalization in a form of weak measurements. Then the concept of postselection is introduced and involved into the issue of weak measurements which leads to the weak values of physical quantities. All these theoretical concepts are presented using simple model examples. Finally, a discussion in provided on the possible interpretation and of weak values and their experimental verification.

•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Statistics of nondemolition weak measurement

Antonio Di Lorenzo, J. Carlos Egues

A measurement consists in coupling a system to a probe and reading the output of the probe to gather information about the system. The weaker the coupling, the smaller the back-action on the system, but also the less information conveyed. If the system undergoes a second measurement, the statistics of the first output can be conditioned on the value of the second one. This procedure is known as postselection. A postselected weak measurement of an observable can give a large average output of the probe when the postselected state is nearly orthogonal to the initial state of the system. This large value is an interference effect in the readout of the probe, which is initially in a coherent superposition of readout states (also known as pointer states). Usually, the weak interaction between system and probe is considered instantaneous, so that the dynamics of the probe can be neglected. However, for a weak measurement in solid-state devices, an interaction of finite duration is likely needed. Here, we show how this finite duration generates a contribution of the dynamical phase to the readout statistics. Furthermore, we derive interpolation formulas that are able to describe the statistics of the weak measurement for the whole range of pre- and postselected states. Phase-space averages appear in the expansion, suggesting an interpretation in terms of non-positive probabilities. Decoherence in the probe is also accounted for and it is pointed out the existence of a regime of intermediate coupling strength in which coherent oscillations can be observed in the probability of the readout.

arXiv:1211.2485•Nov 12, 2012•5 citations

Complex counterpart of variance in quantum measurements for pre- and postselected systems

Kazuhisa Ogawa, Natsuki Abe, H. Kobayashi +1 more

The variance of an observable in a preselected quantum system, which is always real and non-negative, appears as an increase in the probe wave packet width in indirect measurements. Extending this framework to pre- and postselected systems, we formulate a complex-valued counterpart of the variance called ``weak variance.'' In our formulation, the real and imaginary parts of the weak variance appear as changes in the probe wave packet width in the vertical-horizontal and diagonal-antidiagonal directions, respectively, on the quadrature phase plane. Using an optical system, we experimentally demonstrate these changes in the probe wave packet width caused by the real negative and purely imaginary weak variances. Furthermore, we show that the weak variance can be expressed as the variance of the weak-valued probability distribution in pre- and postselected systems. These operational and statistical interpretations support the rationality of formulating the weak variance as a complex counterpart of the variance in pre- and postselected systems.

arXiv:2102.06561•Physical Review Research•Jul 21, 2021•5 citations
Weak values are the fundamental values for observables in a pre- and postselected system. Weak values are typically measured by weak measurement, in which weak values appear in the change of not the pre- and postselected system but the probe system. This indirect characteristic of weak measurement obscures the meaning of weak values for the pre- and postselected system, in contrast to conventional physical quantities, which have a clear operational meaning. In this study, we operationally formulate weak values as the sensitivity of postselection probability amplitude to small transformation in a pre- and postselected system. This formulation of weak values, which is free from the concept of probe shift assumed in weak measurement, gives a direct interpretation of strange weak values for the pre- and postselected system. Furthermore, this formulation can simplify weak-value measurement experiments because the associated measurements appearing in the modulus change of the postselection probability amplitude do not require external degrees of freedom.
Weak measurement is a novel quantum measurement scheme, which is usually characterized by the weak value formalism. To guarantee the validity of the weak value formalism, the fidelity between the preselection and the postselection should not be too small generally. In this work, we study the weak measurement on a qubit system with exactly or asymptotically orthogonal pre- and postselections. We shall establish a general rigorous framework for the weak measurement beyond the weak value formalism, and obtain the average output of a weak measurement when the pre- and postselections are exactly orthogonal. We shall also study the asymptotic behavior of a weak measurement in the limiting process that the pre- and postselections tend to be orthogonal.
Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a subsequent strong measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value : a complex number for which the interpretation has long been debated. We analyse the procedure of weak measurement and postselection, and the interpretation of the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics supplemented by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a subtheory of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the weak value appear as phase space displacements in the postselected expectation values of the measurement device's position and momentum distributions, and we recover the same displacements as in the quantum case by studying the corresponding evolution in our theory of classical mechanics with an epistemic restriction. By using this epistemically restricted theory, we gain insight into the appearance of the weak value as a result of the statistical effects of post selection, and this provides us with an operational interpretation of the weak value, both its real and imaginary parts. We find that the imaginary part of the weak value is a measure of how much postselection biases the mean phase space distribution for a given amount of measurement disturbance. All such biases proportional to the imaginary part of the weak value vanish in the limit where disturbance due to measurement goes to zero. Our analysis also offers intuitive insight into how measurement disturbance can be minimized and the limits of weak measurement.
It is argued that a weak value of an observable is a robust property of a single pre- and postselected quantum system rather than a statistical property. During an infinitesimal time a system with a given weak value affected other systems as if it had been in an eigenstate with eigenvalue equal to the weak value. This differs significantly from the action of a system preselected only and possessing a numerically equal expectation value. The weak value has a physical meaning beyond a conditional average of a pointer in the weak measurement procedure. The difference between the weak value and the expectation value has been demonstrated on the example of photon polarization. In addition, the weak values for systems pre- and postselected in mixed states are considered.
The main goal of this thesis is to introdude to readers the concept of weak measure- ments in quantum mechanics. Firstly a model of indirect measuremnts is established as an alternative to Von Neumann measurement postulate. This model leads to a possible generalization in a form of weak measurements. Then the concept of postselection is introduced and involved into the issue of weak measurements which leads to the weak values of physical quantities. All these theoretical concepts are presented using simple model examples. Finally, a discussion in provided on the possible interpretation and of weak values and their experimental verification.
A measurement consists in coupling a system to a probe and reading the output of the probe to gather information about the system. The weaker the coupling, the smaller the back-action on the system, but also the less information conveyed. If the system undergoes a second measurement, the statistics of the first output can be conditioned on the value of the second one. This procedure is known as postselection. A postselected weak measurement of an observable can give a large average output of the probe when the postselected state is nearly orthogonal to the initial state of the system. This large value is an interference effect in the readout of the probe, which is initially in a coherent superposition of readout states (also known as pointer states). Usually, the weak interaction between system and probe is considered instantaneous, so that the dynamics of the probe can be neglected. However, for a weak measurement in solid-state devices, an interaction of finite duration is likely needed. Here, we show how this finite duration generates a contribution of the dynamical phase to the readout statistics. Furthermore, we derive interpolation formulas that are able to describe the statistics of the weak measurement for the whole range of pre- and postselected states. Phase-space averages appear in the expansion, suggesting an interpretation in terms of non-positive probabilities. Decoherence in the probe is also accounted for and it is pointed out the existence of a regime of intermediate coupling strength in which coherent oscillations can be observed in the probability of the readout.
The variance of an observable in a preselected quantum system, which is always real and non-negative, appears as an increase in the probe wave packet width in indirect measurements. Extending this framework to pre- and postselected systems, we formulate a complex-valued counterpart of the variance called ``weak variance.'' In our formulation, the real and imaginary parts of the weak variance appear as changes in the probe wave packet width in the vertical-horizontal and diagonal-antidiagonal directions, respectively, on the quadrature phase plane. Using an optical system, we experimentally demonstrate these changes in the probe wave packet width caused by the real negative and purely imaginary weak variances. Furthermore, we show that the weak variance can be expressed as the variance of the weak-valued probability distribution in pre- and postselected systems. These operational and statistical interpretations support the rationality of formulating the weak variance as a complex counterpart of the variance in pre- and postselected systems.