© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:1211.2485

Statistics of nondemolition weak measurement

Antonio Di Lorenzo, J. Carlos Egues

Published Nov 12, 2012• 5 citations

Abstract

A measurement consists in coupling a system to a probe and reading the output of the probe to gather information about the system. The weaker the coupling, the smaller the back-action on the system, but also the less information conveyed. If the system undergoes a second measurement, the statistics of the first output can be conditioned on the value of the second one. This procedure is known as postselection. A postselected weak measurement of an observable can give a large average output of the probe when the postselected state is nearly orthogonal to the initial state of the system. This large value is an interference effect in the readout of the probe, which is initially in a coherent superposition of readout states (also known as pointer states). Usually, the weak interaction between system and probe is considered instantaneous, so that the dynamics of the probe can be neglected. However, for a weak measurement in solid-state devices, an interaction of finite duration is likely needed. Here, we show how this finite duration generates a contribution of the dynamical phase to the readout statistics. Furthermore, we derive interpolation formulas that are able to describe the statistics of the weak measurement for the whole range of pre- and postselected states. Phase-space averages appear in the expansion, suggesting an interpretation in terms of non-positive probabilities. Decoherence in the probe is also accounted for and it is pointed out the existence of a regime of intermediate coupling strength in which coherent oscillations can be observed in the probability of the readout.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1211.2485

Related papers

Full counting statistics of weak-value measurement

Antonio Di Lorenzo

A weak measurement consists of coupling a system to a probe in such a way that constructive interference generates a large output. So far, only the average output of the probe and its variance were studied. Here, the characteristic function for the moments of the output is provided. The outputs considered are not limited to the eigenstates of the pointer or of its conjugate variable, so the results apply to any observable $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{o}$ of the probe. Furthermore, a family of well-behaved complex quantities, the normal weak values, is introduced, in terms of which the statistics of the weak measurement can be described. It is shown that, within a good approximation, the whole statistics of weak measurement is described by a complex parameter, the weak value, and a real one.

arXiv:1109.4183•Physical Review A•Mar 5, 2012•49 citations

Origin of meter fluctuations in weak measurement interactions

Tomonori Matsushita, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Measurements map the value of a target observable onto a meter shift, resulting in a meter readout that combines the initial statistics of the meter state with the quantum statistics of the target observable. Even in the limit of weak measurement interactions, some information about the fluctuations of the target observable can be extracted from the change in the readout fluctuations caused by the measurement interaction. Here, we apply the Heisenberg picture to analyze the changes in the meter readout statistics caused by sufficiently weak measurement interactions, including the effects of nonlinearities in the meter response. When additional information is obtained in a subsequent measurement of the system, the meter fluctuations are modified based on the postselected statistics of the target observable. In addition, our analysis reveals a direct modification of the meter fluctuations due to the dependence of the postselection probability on the dynamics induced by the meter in the measurement interaction. We point out that the quantum formalism makes it difficult to distinguish this dynamic term from the physical fluctuations of the target observable and stress the importance of distinguishing between genuine conditional fluctuations of the target observable and the dynamic pseudovariance associated with the measurement back-action.

arXiv:2309.01932•Physical Review A•Feb 20, 2024•0 citations

Weak value beyond conditional expectation value of the pointer readings

Lev Vaidman A, Alon Ben-Israel, Jan Dziewior +6 more

It is argued that a weak value of an observable is a robust property of a single pre- and postselected quantum system rather than a statistical property. During an infinitesimal time a system with a given weak value affected other systems as if it had been in an eigenstate with eigenvalue equal to the weak value. This differs significantly from the action of a system preselected only and possessing a numerically equal expectation value. The weak value has a physical meaning beyond a conditional average of a pointer in the weak measurement procedure. The difference between the weak value and the expectation value has been demonstrated on the example of photon polarization. In addition, the weak values for systems pre- and postselected in mixed states are considered.

arXiv:1611.03989•Physical Review A•Sep 19, 2017•83 citations

State distinguishability under weak measurement and postselection: A unified system and device perspective

Philipp Stammer

We quantify the disturbance of a quantum state undergoing a sequence of observations and particularly focus on a weak measurement followed by postselection and compare these results to the projective counterpart. Taking into account the distinguishability of both the system and the device, we obtain the exact trade-off between the system state disturbance and the change in the device pointer state. We show that for particular postselection procedures the coupling strength between the system and the device can be significantly reduced without losing measurement sensitivity, which is directly transferred to a reduced state disturbance of the system. We observe that a weak measurement alone does not provide this advantage, and only in combination with postselection is a significant improvement in terms of increased measurement sensitivity and reduced state disturbance found. We further show that under realistic experimental conditions this state disturbance is small, whereas the exact postselection probability is considerably larger than the approximate value given by the overlap of the initial and final states when neglecting the system state disturbance.

arXiv:2011.04490•Physical Review A•Dec 10, 2020•1 citation

Weak values maximizing the output of weak measurements

Antonio Di Lorenzo

In a weak measurement, the average output $\langle p\rangle$ of a probe that measures an observable $\Hat{A}$ of a quantum system undergoing both a preparation in a state $\rho_i$ and a postselection in a state $E_f$ is, to a good approximation, a function of the weak value $A_w=\Tr[E_f\Hat{A}\rho_i]/\Tr[E_f\rho_i]$, a complex number. For a fixed coupling, when the overlap $\Tr[E_f\rho_i]$ is very small, $A_w$ diverges, but $\langle p\rangle$ stays finite, often tending to zero for symmetry reasons. This paper answers the question: which are the extremal values of the output as a function of the weak value? We derive equations for the optimal values of $A_w$, and provide the solutions. The results are independent of the dimensionality of the system.

•Jul 17, 2013•1 citation

Operational formulation of weak values without probe systems

Kazuhisa Ogawa, H. Kobayashi, Akihisa Tomita

Weak values are the fundamental values for observables in a pre- and postselected system. Weak values are typically measured by weak measurement, in which weak values appear in the change of not the pre- and postselected system but the probe system. This indirect characteristic of weak measurement obscures the meaning of weak values for the pre- and postselected system, in contrast to conventional physical quantities, which have a clear operational meaning. In this study, we operationally formulate weak values as the sensitivity of postselection probability amplitude to small transformation in a pre- and postselected system. This formulation of weak values, which is free from the concept of probe shift assumed in weak measurement, gives a direct interpretation of strange weak values for the pre- and postselected system. Furthermore, this formulation can simplify weak-value measurement experiments because the associated measurements appearing in the modulus change of the postselection probability amplitude do not require external degrees of freedom.

arXiv:1912.10222•Physical Review A•Apr 17, 2020•15 citations

A measurement consists in coupling a system to a probe and reading the output of the probe to gather information about the system. The weaker the coupling, the smaller the back-action on the system, but also the less information conveyed. If the system undergoes a second measurement, the statistics of the first output can be conditioned on the value of the second one. This procedure is known as postselection. A postselected weak measurement of an observable can give a large average output of the probe when the postselected state is nearly orthogonal to the initial state of the system. This large value is an interference effect in the readout of the probe, which is initially in a coherent superposition of readout states (also known as pointer states). Usually, the weak interaction between system and probe is considered instantaneous, so that the dynamics of the probe can be neglected. However, for a weak measurement in solid-state devices, an interaction of finite duration is likely needed. Here, we show how this finite duration generates a contribution of the dynamical phase to the readout statistics. Furthermore, we derive interpolation formulas that are able to describe the statistics of the weak measurement for the whole range of pre- and postselected states. Phase-space averages appear in the expansion, suggesting an interpretation in terms of non-positive probabilities. Decoherence in the probe is also accounted for and it is pointed out the existence of a regime of intermediate coupling strength in which coherent oscillations can be observed in the probability of the readout.

A weak measurement consists of coupling a system to a probe in such a way that constructive interference generates a large output. So far, only the average output of the probe and its variance were studied. Here, the characteristic function for the moments of the output is provided. The outputs considered are not limited to the eigenstates of the pointer or of its conjugate variable, so the results apply to any observable $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{o}$ of the probe. Furthermore, a family of well-behaved complex quantities, the normal weak values, is introduced, in terms of which the statistics of the weak measurement can be described. It is shown that, within a good approximation, the whole statistics of weak measurement is described by a complex parameter, the weak value, and a real one.

Measurements map the value of a target observable onto a meter shift, resulting in a meter readout that combines the initial statistics of the meter state with the quantum statistics of the target observable. Even in the limit of weak measurement interactions, some information about the fluctuations of the target observable can be extracted from the change in the readout fluctuations caused by the measurement interaction. Here, we apply the Heisenberg picture to analyze the changes in the meter readout statistics caused by sufficiently weak measurement interactions, including the effects of nonlinearities in the meter response. When additional information is obtained in a subsequent measurement of the system, the meter fluctuations are modified based on the postselected statistics of the target observable. In addition, our analysis reveals a direct modification of the meter fluctuations due to the dependence of the postselection probability on the dynamics induced by the meter in the measurement interaction. We point out that the quantum formalism makes it difficult to distinguish this dynamic term from the physical fluctuations of the target observable and stress the importance of distinguishing between genuine conditional fluctuations of the target observable and the dynamic pseudovariance associated with the measurement back-action.

It is argued that a weak value of an observable is a robust property of a single pre- and postselected quantum system rather than a statistical property. During an infinitesimal time a system with a given weak value affected other systems as if it had been in an eigenstate with eigenvalue equal to the weak value. This differs significantly from the action of a system preselected only and possessing a numerically equal expectation value. The weak value has a physical meaning beyond a conditional average of a pointer in the weak measurement procedure. The difference between the weak value and the expectation value has been demonstrated on the example of photon polarization. In addition, the weak values for systems pre- and postselected in mixed states are considered.

We quantify the disturbance of a quantum state undergoing a sequence of observations and particularly focus on a weak measurement followed by postselection and compare these results to the projective counterpart. Taking into account the distinguishability of both the system and the device, we obtain the exact trade-off between the system state disturbance and the change in the device pointer state. We show that for particular postselection procedures the coupling strength between the system and the device can be significantly reduced without losing measurement sensitivity, which is directly transferred to a reduced state disturbance of the system. We observe that a weak measurement alone does not provide this advantage, and only in combination with postselection is a significant improvement in terms of increased measurement sensitivity and reduced state disturbance found. We further show that under realistic experimental conditions this state disturbance is small, whereas the exact postselection probability is considerably larger than the approximate value given by the overlap of the initial and final states when neglecting the system state disturbance.

In a weak measurement, the average output

\langle p\rangle

of a probe that measures an observable $\Hat{A}$ of a quantum system undergoing both a preparation in a state

\rho_i

and a postselection in a state

E_f

is, to a good approximation, a function of the weak value $A_w=\Tr[E_f\Hat{A}\rho_i]/\Tr[E_f\rho_i]$, a complex number. For a fixed coupling, when the overlap $\Tr[E_f\rho_i]$ is very small,

A_w

diverges, but

\langle p\rangle

stays finite, often tending to zero for symmetry reasons. This paper answers the question: which are the extremal values of the output as a function of the weak value? We derive equations for the optimal values of

A_w

, and provide the solutions. The results are independent of the dimensionality of the system.

Weak values are the fundamental values for observables in a pre- and postselected system. Weak values are typically measured by weak measurement, in which weak values appear in the change of not the pre- and postselected system but the probe system. This indirect characteristic of weak measurement obscures the meaning of weak values for the pre- and postselected system, in contrast to conventional physical quantities, which have a clear operational meaning. In this study, we operationally formulate weak values as the sensitivity of postselection probability amplitude to small transformation in a pre- and postselected system. This formulation of weak values, which is free from the concept of probe shift assumed in weak measurement, gives a direct interpretation of strange weak values for the pre- and postselected system. Furthermore, this formulation can simplify weak-value measurement experiments because the associated measurements appearing in the modulus change of the postselection probability amplitude do not require external degrees of freedom.