Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1503.05203 · New Journal of Physics

Weak values in a classical theory with an epistemic restriction

Angela Karanjai, Eric G. Cavalcanti, Stephen D. Bartlett, Terry Rudolph

Published Jul 14, 2015• 15 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a subsequent strong measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value : a complex number for which the interpretation has long been debated. We analyse the procedure of weak measurement and postselection, and the interpretation of the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics supplemented by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a subtheory of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the weak value appear as phase space displacements in the postselected expectation values of the measurement device's position and momentum distributions, and we recover the same displacements as in the quantum case by studying the corresponding evolution in our theory of classical mechanics with an epistemic restriction. By using this epistemically restricted theory, we gain insight into the appearance of the weak value as a result of the statistical effects of post selection, and this provides us with an operational interpretation of the weak value, both its real and imaginary parts. We find that the imaginary part of the weak value is a measure of how much postselection biases the mean phase space distribution for a given amount of measurement disturbance. All such biases proportional to the imaginary part of the weak value vanish in the limit where disturbance due to measurement goes to zero. Our analysis also offers intuitive insight into how measurement disturbance can be minimized and the limits of weak measurement.

DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/17/7/073015

Related papers

Epistemically restricted phase-space representation, weak momentum value, and reconstruction of the quantum wave function

Agus Budiyono

It is shown that a novel ``epistemically restricted phase-space distribution,'' directly derivable from the wave function, can be operationally determined by a weak measurement of momentum followed by postselection on position. The epistemically restricted phase-space representation thereby reveals deep links between a specific epistemic restriction manifesting transparently quantum uncertainty in classical phase space, weak momentum value, and complex wave function.

arXiv:2005.06991•Physical Review A•Sep 30, 2019•11 citations

Significance of the imaginary part of the weak value

Justin Dressel, Andrew N. Jordan

Unlike the real part of the generalized weak value of an observable, which can in a restricted sense be operationally interpreted as an idealized conditioned average of that observable in the limit of zero measurement disturbance, the imaginary part of the generalized weak value does not provide information pertaining to the observable being measured. What it does provide is direct information about how the initial state would be unitarily disturbed by the observable operator. Specifically, we provide an operational interpretation for the imaginary part of the generalized weak value as the logarithmic directional derivative of the postselection probability along the unitary flow generated by the action of the observable operator. To obtain this interpretation, we revisit the standard von Neumann measurement protocol for obtaining the real and imaginary parts of the weak value and solve it exactly for arbitrary initial states and postselections using the quantum operations formalism, which allows us to understand in detail how each part of the generalized weak value arises in the linear response regime. We also provide exact treatments of qubit measurements and Gaussian detectors as illustrative special cases, and show that the measurement disturbance from a Gaussian detector is purely decohering in the Lindblad sense, which allows the shifts for a Gaussian detector to be completely understood for any coupling strength in terms of a single complex weak value that involves the decohered initial state.

arXiv:1112.3986•Physical Review A•Jan 23, 2012•134 citations

The real and imaginary parts of a weak value appearing as back-actions via a post-selection

Kazuhiro Yokota

In a weak measurement the real and imaginary parts of a weak value participate in the shifts of the complementary variables of a pointer. While the real part represents the value of an observable in the limit of zero measurement strength, the imaginary one is regarded as the back-action due to the measurement with a post-selection, which has an influence on the post-selection probability. In this paper I give a case in which a real part could also appear as such a back-action in a post-selection probability on an equal footing with an imaginary one. It is also shown that both of the real and imaginary parts can be inferred by observing the probability in practice, which has an advantage that an additional system of a pointer is not needed.

arXiv:1909.04806•Sep 11, 2019•1 citation

Complex counterpart of variance in quantum measurements for pre- and postselected systems

Kazuhisa Ogawa, Natsuki Abe, H. Kobayashi +1 more

The variance of an observable in a preselected quantum system, which is always real and non-negative, appears as an increase in the probe wave packet width in indirect measurements. Extending this framework to pre- and postselected systems, we formulate a complex-valued counterpart of the variance called ``weak variance.'' In our formulation, the real and imaginary parts of the weak variance appear as changes in the probe wave packet width in the vertical-horizontal and diagonal-antidiagonal directions, respectively, on the quadrature phase plane. Using an optical system, we experimentally demonstrate these changes in the probe wave packet width caused by the real negative and purely imaginary weak variances. Furthermore, we show that the weak variance can be expressed as the variance of the weak-valued probability distribution in pre- and postselected systems. These operational and statistical interpretations support the rationality of formulating the weak variance as a complex counterpart of the variance in pre- and postselected systems.

arXiv:2102.06561•Physical Review Research•Jul 21, 2021•5 citations

Disturbance in weak measurements and the difference between quantum and classical weak values

Asger C. Ipsen

The role of measurement-induced disturbance in weak measurements is of central importance for the interpretation of the weak value. Uncontrolled disturbance can interfere with the postselection process and make the weak value dependent on the details of the measurement process. Here we develop the concept of a generalized weak measurement for classical and quantum mechanics. The two cases appear remarkably similar, but we point out some important differences. A priori it is not clear what the correct notion of disturbance should be in the context of weak measurements. We consider three different notions and get three different results: (1) For a ``strong'' definition of disturbance, we find that weak measurements are disturbing. (2) For a weaker definition we find that a general class of weak measurements is nondisturbing, but that one gets weak values which depend on the measurement process. (3) Finally, with respect to an operational definition of the ``degree of disturbance,'' we find that the AAV weak measurements are the least disturbing, but that the disturbance is always nonzero.

arXiv:1409.3538•Physical Review A•Jun 16, 2015•19 citations

Actual and weak actual values in Bohmian mechanics

Weixiang Ye

We systematically analyze Holland's local expectation values within Bohmian mechanics, referring to them as weak actual values to emphasize their connection with weak measurement theory. We derive the exact time evolution equation for these quantities along a Bohmian trajectory and formally establish their correspondence with the real part of the weak value under position postselection. The explanatory power of this framework is demonstrated by revisiting a recent waveguide experiment: we show that the measured quantity corresponds to the imaginary part of the momentum weak value, which reflects the spatial decay of the wave field, not the particle velocity. This cleanly clarifies the distinct physical roles of the real and imaginary parts of weak values.

quant-pharXiv:2512.12951•Annalen der Physik•Dec 16, 2025•0 citations
Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a subsequent strong measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value : a complex number for which the interpretation has long been debated. We analyse the procedure of weak measurement and postselection, and the interpretation of the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics supplemented by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a subtheory of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the weak value appear as phase space displacements in the postselected expectation values of the measurement device's position and momentum distributions, and we recover the same displacements as in the quantum case by studying the corresponding evolution in our theory of classical mechanics with an epistemic restriction. By using this epistemically restricted theory, we gain insight into the appearance of the weak value as a result of the statistical effects of post selection, and this provides us with an operational interpretation of the weak value, both its real and imaginary parts. We find that the imaginary part of the weak value is a measure of how much postselection biases the mean phase space distribution for a given amount of measurement disturbance. All such biases proportional to the imaginary part of the weak value vanish in the limit where disturbance due to measurement goes to zero. Our analysis also offers intuitive insight into how measurement disturbance can be minimized and the limits of weak measurement.
Unlike the real part of the generalized weak value of an observable, which can in a restricted sense be operationally interpreted as an idealized conditioned average of that observable in the limit of zero measurement disturbance, the imaginary part of the generalized weak value does not provide information pertaining to the observable being measured. What it does provide is direct information about how the initial state would be unitarily disturbed by the observable operator. Specifically, we provide an operational interpretation for the imaginary part of the generalized weak value as the logarithmic directional derivative of the postselection probability along the unitary flow generated by the action of the observable operator. To obtain this interpretation, we revisit the standard von Neumann measurement protocol for obtaining the real and imaginary parts of the weak value and solve it exactly for arbitrary initial states and postselections using the quantum operations formalism, which allows us to understand in detail how each part of the generalized weak value arises in the linear response regime. We also provide exact treatments of qubit measurements and Gaussian detectors as illustrative special cases, and show that the measurement disturbance from a Gaussian detector is purely decohering in the Lindblad sense, which allows the shifts for a Gaussian detector to be completely understood for any coupling strength in terms of a single complex weak value that involves the decohered initial state.
In a weak measurement the real and imaginary parts of a weak value participate in the shifts of the complementary variables of a pointer. While the real part represents the value of an observable in the limit of zero measurement strength, the imaginary one is regarded as the back-action due to the measurement with a post-selection, which has an influence on the post-selection probability. In this paper I give a case in which a real part could also appear as such a back-action in a post-selection probability on an equal footing with an imaginary one. It is also shown that both of the real and imaginary parts can be inferred by observing the probability in practice, which has an advantage that an additional system of a pointer is not needed.
The variance of an observable in a preselected quantum system, which is always real and non-negative, appears as an increase in the probe wave packet width in indirect measurements. Extending this framework to pre- and postselected systems, we formulate a complex-valued counterpart of the variance called ``weak variance.'' In our formulation, the real and imaginary parts of the weak variance appear as changes in the probe wave packet width in the vertical-horizontal and diagonal-antidiagonal directions, respectively, on the quadrature phase plane. Using an optical system, we experimentally demonstrate these changes in the probe wave packet width caused by the real negative and purely imaginary weak variances. Furthermore, we show that the weak variance can be expressed as the variance of the weak-valued probability distribution in pre- and postselected systems. These operational and statistical interpretations support the rationality of formulating the weak variance as a complex counterpart of the variance in pre- and postselected systems.
The role of measurement-induced disturbance in weak measurements is of central importance for the interpretation of the weak value. Uncontrolled disturbance can interfere with the postselection process and make the weak value dependent on the details of the measurement process. Here we develop the concept of a generalized weak measurement for classical and quantum mechanics. The two cases appear remarkably similar, but we point out some important differences. A priori it is not clear what the correct notion of disturbance should be in the context of weak measurements. We consider three different notions and get three different results: (1) For a ``strong'' definition of disturbance, we find that weak measurements are disturbing. (2) For a weaker definition we find that a general class of weak measurements is nondisturbing, but that one gets weak values which depend on the measurement process. (3) Finally, with respect to an operational definition of the ``degree of disturbance,'' we find that the AAV weak measurements are the least disturbing, but that the disturbance is always nonzero.
We systematically analyze Holland's local expectation values within Bohmian mechanics, referring to them as weak actual values to emphasize their connection with weak measurement theory. We derive the exact time evolution equation for these quantities along a Bohmian trajectory and formally establish their correspondence with the real part of the weak value under position postselection. The explanatory power of this framework is demonstrated by revisiting a recent waveguide experiment: we show that the measured quantity corresponds to the imaginary part of the momentum weak value, which reflects the spatial decay of the wave field, not the particle velocity. This cleanly clarifies the distinct physical roles of the real and imaginary parts of weak values.