Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1909.04806

The real and imaginary parts of a weak value appearing as back-actions via a post-selection

Kazuhiro Yokota

Published Sep 11, 2019• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In a weak measurement the real and imaginary parts of a weak value participate in the shifts of the complementary variables of a pointer. While the real part represents the value of an observable in the limit of zero measurement strength, the imaginary one is regarded as the back-action due to the measurement with a post-selection, which has an influence on the post-selection probability. In this paper I give a case in which a real part could also appear as such a back-action in a post-selection probability on an equal footing with an imaginary one. It is also shown that both of the real and imaginary parts can be inferred by observing the probability in practice, which has an advantage that an additional system of a pointer is not needed.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1909.04806

Related papers

Weak values in a classical theory with an epistemic restriction

Angela Karanjai, Eric G. Cavalcanti, Stephen D. Bartlett +1 more

Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a subsequent strong measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value : a complex number for which the interpretation has long been debated. We analyse the procedure of weak measurement and postselection, and the interpretation of the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics supplemented by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a subtheory of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the weak value appear as phase space displacements in the postselected expectation values of the measurement device's position and momentum distributions, and we recover the same displacements as in the quantum case by studying the corresponding evolution in our theory of classical mechanics with an epistemic restriction. By using this epistemically restricted theory, we gain insight into the appearance of the weak value as a result of the statistical effects of post selection, and this provides us with an operational interpretation of the weak value, both its real and imaginary parts. We find that the imaginary part of the weak value is a measure of how much postselection biases the mean phase space distribution for a given amount of measurement disturbance. All such biases proportional to the imaginary part of the weak value vanish in the limit where disturbance due to measurement goes to zero. Our analysis also offers intuitive insight into how measurement disturbance can be minimized and the limits of weak measurement.

arXiv:1503.05203•New Journal of Physics•Jul 14, 2015•15 citations

Significance of the imaginary part of the weak value

Justin Dressel, Andrew N. Jordan

Unlike the real part of the generalized weak value of an observable, which can in a restricted sense be operationally interpreted as an idealized conditioned average of that observable in the limit of zero measurement disturbance, the imaginary part of the generalized weak value does not provide information pertaining to the observable being measured. What it does provide is direct information about how the initial state would be unitarily disturbed by the observable operator. Specifically, we provide an operational interpretation for the imaginary part of the generalized weak value as the logarithmic directional derivative of the postselection probability along the unitary flow generated by the action of the observable operator. To obtain this interpretation, we revisit the standard von Neumann measurement protocol for obtaining the real and imaginary parts of the weak value and solve it exactly for arbitrary initial states and postselections using the quantum operations formalism, which allows us to understand in detail how each part of the generalized weak value arises in the linear response regime. We also provide exact treatments of qubit measurements and Gaussian detectors as illustrative special cases, and show that the measurement disturbance from a Gaussian detector is purely decohering in the Lindblad sense, which allows the shifts for a Gaussian detector to be completely understood for any coupling strength in terms of a single complex weak value that involves the decohered initial state.

arXiv:1112.3986•Physical Review A•Jan 23, 2012•134 citations

Weak value as an indicator of back-action

Riuji Mochizuki

In this study we critically examine some important papers on weak measurement and weak values. We find some insufficiency and mistakes in these papers, and we demonstrate that the real parts of weak values provide the back-action to the post-selection, which is caused by weak measurement. Two examples, a counterfactual statement of Hardy's paradox and experiments that determine the average trajectory of photons passing through double slits, are investigated from our point of view.

arXiv:1312.3036•Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics•Apr 1, 2014•2 citations

Transition between weak and strong measurements in the presence of post-selection

Shogo Hanashiro, Holger F. Hofmann

In the weak measurement regime, post-selection can result in the observation of anomalous weak values, seemingly contradicting the eigenvalue statistics observed when the measurement interaction is strong. Here, we investigate the dependence of meter statistics on measurement strength in a post-selected measurement. We find that the meter statistics in the intermediate regime between weak and strong measurements is nearly independent of measurement strength and show that, in this regime, the system performs a measurement of momentum on the meter. Our results show that post-selection is extremely sensitive to the action of the meter on the system, highlighting the difference between the weak measurement regime where this back-action is negligible and the average meter position is a valid measurement result, and the intermediate regime where the meter statistics should not be misinterpreted as a measurement outcome. The transition between weak values and eigenvalues is facilitated by a reversal of the roles of the system and the meter, where the post-selection acts as a readout of information about the meter. The intermediate measurement regime thus reveals that the apparent contradictions between anomalous weak values and eigenvalues originate from the non-classical effects of back-action on the post-selected meter statistics.

quant-pharXiv:2609.04812•Sep 7, 2026•0 citations

Weak Values Beyond the Weak Limit: Measurement-Strength Invariance Under Post-Selection

Cosmin Andrei, Vlatko Vedral

Weak values are conventionally extracted in the limit of vanishing measurement strength. At finite strength, the corresponding post-selected conditional averages generally acquire nonlinear corrections and need not retain their weak value interpretation. Here we identify a class of measurement protocols for which this expectation fails: the conditional value reconstructed from the measuring probe is exactly independent of the probe strength and therefore coincides with the real part of the weak value. We first analyze this phenomenon in the measurement--disturbance protocol introduced by Lund and Wiseman. We then establish conditions under which this invariance persists, showing that it is determined by the interplay between the probe interaction, a subsequent measurement interaction with an ancillary apparatus, and the final post-selection. These results demonstrate that weak coupling, although generally sufficient for accessing weak values, is not always necessary.

quant-pharXiv:2609.22976•Sep 22, 2026•0 citations

Weak value as an indicator of back-action

Riuji Mochizuki

In this study we critically examine some important papers on weak measurement and weak values. We find some insufficiency and mistakes in these papers, and we demonstrate that the real parts of weak values pro-vide the back-action to the post-selection, which is caused by weak mea-surement. Two examples, a counterfactual statement of Hardy’s paradox and experiments that determine the average trajectory of photons passing through double slits, are investigated from our view point. PACS numbers: 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Ud, 03.65.Ca 1

•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations
In a weak measurement the real and imaginary parts of a weak value participate in the shifts of the complementary variables of a pointer. While the real part represents the value of an observable in the limit of zero measurement strength, the imaginary one is regarded as the back-action due to the measurement with a post-selection, which has an influence on the post-selection probability. In this paper I give a case in which a real part could also appear as such a back-action in a post-selection probability on an equal footing with an imaginary one. It is also shown that both of the real and imaginary parts can be inferred by observing the probability in practice, which has an advantage that an additional system of a pointer is not needed.
Weak measurement of a quantum system followed by postselection based on a subsequent strong measurement gives rise to a quantity called the weak value : a complex number for which the interpretation has long been debated. We analyse the procedure of weak measurement and postselection, and the interpretation of the associated weak value, using a theory of classical mechanics supplemented by an epistemic restriction that is known to be operationally equivalent to a subtheory of quantum mechanics. Both the real and imaginary components of the weak value appear as phase space displacements in the postselected expectation values of the measurement device's position and momentum distributions, and we recover the same displacements as in the quantum case by studying the corresponding evolution in our theory of classical mechanics with an epistemic restriction. By using this epistemically restricted theory, we gain insight into the appearance of the weak value as a result of the statistical effects of post selection, and this provides us with an operational interpretation of the weak value, both its real and imaginary parts. We find that the imaginary part of the weak value is a measure of how much postselection biases the mean phase space distribution for a given amount of measurement disturbance. All such biases proportional to the imaginary part of the weak value vanish in the limit where disturbance due to measurement goes to zero. Our analysis also offers intuitive insight into how measurement disturbance can be minimized and the limits of weak measurement.
Unlike the real part of the generalized weak value of an observable, which can in a restricted sense be operationally interpreted as an idealized conditioned average of that observable in the limit of zero measurement disturbance, the imaginary part of the generalized weak value does not provide information pertaining to the observable being measured. What it does provide is direct information about how the initial state would be unitarily disturbed by the observable operator. Specifically, we provide an operational interpretation for the imaginary part of the generalized weak value as the logarithmic directional derivative of the postselection probability along the unitary flow generated by the action of the observable operator. To obtain this interpretation, we revisit the standard von Neumann measurement protocol for obtaining the real and imaginary parts of the weak value and solve it exactly for arbitrary initial states and postselections using the quantum operations formalism, which allows us to understand in detail how each part of the generalized weak value arises in the linear response regime. We also provide exact treatments of qubit measurements and Gaussian detectors as illustrative special cases, and show that the measurement disturbance from a Gaussian detector is purely decohering in the Lindblad sense, which allows the shifts for a Gaussian detector to be completely understood for any coupling strength in terms of a single complex weak value that involves the decohered initial state.
In the weak measurement regime, post-selection can result in the observation of anomalous weak values, seemingly contradicting the eigenvalue statistics observed when the measurement interaction is strong. Here, we investigate the dependence of meter statistics on measurement strength in a post-selected measurement. We find that the meter statistics in the intermediate regime between weak and strong measurements is nearly independent of measurement strength and show that, in this regime, the system performs a measurement of momentum on the meter. Our results show that post-selection is extremely sensitive to the action of the meter on the system, highlighting the difference between the weak measurement regime where this back-action is negligible and the average meter position is a valid measurement result, and the intermediate regime where the meter statistics should not be misinterpreted as a measurement outcome. The transition between weak values and eigenvalues is facilitated by a reversal of the roles of the system and the meter, where the post-selection acts as a readout of information about the meter. The intermediate measurement regime thus reveals that the apparent contradictions between anomalous weak values and eigenvalues originate from the non-classical effects of back-action on the post-selected meter statistics.
Weak values are conventionally extracted in the limit of vanishing measurement strength. At finite strength, the corresponding post-selected conditional averages generally acquire nonlinear corrections and need not retain their weak value interpretation. Here we identify a class of measurement protocols for which this expectation fails: the conditional value reconstructed from the measuring probe is exactly independent of the probe strength and therefore coincides with the real part of the weak value. We first analyze this phenomenon in the measurement--disturbance protocol introduced by Lund and Wiseman. We then establish conditions under which this invariance persists, showing that it is determined by the interplay between the probe interaction, a subsequent measurement interaction with an ancillary apparatus, and the final post-selection. These results demonstrate that weak coupling, although generally sufficient for accessing weak values, is not always necessary.
In this study we critically examine some important papers on weak measurement and weak values. We find some insufficiency and mistakes in these papers, and we demonstrate that the real parts of weak values pro-vide the back-action to the post-selection, which is caused by weak mea-surement. Two examples, a counterfactual statement of Hardy’s paradox and experiments that determine the average trajectory of photons passing through double slits, are investigated from our view point. PACS numbers: 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Ud, 03.65.Ca 1