Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1910.00450 · Foundations of Physics

Hardy’s Paradox as a Demonstration of Quantum Irrealism

Nicholas G. Engelbert, R. M. Angelo

Published Jan 20, 2020• 21 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-020-00321-z

Related papers

Quantum Analogues of Hardy’s Nonlocality Paradox

T. A. Fritz

arXiv:1006.2497•Foundations of Physics•May 19, 2011•9 citations

Revisiting Hardy's paradox: counterfactual statements, real measurements, entanglement and weak values

Yakir Aharonov, Alonso Botero, Sandu Popescu +2 more

arXiv:quant-ph/0104062•Physics Letters A•Aug 1, 2002•283 citations

Increased success probability in Hardy's nonlocality: Theory and demonstration

Duc Minh Tran, Nguyễn Văn Duy, Le Bin Ho +1 more

The authors introduce a quantum nonlocal scheme for $n$-particle systems using a theoretical model and a quantum simulation. They find a particular version of Hardy's paradox that yields a very high nonlocal probability that approaches 15.6% as the system size $n$ grows.

arXiv:2209.05716•Physical Review A•Apr 14, 2023•13 citations

Hardy-type paradoxes for an arbitrary symmetric bipartite Bell scenario

Kai-Siang Chen, Shiladitya Mal, Gelo Noel M. Tabia +1 more

As with a Bell inequality, Hardy's paradox manifests a contradiction between the prediction given by quantum theory and local hidden-variable theories. In this work, we give two generalizations of Hardy's arguments for manifesting such a paradox to an arbitrary, but symmetric, Bell scenario involving two observers. Our constructions recover that of Meng et al. [Phys. Rev. A 98, 062103 (2018)] and that first discussed by Cabello [Phys. Rev. A 65, 032108 (2002)] as special cases. Among the two constructions, one can be naturally interpreted as a demonstration of the failure of the transitivity of implications (FTI). Moreover, one of their special cases is equivalent to a ladder-proof-type argument for Hardy's paradox. Through a suitably generalized notion of success probability called degree of success, we provide evidence showing that the FTI-based formulation exhibits a higher degree of success compared with all other existing proposals. Moreover, this advantage seems to persist even if we allow imperfections in realizing the zero-probability constraints in such paradoxes. Explicit quantum strategies realizing several of these proofs of nonlocality without inequalities are provided.

arXiv:2311.02045•Physical Review A•Apr 8, 2024•2 citations

The Nature of Quantum Paradoxes

Van der Merwe, Alwyn, Gino Tarozzi

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•9 citations

Realigned Hardy’s paradox

Shuai Zhao, Qing Zhou, Si-Ran Zhao +7 more

Hardy’s paradox provides an “All-versus-Nothing” fashion to directly certify that quantum mechanics cannot be completely described by local realistic theory. However, when considering potential imperfections in experiments, like noisy entanglement source and low detection efficiency, the original Hardy’s paradox can only induce a rather small Hardy violation, and is difficult to reveal. To overcome this challenge, we have proposed a realigned Hardy’s paradox, which can dramatically improve the Hardy violation. Furthermore, we have generalized the realigned Hardy’s paradox to arbitrary even n dichotomic measurements. For n=2, 4 and 6 cases, the realigned Hardy’s paradox can achieve Hardy values approximate 0.4140, 0.7734 and 0.8875 respectively for qubit systems, compared with only 0.09 of the original Hardy’s paradox. Meanwhile, the structure of the realigned Hardy’s paradox is simpler and more robust, in the sense that there is only one Hardy condition. We anticipate that the realigned Hardy’s paradox can tolerate more experimental imperfections and help to stimulate more fascinating quantum information applications.

arXiv:2211.13642•Results in Physics•Nov 23, 2023•0 citations
The authors introduce a quantum nonlocal scheme for nnn-particle systems using a theoretical model and a quantum simulation. They find a particular version of Hardy's paradox that yields a very high nonlocal probability that approaches 15.6% as the system size nnn grows.
As with a Bell inequality, Hardy's paradox manifests a contradiction between the prediction given by quantum theory and local hidden-variable theories. In this work, we give two generalizations of Hardy's arguments for manifesting such a paradox to an arbitrary, but symmetric, Bell scenario involving two observers. Our constructions recover that of Meng et al. [Phys. Rev. A 98, 062103 (2018)] and that first discussed by Cabello [Phys. Rev. A 65, 032108 (2002)] as special cases. Among the two constructions, one can be naturally interpreted as a demonstration of the failure of the transitivity of implications (FTI). Moreover, one of their special cases is equivalent to a ladder-proof-type argument for Hardy's paradox. Through a suitably generalized notion of success probability called degree of success, we provide evidence showing that the FTI-based formulation exhibits a higher degree of success compared with all other existing proposals. Moreover, this advantage seems to persist even if we allow imperfections in realizing the zero-probability constraints in such paradoxes. Explicit quantum strategies realizing several of these proofs of nonlocality without inequalities are provided.
Hardy’s paradox provides an “All-versus-Nothing” fashion to directly certify that quantum mechanics cannot be completely described by local realistic theory. However, when considering potential imperfections in experiments, like noisy entanglement source and low detection efficiency, the original Hardy’s paradox can only induce a rather small Hardy violation, and is difficult to reveal. To overcome this challenge, we have proposed a realigned Hardy’s paradox, which can dramatically improve the Hardy violation. Furthermore, we have generalized the realigned Hardy’s paradox to arbitrary even n dichotomic measurements. For n=2, 4 and 6 cases, the realigned Hardy’s paradox can achieve Hardy values approximate 0.4140, 0.7734 and 0.8875 respectively for qubit systems, compared with only 0.09 of the original Hardy’s paradox. Meanwhile, the structure of the realigned Hardy’s paradox is simpler and more robust, in the sense that there is only one Hardy condition. We anticipate that the realigned Hardy’s paradox can tolerate more experimental imperfections and help to stimulate more fascinating quantum information applications.