Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1006.2497 · Foundations of Physics

Quantum Analogues of Hardy’s Nonlocality Paradox

T. A. Fritz

Published May 19, 2011• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-011-9563-2

Related papers

Detecting Bell Nonlocality Based on the Hardy Paradox

Zhenzhu Dong, Ying Zhen Yang, Huaixin Cao

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Mar 13, 2020•10 citations

Hardy’s Paradox as a Demonstration of Quantum Irrealism

Nicholas G. Engelbert, R. M. Angelo

arXiv:1910.00450•Foundations of Physics•Jan 20, 2020•21 citations

Hardy’s Non-locality Paradox and Possibilistic Conditions for Non-locality

Shane Mansfield, Tobias Fritz

arXiv:1105.1819•Foundations of Physics•Mar 6, 2012•27 citations

Hardy-Bell inequalities and fault-tolerant Hardy paradoxes

Kanyuan Han, Wenqian Zhu, Zhihua Guo +1 more

Abstract Usually, the verification of Bell nonlocality involves two main approaches: violation of specific inequalities and utilization of no-inequality methods. In this paper, we continue to develop the inequality methods by deducing the so-called ‘Hardy-Bell inequalities (HBIs)’ and ‘fault-tolerant Hardy paradoxes (FTHPs)’ for correlation tensors (CTs) with two inputs and general outcomes. We prove that the HBIs are necessary conditions for a CT to be Bell local and one of the FTHPs is sufficient condition for a CT to be Bell nonlocal. We demonstrate the effectiveness of HBIs in determining the nonlocality of CTs or quantum states when the classical Hardy paradox does not appear or a Bell inequality is not violated. Consequently, our methods can be utilized to explore more correlations having Bell nonlocality. Based on the obtained results, we find a neighborhood of a Hardy nonlocal state, in which all states are all Bell nonlocal.

Physica Scripta•Nov 24, 2023•0 citations

Hardy-type self-testing and exposedness of tripartite GHZ correlations

Smritikana Patra, Soumyajit Pal, Ranendu Adhikary

Nonlocality can be witnessed either through Bell-inequality violations or through logical contradictions such as Hardy's paradox. In the bipartite two input two outcome scenario, these two routes have distinct geometric behavior: CHSH-maximal correlations are exposed points of the quantum set, whereas known Hardy-type self-testing correlations on the no-signaling boundary are non-exposed. Here we show that this bipartite intuition fails in the tripartite two input two outcome scenario. We study the tripartite instance of a multipartite Hardy-type paradox and prove that the correlation attaining the maximal Hardy success probability self-tests the Greenberger--Horne--Zeilinger state and the associated measurements. Although this correlation lies on the no-signaling boundary, we show that it is an extremal and exposed point of the quantum correlation set. Moreover, it coincides with the correlation attaining the maximal violation of the Mermin inequality. Thus, in the tripartite GHZ scenario, the logical-paradox and Bell-inequality routes to nonlocality select the same exposed quantum boundary point. We also establish a robust version of the self-test, showing that small deviations from the ideal Hardy constraints imply quantitative closeness to the target state and measurements. Our results reveal a qualitative geometric difference between bipartite and tripartite Hardy-type nonlocality and suggest a broader investigation of exposedness for multipartite Hardy correlations in the multiparty setting.

quant-pharXiv:2512.16242•Physical Review A•Dec 19, 2025•0 citations

Schrödinger’s Paradox and Nonlocality

Douglas L. Hemmick, Asif M. Shakur

SpringerBriefs in physics•Sep 30, 2011•0 citations
Abstract Usually, the verification of Bell nonlocality involves two main approaches: violation of specific inequalities and utilization of no-inequality methods. In this paper, we continue to develop the inequality methods by deducing the so-called ‘Hardy-Bell inequalities (HBIs)’ and ‘fault-tolerant Hardy paradoxes (FTHPs)’ for correlation tensors (CTs) with two inputs and general outcomes. We prove that the HBIs are necessary conditions for a CT to be Bell local and one of the FTHPs is sufficient condition for a CT to be Bell nonlocal. We demonstrate the effectiveness of HBIs in determining the nonlocality of CTs or quantum states when the classical Hardy paradox does not appear or a Bell inequality is not violated. Consequently, our methods can be utilized to explore more correlations having Bell nonlocality. Based on the obtained results, we find a neighborhood of a Hardy nonlocal state, in which all states are all Bell nonlocal.
Nonlocality can be witnessed either through Bell-inequality violations or through logical contradictions such as Hardy's paradox. In the bipartite two input two outcome scenario, these two routes have distinct geometric behavior: CHSH-maximal correlations are exposed points of the quantum set, whereas known Hardy-type self-testing correlations on the no-signaling boundary are non-exposed. Here we show that this bipartite intuition fails in the tripartite two input two outcome scenario. We study the tripartite instance of a multipartite Hardy-type paradox and prove that the correlation attaining the maximal Hardy success probability self-tests the Greenberger--Horne--Zeilinger state and the associated measurements. Although this correlation lies on the no-signaling boundary, we show that it is an extremal and exposed point of the quantum correlation set. Moreover, it coincides with the correlation attaining the maximal violation of the Mermin inequality. Thus, in the tripartite GHZ scenario, the logical-paradox and Bell-inequality routes to nonlocality select the same exposed quantum boundary point. We also establish a robust version of the self-test, showing that small deviations from the ideal Hardy constraints imply quantitative closeness to the target state and measurements. Our results reveal a qualitative geometric difference between bipartite and tripartite Hardy-type nonlocality and suggest a broader investigation of exposedness for multipartite Hardy correlations in the multiparty setting.