arXiv:1810.03662 · Journal of Mathematical Physics

Comment on “Quasi-coherent states for the Hermite oscillator” [J. Math. Phys. 59, 062104 (2018)]

Kevin Zelaya, Oscar Rosas-Ortiz

Published May 1, 2019• 4 citations

Abstract

The paper of Ünal [J. Math. Phys. 59, 062104 (2018)], though worthy of attention, contains a conclusion that is in error and may mislead the efforts to extend his results. The aim of the present note is twofold: we provide a correction to such a conclusion and then we emphasize some missing points that are necessary to clarify the content of the paper.

DOI: 10.1063/1.5064374

Related papers

Comment on “Quartic anharmonic oscillator and non-Hermiticity”

Alí Mostafazadeh

The analysis of the paper by J.-L. Chen et al. [Phys. Rev. A 67, 012101 (2003)] suffers from a conceptual error. Its results contradict some well-established mathematical facts and are incorrect.

Physical Review AApr 8, 20050 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Coherent-state path integrals in the continuum’”

G. Kordas, S. I. Mistakidis, A. I. Karanikas

In this Reply we briefly clarify the main points of our method to construct coherent-state path integrals in the continuum and we reply to the critique raised by in the preceding Comment by Kochetov [Phys. Rev. A 99, 026101 (2019)]. By using definite examples, we prove that our approach is capable of resolving the inconsistencies accompanying the standard coherent-state path-integral representation of interacting systems.

Physical Review AFeb 13, 20193 citations

Comment on “Coherent states for the nonlinear harmonic oscillator” [J. Math. Phys. 53, 062104 (2012)]

Naila Amir, Shahid Iqbal

We argue that the first order corrected computational scheme, used by Ghosh [J. Math. Phys. 53, 062104 (2012)] to obtain eigenenergies, corresponding generalized coherent states and various expectation values, is illegitimate. Consequently, the results presented in the work of Ghosh are incorrect and the corresponding conclusions are misleading.

Journal of Mathematical PhysicsNov 1, 201411 citations

Comment on "Quantization of the damped harmonic oscillator" [Serhan et al, J. Math. Phys. 59, 082105 (2018)]

Zafar Ahmed, Sachin Kumar, A. Baishya

A recent paper [J. Math. Phys. {\bf 59}, 082105 (2018)] constructs a Hamiltonian for the (dissipative) damped harmonic oscillator. We point out that non-Hermiticity of this Hamiltonian has been ignored to find real discrete eigenvalues which are actually non-real. We emphasize that non-Hermiticity in Hamiltonian is crucial and it is a quantal signature of dissipation.

arXiv:1902.04895Feb 13, 20190 citations

Reply to Comment on "Non Hermitian Quantum Mechanics with Minimal Length Uncertainty", arXiv:0908.2341

Tapan Jana, Pinaki Roy

It is shown that the results of ref [1] are consistent.

arXiv:0910.5601Oct 29, 20090 citations

Comment on `Must a Hamiltonian be hermitian'

Andreas van Hameren

A small comment on the paper with the mentioned title by Carl M. Bender, Dorje C. Brody and Hugh F. Jones.

arXiv:hep-th/0303061Mar 7, 20030 citations