In this report, we reply to a recent comment by Carl M. Bender, Gregorio Benincasa and Hugh F. Jones on our work 'New ansatz for metric operator calculation in pseudo-Hermitian field theory (Phys. Rev. D. 79, 107702 (2009)). In fact, they figured out that there exist sign errors in our work which leaded to the conclusion of the invalidity of the ansatz introduced in our work. Here, we show that, the ansatz is valid in d+1 space-time dimensions, which by itself is a new and very important result. The importance of the work comes from the fact that it is the first time to have a metric operator for a quantum field theory which is local in the fields as well as valid in 3+1 space-time dimensions. Moreover, it is composed of the operators in the Hamiltonian itself which makes the Feynmann diagram calculations for the physical amplitudes go the same way as in conventional theories.
Recently Bender, Brody, Jones and Meister found that in the quantum brachistochrone problem the passage time needed for the evolution of certain initial states into specified final states can be made arbitrarily small, when the time-evolution operator is taken to be non-Hermitian but -symmetric. Here we demonstrate that such phenomena can also be obtained for non-Hermitian Hamiltonians for which -symmetry is completely broken, i.e. dissipative systems. We observe that the effect of a tunable passage time can be achieved by projecting between orthogonal eigenstates by means of a time-evolution operator associated with a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. It is not essential that this Hamiltonian is -symmetric.
Recently Bender, Brody, Jones and Meister found that in the quantum brachistochrone problem the passage time needed for the evolution of certain initial states into specified final states can be made arbitrarily small, when the time-evolution operator is taken to be non-Hermitian but PT-symmetric. Here we demonstrate that such phenomena can also be obtained for dissipative systems. We conclude that the effect of a tunable passage time can be attributed to the non-Hermitian nature of the time-evolution operator rather than to its PT-symmetry.