Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1801.06266

Generalization of BCS theory to short coherence length superconductors: A BCS--Bose-Einstein crossover scenario

Qijin Chen

Published Jan 19, 2018• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The (mean field based) BCS theory is considered one of the most successful theories in condensed matter physics. It is justified in ordinary metal superconductors the coherence length $ξ$ is large, with two important features: the order parameter (OP) and excitation gap (EG) are identical, and the pair formation and their Bose condensation take place at the same temperature Tc. It fails to explain the underdoped cuprate superconductivity: EG is finite at Tc and thus distinct from OP. Since these superconductors belong to a large class of small $ξ$ materials, this failure has the potential for widespread impact. Here we have extended BCS theory in a natural way to short $ξ$ superconductors, based on a BCS--BEC crossover scenario, and arrived at a simple physical picture in which incoherent, finite momentum pairs become progressively more important as the pairing interaction becomes stronger, leading to the distinction between EG and OP. The superconductivity from the fermionic perspective and BEC from the bosonic perspective are just two sides of the same coin. Our theory is capable of making verifiable quantitative predictions. We obtain a cuprate phase diagram (with one free parameter) , in (semi-)quantitative agreement with experiment. The mutually compensating contributions from fermionic quasiparticles and bosonic pair excitations provides a natural explanation for the quasi-universal behavior of the in-plane superfluid density versus T. Our bosonic pair excitations also provide an intrinsic mechanism for the long mysterious linear T terms in the specific heat. Incoherent pair contributions lead to new low T power laws, consistent with existing experiments. Finally, we demonstrated that the onset of superconducting long range order leads to sharp features in the specific heat at Tc, consistent with experiment.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1801.06266

Related papers

Applying BCS–BEC crossover theory to high-temperature superconductors and ultracold atomic Fermi gases (Review Article)

Q. Chen, K. Levin, J. Stajic

This review is written at the time of the twentieth anniversary of the discovery of high-temperature superconductors, which nearly coincides with the important discovery of the superfluid phases of ultracold trapped fermionic atoms. We show how these two subjects have much in common. Both have been addressed from the perspective of the BCS—Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) crossover scenario, which is designed to treat short coherence length superfluids with transition temperatures which are “high” with respect to the Fermi energy. A generalized mean field treatment of BCS–BEC crossover at general temperatures T, based on the BCS–Leggett ground state, has met with remarkable success in the fermionic atomic systems. Here we summarize this success in the context of four different cold atom experiments, all of which provide indications, direct or indirect, for the existence of a pseudogap. This scenario also provides a physical picture of the pseudogap phase in the underdoped cuprates which is a central focus of high Tc research. We summarize successful applications of BCS–BEC crossover to key experiments in high Tc systems, including the phase diagram, specific heat, and vortex core STM data, along with the Nernst effect, and exciting recent data on the superfluid density in very underdoped samples.

arXiv:cond-mat/0508603•Low Temperature Physics•Apr 1, 2006•43 citations

Pair excitations, collective modes, and gauge invariance in the BCS–Bose-Einstein crossover scenario

Ioan Kosztin, Qijin Chen, Ying-Jer Kao +1 more

In this paper we study the BCS Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) crossover scenario within the superconducting state, using a T-matrix approach which yields the ground state proposed by Leggett. Here we extend this ground state analysis to finite temperatures T and interpret the resulting physics. We find two types of bosoniclike excitations of the system: long lived, incoherent pair excitations and collective modes of the superconducting order parameter, which have different dynamics. Using a gauge invariant formalism, this paper addresses their contrasting behavior as a function of T and superconducting coupling constant g. At a more physical level, our paper emphasizes how, at finite T, BCS-BEC approaches introduce an important parameter ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{pg}}^{2}={\ensuremath{\Delta}}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{sc}}^{2}$ into the description of superconductivity. This parameter is governed by the pair excitations and is associated with particle-hole asymmetry effects that are significant for sufficiently large g. In the fermionic regime, ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{pg}}^{2}$ represents the difference between the square of the excitation gap ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}^{2}$ and that of the superconducting order parameter ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{sc}}^{2}.$ The parameter ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{pg}}^{2},$ which is necessarily zero in the BCS (mean field) limit increases monotonically with the strength of the attractive interaction g. It follows that there is a significant physical distinction between this BCS-BEC crossover approach (in which g is the essential variable which determines ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{pg}})$ and the widely discussed phase fluctuation scenario in which the plasma frequency is the tuning parameter. Finally, we emphasize that in the strong coupling limit, there are important differences between the composite bosons that arise in crossover theories and the usual bosons of the (interacting) Bose liquid. Because of constraints imposed on the fermionic excitation gap and chemical potential, in crossover theories, the fermionic degrees of freedom can never be fully removed from consideration.

arXiv:cond-mat/9906180•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•May 1, 2000•74 citations

Generalized BCS-Bose Crossover Picture of Superconductivity

Josep Amengual i Batle, M. Casas, MANUEL DE LLANO +2 more

A recent unification of the BCS theory with that of the Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) through a "complete" boson-fermion model is discussed as a generalization of the "BCS-Bose crossover" picture of superconductivity. Good first-principles Tc predictions in 2D are calculated with no adjustable parameters for the so-called "exotic" cuprate superconductors of the "Uemura plot", without abandoning the phonon interaction mechanism. The only condition is that one depart moderately from the perfect electron-/hole-Cooper-pair symmetry to which BCS (as well as the "crossover") theory are restricted by construction.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•Aug 10, 2003•0 citations

BEC, BCS and BCS-Bose Crossover Theories in Superconductors and Superfluids

MANUEL DE LLANO, Francisco J. Sevilla, M. A. Solís +1 more

For the Cooper/BCS model interaction in superconductors (SCs) it is shown: a) how BCS-Bose crossover picture transition temperatures Tc, defined self-consistently by both the gap and fermion-number equations, require unphysically large couplings to differ significantly from the Tc of ordinary BCS theory defined without the number equation since here the chemical potential is assumed equal to the Fermi energy; how although ignoring either hole- or electron-Cooper-pairs in the recent "complete boson-fermion model": b) one obtains the precise BCS gap equation for all temperatures T, but c) only half the zero-temperature BCS condensation energy emerges. Results (b) and (c) are also expected to hold for neutral-fermion superfluids (SFs)--such as liquid $^3$He, neutron matter and trapped ultra-cold fermion atomic gases--where the pair-forming two-fermion interaction of course differs from the Cooper/BCS one for SCs.

arXiv:cond-mat/0412418•Dec 16, 2004•0 citations

Bosonization of Cooper pairs and novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity in high-$T_c$ cuprates and other systems

Safarali Dzhumanov

The criteria for bosonization of Cooper pairs and novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity in high-$T_c$ cuprates and other pseudogap matters are formulated by using the uncertainty principle and the boson mean field theory. We argue that the BCS-type s- or d-wave superconductivity occurring in the fermionic limit of Cooper pairs (which exist in ordinary metals and heavily overdoped cuprates with large Fermi energies) is not characteristic of underdoped to overdoped cuprates with low Fermi energies. The superconducting order parameter in high-$T_c$ cuprates and other pseudogap matters cannot be determined as the BCS-like (s- or d-wave) gap. We show that the unconventional superconductivity/superfluidity occurring in the bosonic limit of Cooper pairs exists in low Fermi energy systems where the bosonic Cooper pairs are formed at a pseudogap temperature T* above the uperconducting/superfluid transition temperature $T_c$ and then such bosons condenses into a Bose superfluid at $T_c$. The pair condensation of attracting bosons occurs at $T_c$ and then their single particle condensation sets in at $T_c^*$ lower than $T_c$ (in three dimensions (3D)) or at T=0 (in two dimensions (2D)). The coherent single particle and pair condensates of bosons exist as two distinct superfluid phases below $T_c$. By solving the mean field equations for high-$T_c$ cuprates, the novel superconducting states (i.e., a vortex-like state existing below the temperature $T_v=T^{2D}_c$ lower than T* but higher than $T_c=T^{3D}_c$ and two superconducting phases below $T_c$) and their properties characterized by the boson superfluid stiffness are determined and compared with the key experimental findings. The novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity exists also in other exotic superconductors/superfluids, including quantum liquids, atomic Fermi gases and low-density nuclear matter.

arXiv:1709.02110•Sep 7, 2017•0 citations

BCS Theory of Superconductivity

A. S. Alexandrov, Nevill Mott

The crucial demonstration that superfluidity was linked to Bose particles and Bose-Einstein condensation came after the discovery of He3 in 1949, which failed to show the characteristic A transition within a reasonable wide temperature interval around the critical temperature for the onset of superfluidity in He4. The idea of the bosonization of electrons due to their pairing, introduced by Ogg (1946) became very attractive as an explanation for superconductivity after Schafroth (1955) showed that a gas of charged bosons with charge 2e would indeed show a Meissner effect, which is one of the most crucial features of superconductors (see Chapter 1). However this phenomenological Bose-gas picture was condemned and later on practically forgotten because it was unable to account quantitatively for the critical parameters of the classical (low-temperature) superconductors. Using for Tc the Bose-Einstein condensation temperature Eq.(l.S) one obtains the utterly meaningless result Tc = lOOOO.R&s; with the atomic density of electron pairs ~ 1022cm~3 and with the effective mass m** = 2me. The failure of the Schafroth picture stems from a very large size £ of pairs in classical superconductors, which can be estimated from the uncertainty principle: The uncertainty of the momentum 8p is estimated from the uncertainty of the kinetic energy 8E ~ vpSp, which should be of the order of Tc, the only characteristic energy of the superconducting state. Therefore and turns out to be more than one micron for simple metals with Tc ~ IK and the Fermi velocity VF — I0scm/s. That means that pairs in classical superconductors overlap strongly and the Shafroth model of real space pairs is wrong. The finally successful theory for classical superconductors was formulated by Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer (1957). In this chapter we present the main points of the BCS theory, using the Bogoliubov transformation (1947,1958) for the weak-coupling regime and the Green&s;s function technique for the intermediate coupling in Chapter 3. More details will be found in the excellent books by Schrieffer(1965), De Gennes (1989) and Abrikosov, Gor&s;kov and Dzyaloshinskii (1963).

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Nov 24, 1994•0 citations
The (mean field based) BCS theory is considered one of the most successful theories in condensed matter physics. It is justified in ordinary metal superconductors the coherence length ξξξ is large, with two important features: the order parameter (OP) and excitation gap (EG) are identical, and the pair formation and their Bose condensation take place at the same temperature Tc. It fails to explain the underdoped cuprate superconductivity: EG is finite at Tc and thus distinct from OP. Since these superconductors belong to a large class of small ξξξ materials, this failure has the potential for widespread impact. Here we have extended BCS theory in a natural way to short ξξξ superconductors, based on a BCS--BEC crossover scenario, and arrived at a simple physical picture in which incoherent, finite momentum pairs become progressively more important as the pairing interaction becomes stronger, leading to the distinction between EG and OP. The superconductivity from the fermionic perspective and BEC from the bosonic perspective are just two sides of the same coin. Our theory is capable of making verifiable quantitative predictions. We obtain a cuprate phase diagram (with one free parameter) , in (semi-)quantitative agreement with experiment. The mutually compensating contributions from fermionic quasiparticles and bosonic pair excitations provides a natural explanation for the quasi-universal behavior of the in-plane superfluid density versus T. Our bosonic pair excitations also provide an intrinsic mechanism for the long mysterious linear T terms in the specific heat. Incoherent pair contributions lead to new low T power laws, consistent with existing experiments. Finally, we demonstrated that the onset of superconducting long range order leads to sharp features in the specific heat at Tc, consistent with experiment.
This review is written at the time of the twentieth anniversary of the discovery of high-temperature superconductors, which nearly coincides with the important discovery of the superfluid phases of ultracold trapped fermionic atoms. We show how these two subjects have much in common. Both have been addressed from the perspective of the BCS—Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) crossover scenario, which is designed to treat short coherence length superfluids with transition temperatures which are “high” with respect to the Fermi energy. A generalized mean field treatment of BCS–BEC crossover at general temperatures T, based on the BCS–Leggett ground state, has met with remarkable success in the fermionic atomic systems. Here we summarize this success in the context of four different cold atom experiments, all of which provide indications, direct or indirect, for the existence of a pseudogap. This scenario also provides a physical picture of the pseudogap phase in the underdoped cuprates which is a central focus of high Tc research. We summarize successful applications of BCS–BEC crossover to key experiments in high Tc systems, including the phase diagram, specific heat, and vortex core STM data, along with the Nernst effect, and exciting recent data on the superfluid density in very underdoped samples.
In this paper we study the BCS Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) crossover scenario within the superconducting state, using a T-matrix approach which yields the ground state proposed by Leggett. Here we extend this ground state analysis to finite temperatures T and interpret the resulting physics. We find two types of bosoniclike excitations of the system: long lived, incoherent pair excitations and collective modes of the superconducting order parameter, which have different dynamics. Using a gauge invariant formalism, this paper addresses their contrasting behavior as a function of T and superconducting coupling constant g. At a more physical level, our paper emphasizes how, at finite T, BCS-BEC approaches introduce an important parameter ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{pg}}^{2}={\ensuremath{\Delta}}^{2}\ensuremath{-}{\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{sc}}^{2}$ into the description of superconductivity. This parameter is governed by the pair excitations and is associated with particle-hole asymmetry effects that are significant for sufficiently large g. In the fermionic regime, ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{pg}}^{2}$ represents the difference between the square of the excitation gap ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}^{2}$ and that of the superconducting order parameter ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{sc}}^{2}.$ The parameter ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{pg}}^{2},$ which is necessarily zero in the BCS (mean field) limit increases monotonically with the strength of the attractive interaction g. It follows that there is a significant physical distinction between this BCS-BEC crossover approach (in which g is the essential variable which determines ${\ensuremath{\Delta}}_{\mathrm{pg}})$ and the widely discussed phase fluctuation scenario in which the plasma frequency is the tuning parameter. Finally, we emphasize that in the strong coupling limit, there are important differences between the composite bosons that arise in crossover theories and the usual bosons of the (interacting) Bose liquid. Because of constraints imposed on the fermionic excitation gap and chemical potential, in crossover theories, the fermionic degrees of freedom can never be fully removed from consideration.
A recent unification of the BCS theory with that of the Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) through a "complete" boson-fermion model is discussed as a generalization of the "BCS-Bose crossover" picture of superconductivity. Good first-principles Tc predictions in 2D are calculated with no adjustable parameters for the so-called "exotic" cuprate superconductors of the "Uemura plot", without abandoning the phonon interaction mechanism. The only condition is that one depart moderately from the perfect electron-/hole-Cooper-pair symmetry to which BCS (as well as the "crossover") theory are restricted by construction.
For the Cooper/BCS model interaction in superconductors (SCs) it is shown: a) how BCS-Bose crossover picture transition temperatures Tc, defined self-consistently by both the gap and fermion-number equations, require unphysically large couplings to differ significantly from the Tc of ordinary BCS theory defined without the number equation since here the chemical potential is assumed equal to the Fermi energy; how although ignoring either hole- or electron-Cooper-pairs in the recent "complete boson-fermion model": b) one obtains the precise BCS gap equation for all temperatures T, but c) only half the zero-temperature BCS condensation energy emerges. Results (b) and (c) are also expected to hold for neutral-fermion superfluids (SFs)--such as liquid 3^33He, neutron matter and trapped ultra-cold fermion atomic gases--where the pair-forming two-fermion interaction of course differs from the Cooper/BCS one for SCs.
Bosonization of Cooper pairs and novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity in high-TcT_cTc​ cuprates and other systems
The criteria for bosonization of Cooper pairs and novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity in high-TcT_cTc​ cuprates and other pseudogap matters are formulated by using the uncertainty principle and the boson mean field theory. We argue that the BCS-type s- or d-wave superconductivity occurring in the fermionic limit of Cooper pairs (which exist in ordinary metals and heavily overdoped cuprates with large Fermi energies) is not characteristic of underdoped to overdoped cuprates with low Fermi energies. The superconducting order parameter in high-TcT_cTc​ cuprates and other pseudogap matters cannot be determined as the BCS-like (s- or d-wave) gap. We show that the unconventional superconductivity/superfluidity occurring in the bosonic limit of Cooper pairs exists in low Fermi energy systems where the bosonic Cooper pairs are formed at a pseudogap temperature T* above the uperconducting/superfluid transition temperature TcT_cTc​ and then such bosons condenses into a Bose superfluid at TcT_cTc​. The pair condensation of attracting bosons occurs at TcT_cTc​ and then their single particle condensation sets in at Tc∗T_c^*Tc∗​ lower than TcT_cTc​ (in three dimensions (3D)) or at T=0 (in two dimensions (2D)). The coherent single particle and pair condensates of bosons exist as two distinct superfluid phases below TcT_cTc​. By solving the mean field equations for high-TcT_cTc​ cuprates, the novel superconducting states (i.e., a vortex-like state existing below the temperature Tv=Tc2DT_v=T^{2D}_cTv​=Tc2D​ lower than T* but higher than Tc=Tc3DT_c=T^{3D}_cTc​=Tc3D​ and two superconducting phases below TcT_cTc​) and their properties characterized by the boson superfluid stiffness are determined and compared with the key experimental findings. The novel Bose-liquid superconductivity and superfluidity exists also in other exotic superconductors/superfluids, including quantum liquids, atomic Fermi gases and low-density nuclear matter.
The crucial demonstration that superfluidity was linked to Bose particles and Bose-Einstein condensation came after the discovery of He3 in 1949, which failed to show the characteristic A transition within a reasonable wide temperature interval around the critical temperature for the onset of superfluidity in He4. The idea of the bosonization of electrons due to their pairing, introduced by Ogg (1946) became very attractive as an explanation for superconductivity after Schafroth (1955) showed that a gas of charged bosons with charge 2e would indeed show a Meissner effect, which is one of the most crucial features of superconductors (see Chapter 1). However this phenomenological Bose-gas picture was condemned and later on practically forgotten because it was unable to account quantitatively for the critical parameters of the classical (low-temperature) superconductors. Using for Tc the Bose-Einstein condensation temperature Eq.(l.S) one obtains the utterly meaningless result Tc = lOOOO.R&s; with the atomic density of electron pairs ~ 1022cm~3 and with the effective mass m** = 2me. The failure of the Schafroth picture stems from a very large size £ of pairs in classical superconductors, which can be estimated from the uncertainty principle: The uncertainty of the momentum 8p is estimated from the uncertainty of the kinetic energy 8E ~ vpSp, which should be of the order of Tc, the only characteristic energy of the superconducting state. Therefore and turns out to be more than one micron for simple metals with Tc ~ IK and the Fermi velocity VF — I0scm/s. That means that pairs in classical superconductors overlap strongly and the Shafroth model of real space pairs is wrong. The finally successful theory for classical superconductors was formulated by Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer (1957). In this chapter we present the main points of the BCS theory, using the Bogoliubov transformation (1947,1958) for the weak-coupling regime and the Green&s;s function technique for the intermediate coupling in Chapter 3. More details will be found in the excellent books by Schrieffer(1965), De Gennes (1989) and Abrikosov, Gor&s;kov and Dzyaloshinskii (1963).