Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1712.09271 · Physical Review X

Practical Quantum Error Mitigation for Near-Future Applications

Suguru Endo, Simon C. Benjamin, Ying Li

Published Jul 26, 2018• 562 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A new analysis of quantum error mitigation, which attempts to limit the effects of errors in near-term quantum computers, shows that two proposed techniques can work in small systems without the need for extra qubits or peripheral devices.
DOI
10.1103/physrevx.8.031027

Related papers

Quantum Error Mitigation: A Key Approach to Overcoming the Barriers to Practical Application of Quantum Technology

Suguru Endo

NTT technical review•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Multi-exponential error extrapolation and combining error mitigation techniques for NISQ applications

Zhenyu Cai

Abstract Noise in quantum hardware remains the biggest roadblock for the implementation of quantum computers. To fight the noise in the practical application of near-term quantum computers, instead of relying on quantum error correction which requires large qubit overhead, we turn to quantum error mitigation, in which we make use of extra measurements. Error extrapolation is an error mitigation technique that has been successfully implemented experimentally. Numerical simulation and heuristic arguments have indicated that exponential curves are effective for extrapolation in the large circuit limit with an expected circuit error count around unity. In this Article, we extend this to multi-exponential error extrapolation and provide more rigorous proof for its effectiveness under Pauli noise. This is further validated via our numerical simulations, showing orders of magnitude improvements in the estimation accuracy over single-exponential extrapolation. Moreover, we develop methods to combine error extrapolation with two other error mitigation techniques: quasi-probability and symmetry verification, through exploiting features of these individual techniques. As shown in our simulation, our combined method can achieve low estimation bias with a sampling cost multiple times smaller than quasi-probability while without needing to be able to adjust the hardware error rate as required in canonical error extrapolation.

arXiv:2007.01265•npj Quantum Information•May 25, 2021•78 citations

Closing in on quantum error correction

Don Monroe

Quantum computers will only become practical when they implement quantum error correction.

Communications of the ACM•Sep 24, 2019•0 citations

Quantum Error Mitigation and Quantum Error Correction in Near-Term Application

Ugnė Liaubaitė

Quantum computation is expected to have significant practical applications. The main problem in quantum computing is susceptibility to noise. Quantum error correction was developed to allow large-scale applications of quantum computing by achieving fault tolerance. However, as large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computation is not available, the question of applications of near-term hardware remains important. Current noisy intermediate-scale (NISQ) quantum devices can be used for small applications or as testbeds for larger applications; noise suppression techniques are of significant importance to their applicability. This thesis addresses noise suppression via quantum error mitigation (QEM) and quantum error correction (QEC) for near-term applications. The work aims to improve the understanding of noise-suppression techniques and their performance for exploring the physical systems of interest. The results presented in this thesis are divided into QEM and QEC chapters. The majority of the work is focused on QEM. The main interest of this thesis is the application of QEM to Hamiltonian simulations. Two simulation methods: the Trotter method and a quantum signal processing-based method, are explored. Both simulation methods, enhanced by zero-noise extrapolation, are employed to simulate the transverse-field Ising model. The obtained numerical results are promising, as the QEM allows a good recovery of noiseless values in low-noise shallow circuits, even with fixed sampling resources. A further result obtained in the QEM domain is a definition of a mitigation technique based on optimal measurement (in a metrological sense). The presentation includes analytical calculations of implementation costs and error propagation, as well as a numerical application to Hamiltonian simulation, yielding promising results: noise suppression by several orders of magnitude. The QEC part of the thesis explores its application in quantum metrology. The focus is on parameter sensing in many-body Hamiltonians. The results are purely analytical and extend a known lemma to $m$-local homogeneous Pauli Hamiltonian parameter sensing. This allows discussion of the scaling achieved for sensing the Hamiltonian parameters with respect to the code properties. The results in this thesis establish applications of QEM and QEC in selected near-term applications, quantify their performance, and discuss caveats and potential future applications. This thesis presents a theoretical and numerical study with implications for future experimental implementations. The relative success of the QEM and QEC shown in this thesis relies on tailoring the techniques to a chosen problem, highlighting the importance of technique adaptation in near-term applications.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Computing Error Mitigation Advance in Real-Time Quantum Computer with Novel Quantum Using Superposition and Entanglement of Qubits

V. Karthick, A. Gayathri

Lecture notes in networks and systems•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

The Accuracy vs. Sampling Overhead Trade-off in Quantum Error Mitigation Using Monte Carlo-Based Channel Inversion

Yifeng Xiong, Soon Xin Ng, Lajos Hanzo

Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is a class of promising techniques for reducing the computational error of variational quantum algorithms. In general, the computational error reduction comes at the cost of a sampling overhead due to the variance-boosting effect caused by the channel inversion operation, which ultimately limits the applicability of QEM. Existing sampling overhead analysis of QEM typically assumes exact channel inversion, which is unrealistic in practical scenarios. In this treatise, we consider a practical channel inversion strategy based on Monte Carlo sampling, which introduces additional computational error that in turn may be eliminated at the cost of an extra sampling overhead. In particular, we show that when the computational error is small compared to the dynamic range of the error-free results, it scales with the square root of the number of gates. By contrast, the error exhibits a linear scaling with the number of gates in the absence of QEM under the same assumptions. Hence, the error scaling of QEM remains to be preferable even without the extra sampling overhead. Our analytical results are accompanied by numerical examples.

arXiv:2201.07923•IEEE Transactions on Communications•Jan 18, 2022•2 citations
Abstract Noise in quantum hardware remains the biggest roadblock for the implementation of quantum computers. To fight the noise in the practical application of near-term quantum computers, instead of relying on quantum error correction which requires large qubit overhead, we turn to quantum error mitigation, in which we make use of extra measurements. Error extrapolation is an error mitigation technique that has been successfully implemented experimentally. Numerical simulation and heuristic arguments have indicated that exponential curves are effective for extrapolation in the large circuit limit with an expected circuit error count around unity. In this Article, we extend this to multi-exponential error extrapolation and provide more rigorous proof for its effectiveness under Pauli noise. This is further validated via our numerical simulations, showing orders of magnitude improvements in the estimation accuracy over single-exponential extrapolation. Moreover, we develop methods to combine error extrapolation with two other error mitigation techniques: quasi-probability and symmetry verification, through exploiting features of these individual techniques. As shown in our simulation, our combined method can achieve low estimation bias with a sampling cost multiple times smaller than quasi-probability while without needing to be able to adjust the hardware error rate as required in canonical error extrapolation.
Quantum computation is expected to have significant practical applications. The main problem in quantum computing is susceptibility to noise. Quantum error correction was developed to allow large-scale applications of quantum computing by achieving fault tolerance. However, as large-scale fault-tolerant quantum computation is not available, the question of applications of near-term hardware remains important. Current noisy intermediate-scale (NISQ) quantum devices can be used for small applications or as testbeds for larger applications; noise suppression techniques are of significant importance to their applicability. This thesis addresses noise suppression via quantum error mitigation (QEM) and quantum error correction (QEC) for near-term applications. The work aims to improve the understanding of noise-suppression techniques and their performance for exploring the physical systems of interest. The results presented in this thesis are divided into QEM and QEC chapters. The majority of the work is focused on QEM. The main interest of this thesis is the application of QEM to Hamiltonian simulations. Two simulation methods: the Trotter method and a quantum signal processing-based method, are explored. Both simulation methods, enhanced by zero-noise extrapolation, are employed to simulate the transverse-field Ising model. The obtained numerical results are promising, as the QEM allows a good recovery of noiseless values in low-noise shallow circuits, even with fixed sampling resources. A further result obtained in the QEM domain is a definition of a mitigation technique based on optimal measurement (in a metrological sense). The presentation includes analytical calculations of implementation costs and error propagation, as well as a numerical application to Hamiltonian simulation, yielding promising results: noise suppression by several orders of magnitude. The QEC part of the thesis explores its application in quantum metrology. The focus is on parameter sensing in many-body Hamiltonians. The results are purely analytical and extend a known lemma to mmm-local homogeneous Pauli Hamiltonian parameter sensing. This allows discussion of the scaling achieved for sensing the Hamiltonian parameters with respect to the code properties. The results in this thesis establish applications of QEM and QEC in selected near-term applications, quantify their performance, and discuss caveats and potential future applications. This thesis presents a theoretical and numerical study with implications for future experimental implementations. The relative success of the QEM and QEC shown in this thesis relies on tailoring the techniques to a chosen problem, highlighting the importance of technique adaptation in near-term applications.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is a class of promising techniques for reducing the computational error of variational quantum algorithms. In general, the computational error reduction comes at the cost of a sampling overhead due to the variance-boosting effect caused by the channel inversion operation, which ultimately limits the applicability of QEM. Existing sampling overhead analysis of QEM typically assumes exact channel inversion, which is unrealistic in practical scenarios. In this treatise, we consider a practical channel inversion strategy based on Monte Carlo sampling, which introduces additional computational error that in turn may be eliminated at the cost of an extra sampling overhead. In particular, we show that when the computational error is small compared to the dynamic range of the error-free results, it scales with the square root of the number of gates. By contrast, the error exhibits a linear scaling with the number of gates in the absence of QEM under the same assumptions. Hence, the error scaling of QEM remains to be preferable even without the extra sampling overhead. Our analytical results are accompanied by numerical examples.