Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is a class of promising techniques for reducing the computational error of variational quantum algorithms. In general, the computational error reduction comes at the cost of a sampling overhead due to the variance-boosting effect caused by the channel inversion operation, which ultimately limits the applicability of QEM. Existing sampling overhead analysis of QEM typically assumes exact channel inversion, which is unrealistic in practical scenarios. In this treatise, we consider a practical channel inversion strategy based on Monte Carlo sampling, which introduces additional computational error that in turn may be eliminated at the cost of an extra sampling overhead. In particular, we show that when the computational error is small compared to the dynamic range of the error-free results, it scales with the square root of the number of gates. By contrast, the error exhibits a linear scaling with the number of gates in the absence of QEM under the same assumptions. Hence, the error scaling of QEM remains to be preferable even without the extra sampling overhead. Our analytical results are accompanied by numerical examples.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is a class of promising techniques for reducing the computational error of variational quantum algorithms. In general, the computational error reduction comes at the cost of a sampling overhead due to the variance-boosting effect caused by the channel inversion operation, which ultimately limits the applicability of QEM. Existing sampling overhead analysis of QEM typically assumes exact channel inversion, which is unrealistic in practical scenarios. In this treatise, we consider a practical channel inversion strategy based on Monte Carlo sampling, which introduces additional computational error that in turn may be eliminated at the cost of an extra sampling overhead. In particular, we show that when the computational error is small compared to the dynamic range of the error-free results, it scales with the square root of the number of gates. By contrast, the error exhibits a linear scaling with the number of gates in the absence of QEM under the same assumptions. Hence, the error scaling of QEM remains to be preferable even without the extra sampling overhead. Our analytical results are accompanied by numerical examples.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) infers noiseless expectation values from noisy variants of a target quantum circuit. Unlike quantum error correction, QEM requires no additional hardware resources and is therefore routinely employed in experiments on contemporary quantum processors. QEM strategies based on agnostic noise amplification (ANA) are intrinsically resilient to temporal noise drift during the execution of the experiment, but their sampling cost (runtime overhead) remains a major practical bottleneck. In this work, we introduce the virtual noise scaling framework and combine it with layered mitigation to further enhance performance. While virtual noise scaling consistently reduces sampling overhead, we identify a specific noise threshold for the layered mitigation approach. When the noise level is above this threshold, layered mitigation decreases the sampling overhead; conversely, when below it, the overhead increases. Notably, this threshold is circuit-independent and depends solely on the number of layers. For strong noise, the combination of virtual noise scaling and layered mitigation yields several orders of magnitude reduction in sampling overhead compared with conventional zero-noise extrapolation post-processing. As a result, mitigation tasks that once seemed unrealistic are now challenging but achievable. The proposed approach is compatible with dynamic circuits and can be seamlessly integrated with error detection and quantum error correction schemes. In addition, it is also applicable to ANA-based mitigation of mid-circuit measurements and preparation errors. Our findings extend to any constant-step amplification factors and therefore also apply to probabilistic error amplification (PEA) QEM. We validate our post-processing approach by applying it to previously reported experimental data, where we observe a substantial improvement in mitigation efficiency and accuracy.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is a promising technique of protecting hybrid quantum-classical computation from decoherence, but it suffers from sampling overhead which erodes the computational speed. In this treatise, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the sampling overhead imposed by QEM. In particular, we show that Pauli errors incur the lowest sampling overhead among a large class of realistic quantum channels having the same average fidelity. Furthermore, we show that depolarizing errors incur the lowest sampling overhead among all kinds of Pauli errors. Additionally, we conceive a scheme amalgamating QEM with quantum channel coding, and analyse its sampling overhead reduction compared to pure QEM. Especially, we observe that there exist a critical number of gates contained in quantum circuits, beyond which their amalgamation is preferable to pure QEM.
Simulating real-time dynamics under a Hamiltonian is a central goal of quantum information science. While numerous Hamiltonian-simulation quantum algorithms have been proposed, the effects of physical noise have rarely been incorporated into their performance analysis, despite the non-negligible noise levels of quantum devices. We present an end-to-end complexity analysis of noisy Hamiltonian simulation combined with quantum error mitigation (QEM) to answer how many circuit runs are required to reach a given target accuracy. Because the QEM sampling overhead grows exponentially with the circuit depth while the algorithmic error decreases with it, the circuit depth becomes an optimization variable, and we derive an analytic depth-selection rule for two algorithm families. For the order-k Suzuki--Trotter formula, the optimized cost exhibits a critical error εc, below which the required number of circuit runs grows exponentially. QEM improves the noise dependence of εc from sublinear to kth-power scaling, an exponent improvement by a factor of k+1. For randomized-LCU-based simulation, optimizing the repetition number yields a square-root improvement in the simulation-time dependence of the sampling-overhead exponent over the standard parameter choice. We further quantify the noise-characterization cost required for error mitigation via gate set tomography and the recently proposed space-time noise inversion method, showing that the latter can significantly reduce this cost.
The pursuit of practical quantum utility on near-term quantum processors is critically challenged by their inherent noise. Quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques are leading solutions to improve computation fidelity with relatively low qubit-overhead, while full-scale quantum error correction remains a distant goal. However, QEM techniques incur substantial measurement overheads, especially when applied to families of quantum circuits parameterized by classical inputs. Focusing on zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE), a widely adopted QEM technique, here we devise the surrogate-enabled ZNE (S-ZNE), which leverages classical learning surrogates to perform ZNE entirely on the classical side. Unlike conventional ZNE, whose measurement cost scales linearly with the number of circuits, S-ZNE requires only constant measurement overhead for an entire family of quantum circuits, offering superior scalability. Theoretical analysis indicates that S-ZNE achieves accuracy comparable to conventional ZNE in many practical scenarios, and numerical experiments on up to 100-qubit ground-state energy and quantum metrology tasks confirm its effectiveness. Our approach provides a template that can be effectively extended to other quantum error mitigation protocols, opening a promising path toward scalable error mitigation.
Abstract The inevitable accumulation of errors in near-future quantum devices represents a key obstacle in delivering practical quantum advantages, motivating the development of various quantum error-mitigation methods. Here, we derive fundamental bounds concerning how error-mitigation algorithms can reduce the computation error as a function of their sampling overhead. Our bounds place universal performance limits on a general error-mitigation protocol class. We use them to show (1) that the sampling overhead that ensures a certain computational accuracy for mitigating local depolarizing noise in layered circuits scales exponentially with the circuit depth for general error-mitigation protocols and (2) the optimality of probabilistic error cancellation among a wide class of strategies in mitigating the local dephasing noise on an arbitrary number of qubits. Our results provide a means to identify when a given quantum error-mitigation strategy is optimal and when there is potential room for improvement.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is critical for extracting reliable computations from noisy quantum processors, proving itself essential not only in the near term but also as a valuable supplement to fully fault-tolerant systems in the future. Despite the necessity, practical QEM deployment still confronts challenges, including the excessive cost of sampling quantum circuits and reliance on unrealistic assumptions such as gate-independent noise. In this paper, we propose Classical Noise Inversion (CNI), which shifts the QEM from sampling diverse quantum circuits to repeated single-circuit measurement, a drastic cost reduction given that the former incurs far heavier time overhead than the latter on realistic quantum hardware. We target general noise models and establish critical conditions for their classical tractability, under which CNI remains effective. For noise models that violate the condition, we propose partial CNI, which mitigates the classically tractable factor of noise via CNI and mitigates the other part via probabilistic error cancellation tailored to gate-dependent noise. To minimize the sampling overhead, we introduce noise compression, which groups noise components with equivalent effects on measurement outcomes, thereby attaining theoretically optimal error-mitigation overhead. The proposed protocols are particularly efficient for error-propagatable circuits, including adaptive universal quantum computing represented by Clifford+T fault-tolerant circuits, and generalized measurement represented by classical shadows. To demonstrate the practical merits of CNI, we integrate it with thrifty classical shadow, and use analysis and numerical simulations to show its advantages in both efficiency and accuracy over existing approaches.