Abstract Quantum computing is no longer a nascent field. Programmable quantum annealing (QA) devices with more than 1000 qubits are commercially available. How does one know that a putative QA device is indeed quantum? How should one go about benchmarking its performance and compare it to classical algorithms? How can its performance be improved by error correction? In this contribution to the focus collection on ‘What would you do with 1000 qubits?’, we review the work we and others have done in this area, since the first D-Wave quantum annealer with 108 qubits was made available to us. Some of the lessons we have learned will be useful when other quantum computing platforms reach a similar scale, and practitioners will attempt to demonstrate quantum speedup.
Abstract Quantum computing is no longer a nascent field. Programmable quantum annealing (QA) devices with more than 1000 qubits are commercially available. How does one know that a putative QA device is indeed quantum? How should one go about benchmarking its performance and compare it to classical algorithms? How can its performance be improved by error correction? In this contribution to the focus collection on ‘What would you do with 1000 qubits?’, we review the work we and others have done in this area, since the first D-Wave quantum annealer with 108 qubits was made available to us. Some of the lessons we have learned will be useful when other quantum computing platforms reach a similar scale, and practitioners will attempt to demonstrate quantum speedup.
As a wide variety of quantum computing platforms become available, methods for assessing and comparing the performance of these devices are of increasing interest and importance. Inspired by the success of single-qubit error rate computations for tracking the progress of gate-based quantum computers, this work proposes a quantum annealing single-qubit assessment (QASA) protocol for quantifying the performance of individual qubits in quantum annealing computers. The proposed protocol scales to large quantum annealers with thousands of qubits and provides unique insights into the distribution of qubit properties within a particular hardware device. The efficacy of the QASA protocol is demonstrated by analyzing the properties of a D-Wave 2000Q system, revealing unanticipated correlations in the qubit performance of that device. A study repeating the QASA protocol at different annealing times highlights how the method can be utilized to understand the impact of annealing parameters on qubit performance. Overall, the proposed QASA protocol provides a useful tool for assessing the performance of current and emerging quantum annealing devices.
The observation of an unequivocal quantum speedup remains an elusive objective for quantum computing. The D-Wave quantum annealing processors have been at the forefront of experimental attempts to address this goal, given their relatively large numbers of qubits and programmability. A complete determination of the optimal time-to-solution (TTS) using these processors has not been possible to date, preventing definitive conclusions about the presence of a scaling advantage. The main technical obstacle has been the inability to verify an optimal annealing time within the available range. Here we overcome this obstacle and present a class of problem instances for which we observe an optimal annealing time using a D-Wave 2000Q processor over a range spanning up to more than 2000 qubits. This allows us to perform an optimal TTS benchmarking analysis and perform a comparison to several classical algorithms, including simulated annealing, spin-vector Monte Carlo, and discrete-time simulated quantum annealing. We establish the first example of a scaling advantage for an experimental quantum annealer over classical simulated annealing: we find that the D-Wave device exhibits certifiably better scaling than simulated annealing, with 95% confidence, over the range of problem sizes that we can test. However, we do not find evidence for a quantum speedup: simulated quantum annealing exhibits the best scaling by a significant margin. Our construction of instance classes with verifiably optimal annealing times opens up the possibility of generating many new such classes, paving the way for further definitive assessments of scaling advantages using current and future quantum annealing devices.
A quantum computer (QC) is a device that performs operations according to the rules of quantum theory. There are various types of QCs of which nowadays the two most important ones considered for practical realization are the gate-based QC and the quantum annealer (QA). Practical realizations of gate-based QCs consist of less than 100 qubits while QAs with more than 2000 qubits are commercially available.In the gate model QC, a universal QC, a computation (or quantum algorithm) consists of a sequence of quantum gate operations (unitary transformations) that changes the internal state of the QC. Quantum annealing is a technique for finding the global minimum of a quadratic function of binary variables by exploiting quantum fluctuations. Its main potential targets are combinatorial optimization problems featuring a discrete search space with many local minima.We present results of simulating on the IBM Quantum Experience devices and on the D-Wave 2X QA with more than 1000 qubits. Simulations of both types of QCs are performed by first modeling them as zero-temperature quantum systems of interacting spin-1/2 particles and then emulating their dynamics by solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. Our software allows for the simulation of a 48-qubit gate-based QC on the Sunway TaihuLight supercomputer.We also briefly report about EQUIPE, a user group, established by Forschungszentrum Jülich, to Enable QUantum Information Processing in Europe and about JUNIQ, a Jülich User Infrastructure for Research and Development in Quantum Computing, offering European users from science and industry user support and access to various QC simulators and eventually technologies on various stages of maturity (D-Wave QA, multi-qubit devices for QC without error correction from e.g. IBM, Google, Rigetti Computing, …, and experimental devices).
Quantum annealing (QA) is a heuristic quantum optimization algorithm that can be used to solve combinatorial optimization problems. In recent years, advances in quantum technologies have enabled the development of small- and intermediate-scale quantum processors that implement the QA algorithm for programmable use. Specifically, QA processors produced by D-Wave systems have been studied and tested extensively in both research and industrial settings across different disciplines. In this paper we provide a literature review of the theoretical motivations for QA as a heuristic quantum optimization algorithm, the software and hardware that is required to use such quantum processors, and the state-of-the-art applications and proofs-of-concepts that have been demonstrated using them. The goal of our review is to provide a centralized and condensed source regarding applications of QA technology. We identify the advantages, limitations, and potential of QA for both researchers and practitioners from various fields.
Many problems of industrial interest are NP-complete, and quickly exhaust resources of computational devices with increasing input sizes. Quantum annealers (QA) are physical devices that aim at this class of problems by exploiting quantum mechanical properties of nature. However, they compete with efficient heuristics and probabilistic or randomised algorithms on classical machines that allow for finding approximate solutions to large NP-complete problems. While first implementations of QA have become commercially available, their practical benefits are far from fully explored. To the best of our knowledge, approximation techniques have not yet received substantial attention. In this paper, we explore how problems' approximate versions of varying degree can be systematically constructed for quantum annealer programs, and how this influences result quality or the handling of larger problem instances on given set of qubits. We illustrate various approximation techniques on both, simulations and real QA hardware, on different seminal problems, and interpret the results to contribute towards a better understanding of the real-world power and limitations of current-state and future quantum computing.
Quantum computation exploits superposition, entanglement, interference, and measurement to process information.Research has moved from theoretical algorithms to functional devices where the performance is not only limited by qubit physics, but also by the control, compilation, error mitigation, and error correction.This review considers quantum computing on various levels of abstraction, including physical qubits, quantum algorithms, system architecture, fault-tolerance, and emerging applications.Study-specific evidence regarding scale, operational quality, connectivity, control and suppression of errors is compared across the different types of superconducting circuits, trapped ions, semiconductor spin qubits, neutral atoms and photonic processors.The review of the fundamental algorithms, noisy intermediate-scale quantum computing, variational and hybrid quantum-classical approaches, quantum simulation, quantum machine learning, and security implications is also discussed.Measurable progress has been demonstrated in published experiments for logical-qubit operation, below-threshold surface-code memory, programmable photonic sampling and platformspecific scaling.However, the reported metrics are not directly interchangeable, and practical advantage remains task-and baseline-dependent.Further progress will need to be accompanied by coordinated developments in hardware reliability, error correction, classical control, estimates of algorithmic resources, and clear classical method comparisons.