Quantum annealing (QA) is a heuristic quantum optimization algorithm that can be used to solve combinatorial optimization problems. In recent years, advances in quantum technologies have enabled the development of small- and intermediate-scale quantum processors that implement the QA algorithm for programmable use. Specifically, QA processors produced by D-Wave systems have been studied and tested extensively in both research and industrial settings across different disciplines. In this paper we provide a literature review of the theoretical motivations for QA as a heuristic quantum optimization algorithm, the software and hardware that is required to use such quantum processors, and the state-of-the-art applications and proofs-of-concepts that have been demonstrated using them. The goal of our review is to provide a centralized and condensed source regarding applications of QA technology. We identify the advantages, limitations, and potential of QA for both researchers and practitioners from various fields.
Quantum annealing (QA) is a heuristic quantum optimization algorithm that can be used to solve combinatorial optimization problems. In recent years, advances in quantum technologies have enabled the development of small- and intermediate-scale quantum processors that implement the QA algorithm for programmable use. Specifically, QA processors produced by D-Wave systems have been studied and tested extensively in both research and industrial settings across different disciplines. In this paper we provide a literature review of the theoretical motivations for QA as a heuristic quantum optimization algorithm, the software and hardware that is required to use such quantum processors, and the state-of-the-art applications and proofs-of-concepts that have been demonstrated using them. The goal of our review is to provide a centralized and condensed source regarding applications of QA technology. We identify the advantages, limitations, and potential of QA for both researchers and practitioners from various fields.
Quantum annealing (QA) algorithm is a new quantum optimization algorithm based on the classical simulated annealing (SA) algorithm. Unlike classical SA algorithm, which uses the thermal waves to search for the optimal solution, the QA algorithm uses the quantum tunneling effect to allow a quantum to penetrate a potential barrier with a higher energy than itself. Therefore, the algorithm can get rid of the local extreme values and is more likely to approach the global optimal with higher probability. In the literature, the QA algorithm has shown perfect optimization effects on combinatorial optimization problems. In this paper, the basic concepts and application fields of QA algorithm, which is the core principle of D-Wave quantum computer, are systematically reviewed. The applications of QA algorithm in cryptography, traveling salesman problem, graph coloring problem, and traffic path are discussed in detail. In addition, the direction of future research for QA algorithm is explored.
Combinatorial optimization is a foundation of numerous scientific, industrial, and social decision-making questions, but its usefulness is mostly restricted by the exponential complexity of the problem of classical computability. The quantum annealing (QA) has become one of the leading analogue quantum systems to address such problems, whereby optimization problems are converted into physical energy structures and quantum fluctuations are utilized to perform systematic exploration. It provides a critical, synthesized, and comprehensive review of quantum annealing as applied to combinatorial optimization, including the theoretical basis, hardware designs, algorithm methods, issues of embedding and encoding, benchmarking procedures, applications, and integration with quantum algorithms based on gates and solvers on a classical computer. We build a comprehensive taxonomy between adiabatic dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to state-of-the-art flux-qubit annealers, new architectures, and hybrid quantum classical pipelines. We show that the overhead of embedding and encoding and the benchmarking approach taken are the most significant factors in determining scalability and performance, but not the raw number of qubits. Transportation, energy systems, robotics, finance, pharmacological discovery, and machine learning are just some examples of the domain-specific case studies that use QA with minimal empirical utility as a hybrid refinement engine and not an independent solver. Moreover, we introduce a stringent evaluation of the existing benchmarking culture, clarify the causal links between QA and QAOA as well as between VQE and structural predicaments, and reveal the institutional roots of the existing restrictions. We conclude by identifying a research roadmap in the future, focusing on the annealing hardness characterization, Stoquastic control manipulation, embedding rules automation, architecture design, and development of principled quantum advantage. It creates a benchmark reference to those in the field and research and deployment of scalable, reliable, and application-relevant quantum optimization
Quantum annealing has emerged as a transformative approach in solving combinatorial optimization problems by leveraging the principles of quantum mechanics. A comprehensive survey of quantum annealing is presented, delineating its foundational concepts, state-of-the-art advancements, and diverse applications across domains such as logistics, finance, machine learning, and energy optimization. Notable contributions include the introduction of a systematic benchmarking framework to evaluate quantum annealing against classical optimization techniques across metrics like time-to-target, scalability, and energy efficiency. Additionally, novel hybrid quantum-classical paradigms and hardware advancements are explored, addressing challenges in qubit connectivity, coherence, and noise resilience. Optimization problems are mapped to suitable quantum annealing platforms, offering practical guidelines for leveraging quantum technologies in real-world scenarios. Critical gaps in scalability and integration with machine learning are identified, with future research directions proposed to bridge these challenges. These findings provide a holistic understanding of quantum annealing's potential, offering a foundational resource for advancing quantum computing in optimization.
Critical decision-making issues in science, engineering, and industry are based on combinatorial optimization; however, its application is inherently limited by the NP-hard nature of the problem. A specialized paradigm of analogue quantum computing, quantum annealing (QA), has been proposed to solve these problems by encoding optimization problems into physical energy landscapes and solving them by quantum tunnelling systematically through exploration of solution space. This is a critical review that summarizes the current applications of quantum annealing to combinatorial optimization and includes a theoretical background, hardware designs, algorithm implementation strategies, encoding and embedding schemes, protocols to benchmark quantum annealing, areas of implementation, and links with the quantum algorithms implementation with gate-based hardware and classical solvers. We develop a unified framework, relating adiabatic quantum dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to modern flux-qubit annealers (Chimera, Pegasus, Zephyr topologies), and emergent architectures (Lechner-Hauke-Zoller systems, Rydberg atom platforms), and hybrids of quantum and classical computation. Through our analysis, we find that overhead in embedding and encoding is the largest determinant of the scalability and performance (this is not just the number of qubits). Minor embeddings also usually have a physical qubit count per logical variable of between 5 and 12 qubits, which limits effective problem capacity by 80-92% and, due to chain-breaking errors, compromises the quality of solutions.
Quantum annealing is a meta-heuristic approach tailored to solve combinatorial optimization problems with quantum annealers. In this tutorial, we provide a fundamental and comprehensive introduction to quantum annealing and modern data management systems and show quantum annealing's potential benefits and applications in the realm of database optimization. We demonstrate how to apply quantum annealing for selected database optimization problems, which are critical challenges in many data management platforms. The demonstrations include solving join order optimization problems in relational databases, optimizing sophisticated transaction scheduling, and allocating virtual machines within cloud-based architectures with respect to sustainability metrics. On the one hand, the demonstrations show how to apply quantum annealing on key problems of database management systems (join order selection, transaction scheduling), and on the other hand, they show how quantum annealing can be integrated as a part of larger and dynamic optimization pipelines (virtual machine allocation). The goal of our tutorial is to provide a centralized and condensed source regarding theories and applications of quantum annealing technology for database researchers, practitioners, and everyone who wants to understand how to potentially optimize data management with quantum computing in practice. Besides, we identify the advantages, limitations, and potentials of quantum computing for future database and data management research.
Quantum annealing is a computing paradigm that has the ambitious goal of efficiently solving large-scale combinatorial optimization problems of practical importance. However, many challenges have yet to be overcome before this goal can be reached. This perspectives article first gives a brief introduction to the concept of quantum annealing, and then highlights new pathways that may clear the way towards feasible and large scale quantum annealing. Moreover, since this field of research is to a strong degree driven by a synergy between experiment and theory, we discuss both in this work. An important focus in this article is on future perspectives, which complements other review articles, and which we hope will motivate further research.