We study how well we can retrodict results of measurements made on a quantum system if we can make measurements on its final state. We know what measurements were made, but not their results. An initial examination shows that we can gain anywhere from no information to perfect information about the results of previous measurements, depending on the measurements and the initial state of the system. The case of two two-outcome measurements, the second of which is a projective measurement, is examined in some detail. We then look at a model of a qubit interferometer in which measurements are made in order to determine the path the qubit followed. The measurement made on the final state of the qubit depends on the information about previous measurement results that we are trying to determine. One can attempt to find the result of just one of the measurements or all of them or to find a measurement sequence that was not realized. We study all three possibilities.
We study how well we can retrodict results of measurements made on a quantum system if we can make measurements on its final state. We know what measurements were made, but not their results. An initial examination shows that we can gain anywhere from no information to perfect information about the results of previous measurements, depending on the measurements and the initial state of the system. The case of two two-outcome measurements, the second of which is a projective measurement, is examined in some detail. We then look at a model of a qubit interferometer in which measurements are made in order to determine the path the qubit followed. The measurement made on the final state of the qubit depends on the information about previous measurement results that we are trying to determine. One can attempt to find the result of just one of the measurements or all of them or to find a measurement sequence that was not realized. We study all three possibilities.
When a photon passes through an interferometer, quantum mechanics does not provide a clear answer as to its past. Quantum retrodiction is a quantitative theory, which endeavors to make statements about the past of a system based on present knowledge. Quantum retrodiction may be used to analyze the past of a photon, that is, its trajectory. Here we experimentally retrodict the trajectories of single photons in double interferometers by measuring the final state of the photon. A sequence of measurements is made on a photon to determine which path the photon followed, so a series of retrodiction of measurement results can be regarded as a photon trajectory. We obtain information about the partial trajectory and the entire trajectory of the photon. Furthermore, we also observe the effect of different measurements in the extraction of trajectory information. Our experiment highlights the application of retrodiction theory to the study of the photon's past, and provides potential application in quantum communications.
To prepare quantum states and extract information, it is often assumed that one can perform a perfectly projective measurement. Such measurements can achieve an uncorrelated system and environment state. However, perfectly projective measurements can be difficult or impossible to perform in practice. We investigate the limitations of repeated nonprojective measurements in preparing a quantum system. For an n-qubit system initially entangled with its environment and subsequently prepared with measurements, using a sequence of weak measurements, we show that some entanglement remains unless one of the measurement operators becomes perfectly projective through an extreme limiting process. Removing initial (unentangled) correlations between a system and its environment and the scenario where measurement outcomes are not tracked are also discussed. We present results for n-qubit and n-dimensional input states.
We now have all the basic tools we need to describe systems of one and two qubits. In this final chapter of Part I we look at some of the consequences of the peculiar properties of qubits when they are used to encode information. Many of these results can be traced to the properties of quantum measurement. Measuring a single qubit A key result in quantum information theory is that it is impossible to accurately characterize a single qubit. In other words, there is no experiment, or sequence of experiments, which allows us to find out the state of a single quantum bit. The reason for this problem is twofold. Firstly, we have to make some sort of decision about the basis we will use for the measurement. For example, when measuring a single qubit the most popular choice is to make a measurement in the computational basis. This is equivalent to asking the qubit whether it is in state |0⧽ or state |1⧽. If the qubit is indeed in one of the basis states the measurement process is simple, and we will get the obvious answer of 0 if it is in |0⧽ and 1 if it is in |1⧽. If, however, the qubit is in a superposition, such as α|0⧽+β|1⧽, then the situation is more difficult. Characterizing the state now means determining the values of the two complex numbers α and β, but the measurement can only return the answer 0 or 1, and for a superposition state one of these two answers will be returned at random, with probabilities |α| 2 and |β| 2 , respectively.
Measurements in quantum mechanics cannot perfectly distinguish all states and necessarily disturb the measured system. We present and analyze a proposal to demonstrate fundamental limits on quantum control of a single qubit arising from these properties of quantum measurements. We consider a qubit prepared in one of two nonorthogonal states and subsequently subjected to dephasing noise. The task is to use measurement and feedback control to attempt to correct the state of the qubit. We demonstrate that projective measurements are not optimal for this task, and that there exists a nonprojective measurement with an optimum measurement strength which achieves the best trade-off between gaining information about the system and disturbing it through measurement backaction. We study the performance of a quantum control scheme that makes use of this weak measurement followed by feedback control, and demonstrate that it realizes the optimal recovery from noise for this system. We contrast this approach with various classically inspired control schemes.
This thesis fathoms the possibilities and limitations of measurements in quantum optics. After a short introduction to the general aspects of measurements in quantum mechanics, it presents three examples of a measurement process in concrete applications to quantum optics. For one, while operators describing quantities of interest might have a simple theoretical form, it is often hard to actually implement a measurement of their expectation values experimentally. This situation is encountered in the first part which is devoted to the measurement of quantum statistical properties of a light beam. In contrast to classical optics, these statistics are not fully determined by first- and second-order correlations. Instead, higher-order correlations, usually described by non-Hermitian operators, are necessary to characterize the quantum state completely. A particular example is the N-photon Fock state, for which only a measurement of the Nth-order correlations allows for a full characterization. Here, we present a new method how to measure an important class of Nth-order correlations for arbitrary N in a single spatial mode with two polarizations with limited experimental resources. The second part is again centered around the realization of specific measurement operators for photon correlation measurements. However, in contrast to the previous chapter, these measurements are not an end in their own, but are designed to create specific quantum states as a consequence of the measurement process: A suitable measurement of photons emitted by a number of atoms allows to transfer the atoms into long-lived entangled states. We find that with this method it is possible to entangle two remote atomic qubits to an arbitrary and well-defined degree. Furthermore, we show how to generate two families of quantum states in an arbitrary number of remote atomic qubits: one family consists of all -- symmetric and non-symmetric -- total angular momentum eigenstates in N remote qubits, the other is a family of cluster states. It is also systematically investigated whether the technique of quantum state engineering by projective measurements allows for the creation of any arbitrary state. We find explicit solutions for the case of two and three qubits, while it is shown that no solution exist for N > 6. We conclude the section by proving that with some changes in the setup, this measurement-based quantum state engineering technique allows to create the same states among the scattered photons themselves rather than among the emitting atoms. The last part is devoted to the amount of information one is able to gain about a given system when performing a measurement. The corresponding limits of information are investigated at the example of the duality that arises in a two-way interferometer between the visibility of the interference pattern and the knowledge about the path of the interfering object. We show that there exist correlations between the phase difference the interfering object acquires on its way through the interferometer and the amount of which-way information retrievable from certain observables of the which-way detector. In this way, the which-way information becomes a phase-dependent quantity. In particular, we find that for certain values of the phase shift, the amount of extractable which-way information can be larger than allowed by phase-independent measurement. This property is put to use to find the optimal observable for the which-way detector readout in dependence on the phase of the interfering object. Following this strategy, we are able to gain more which-way information than previously thought possible.
The task of reconstructing the system's state from the measurements results, known as the Pauli problem, usually requires repetition of two successive steps. Preparation in an initial state to be determined is followed by an accurate measurement of one of the several chosen operators in order to provide the necessary "Pauli data". We consider a similar yet more general problem of recovering Feynman's transition (path) amplitudes from the results of at least three consecutive measurements. The three-step histories of a pre- and post-selected quantum system are subjected to a type of interference not available to their two-step counterparts. We show that this interference can be exploited, and if the intermediate measurement is "fuzzy", the path amplitudes can be successfully recovered. The simplest case of a two-level system is analysed in detail. The "weak measurement" limit and the usefulness of the path amplitudes are also discussed.