arXiv:1604.05063

Searching for microscopic classical cats

Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica

Published Apr 18, 2016• 1 citation

Abstract

With the exception of superselection rules, there are no known explicit violations of the Principle of quantum Superposition. However, quantum measurement and the emergence of classicality seem to imply that the Principle of Superposition is not universal, so perhaps new superselection rules or something similar wait to be found. This invites us to search for explicit violations of superposition, even in places where we expect it to hold. Given that many quantum measurement devices rely on atoms absorbing photons, these processes are natural places for a first search for such violations. We propose experiments designed to test whether the emission and absorption of photons by atoms may suppress the interference in certain conditions. If the atom is found, in certain situations, to absorb completely the photon, this would mean that in those situations the atom cannot exist or at least it cannot be stable as a superposition of states in which it absorbed the photon and it did not absorb it. Then we will have a new possibility to resolve the problem of measurement, and that of the emergence of classicality. A negative result would mean an additional confirmation of the Principle of Superposition in these particular cases.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1604.05063

Related papers

Observing superpositions of different number states

Jacob Dunningham, L M Rico-Gutierrez, Veiko Palge

The formal structure of quantum mechanics allows systems to exist in a superposition of different states. A curious feature is that while some superpositions, such as position or momentum, are routinely observed, others such as mass or charge are not. This anomaly is at least partly due to the fact that it is much easier to carry out interference experiments for certain observables than others. Here we focus particularly on the superposition of two different number states for photons or bosonic atoms. This can equally well be thought of as a superposition of different masses in the case of atoms. We present different interferometry schemes that should, at least in principle, allow us to observe interference between these states. This would provide evidence of a superposition that we would normally consider to be prevented by superselection rules.

Optics and SpectroscopyOct 1, 20113 citations

Quantum erasing the nature of reality: or, perhaps, the reality of nature?

Paul G. Kwiat, Berthold‐Georg Englert

Introduction WHY must I treat the measuring device classically? What will happen to me if I don't?! Eugene Wigner The quantum measurement problem – how does an apparently “classical” definite world arise out of the random world of quantum superpositions – was and continues to be one of the fundamental philosophical issues in quantum mechanics. What we mean by a classical world, for example, is one in which macroscopic objects are not in superposition states of being simultaneously in several locations at once, and cats are never in coherent superpositions of being alive and dead. This lack of coherence is actually a loss of the coherence that exists at the level of the isolated quanta, but somehow does not survive the transition to the classical level of measuring apparatus. Such incoherent states are known as mixed states. Therefore, to study the quantum–classical interface, or even to investigate whether such an interface exists at all other than in the minds of “classical sympathizers,” one should look carefully at mixed states, how they arise and how they behave. Here we describe a set of experiments, both real and gedanken , investigating the subtleties of quantum interference when mixed states are involved. We start by describing the well-known double-slit experiment, and the loss of interference when which-path information can be had.

Cambridge University Press eBooksApr 22, 200412 citations

Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical

Wojciech Hubert Zurek

The manner in which states of some quantum systems become effectively classical is of great significance for the foundations of quantum physics, as well as for problems of practical interest such as quantum engineering. In the past two decades it has become increasingly clear that many (perhaps all) of the symptoms of classicality can be induced in quantum systems by their environments. Thus decoherence is caused by the interaction in which the environment in effect monitors certain observables of the system, destroying coherence between the pointer states corresponding to their eigenvalues. This leads to environment-induced superselection or einselection, a quantum process associated with selective loss of information. Einselected pointer states are stable. They can retain correlations with the rest of the universe in spite of the environment. Einselection enforces classicality by imposing an effective ban on the vast majority of the Hilbert space, eliminating especially the flagrantly nonlocal ``Schr\"odinger-cat states.'' The classical structure of phase space emerges from the quantum Hilbert space in the appropriate macroscopic limit. Combination of einselection with dynamics leads to the idealizations of a point and of a classical trajectory. In measurements, einselection replaces quantum entanglement between the apparatus and the measured system with the classical correlation. Only the preferred pointer observable of the apparatus can store information that has predictive power. When the measured quantum system is microscopic and isolated, this restriction on the predictive utility of its correlations with the macroscopic apparatus results in the effective ``collapse of the wave packet.'' The existential interpretation implied by einselection regards observers as open quantum systems, distinguished only by their ability to acquire, store, and process information. Spreading of the correlations with the effectively classical pointer states throughout the environment allows one to understand ``classical reality'' as a property based on the relatively objective existence of the einselected states. Effectively classical pointer states can be ``found out'' without being re-prepared, e.g, by intercepting the information already present in the environment. The redundancy of the records of pointer states in the environment (which can be thought of as their ``fitness'' in the Darwinian sense) is a measure of their classicality. A new symmetry appears in this setting. Environment-assisted invariance or envariance sheds new light on the nature of ignorance of the state of the system due to quantum correlations with the environment and leads to Born's rules and to reduced density matrices, ultimately justifying basic principles of the program of decoherence and einselection.

arXiv:quant-ph/0105127Reviews of Modern PhysicsMay 22, 20034,294 citations

The Trouble with Superselection Accounts of Measurement

Mariam Thalos

A superselection rule advanced in the course of a quantum-mechanical treatment of some phenomenon is an assertion to the effect that the superposition principle of quantum mechanics is to be restricted in the application at hand. Superselection accounts of measurement all have in common a decision to represent the indicator states of detectors by eigenspaces of superselection operators named in a superselection rule, on the grounds that the states in question are states of a so-called classical quantity and therefore not subject to quantum interference effects. By this strategy superselectionists of measurement expect to dispense with use of projection postulates in treatments of measurement. I shall argue that superselection accounts of measurement are self-contradictory, and that treatments of infinite systems, if they can avoid the contradiction, are not true superselection accounts.

Philosophy of ScienceSep 1, 19982 citations

Macroscopic Quantum Superpositions Cannot Be Measured, Even in Principle

Andrew Knight

I show in this paper why the universality of quantum mechanics at all scales, which implies the possibility of Schrodinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend thought experiments, cannot be experimentally confirmed, and why macroscopic superpositions in general cannot be observed or measured, even in principle. Through the relativity of quantum superposition and the transitivity of correlation, it is shown that from the perspective of an object that is in quantum superposition relative to a macroscopic measuring device and observer, the observer is already sufficiently well correlated to the measuring device that once the object correlates to the measuring device, there is no time period in which the observer can perform an appropriate interference experiment to show that the measuring device is in a superposition.

Aug 25, 20201 citation

On Quantum Superposition

Guang-Liang Li

Lying at the heart of quantum mechanics, the notion of quantum superposition causes enormous difficulty in understanding the problem of quantum measurement, which concerns the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of the quantum theory. According to Bell’s theorem, Einstein’s viewpoint in his debate with Bohr seems to be wrong. In the present paper, a new principle (referred to as the general principle of measurements) is introduced and proved as a mathematical theorem. Based on this principle, various forms of quantum superposition (including quantum entanglement) and the corresponding experiments are scrutinized. The main findings are as follows. (a) Einstein’s viewpoint is correct and Bell’s theorem is problematic. (b) Measurement outcomes of any actual experiment with individual microscopic objects described in a form of quantum superposition, in particular, the experimental results of testing Bell inequalities, are all erroneously explained. (c) Bell inequalities failed to capture the essence of the Einstein-Bohr debate, i.e., whether quantum superposition is legitimate for describing individual microscopic objects. (d) All kinds of quantum superposition violate the general principle of measurements and hence are illegitimate. (e) Quantum mechanics can be completed by using disjunction (“or”) as the logical relation between the orthonormal vectors that span an arbitrarily given Hilbert space for describing a single microscopic object, and the mathematical setting will remain essentially unchanged; hidden-variable theories are irrelevant to the real world. (f) After completing quantum mechanics as above, the difficulty in understanding the problem of quantum measurement disappears naturally. Implications of the findings are also discussed.

QeiosAug 20, 20240 citations