Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1503.02580

Reply to "Comment on `Floquet Fractional Chern Insulators'"

Adolfo G. Grushin, Álvaro Gómez-León, Titus Neupert

Published Mar 9, 2015• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We respond to the comments expressed by L. D'Alessio in arXiv:1412.3481 on our work "Floquet Fractional Chern Insulators" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 156801 (2014)]. We confirm the central result that the ground state of the effective Hamiltonian is an interacting fractional Chern insulator.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1503.02580

Related papers

Comment on "Floquet Fractional Chern Insulators"

Luca D’Alessio

In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 156801 (2014)], Grushin et al. studied a Fermi-Hubbard-model for spinful electrons on a honeycomb lattice coupled to an external polarized electric field. By computing the Floquet Hamiltonian perturbatively to order $ω^{-1}$ (where $ω$ is the frequency of the drive) they predicted that, for specific values of the driving and filling, the system can transition into a Fractional Chern Insulator. In this comment we point out that: i) the calculation of the Floquet Hamiltonian misses some terms of order $ω^{-1}$ and ii) the assumption that the Floquet bands are filled as in time-independent systems is questionable.

arXiv:1412.3481•Dec 10, 2014•1 citation

Reply to Comment on "Space-Time Crystals of Trapped Ions"

Tongcang Li, Zhexuan Gong, Zhang‐qi Yin +5 more

This is a reply to the comment from Patrick Bruno (arXiv:1211.4792) on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 163001 (2012)).

arXiv:1212.6959•Dec 31, 2012•3 citations

Reply to Comment on: "Fluctuation Theorem for Many-Body Pure Quantum States"

Eiki Iyoda, Kazuya Kaneko, Takahiro Sagawa

We reply to Comment by J. Gemmer, L. Knipschild, R. Steinigeweg (arXiv:1712.02128) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100601 (2017).

arXiv:1712.05172•Dec 14, 2017•1 citation

Reply to “Comment on ‘Accurate ground-state phase diagram of the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model at half filling’ ”

G. P. Zhang

We respond to Jeckelman's Comment on our paper [G. P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 68, 153101 (2003)], which discusses his previous work [E. Jeckelmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 236401 (2002)]. We feel that it is important to point out that his previous results show a trend contradicting the weak-coupling limit, a conclusion that is independent of our calculation. Therefore, our comments on his previous results remain valid and our conclusion is unchanged.

Physical Review B•May 4, 2005•2 citations

Reply to Comment on "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED"

Oliver Viehmann, Jan von Delft, Florian Marquardt

A Reply to the Comment by C. Ciuti and P. Nataf [arXiv:1112.0986v1] on our Letter "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113602 (2011)].

arXiv:1202.2916•Feb 14, 2012•3 citations

Reply to "Common on `Superfluidity in the interior-gap states'"

Shin-Tza Wu, Sungkit Yip

We show that the recent Comment by Liu and Wilczek (cond-mat/0304632) on our work (PRA 67, 053603) is incorrect.

arXiv:cond-mat/0305675•May 29, 2003•0 citations
In a recent paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 156801 (2014)], Grushin et al. studied a Fermi-Hubbard-model for spinful electrons on a honeycomb lattice coupled to an external polarized electric field. By computing the Floquet Hamiltonian perturbatively to order ω−1ω^{-1}ω−1 (where ωωω is the frequency of the drive) they predicted that, for specific values of the driving and filling, the system can transition into a Fractional Chern Insulator. In this comment we point out that: i) the calculation of the Floquet Hamiltonian misses some terms of order ω−1ω^{-1}ω−1 and ii) the assumption that the Floquet bands are filled as in time-independent systems is questionable.