Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1410.2723

Counterfactuality of "counterfactual" communication

Lev Vaidman A

Published Oct 10, 2014• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The counterfactuality of the recently proposed protocols for direct quantum communication is analyzed. It is argued that the protocols can be counterfactual only for one value of the transmitted bit. The protocols achieve a reduced probability of detection of the particle in the transmission channel by increasing the number of paths in the channel. However, this probability is not lower than the probability of detecting a particle actually passing through such a multi-path channel, which was found to be surprisingly small. The relation between security and counterfactuality of the protocols is discussed. An analysis of counterfactuality of the protocols in the framework of the Bohmian interpretation is performed.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1410.2723

Related papers

Counterfactuality of ‘counterfactual’ communication

Lev Vaidman A

The counterfactuality of the recently proposed protocols for direct quantum communication is analyzed. It is argued that the protocols can be counterfactual only for one value of the transmitted bit. The protocols achieve a reduced probability of detection of the particle in the transmission channel by increasing the number of paths in the channel. However, this probability is not lower than the probability of detecting a particle actually passing through such a multi-path channel, which was found to be surprisingly small. The relation between security and counterfactuality of the protocols is discussed. An analysis of counterfactuality of the protocols in the framework of the Bohmian interpretation is performed.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 26, 2015•37 citations

Counterfactuality of “counterfactual” communication

Lev Vaidman A

The counterfactuality of recently proposed protocols for direct quantum communication is analyzed. It is argued that the protocols can be counterfactual only for one value of transmitted bit. The protocols achieve reduced probability of detection of the particle in the transmission channel by increasing the number of paths in the channel, but not below the probability of detecting of a particle actually passing through such multi-path channel.

Latin America Optics and Photonics Conference•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Modification of counterfactual communication protocols that eliminates weak particle traces

Yakir Aharonov, Lev Vaidman A

The possibility to communicate between spatially separated regions, without even a single photon passing between the two parties, is an amazing quantum phenomenon. The possibility of transmitting one value of a bit in such a way, the interaction-free measurement, has been known for quarter of a century. The protocols of full communication, including transmitting unknown quantum states, were proposed only a few years ago, but it was shown that in all these protocols the particle was leaving a weak trace in the transmission channel, the trace being larger than the trace left by a single particle passing through the channel. This made the claim of counterfactuality of these protocols at best controversial. However, a simple modification of these recent protocols eliminates the trace in the transmission channel, making all these protocols counterfactual.

arXiv:1805.10634•Physical Review A•Jan 18, 2019•49 citations

Counterfactual Quantum Protocols for Dialogue, Teleportation, and Comparison

Saw Nang Paing, Fakhar Zaman, Junaid ur Rehman +4 more

Counterfactual quantum communication enables communication between remote parties without transmitting any information-carrying particle. In this paper, we propose four protocols for secure quantum communication networks utilizing such communication. The first protocol, counterfactual quantum secure direct communication (CQSDC), enables a sender to securely and counterfactually communicate a secret message. The second protocol, counterfactual quantum secure dialogue (CQSD), allows legitimate parties to transmit secret messages in each direction simultaneously, securely and counterfactually. The third protocol, counterfactual controlled quantum teleportation (CCQT), facilitates a sender to counterfactually teleport a quantum state to a receiver under the supervision of a controller. Finally, the fourth protocol, counterfactual quantum private comparison (CQPC), capacitates a third party to compare the private states of the end parties without the actual knowledge of the counterfactually transmitted states. We devise the CQSDC and CQSD protocols by exploiting the counterfactual Swap, dual chained quantum Zeno (CQZ), and distributed controlled NOT gates. For CCQT and CQPC protocols, we utilize CQZ gates with a horizontally polarized photon input. We show that the security of CQSDC and CQSD relies on counterfactual entanglement swapping, while that of CCQT and CQPC depends on establishing secure counterfactual communication channels and security validation with decoy particles, respectively.

IEEE Transactions on Communications•Aug 14, 2024•6 citations

Postselection and counterfactual communication

David R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur, C. H. W. Barnes

A recently proposed quantum protocol for counterfactual communication [Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 99, 010103(R) (2019)] relies on postselection to eliminate the weak trace in the transmission channel. We show that the postselection in this protocol additionally eliminates the flow of Fisher information from transmitter to receiver. However, we also show that a classical communication protocol with postselection can be counterfactual. Hence, we argue that postselection should not be allowed in genuine quantum counterfactual communication. In the proposed quantum protocol, the probability of discarding an event by postselection tends to zero with an increasing number of ideal optical components. But the counterfactual violation strength tends to infinity at a faster rate. Consequently, the quantum protocol is not counterfactual proper.

arXiv:1904.01036•Physical Review A•Jun 10, 2019•18 citations

Direct counterfactual quantum-communication protocol beyond a single-photon source

Zheng-Hong Li, Shang-Yue Feng, M. Al-Amri +1 more

The direct counterfactual quantum-communication protocol involving double-chained Mach-Zehnder interferometers requires a single-photon input. Here, we show that even with multiphoton light sources, including a strong coherent light source as input, the counterfactual communication can be achieved with success probability approaching unity in the ideal asymptotic limit. The path evolution of multiple photons is nonlocally controlled. Thus, information is transmitted without any photons, or any other auxiliary information carriers, appearing in the public transmission channel. The effect is quantum since quantum measurements are an essential requirement for this protocol. Furthermore, a modified scheme is proposed in which the number of interferometers is reduced.

arXiv:2202.03935•Physical Review A•Sep 15, 2022•10 citations
The counterfactuality of the recently proposed protocols for direct quantum communication is analyzed. It is argued that the protocols can be counterfactual only for one value of the transmitted bit. The protocols achieve a reduced probability of detection of the particle in the transmission channel by increasing the number of paths in the channel. However, this probability is not lower than the probability of detecting a particle actually passing through such a multi-path channel, which was found to be surprisingly small. The relation between security and counterfactuality of the protocols is discussed. An analysis of counterfactuality of the protocols in the framework of the Bohmian interpretation is performed.
The counterfactuality of the recently proposed protocols for direct quantum communication is analyzed. It is argued that the protocols can be counterfactual only for one value of the transmitted bit. The protocols achieve a reduced probability of detection of the particle in the transmission channel by increasing the number of paths in the channel. However, this probability is not lower than the probability of detecting a particle actually passing through such a multi-path channel, which was found to be surprisingly small. The relation between security and counterfactuality of the protocols is discussed. An analysis of counterfactuality of the protocols in the framework of the Bohmian interpretation is performed.
The possibility to communicate between spatially separated regions, without even a single photon passing between the two parties, is an amazing quantum phenomenon. The possibility of transmitting one value of a bit in such a way, the interaction-free measurement, has been known for quarter of a century. The protocols of full communication, including transmitting unknown quantum states, were proposed only a few years ago, but it was shown that in all these protocols the particle was leaving a weak trace in the transmission channel, the trace being larger than the trace left by a single particle passing through the channel. This made the claim of counterfactuality of these protocols at best controversial. However, a simple modification of these recent protocols eliminates the trace in the transmission channel, making all these protocols counterfactual.
Counterfactual quantum communication enables communication between remote parties without transmitting any information-carrying particle. In this paper, we propose four protocols for secure quantum communication networks utilizing such communication. The first protocol, counterfactual quantum secure direct communication (CQSDC), enables a sender to securely and counterfactually communicate a secret message. The second protocol, counterfactual quantum secure dialogue (CQSD), allows legitimate parties to transmit secret messages in each direction simultaneously, securely and counterfactually. The third protocol, counterfactual controlled quantum teleportation (CCQT), facilitates a sender to counterfactually teleport a quantum state to a receiver under the supervision of a controller. Finally, the fourth protocol, counterfactual quantum private comparison (CQPC), capacitates a third party to compare the private states of the end parties without the actual knowledge of the counterfactually transmitted states. We devise the CQSDC and CQSD protocols by exploiting the counterfactual Swap, dual chained quantum Zeno (CQZ), and distributed controlled NOT gates. For CCQT and CQPC protocols, we utilize CQZ gates with a horizontally polarized photon input. We show that the security of CQSDC and CQSD relies on counterfactual entanglement swapping, while that of CCQT and CQPC depends on establishing secure counterfactual communication channels and security validation with decoy particles, respectively.
A recently proposed quantum protocol for counterfactual communication [Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 99, 010103(R) (2019)] relies on postselection to eliminate the weak trace in the transmission channel. We show that the postselection in this protocol additionally eliminates the flow of Fisher information from transmitter to receiver. However, we also show that a classical communication protocol with postselection can be counterfactual. Hence, we argue that postselection should not be allowed in genuine quantum counterfactual communication. In the proposed quantum protocol, the probability of discarding an event by postselection tends to zero with an increasing number of ideal optical components. But the counterfactual violation strength tends to infinity at a faster rate. Consequently, the quantum protocol is not counterfactual proper.
The direct counterfactual quantum-communication protocol involving double-chained Mach-Zehnder interferometers requires a single-photon input. Here, we show that even with multiphoton light sources, including a strong coherent light source as input, the counterfactual communication can be achieved with success probability approaching unity in the ideal asymptotic limit. The path evolution of multiple photons is nonlocally controlled. Thus, information is transmitted without any photons, or any other auxiliary information carriers, appearing in the public transmission channel. The effect is quantum since quantum measurements are an essential requirement for this protocol. Furthermore, a modified scheme is proposed in which the number of interferometers is reduced.