Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Latin America Optics and Photonics Conference

Counterfactuality of “counterfactual” communication

Lev Vaidman A

Published Jan 1, 2014• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The counterfactuality of recently proposed protocols for direct quantum communication is analyzed. It is argued that the protocols can be counterfactual only for one value of transmitted bit. The protocols achieve reduced probability of detection of the particle in the transmission channel by increasing the number of paths in the channel, but not below the probability of detecting of a particle actually passing through such multi-path channel.

DOI
10.1364/laop.2014.lm3b.1

Related papers

Counterfactuality of ‘counterfactual’ communication

Lev Vaidman A

The counterfactuality of the recently proposed protocols for direct quantum communication is analyzed. It is argued that the protocols can be counterfactual only for one value of the transmitted bit. The protocols achieve a reduced probability of detection of the particle in the transmission channel by increasing the number of paths in the channel. However, this probability is not lower than the probability of detecting a particle actually passing through such a multi-path channel, which was found to be surprisingly small. The relation between security and counterfactuality of the protocols is discussed. An analysis of counterfactuality of the protocols in the framework of the Bohmian interpretation is performed.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Oct 26, 2015•37 citations

Counterfactuality of "counterfactual" communication

Lev Vaidman A

The counterfactuality of the recently proposed protocols for direct quantum communication is analyzed. It is argued that the protocols can be counterfactual only for one value of the transmitted bit. The protocols achieve a reduced probability of detection of the particle in the transmission channel by increasing the number of paths in the channel. However, this probability is not lower than the probability of detecting a particle actually passing through such a multi-path channel, which was found to be surprisingly small. The relation between security and counterfactuality of the protocols is discussed. An analysis of counterfactuality of the protocols in the framework of the Bohmian interpretation is performed.

arXiv:1410.2723•Oct 10, 2014•1 citation

Modification of counterfactual communication protocols that eliminates weak particle traces

Yakir Aharonov, Lev Vaidman A

The possibility to communicate between spatially separated regions, without even a single photon passing between the two parties, is an amazing quantum phenomenon. The possibility of transmitting one value of a bit in such a way, the interaction-free measurement, has been known for quarter of a century. The protocols of full communication, including transmitting unknown quantum states, were proposed only a few years ago, but it was shown that in all these protocols the particle was leaving a weak trace in the transmission channel, the trace being larger than the trace left by a single particle passing through the channel. This made the claim of counterfactuality of these protocols at best controversial. However, a simple modification of these recent protocols eliminates the trace in the transmission channel, making all these protocols counterfactual.

arXiv:1805.10634•Physical Review A•Jan 18, 2019•49 citations

Postselection and counterfactual communication

David R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur, C. H. W. Barnes

A recently proposed quantum protocol for counterfactual communication [Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 99, 010103(R) (2019)] relies on postselection to eliminate the weak trace in the transmission channel. We show that the postselection in this protocol additionally eliminates the flow of Fisher information from transmitter to receiver. However, we also show that a classical communication protocol with postselection can be counterfactual. Hence, we argue that postselection should not be allowed in genuine quantum counterfactual communication. In the proposed quantum protocol, the probability of discarding an event by postselection tends to zero with an increasing number of ideal optical components. But the counterfactual violation strength tends to infinity at a faster rate. Consequently, the quantum protocol is not counterfactual proper.

arXiv:1904.01036•Physical Review A•Jun 10, 2019•18 citations

Counterfactual communication

Lev Vaidman A

Counterfactual communication, transferring bits and even qubits without particle travelling in the transmission channel is a bizarre quantum effect. It is also a very controversial topic. Here I will try to clarify the meaning of various “counterfactual" quantum protocols.

Optical and Quantum Sensing and Precision Metrology II•Mar 1, 2019•1 citation

Comment on “Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication”

Lev Vaidman A

I argue that recent "Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication" by Salih et al. [PRL 110, 170502 (2013), arXiv:1206.2042] is counterfactual only for one type of the information bit.

arXiv:1304.6689•Physical Review Letters•May 23, 2014•64 citations
The counterfactuality of recently proposed protocols for direct quantum communication is analyzed. It is argued that the protocols can be counterfactual only for one value of transmitted bit. The protocols achieve reduced probability of detection of the particle in the transmission channel by increasing the number of paths in the channel, but not below the probability of detecting of a particle actually passing through such multi-path channel.
The counterfactuality of the recently proposed protocols for direct quantum communication is analyzed. It is argued that the protocols can be counterfactual only for one value of the transmitted bit. The protocols achieve a reduced probability of detection of the particle in the transmission channel by increasing the number of paths in the channel. However, this probability is not lower than the probability of detecting a particle actually passing through such a multi-path channel, which was found to be surprisingly small. The relation between security and counterfactuality of the protocols is discussed. An analysis of counterfactuality of the protocols in the framework of the Bohmian interpretation is performed.
The counterfactuality of the recently proposed protocols for direct quantum communication is analyzed. It is argued that the protocols can be counterfactual only for one value of the transmitted bit. The protocols achieve a reduced probability of detection of the particle in the transmission channel by increasing the number of paths in the channel. However, this probability is not lower than the probability of detecting a particle actually passing through such a multi-path channel, which was found to be surprisingly small. The relation between security and counterfactuality of the protocols is discussed. An analysis of counterfactuality of the protocols in the framework of the Bohmian interpretation is performed.
The possibility to communicate between spatially separated regions, without even a single photon passing between the two parties, is an amazing quantum phenomenon. The possibility of transmitting one value of a bit in such a way, the interaction-free measurement, has been known for quarter of a century. The protocols of full communication, including transmitting unknown quantum states, were proposed only a few years ago, but it was shown that in all these protocols the particle was leaving a weak trace in the transmission channel, the trace being larger than the trace left by a single particle passing through the channel. This made the claim of counterfactuality of these protocols at best controversial. However, a simple modification of these recent protocols eliminates the trace in the transmission channel, making all these protocols counterfactual.
A recently proposed quantum protocol for counterfactual communication [Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 99, 010103(R) (2019)] relies on postselection to eliminate the weak trace in the transmission channel. We show that the postselection in this protocol additionally eliminates the flow of Fisher information from transmitter to receiver. However, we also show that a classical communication protocol with postselection can be counterfactual. Hence, we argue that postselection should not be allowed in genuine quantum counterfactual communication. In the proposed quantum protocol, the probability of discarding an event by postselection tends to zero with an increasing number of ideal optical components. But the counterfactual violation strength tends to infinity at a faster rate. Consequently, the quantum protocol is not counterfactual proper.