Why does spontaneous symmetry breaking occur? Why is a state breaking symmetry realized? We explore an idea that measurement selects such a state even if a system is given in a state respecting the symmetry of the system. We point out that the spectrum of the relevant observable is important, and simply apply the projection postulate for quantum measurement. We first show that this approach correctly describes the well-known interference of Bose-Einstein condensates. We then examine a fermionic system and prove that superconducting states with a definite relative phase are selected by the measurement of the current flowing between two superconductors, eliminating the need to assume the presence of an a priori phase to explain the Josephson effect.
Why does spontaneous symmetry breaking occur? Why is a state breaking symmetry realized? We explore an idea that measurement selects such a state even if a system is given in a state respecting the symmetry of the system. We point out that the spectrum of the relevant observable is important, and simply apply the projection postulate for quantum measurement. We first show that this approach correctly describes the well-known interference of Bose-Einstein condensates. We then examine a fermionic system and prove that superconducting states with a definite relative phase are selected by the measurement of the current flowing between two superconductors, eliminating the need to assume the presence of an a priori phase to explain the Josephson effect.
We show that superconductors have a thin spectrum associated with spontaneous symmetry breaking similar to that of antiferromagnets, while still being in full agreement with Elitzur's theorem, which forbids the spontaneous breaking of local (gauge) symmetries. This thin spectrum in the superconductors consists of in-gap states that are associated with the spontaneous breaking of a global phase symmetry. In qubits based on mesoscopic superconducting devices, the presence of the thin spectrum implies a maximum coherence time which is proportional to the number of Cooper pairs in the device. Here we present the detailed calculations leading up to these results and discuss the relation between spontaneous symmetry breaking in superconductors and the Meissner effect, the Anderson-Higgs mechanism, and the Josephson effect. Whereas for the Meissner effect a symmetry breaking of the phase of the superconductor is not required, it is essential for the Josephson effect.
The question of whether Bose-Einstein condensation involves spontaneous symmetry breaking is surprisingly controversial. We review the theory of spontaneous symmetry breaking in ferromagnets, compare it with the theory of symmetry breaking in condensates, and discuss the different viewpoints on the correspondence to experiments. These viewpoints include alternative perspectives in which we can treat condensates with fixed particle numbers, and where coherence arises from measurements. This question relates to whether condensates of quasiparticles such as polaritons can be viewed as “real” condensates. Introduction Spontaneous symmetry breaking is a deep subject in physics with long historical roots. At the most basic level, it arises in the field of cosmology. Physicists have long had an aesthetic principle that leads us to expect symmetry in the all of the basic equations of physical law. Yet the universe is manifestly full of asymmetries. How does a symmetric system acquire asymmetry merely by evolving in time? Starting in the 1950s, cosmologists began to borrow the ideas of spontaneous symmetry breaking from condensed matter physics, which were originally developed to explain spontaneous magnetization in ferromagnetic systems. Spontaneous coherence in all its forms (e.g., Bose-Einstein condensation [BEC], superconductivity, and lasing) can be viewed as another type of symmetry breaking. The Hamiltonian of the system is symmetric, yet under some conditions, the energy of the system can be reduced by putting the system into a state with asymmetry, namely, a state with a common phase for a macroscopic number of particles. The symmetry of the system implies that it does not matter what the exact choice of that phase is, as long as it is the same for all the particles. It is not obvious, however, whether the symmetry breaking which occurs in spontaneous coherence of the type seen in lasers or in Bose-Einstein condensation is the same as that seen in ferromagnetic systems. There are similarities in the systems which encourage the same view of all types of symmetry breaking, but there are also differences. In fact, there is a substantial school of thought that symmetry breaking in Bose-Einstein condensates with ultracold atoms is a “convenient fiction” (a term applied to optical coherence by Mølmer [1]).
In this paper, we have used a technique , when a weak link is created between two systems which have undergone some type of gauge symmetry breaking. In fact the Josephson effect has been observed in superfluid .Bose condensate atomic gases is generally expected. A system whose gauge symmetry has been spontaneously broken can be described by order parameter that behaves in much respect like a macroscopic function)(rΨ. For Bose Einstein Condensates of dilute alkali gases )(rΨis the wave function of the macroscopically occupied one atomic state
Spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) for Bose-Einstein condensates cannot treat phase off-diagonal effects, and thus cannot explain Bell inequality violations. We describe another situation that is beyond a SSB treatment: an experiment where particles from two (possibly macroscopic) condensate sources are used for conjugate measurements of the relative phase and populations. Off-diagonal phase effects are characterized by a "quantum angle" and observed via "population oscillations," signaling quantum interference of macroscopically distinct states.
Abstract Spontaneous symmetry breaking is related to the appearance of emergent phenomena, while a non-vanishing order parameter has been viewed as the sign of turning into such symmetry-breaking phase. We study the spontaneous symmetry breaking in the conventional superconductor and Bose–Einstein condensation with a continuous measure of symmetry by showing that both the many-body systems can be mapped into the many spin model. We also formulate the underlying relation between the spontaneous symmetry breaking and the order parameter quantitatively. The degree of symmetry stays unity in the absence of the two emergent phenomena, while decreases exponentially at the appearance of the order parameter which indicates the inextricable relation between the spontaneous symmetry and the order parameter.
The fundamental problem is analyzed, the relation between Bose-Einstein condensation and spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking. This relation is largerly misunderstood in physics community. Numerous articles and books contain the statement that, though gauge symmetry breaking helps for describing Bose-Einstein condensation, but the latter, in principle, does not require any symmetry breaking. This, however, is not correct. The analysis is based on the known mathematical theorems. But in order not to overcomplicate the presentation and to make it accessible to all readers, technical details are often omitted here. The emphasis is made on the following basic general facts: Spontaneous breaking of gauge symmetry is the necessary and sufficient condition for Bose-Einstein condensation. Condensate fluctuations, in thermodynamic limit, are negligible. Their catastrophic behavior can arise only as a result of incorrect calculations, when a Bose-condensed system is described without gauge symmetry breaking. It is crucially important to employ the representative statistical ensembles equipped with all conditions that are necessary for a unique and mathematically correct description of the given statistical system. Only then one is able to develop a self-consistent theory, free of paradoxes.