Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0711.0848 · Laser Physics Letters

Bose-Einstein condensation and gauge symmetry breaking

Vyacheslav I. Yukalov

Published Apr 4, 2007• 80 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The fundamental problem is analyzed, the relation between Bose-Einstein condensation and spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking. This relation is largerly misunderstood in physics community. Numerous articles and books contain the statement that, though gauge symmetry breaking helps for describing Bose-Einstein condensation, but the latter, in principle, does not require any symmetry breaking. This, however, is not correct. The analysis is based on the known mathematical theorems. But in order not to overcomplicate the presentation and to make it accessible to all readers, technical details are often omitted here. The emphasis is made on the following basic general facts: Spontaneous breaking of gauge symmetry is the necessary and sufficient condition for Bose-Einstein condensation. Condensate fluctuations, in thermodynamic limit, are negligible. Their catastrophic behavior can arise only as a result of incorrect calculations, when a Bose-condensed system is described without gauge symmetry breaking. It is crucially important to employ the representative statistical ensembles equipped with all conditions that are necessary for a unique and mathematically correct description of the given statistical system. Only then one is able to develop a self-consistent theory, free of paradoxes.

DOI
10.1002/lapl.200710029

Related papers

Major issues in theory of Bose–Einstein condensation

Vyacheslav I. Yukalov

Major issues arising in the theory of Bose–Einstein condensation are reviewed. These issues, although being principally important, are very often misunderstood, which results in wrong conclusions. The basic point is global gauge symmetry breaking that is a necessary and sufficient condition for Bose–Einstein condensation. Paying no attention to this basic point is a common fallacy leading to a number of confusions. For instance, the attempt of describing Bose condensation without gauge symmetry breaking produces the so-called “grand canonical catastrophe” that actually does not exist in the correct description of Bose condensation accompanied by gauge symmetry breaking. The other common flaw is forgetting to consider the stability of the studied systems. One sometimes accomplishes lengthy calculations and discusses the properties of a system that in reality cannot exist being unstable. In some cases, the seeming instability is caused by the negligence of the simple mathematical reason teaching us that one should not go beyond the approximation applicability. An example of such an artificial instability is related to the appearance of the so-called “thermodynamically anomalous fluctuations” whose arising is due to the use of a second-order approximation for calculating fourth-order terms, in this way distorting the O(2)-class model of a Bose-condensed system to the Gaussian-class model. These and other principal points, important for the correct treatment of Bose-condensed systems, are reviewed, including the resolution of the Hohenberg–Martin dilemma of gapless versus conserving theories for Bose-condensed systems and the problem of statistical ensemble equivalence.

arXiv:2505.16600•AVS Quantum Science•May 14, 2025•7 citations

Some typical delusions in the theory of Bose-Einstein condensation

Vyacheslav I. Yukalov

Despite the long history of the theory of Bose-Einstein condensation, there exist till nowadays some slippery points that are often misunderstood and result in confusion. The report touches some of these points, explaining the following: Global gauge symmetry breaking is the necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of Bose-Einstein condensate. There is no any ``grand canonical catastrophe". The stability of the ideal Bose gas depends on the spatial dimensionality and the shape of a trap. Symmetry-broken averages cannot be neglected. The so-called ``Popov approximation", ascribed to Popov, suggesting to neglect anomalous averages, is neither an approximation nor has anything to do with Popov. There are no thermodynamically anomalous fluctuations in stable equilibrium systems. Representative statistical ensembles are equivalent.

arXiv:2604.02662•Apr 3, 2026•0 citations

Spontaneous symmetry breaking under Bose--Einstein condensation

Vyacheslav I. Yukalov

Due to high current interest to Bose-Einstein condensation, the related topics, such as spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking, ergodic decomposition, and particle fluctuations, are intensively discussed in literature. These discussions, unfortunately, involve quite a number of controversies and confusions. The goal of the present brief survey is to clarify some of these confusions, concentrating on the principal points, such as the relationship between the conditions of Bose-Einstein condensation, the Bogolubov method of quasiaverages, spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking, ergodic decomposition, the presumed existence of nonthermodynamic particle fluctuations leading to the so-called ``grand canonical catastrophe", and the requirements for system stability.

arXiv:2606.12606•Jun 10, 2026•0 citations

Some typical delusions in the theory of Bose-Einstein condensation

Vyacheslav I. Yukalov

Abstract Despite the long history of the theory of Bose-Einstein condensation, there exist till nowadays some slippery points that are often misunderstood and result in confusion. The report touches some of these points, explaining the following: Global gauge symmetry breaking is the necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of Bose-Einstein condensate. There is no any “grand canonical catastrophe”. The stability of the ideal Bose gas depends on the spatial dimensionality and the shape of a trap. Symmetry-broken averages cannot be neglected. The so-called “Popov approximation”, ascribed to Popov, suggesting to neglect anomalous averages, is neither an approximation nor has anything to do with Popov. There are no thermodynamically anomalous fluctuations in stable equilibrium systems. Representative statistical ensembles are equivalent.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Feb 1, 2026•0 citations

Spontaneous symmetry breaking under Bose–Einstein condensation

Vyacheslav I. Yukalov

Abstract Due to high current interest to Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC), the related topics, such as spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking, ergodic decomposition, and particle fluctuations, are intensively discussed in literature. These discussions, unfortunately, involve quite a number of controversies and confusions. The goal of the present brief survey is to clarify some of these confusions, concentrating on the principal points, such as the relationship between the conditions of BEC, the Bogolubov method of quasiaverages, spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking, ergodic decomposition, the presumed existence of nonthermodynamic particle fluctuations leading to the so-called ‘grand canonical catastrophe’, and the requirements for system stability.

Laser Physics Letters•Jun 1, 2026•0 citations

Basics of Bose-Einstein condensation

Vyacheslav I. Yukalov

The review is devoted to the elucidation of the basic problems arising in the theoretical investigation of systems with Bose-Einstein condensate. Understanding these challenging problems is necessary for the correct description of Bose-condensed systems. The principal problems considered in the review are as follows: (i) What is the relation between Bose-Einstein condensation and global gauge symmetry breaking? (ii) How to resolve the Hohenberg-Martin dilemma of conserving versus gapless theories? (iii) How to describe Bose-condensed systems in strong spatially random potentials? (iv) Whether thermodynamically anomalous fluctuations in Bose systems are admissible? (v) How to create nonground-statc condensates? Detailed answers to these questions are given in the review. As examples of nonequilibrium condensates, three cases are described: coherent modes, turbulent superfluids, and heterophase fluids.

arXiv:1105.4992•Physics of Particles and Nuclei•May 1, 2011•112 citations
The fundamental problem is analyzed, the relation between Bose-Einstein condensation and spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking. This relation is largerly misunderstood in physics community. Numerous articles and books contain the statement that, though gauge symmetry breaking helps for describing Bose-Einstein condensation, but the latter, in principle, does not require any symmetry breaking. This, however, is not correct. The analysis is based on the known mathematical theorems. But in order not to overcomplicate the presentation and to make it accessible to all readers, technical details are often omitted here. The emphasis is made on the following basic general facts: Spontaneous breaking of gauge symmetry is the necessary and sufficient condition for Bose-Einstein condensation. Condensate fluctuations, in thermodynamic limit, are negligible. Their catastrophic behavior can arise only as a result of incorrect calculations, when a Bose-condensed system is described without gauge symmetry breaking. It is crucially important to employ the representative statistical ensembles equipped with all conditions that are necessary for a unique and mathematically correct description of the given statistical system. Only then one is able to develop a self-consistent theory, free of paradoxes.
Major issues arising in the theory of Bose–Einstein condensation are reviewed. These issues, although being principally important, are very often misunderstood, which results in wrong conclusions. The basic point is global gauge symmetry breaking that is a necessary and sufficient condition for Bose–Einstein condensation. Paying no attention to this basic point is a common fallacy leading to a number of confusions. For instance, the attempt of describing Bose condensation without gauge symmetry breaking produces the so-called “grand canonical catastrophe” that actually does not exist in the correct description of Bose condensation accompanied by gauge symmetry breaking. The other common flaw is forgetting to consider the stability of the studied systems. One sometimes accomplishes lengthy calculations and discusses the properties of a system that in reality cannot exist being unstable. In some cases, the seeming instability is caused by the negligence of the simple mathematical reason teaching us that one should not go beyond the approximation applicability. An example of such an artificial instability is related to the appearance of the so-called “thermodynamically anomalous fluctuations” whose arising is due to the use of a second-order approximation for calculating fourth-order terms, in this way distorting the O(2)-class model of a Bose-condensed system to the Gaussian-class model. These and other principal points, important for the correct treatment of Bose-condensed systems, are reviewed, including the resolution of the Hohenberg–Martin dilemma of gapless versus conserving theories for Bose-condensed systems and the problem of statistical ensemble equivalence.
Despite the long history of the theory of Bose-Einstein condensation, there exist till nowadays some slippery points that are often misunderstood and result in confusion. The report touches some of these points, explaining the following: Global gauge symmetry breaking is the necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of Bose-Einstein condensate. There is no any ``grand canonical catastrophe". The stability of the ideal Bose gas depends on the spatial dimensionality and the shape of a trap. Symmetry-broken averages cannot be neglected. The so-called ``Popov approximation", ascribed to Popov, suggesting to neglect anomalous averages, is neither an approximation nor has anything to do with Popov. There are no thermodynamically anomalous fluctuations in stable equilibrium systems. Representative statistical ensembles are equivalent.
Due to high current interest to Bose-Einstein condensation, the related topics, such as spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking, ergodic decomposition, and particle fluctuations, are intensively discussed in literature. These discussions, unfortunately, involve quite a number of controversies and confusions. The goal of the present brief survey is to clarify some of these confusions, concentrating on the principal points, such as the relationship between the conditions of Bose-Einstein condensation, the Bogolubov method of quasiaverages, spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking, ergodic decomposition, the presumed existence of nonthermodynamic particle fluctuations leading to the so-called ``grand canonical catastrophe", and the requirements for system stability.
Abstract Despite the long history of the theory of Bose-Einstein condensation, there exist till nowadays some slippery points that are often misunderstood and result in confusion. The report touches some of these points, explaining the following: Global gauge symmetry breaking is the necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of Bose-Einstein condensate. There is no any “grand canonical catastrophe”. The stability of the ideal Bose gas depends on the spatial dimensionality and the shape of a trap. Symmetry-broken averages cannot be neglected. The so-called “Popov approximation”, ascribed to Popov, suggesting to neglect anomalous averages, is neither an approximation nor has anything to do with Popov. There are no thermodynamically anomalous fluctuations in stable equilibrium systems. Representative statistical ensembles are equivalent.
Abstract Due to high current interest to Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC), the related topics, such as spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking, ergodic decomposition, and particle fluctuations, are intensively discussed in literature. These discussions, unfortunately, involve quite a number of controversies and confusions. The goal of the present brief survey is to clarify some of these confusions, concentrating on the principal points, such as the relationship between the conditions of BEC, the Bogolubov method of quasiaverages, spontaneous gauge symmetry breaking, ergodic decomposition, the presumed existence of nonthermodynamic particle fluctuations leading to the so-called ‘grand canonical catastrophe’, and the requirements for system stability.
The review is devoted to the elucidation of the basic problems arising in the theoretical investigation of systems with Bose-Einstein condensate. Understanding these challenging problems is necessary for the correct description of Bose-condensed systems. The principal problems considered in the review are as follows: (i) What is the relation between Bose-Einstein condensation and global gauge symmetry breaking? (ii) How to resolve the Hohenberg-Martin dilemma of conserving versus gapless theories? (iii) How to describe Bose-condensed systems in strong spatially random potentials? (iv) Whether thermodynamically anomalous fluctuations in Bose systems are admissible? (v) How to create nonground-statc condensates? Detailed answers to these questions are given in the review. As examples of nonequilibrium condensates, three cases are described: coherent modes, turbulent superfluids, and heterophase fluids.