Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1301.7696

Zurek's envariance derivation of Born's rule and measurement

Fedor Herbut

Published Jan 31, 2013• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Zurek's derivation of Born's rule using envariance (invariance due to entanglement) is considered to capture the probability in full generality, but only as applied to measurement of a quantum observable. Contrariwise, textbook formulations of Born's rule begin with a pure state of a closed, undivided system. The task of this study is to show that a rearrangement of the Zurek approach is possible in which the latter is viewed as giving the probabilities for Schmidt states of an arbitrary composite state vector, and afterwards it is extended to probabilities in a closed, undivided system. This is achieved by determining simultaneously probability and measurement based on the fact that the physical meaning of probability and that of measurement are inextricably dependent on each other.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1301.7696

Related papers

Derivation of the Born rule based on the minimal set of assumptions

A. V. Nenashev

The Born rule for probabilities of measurement results is deduced from the set of five assumptions. The assumptions state that: (a) the state vector fully determines the probabilities of all measurement results; (b) between measurements, any quantum system is governed by that part of standard quantum mechanics, which does not refer to measurements; (c) probabilities of measurement results obey the rules of the classical theory of probability; (d) no information transfer is possible without interaction; (e) if two spin-1/2 particles are in the entangled state (sqrt(1-λ)|up>|up> + sqrt(λ)|down>|down>), and one of spins is measured by the Stern-Gerlach apparatus, then the state of the other spin after this measurement will be either |up> or |down>, corresponding to the measurement result. No one of these assumptions can be omitted. The method of the derivation is based on Zurek's idea of environment-assisted invariance [PRL 90, 120404 (2003)], though taken in rather modified form. Entanglement plays a crucial role in our approach (like in Zurek's one), so the probabilities are first considered in the case when the measured quantum system is entangled with some environment. Probabilities in pure states appear then as a particular case. The method of the present paper can be applied to both ideal and non-ideal measuring devices, irrespective to their constructions and principles of operation.

arXiv:1308.5384•Aug 25, 2013•0 citations

Quantum probabilities from quantum entanglement: experimentally unpacking the Born rule

Jérémie Harris, Frédéric Bouchard, Enrico Santamato +3 more

The Born rule, a foundational axiom used to deduce probabilities of events from wavefunctions, is indispensable in the everyday practice of quantum physics. It is also key in the quest to reconcile the ostensibly inconsistent laws of the quantum and classical realms, as it confers physical significance to reduced density matrices, the essential tools of decoherence theory. Following Bohr's Copenhagen interpretation, textbooks postulate the Born rule outright. However, recent attempts to derive it from other quantum principles have been successful, holding promise for simplifying and clarifying the quantum foundational bedrock. A major family of derivations is based on envariance, a recently discovered symmetry of entangled quantum states. Here, we identify and experimentally test three premises central to these envariance-based derivations, thus demonstrating, in the microworld, the symmetries from which the Born rule is derived. Further, we demonstrate envariance in a purely local quantum system, showing its independence from relativistic causality.

arXiv:1604.01471•New Journal of Physics•May 11, 2016•13 citations

Quantum probabilities from combination of Zurekʼs envariance and Gleasonʼs theorem

A. V. Nenashev

The quantum-mechanical rule for probabilities, in its most general form of positive-operator valued measure (POVM), is shown to be a consequence of the environment-assisted invariance (envariance) idea suggested by Zurek [Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 120404 (2003)], being completed by Gleason's theorem. This provides also a method for derivation of the Born rule.

arXiv:1406.0138•Physica Scripta•Dec 1, 2014•3 citations

Summing to Uncertainty: On the Necessity of Additivity in Deriving the Born Rule

Jiaxuan Zhang

The emergence of intrinsic probability has long been one of the most important and puzzling problems in quantum mechanics, and the law most directly related to this problem is the Born rule. For a century, there have been many attempts to derive the Born rule as a theorem rather than postulating it. However, existing derivations of the Born rule are each based on different frameworks and have attracted different criticisms. The assumptions from which they start are also highly divergent, and the connections between them have not been sufficiently studied. These possible connections are very likely to be the key to answering questions about the origin of probability in quantum mechanics. This paper focuses on proving the necessity and indispensability of the additivity assumption in the derivation of the Born rule. This supports the view that the Born rule cannot be derived solely from other non-probabilistic quantum or additional postulates. We first prove that additivity cannot be derived from two other commonly used non-probabilistic additional assumptions, non-contextuality and normalization. Then we analyze the crucial role of the additivity assumption in five important existing derivations of the Born rule. These include Gleason's Theorem, Busch's extension of Gleason's Theorem, the Deutsch-Wallace Theorem, Zurek's envariance proof, and the Finkelstein-Hartle Theorem. We show that these derivations either depend heavily on the additivity assumption or lead to obvious loopholes due to the lack of additivity. We also point out some problems arised from the lack of a non-contextuality assumption. Our results provide a novel insight into the important role of additivity assumption in quantum measurement, as well as into the origin of probability in quantum mechanics.

quant-pharXiv:2603.06211•Physical Review A•Mar 9, 2026•2 citations

Born Rule: Quantum Probability as Classical Probability

Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica

Abstract I provide a simple derivation of the Born rule as giving a classical probability, that is, the ratio of the measure of favorable states of the system to the measure of its total possible states. In classical systems, the probability is due to the fact that the same macrostate can be realized in different ways as a microstate. Despite the radical differences between quantum and classical systems, I show that the same can be applied to quantum systems, and the result is the Born rule. This works only if the basis is continuous (an eigenbasis of observables with continuous spectra), but all known physically realistic measurements involve a continuous basis (the position basis). The continuous basis is not unique, and for subsystems it depends on the observable. But for the entire universe, there are continuous bases that give the Born rule for all measurements, because all measurements reduce to distinguishing macroscopic pointer states, and macroscopic observations commute. This allows for the possibility of a unique ontic basis for the entire universe. In the wavefunctional formulation, the basis can be chosen to consist of classical field configurations, and the coefficients $$\Psi [\phi ]$$ Ψ [ ϕ ] can be made real by absorbing them into a global U(1) gauge. For the many-worlds interpretation, this result gives the Born rule from micro-branch counting.

arXiv:2209.08621•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Apr 25, 2025•6 citations

Born’s Rule from the Symmetries of Entanglement

Wojciech Hubert Zurek

Chapter 3 describes how quantum entanglement leads to probabilities based on a symmetry, but—in contrast to subjective equal likelihood based solely on ignorance—it is an objective symmetry of known quantum states. Entanglement-assisted invariance (or envariance for short) relies on quantum correlations: One can know the quantum state of the whole and use this to quantify the resulting ignorance of the states of parts. Thus, quantum probability is, in effect, an objective consequence of the Heisenberg-like indeterminacy between global and local observables. This derivation of Born’s rule is based on the consistent subset of quantum postulates. It justifies statistical interpretation of reduced density matrices, an indispensable tool of decoherence theory. Hence, it gives one the mandate to explore—in Part II of this book—the fundamental implications of decoherence and its consequences using reduced density matrices and other customary tools.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 6, 2025•0 citations
Zurek's derivation of Born's rule using envariance (invariance due to entanglement) is considered to capture the probability in full generality, but only as applied to measurement of a quantum observable. Contrariwise, textbook formulations of Born's rule begin with a pure state of a closed, undivided system. The task of this study is to show that a rearrangement of the Zurek approach is possible in which the latter is viewed as giving the probabilities for Schmidt states of an arbitrary composite state vector, and afterwards it is extended to probabilities in a closed, undivided system. This is achieved by determining simultaneously probability and measurement based on the fact that the physical meaning of probability and that of measurement are inextricably dependent on each other.
The Born rule for probabilities of measurement results is deduced from the set of five assumptions. The assumptions state that: (a) the state vector fully determines the probabilities of all measurement results; (b) between measurements, any quantum system is governed by that part of standard quantum mechanics, which does not refer to measurements; (c) probabilities of measurement results obey the rules of the classical theory of probability; (d) no information transfer is possible without interaction; (e) if two spin-1/2 particles are in the entangled state (sqrt(1-λ)|up>|up> + sqrt(λ)|down>|down>), and one of spins is measured by the Stern-Gerlach apparatus, then the state of the other spin after this measurement will be either |up> or |down>, corresponding to the measurement result. No one of these assumptions can be omitted. The method of the derivation is based on Zurek's idea of environment-assisted invariance [PRL 90, 120404 (2003)], though taken in rather modified form. Entanglement plays a crucial role in our approach (like in Zurek's one), so the probabilities are first considered in the case when the measured quantum system is entangled with some environment. Probabilities in pure states appear then as a particular case. The method of the present paper can be applied to both ideal and non-ideal measuring devices, irrespective to their constructions and principles of operation.
The Born rule, a foundational axiom used to deduce probabilities of events from wavefunctions, is indispensable in the everyday practice of quantum physics. It is also key in the quest to reconcile the ostensibly inconsistent laws of the quantum and classical realms, as it confers physical significance to reduced density matrices, the essential tools of decoherence theory. Following Bohr's Copenhagen interpretation, textbooks postulate the Born rule outright. However, recent attempts to derive it from other quantum principles have been successful, holding promise for simplifying and clarifying the quantum foundational bedrock. A major family of derivations is based on envariance, a recently discovered symmetry of entangled quantum states. Here, we identify and experimentally test three premises central to these envariance-based derivations, thus demonstrating, in the microworld, the symmetries from which the Born rule is derived. Further, we demonstrate envariance in a purely local quantum system, showing its independence from relativistic causality.
The emergence of intrinsic probability has long been one of the most important and puzzling problems in quantum mechanics, and the law most directly related to this problem is the Born rule. For a century, there have been many attempts to derive the Born rule as a theorem rather than postulating it. However, existing derivations of the Born rule are each based on different frameworks and have attracted different criticisms. The assumptions from which they start are also highly divergent, and the connections between them have not been sufficiently studied. These possible connections are very likely to be the key to answering questions about the origin of probability in quantum mechanics. This paper focuses on proving the necessity and indispensability of the additivity assumption in the derivation of the Born rule. This supports the view that the Born rule cannot be derived solely from other non-probabilistic quantum or additional postulates. We first prove that additivity cannot be derived from two other commonly used non-probabilistic additional assumptions, non-contextuality and normalization. Then we analyze the crucial role of the additivity assumption in five important existing derivations of the Born rule. These include Gleason's Theorem, Busch's extension of Gleason's Theorem, the Deutsch-Wallace Theorem, Zurek's envariance proof, and the Finkelstein-Hartle Theorem. We show that these derivations either depend heavily on the additivity assumption or lead to obvious loopholes due to the lack of additivity. We also point out some problems arised from the lack of a non-contextuality assumption. Our results provide a novel insight into the important role of additivity assumption in quantum measurement, as well as into the origin of probability in quantum mechanics.
Abstract I provide a simple derivation of the Born rule as giving a classical probability, that is, the ratio of the measure of favorable states of the system to the measure of its total possible states. In classical systems, the probability is due to the fact that the same macrostate can be realized in different ways as a microstate. Despite the radical differences between quantum and classical systems, I show that the same can be applied to quantum systems, and the result is the Born rule. This works only if the basis is continuous (an eigenbasis of observables with continuous spectra), but all known physically realistic measurements involve a continuous basis (the position basis). The continuous basis is not unique, and for subsystems it depends on the observable. But for the entire universe, there are continuous bases that give the Born rule for all measurements, because all measurements reduce to distinguishing macroscopic pointer states, and macroscopic observations commute. This allows for the possibility of a unique ontic basis for the entire universe. In the wavefunctional formulation, the basis can be chosen to consist of classical field configurations, and the coefficients Ψ[ϕ]\Psi [\phi ]Ψ[ϕ] Ψ [ ϕ ] can be made real by absorbing them into a global U(1) gauge. For the many-worlds interpretation, this result gives the Born rule from micro-branch counting.
Chapter 3 describes how quantum entanglement leads to probabilities based on a symmetry, but—in contrast to subjective equal likelihood based solely on ignorance—it is an objective symmetry of known quantum states. Entanglement-assisted invariance (or envariance for short) relies on quantum correlations: One can know the quantum state of the whole and use this to quantify the resulting ignorance of the states of parts. Thus, quantum probability is, in effect, an objective consequence of the Heisenberg-like indeterminacy between global and local observables. This derivation of Born’s rule is based on the consistent subset of quantum postulates. It justifies statistical interpretation of reduced density matrices, an indispensable tool of decoherence theory. Hence, it gives one the mandate to explore—in Part II of this book—the fundamental implications of decoherence and its consequences using reduced density matrices and other customary tools.