Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1210.5978

Quantum contextuality from a simple principle?

Joe Henson C

Published Oct 22, 2012• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In a recent article entitled "A simple explanation of the quantum violation of a fundamental inequality," Cabello proposes a condition on a class of probabilistic models that, he claims, gives the same bound on contextuality for the KCBS inequality as quantum mechanics, and also rules out PR-box nonlocality. He conjectures that the condition will also reproduce quantum limits on contextuality in other scenarios. Here we show that the proposed principle is actually too weak to derive these results. Cabello has implicitly assumed in the proofs that if all pairs in a set of events are pairwise exclusive (so that their probabilities must sum to less than 1), the set can itself be considered exclusive. Perhaps surprisingly, this is not in general true in the general probabilistic framework under discussion. We call this hidden assumption "Consistent Exclusivity" or CE. With this extra assumption Cabello's proofs are sound. Furthermore, it is established that CE holds in quantum mechanics, providing a reasonable and simple new principle that may characterise quantum non-contextuality in many scenarios.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1210.5978

Related papers

Bounding Quantum Contextuality with Lack of Third-Order Interference

Joe Henson C

Recently, many simple principles have been proposed that can explain quantum limitations on possible sets of experimental probabilities in nonlocality and contextuality experiments. However, few implications between these principles are known. Here it is shown that the lack of irreducible third-order interference (a generalization of the idea that no probabilistic interference remains unaccounted for once we have taken into account interference between pairs of slits in a n-sit experiment) implies the principle known as the E principle or consistent exclusivity (that, if each pair of a set of experimental outcomes are exclusive alternatives in some measurement, then their probabilities are consistent with the existence of a further measurement in which they are all exclusive). This is a step towards a more unified understanding of quantum nonlocality and contextuality, which promises to allow derivations of important results from minimal, easily grasped assumptions. As one example, this result implies that lack of third-order interference bounds violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-Bell inequality to 2.883.

arXiv:1406.3281•Physical Review Letters•Jun 4, 2015•28 citations

Simple Explanation of the Quantum Violation of a Fundamental Inequality

Adán Cabello

We show that the maximum quantum violation of the Klyachko-Can-Binicioğlu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is exactly the maximum value satisfying the following principle: The sum of probabilities of pairwise exclusive events cannot exceed 1. We call this principle "global exclusivity," since its power shows up when it is applied to global events resulting from enlarged scenarios in which the events in the inequality are considered jointly with other events. We identify scenarios in which this principle singles out quantum contextuality, and show that a recent proof excluding nonlocal boxes follows from the maximum violation imposed by this principle to the KCBS inequality.

arXiv:1210.2988•Physical Review Letters•Feb 5, 2013•171 citations

The Exclusivity Principle and the Set of Quantum Correlations

Bárbara Amaral

The most promising candidate for being the fundamental principle of quantum contextuality is the Exclusivity principle, which states that the sum of the probabilities of a set of pairwise exclusive events cannot exceed 1. By itself, the Exclusivity principle singles out the maximum quantum value for some important Bell and noncontextuality inequalities. We can get better results if we apply the E principle to more sophisticated scenarios. This happens because this principle exhibits activation effects: a distribution satisfying this principles does not necessarily satisfy it when combined with other distributions. Activation effects can be used to prove that the Exclusivity principle singles out the set of quantum distributions for the most simple noncontextuality inequality. It is still not known if the exclusivity principle solves the problem of explaining quantum contextuality completely, but many results have been proven that support the conjecture that it might. The main purpose of this thesis is to discuss in detail the situations in which the E principle can be used to rule out distributions outside the quantum set.

arXiv:1502.03235•Feb 11, 2015•6 citations

Macroscopic noncontextuality as a principle for almost-quantum correlations

Joe Henson C, Ana Belén Sainz

Quantum mechanics allows only certain sets of experimental results (or ``probabilistic models'') for Bell-type quantum nonlocality experiments. A derivation of this set from simple physical or information theoretic principles would represent an important step forward in our understanding of quantum mechanics, and this problem has been intensely investigated in recent years. ``Macroscopic locality,'' which requires the recovery of locality in the limit of large numbers of trials, is one of several principles discussed in the literature that place a bound on the set of quantum probabilistic models. A similar question can also be asked about probabilistic models for the more general class of quantum contextuality experiments. Here, we extend the macroscopic locality principle to this more general setting, using the hypergraph approach of Ac\'{\i}n, Fritz, Leverrier, and Sainz [Comm. Math. Phys. 334(2), 533--628 (2015)], which provides a framework to study both phenomena of nonlocality and contextuality in a unified manner. We find that the set of probabilistic models allowed by our macroscopic noncontextuality principle is equivalent to an important and previously studied set in this formalism, which is slightly larger than the quantum set. In the particular case of Bell scenarios, this set is equivalent to the set of ``almost-quantum'' models, which is of particular interest since the latter was recently shown to satisfy all but one of the principles that have been proposed to bound quantum probabilistic models, without being implied by any of them (or even their conjunction). Our condition is the first characterization of the almost-quantum set from a simple physical principle.

arXiv:1501.06052•Physical Review A•Apr 13, 2015•19 citations

Bosonic bunching does not reveal stronger quantum contextuality

Adán Cabello

In a recent paper, Kurzynski et al. present a gedanken experiment that, they claim, violates the Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky (KCBS) noncontextuality (NC) inequality beyond its maximum quantum value, and a similar experiment that, they claim, violates Specker's NC inequality, which is not violated by quantum mechanics. We argue that these claims are baseless, since these experiments do not satisfy the conditions required for any observation of contextuality through the experimental violation of a NC inequality. Moreover, the physical events in the experiments of Kurzynski et al. do not have the relationships of exclusivity which the authors assume they have.

arXiv:1212.5502•Dec 21, 2012•0 citations

Twin inequality for fully contextual quantum correlations

Adán Cabello

Quantum mechanics exhibits a very peculiar form of contextuality. Identifying and connecting the simplest scenarios in which more general theories can or cannot be more contextual than quantum mechanics is a fundamental step in the quest for the principle that singles out quantum contextuality. The former scenario corresponds to the Klyachko-Can-Binicio\ifmmode \breve{g}\else \u{g}\fi{}lu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality. Here we show that there is a simple tight inequality, twin to the KCBS, for which quantum contextuality cannot be outperformed. In a sense, this twin inequality is the simplest tool for recognizing fully contextual quantum correlations.

arXiv:1209.0112•Physical Review A•Jan 30, 2013•19 citations
In a recent article entitled "A simple explanation of the quantum violation of a fundamental inequality," Cabello proposes a condition on a class of probabilistic models that, he claims, gives the same bound on contextuality for the KCBS inequality as quantum mechanics, and also rules out PR-box nonlocality. He conjectures that the condition will also reproduce quantum limits on contextuality in other scenarios. Here we show that the proposed principle is actually too weak to derive these results. Cabello has implicitly assumed in the proofs that if all pairs in a set of events are pairwise exclusive (so that their probabilities must sum to less than 1), the set can itself be considered exclusive. Perhaps surprisingly, this is not in general true in the general probabilistic framework under discussion. We call this hidden assumption "Consistent Exclusivity" or CE. With this extra assumption Cabello's proofs are sound. Furthermore, it is established that CE holds in quantum mechanics, providing a reasonable and simple new principle that may characterise quantum non-contextuality in many scenarios.
Recently, many simple principles have been proposed that can explain quantum limitations on possible sets of experimental probabilities in nonlocality and contextuality experiments. However, few implications between these principles are known. Here it is shown that the lack of irreducible third-order interference (a generalization of the idea that no probabilistic interference remains unaccounted for once we have taken into account interference between pairs of slits in a n-sit experiment) implies the principle known as the E principle or consistent exclusivity (that, if each pair of a set of experimental outcomes are exclusive alternatives in some measurement, then their probabilities are consistent with the existence of a further measurement in which they are all exclusive). This is a step towards a more unified understanding of quantum nonlocality and contextuality, which promises to allow derivations of important results from minimal, easily grasped assumptions. As one example, this result implies that lack of third-order interference bounds violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-Bell inequality to 2.883.
We show that the maximum quantum violation of the Klyachko-Can-Binicioğlu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is exactly the maximum value satisfying the following principle: The sum of probabilities of pairwise exclusive events cannot exceed 1. We call this principle "global exclusivity," since its power shows up when it is applied to global events resulting from enlarged scenarios in which the events in the inequality are considered jointly with other events. We identify scenarios in which this principle singles out quantum contextuality, and show that a recent proof excluding nonlocal boxes follows from the maximum violation imposed by this principle to the KCBS inequality.
The most promising candidate for being the fundamental principle of quantum contextuality is the Exclusivity principle, which states that the sum of the probabilities of a set of pairwise exclusive events cannot exceed 1. By itself, the Exclusivity principle singles out the maximum quantum value for some important Bell and noncontextuality inequalities. We can get better results if we apply the E principle to more sophisticated scenarios. This happens because this principle exhibits activation effects: a distribution satisfying this principles does not necessarily satisfy it when combined with other distributions. Activation effects can be used to prove that the Exclusivity principle singles out the set of quantum distributions for the most simple noncontextuality inequality. It is still not known if the exclusivity principle solves the problem of explaining quantum contextuality completely, but many results have been proven that support the conjecture that it might. The main purpose of this thesis is to discuss in detail the situations in which the E principle can be used to rule out distributions outside the quantum set.
Quantum mechanics allows only certain sets of experimental results (or ``probabilistic models'') for Bell-type quantum nonlocality experiments. A derivation of this set from simple physical or information theoretic principles would represent an important step forward in our understanding of quantum mechanics, and this problem has been intensely investigated in recent years. ``Macroscopic locality,'' which requires the recovery of locality in the limit of large numbers of trials, is one of several principles discussed in the literature that place a bound on the set of quantum probabilistic models. A similar question can also be asked about probabilistic models for the more general class of quantum contextuality experiments. Here, we extend the macroscopic locality principle to this more general setting, using the hypergraph approach of Ac\'{\i}n, Fritz, Leverrier, and Sainz [Comm. Math. Phys. 334(2), 533--628 (2015)], which provides a framework to study both phenomena of nonlocality and contextuality in a unified manner. We find that the set of probabilistic models allowed by our macroscopic noncontextuality principle is equivalent to an important and previously studied set in this formalism, which is slightly larger than the quantum set. In the particular case of Bell scenarios, this set is equivalent to the set of ``almost-quantum'' models, which is of particular interest since the latter was recently shown to satisfy all but one of the principles that have been proposed to bound quantum probabilistic models, without being implied by any of them (or even their conjunction). Our condition is the first characterization of the almost-quantum set from a simple physical principle.
In a recent paper, Kurzynski et al. present a gedanken experiment that, they claim, violates the Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky (KCBS) noncontextuality (NC) inequality beyond its maximum quantum value, and a similar experiment that, they claim, violates Specker's NC inequality, which is not violated by quantum mechanics. We argue that these claims are baseless, since these experiments do not satisfy the conditions required for any observation of contextuality through the experimental violation of a NC inequality. Moreover, the physical events in the experiments of Kurzynski et al. do not have the relationships of exclusivity which the authors assume they have.
Quantum mechanics exhibits a very peculiar form of contextuality. Identifying and connecting the simplest scenarios in which more general theories can or cannot be more contextual than quantum mechanics is a fundamental step in the quest for the principle that singles out quantum contextuality. The former scenario corresponds to the Klyachko-Can-Binicio\ifmmode \breve{g}\else \u{g}\fi{}lu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality. Here we show that there is a simple tight inequality, twin to the KCBS, for which quantum contextuality cannot be outperformed. In a sense, this twin inequality is the simplest tool for recognizing fully contextual quantum correlations.