Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1210.2988 · Physical Review Letters

Simple Explanation of the Quantum Violation of a Fundamental Inequality

Adán Cabello

Published Feb 5, 2013• 171 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We show that the maximum quantum violation of the Klyachko-Can-Binicioğlu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is exactly the maximum value satisfying the following principle: The sum of probabilities of pairwise exclusive events cannot exceed 1. We call this principle "global exclusivity," since its power shows up when it is applied to global events resulting from enlarged scenarios in which the events in the inequality are considered jointly with other events. We identify scenarios in which this principle singles out quantum contextuality, and show that a recent proof excluding nonlocal boxes follows from the maximum violation imposed by this principle to the KCBS inequality.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.110.060402

Related papers

Quantum contextuality from a simple principle?

Joe Henson C

In a recent article entitled "A simple explanation of the quantum violation of a fundamental inequality," Cabello proposes a condition on a class of probabilistic models that, he claims, gives the same bound on contextuality for the KCBS inequality as quantum mechanics, and also rules out PR-box nonlocality. He conjectures that the condition will also reproduce quantum limits on contextuality in other scenarios. Here we show that the proposed principle is actually too weak to derive these results. Cabello has implicitly assumed in the proofs that if all pairs in a set of events are pairwise exclusive (so that their probabilities must sum to less than 1), the set can itself be considered exclusive. Perhaps surprisingly, this is not in general true in the general probabilistic framework under discussion. We call this hidden assumption "Consistent Exclusivity" or CE. With this extra assumption Cabello's proofs are sound. Furthermore, it is established that CE holds in quantum mechanics, providing a reasonable and simple new principle that may characterise quantum non-contextuality in many scenarios.

arXiv:1210.5978•Oct 22, 2012•12 citations

Minimum detection efficiency for the loophole-free confirmation of quantum contextuality

向阳, 洪方昱

Klyachko–Can–Binicioglu–Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is a Bell-like inequality,the violation of which can be used to confirm the existence of quantum contextuality.However,the imperfection of detection efficiency may cause the so-called loophole in actual KCBS’s experiments.We derive an alternative KCBS inequality to deal with the loophole in actual KCBS’s experiments.We prove that if the experimental data violate this KCBS inequality,the loophole-free violation of the original KCBS inequality will occur.We show that the minimum detection efficiency needed for a loophole-free violation of the KCBS inequality is about 0.9738.

中国物理B：英文版•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Minimum detection efficiency for the loophole-free confirmation of quantum contextuality

Yang Xiang, Fang-Yu Hong

Klyachko—Can—Binicioğlu—Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is a Bell-like inequality, the violation of which can be used to confirm the existence of quantum contextuality. However, the imperfection of detection efficiency may cause the so-called loophole in actual KCBS's experiments. We derive an alternative KCBS inequality to deal with the loophole in actual KCBS's experiments. We prove that if the experimental data violate this KCBS inequality, the loophole-free violation of the original KCBS inequality will occur. We show that the minimum detection efficiency needed for a loophole-free violation of the KCBS inequality is about 0.9738.

Chinese Physics B•Nov 1, 2013•1 citation

Bosonic bunching does not reveal stronger quantum contextuality

Adán Cabello

In a recent paper, Kurzynski et al. present a gedanken experiment that, they claim, violates the Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky (KCBS) noncontextuality (NC) inequality beyond its maximum quantum value, and a similar experiment that, they claim, violates Specker's NC inequality, which is not violated by quantum mechanics. We argue that these claims are baseless, since these experiments do not satisfy the conditions required for any observation of contextuality through the experimental violation of a NC inequality. Moreover, the physical events in the experiments of Kurzynski et al. do not have the relationships of exclusivity which the authors assume they have.

arXiv:1212.5502•Dec 21, 2012•0 citations

The Exclusivity Principle and the Set of Quantum Correlations

Bárbara Amaral

The most promising candidate for being the fundamental principle of quantum contextuality is the Exclusivity principle, which states that the sum of the probabilities of a set of pairwise exclusive events cannot exceed 1. By itself, the Exclusivity principle singles out the maximum quantum value for some important Bell and noncontextuality inequalities. We can get better results if we apply the E principle to more sophisticated scenarios. This happens because this principle exhibits activation effects: a distribution satisfying this principles does not necessarily satisfy it when combined with other distributions. Activation effects can be used to prove that the Exclusivity principle singles out the set of quantum distributions for the most simple noncontextuality inequality. It is still not known if the exclusivity principle solves the problem of explaining quantum contextuality completely, but many results have been proven that support the conjecture that it might. The main purpose of this thesis is to discuss in detail the situations in which the E principle can be used to rule out distributions outside the quantum set.

arXiv:1502.03235•Feb 11, 2015•6 citations

Twin inequality for fully contextual quantum correlations

Adán Cabello

Quantum mechanics exhibits a very peculiar form of contextuality. Identifying and connecting the simplest scenarios in which more general theories can or cannot be more contextual than quantum mechanics is a fundamental step in the quest for the principle that singles out quantum contextuality. The former scenario corresponds to the Klyachko-Can-Binicio\ifmmode \breve{g}\else \u{g}\fi{}lu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality. Here we show that there is a simple tight inequality, twin to the KCBS, for which quantum contextuality cannot be outperformed. In a sense, this twin inequality is the simplest tool for recognizing fully contextual quantum correlations.

arXiv:1209.0112•Physical Review A•Jan 30, 2013•19 citations
We show that the maximum quantum violation of the Klyachko-Can-Binicioğlu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is exactly the maximum value satisfying the following principle: The sum of probabilities of pairwise exclusive events cannot exceed 1. We call this principle "global exclusivity," since its power shows up when it is applied to global events resulting from enlarged scenarios in which the events in the inequality are considered jointly with other events. We identify scenarios in which this principle singles out quantum contextuality, and show that a recent proof excluding nonlocal boxes follows from the maximum violation imposed by this principle to the KCBS inequality.
In a recent article entitled "A simple explanation of the quantum violation of a fundamental inequality," Cabello proposes a condition on a class of probabilistic models that, he claims, gives the same bound on contextuality for the KCBS inequality as quantum mechanics, and also rules out PR-box nonlocality. He conjectures that the condition will also reproduce quantum limits on contextuality in other scenarios. Here we show that the proposed principle is actually too weak to derive these results. Cabello has implicitly assumed in the proofs that if all pairs in a set of events are pairwise exclusive (so that their probabilities must sum to less than 1), the set can itself be considered exclusive. Perhaps surprisingly, this is not in general true in the general probabilistic framework under discussion. We call this hidden assumption "Consistent Exclusivity" or CE. With this extra assumption Cabello's proofs are sound. Furthermore, it is established that CE holds in quantum mechanics, providing a reasonable and simple new principle that may characterise quantum non-contextuality in many scenarios.
Klyachko–Can–Binicioglu–Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is a Bell-like inequality,the violation of which can be used to confirm the existence of quantum contextuality.However,the imperfection of detection efficiency may cause the so-called loophole in actual KCBS’s experiments.We derive an alternative KCBS inequality to deal with the loophole in actual KCBS’s experiments.We prove that if the experimental data violate this KCBS inequality,the loophole-free violation of the original KCBS inequality will occur.We show that the minimum detection efficiency needed for a loophole-free violation of the KCBS inequality is about 0.9738.
Klyachko—Can—Binicioğlu—Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is a Bell-like inequality, the violation of which can be used to confirm the existence of quantum contextuality. However, the imperfection of detection efficiency may cause the so-called loophole in actual KCBS's experiments. We derive an alternative KCBS inequality to deal with the loophole in actual KCBS's experiments. We prove that if the experimental data violate this KCBS inequality, the loophole-free violation of the original KCBS inequality will occur. We show that the minimum detection efficiency needed for a loophole-free violation of the KCBS inequality is about 0.9738.
In a recent paper, Kurzynski et al. present a gedanken experiment that, they claim, violates the Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky (KCBS) noncontextuality (NC) inequality beyond its maximum quantum value, and a similar experiment that, they claim, violates Specker's NC inequality, which is not violated by quantum mechanics. We argue that these claims are baseless, since these experiments do not satisfy the conditions required for any observation of contextuality through the experimental violation of a NC inequality. Moreover, the physical events in the experiments of Kurzynski et al. do not have the relationships of exclusivity which the authors assume they have.
The most promising candidate for being the fundamental principle of quantum contextuality is the Exclusivity principle, which states that the sum of the probabilities of a set of pairwise exclusive events cannot exceed 1. By itself, the Exclusivity principle singles out the maximum quantum value for some important Bell and noncontextuality inequalities. We can get better results if we apply the E principle to more sophisticated scenarios. This happens because this principle exhibits activation effects: a distribution satisfying this principles does not necessarily satisfy it when combined with other distributions. Activation effects can be used to prove that the Exclusivity principle singles out the set of quantum distributions for the most simple noncontextuality inequality. It is still not known if the exclusivity principle solves the problem of explaining quantum contextuality completely, but many results have been proven that support the conjecture that it might. The main purpose of this thesis is to discuss in detail the situations in which the E principle can be used to rule out distributions outside the quantum set.
Quantum mechanics exhibits a very peculiar form of contextuality. Identifying and connecting the simplest scenarios in which more general theories can or cannot be more contextual than quantum mechanics is a fundamental step in the quest for the principle that singles out quantum contextuality. The former scenario corresponds to the Klyachko-Can-Binicio\ifmmode \breve{g}\else \u{g}\fi{}lu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality. Here we show that there is a simple tight inequality, twin to the KCBS, for which quantum contextuality cannot be outperformed. In a sense, this twin inequality is the simplest tool for recognizing fully contextual quantum correlations.