Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1212.5502

Bosonic bunching does not reveal stronger quantum contextuality

Adán Cabello

Published Dec 21, 2012• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In a recent paper, Kurzynski et al. present a gedanken experiment that, they claim, violates the Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky (KCBS) noncontextuality (NC) inequality beyond its maximum quantum value, and a similar experiment that, they claim, violates Specker's NC inequality, which is not violated by quantum mechanics. We argue that these claims are baseless, since these experiments do not satisfy the conditions required for any observation of contextuality through the experimental violation of a NC inequality. Moreover, the physical events in the experiments of Kurzynski et al. do not have the relationships of exclusivity which the authors assume they have.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1212.5502

Related papers

Simple Explanation of the Quantum Violation of a Fundamental Inequality

Adán Cabello

We show that the maximum quantum violation of the Klyachko-Can-Binicioğlu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is exactly the maximum value satisfying the following principle: The sum of probabilities of pairwise exclusive events cannot exceed 1. We call this principle "global exclusivity," since its power shows up when it is applied to global events resulting from enlarged scenarios in which the events in the inequality are considered jointly with other events. We identify scenarios in which this principle singles out quantum contextuality, and show that a recent proof excluding nonlocal boxes follows from the maximum violation imposed by this principle to the KCBS inequality.

arXiv:1210.2988•Physical Review Letters•Feb 5, 2013•171 citations

Revealing quantum contextuality using a single measurement device

Jaskaran Singh, Rajendra Singh Bhati, Arvind

In this paper we analyze the notion of measurement noncontextuality (MNC) and identify contextual scenarios which involve sequential measurements of only a single measurement device. We show that any noncontextual ontological model fails to explain the statistics of outcomes of a single carefully constructed positive-operator-valued measure (POVM) executed sequentially on a quantum system. The context of measurement arises from the different configurations in which the device can be used. We develop an inequality from the noncontextual (NC) ontic model, and construct a quantum situation involving measurements from the Klyachko-Can-Binicio\ifmmode \check{g}\else \v{g}\fi{}lu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality. We show that the resultant statistics arising from this device violate our NC inequality. This device can be generalized by incorporating measurements from arbitrary $n$-cycle contextuality inequalities of which $n=5$ corresponds to the KCBS inequality. We show that the NC and quantum bounds for various scenarios can be derived more easily using only the functional relationships between the outcomes for larger values $n$. This makes it one of the simpler contextual inequalities to analyze.

arXiv:2102.00410•Physical Review A•Jan 3, 2023•5 citations

Bosonic bunching reveals strong contextual behaviour

Paweł Kurzyński, Akihito Soeda, Jayne E. Thompson +1 more

We show that violation of Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 020403 (2008)] pentagram-like inequality can exceed $\sqrt{5}$ provided that exclusive events do not have to be comeasurable and that one uses bosonic systems which exhibit bunching effects. We also show that in this case one can find three pairwise exclusive events whose sum of probabilities is 3/2.

arXiv:1211.6907•Nov 29, 2012•0 citations

Comment on "Two Fundamental Experimental Tests of Nonclassicality with Qutrits"

Radek Łapkiewicz, Li, Peizhe, Christoph Schaeff +4 more

In a recent paper [arXiv:1301.2887] Ahrens et al. claim that our "(...) experiment on qutrits does not test Klyachko et al.'s inequality, but an inequality with extra correlations" and that the "(...) experiment cannot be considered a proper test of a noncontextuality inequality, since the same observable is measured with different setups in different contexts". We disagree with these claims. In this note we briefly re-state how our test of the non-contextuality inequality was constructed. We explain how we keep the context of measurements when switching between different terms of the tested inequality, and we argue that we did in fact test the Klyachko, Can, Binicioglu and Shumovsky inequality. In doing so, we also clarify why our experiment is indeed a proper test of noncontextual realism.

arXiv:1305.5529•May 23, 2013•5 citations

Contextuality in Algebraic Quantum Theory

Yuichiro Kitajima

Klyachko, Can, Binicioğlu, and Shumovsky (KCBS) have introduced an inequality which holds if there is a noncontextual hidden variable theory. It is called KCBS inequality. Its violation shows a contradiction between predictions of quantum theory and noncontextual hidden variable theories. Bell-Kochen-Specker (BKS) theorem also shows that there are no noncontextual hidden variable theories in quantum theory by showing that there is no value assignment on a set of all observables. Thus, its approach is different from KCBS inequality. In the present paper, we show a logical relation between KCBS inequality and a value assignment, and examine a consequence of this logical relation.

Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Minimum detection efficiency for the loophole-free confirmation of quantum contextuality

向阳, 洪方昱

Klyachko–Can–Binicioglu–Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is a Bell-like inequality,the violation of which can be used to confirm the existence of quantum contextuality.However,the imperfection of detection efficiency may cause the so-called loophole in actual KCBS’s experiments.We derive an alternative KCBS inequality to deal with the loophole in actual KCBS’s experiments.We prove that if the experimental data violate this KCBS inequality,the loophole-free violation of the original KCBS inequality will occur.We show that the minimum detection efficiency needed for a loophole-free violation of the KCBS inequality is about 0.9738.

中国物理B：英文版•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations
In a recent paper, Kurzynski et al. present a gedanken experiment that, they claim, violates the Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky (KCBS) noncontextuality (NC) inequality beyond its maximum quantum value, and a similar experiment that, they claim, violates Specker's NC inequality, which is not violated by quantum mechanics. We argue that these claims are baseless, since these experiments do not satisfy the conditions required for any observation of contextuality through the experimental violation of a NC inequality. Moreover, the physical events in the experiments of Kurzynski et al. do not have the relationships of exclusivity which the authors assume they have.
We show that the maximum quantum violation of the Klyachko-Can-Binicioğlu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is exactly the maximum value satisfying the following principle: The sum of probabilities of pairwise exclusive events cannot exceed 1. We call this principle "global exclusivity," since its power shows up when it is applied to global events resulting from enlarged scenarios in which the events in the inequality are considered jointly with other events. We identify scenarios in which this principle singles out quantum contextuality, and show that a recent proof excluding nonlocal boxes follows from the maximum violation imposed by this principle to the KCBS inequality.
In this paper we analyze the notion of measurement noncontextuality (MNC) and identify contextual scenarios which involve sequential measurements of only a single measurement device. We show that any noncontextual ontological model fails to explain the statistics of outcomes of a single carefully constructed positive-operator-valued measure (POVM) executed sequentially on a quantum system. The context of measurement arises from the different configurations in which the device can be used. We develop an inequality from the noncontextual (NC) ontic model, and construct a quantum situation involving measurements from the Klyachko-Can-Binicio\ifmmode \check{g}\else \v{g}\fi{}lu-Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality. We show that the resultant statistics arising from this device violate our NC inequality. This device can be generalized by incorporating measurements from arbitrary nnn-cycle contextuality inequalities of which n=5n=5n=5 corresponds to the KCBS inequality. We show that the NC and quantum bounds for various scenarios can be derived more easily using only the functional relationships between the outcomes for larger values nnn. This makes it one of the simpler contextual inequalities to analyze.
We show that violation of Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 101}, 020403 (2008)] pentagram-like inequality can exceed 5\sqrt{5}5​ provided that exclusive events do not have to be comeasurable and that one uses bosonic systems which exhibit bunching effects. We also show that in this case one can find three pairwise exclusive events whose sum of probabilities is 3/2.
In a recent paper [arXiv:1301.2887] Ahrens et al. claim that our "(...) experiment on qutrits does not test Klyachko et al.'s inequality, but an inequality with extra correlations" and that the "(...) experiment cannot be considered a proper test of a noncontextuality inequality, since the same observable is measured with different setups in different contexts". We disagree with these claims. In this note we briefly re-state how our test of the non-contextuality inequality was constructed. We explain how we keep the context of measurements when switching between different terms of the tested inequality, and we argue that we did in fact test the Klyachko, Can, Binicioglu and Shumovsky inequality. In doing so, we also clarify why our experiment is indeed a proper test of noncontextual realism.
Klyachko, Can, Binicioğlu, and Shumovsky (KCBS) have introduced an inequality which holds if there is a noncontextual hidden variable theory. It is called KCBS inequality. Its violation shows a contradiction between predictions of quantum theory and noncontextual hidden variable theories. Bell-Kochen-Specker (BKS) theorem also shows that there are no noncontextual hidden variable theories in quantum theory by showing that there is no value assignment on a set of all observables. Thus, its approach is different from KCBS inequality. In the present paper, we show a logical relation between KCBS inequality and a value assignment, and examine a consequence of this logical relation.
Klyachko–Can–Binicioglu–Shumovsky (KCBS) inequality is a Bell-like inequality,the violation of which can be used to confirm the existence of quantum contextuality.However,the imperfection of detection efficiency may cause the so-called loophole in actual KCBS’s experiments.We derive an alternative KCBS inequality to deal with the loophole in actual KCBS’s experiments.We prove that if the experimental data violate this KCBS inequality,the loophole-free violation of the original KCBS inequality will occur.We show that the minimum detection efficiency needed for a loophole-free violation of the KCBS inequality is about 0.9738.