Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1110.4602

Quantum phase properties of nonlinear optical phenomena

R. Tanaś, Adam Miranowicz, Ts. Gantsog

Published Oct 20, 2011• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We review some quantum-phase descriptions of optical fields. We focus on real fields that can be generated in practice in various nonlinear optical processes. Thus, we rather avoid discussions of phase formalisms as such and try to exploit their practical applicability in the description of optical fields. In the description of the phase properties we use two different, though related formalisms: the Pegg-Barnett Hermitian phase formalism and the formalism based on $s$-parametrized phase distributions.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1110.4602

Related papers

Number-Phase Uncertainty Relations for Optical Fields

R. Tanaś

The Hermitian phase formalism of Pegg and Barnett allows for direct calculations of the phase variance and, consequently, the number-phase uncertainty product. This gives us a unique opportunity, inaccessible before, to study the number-phase uncertainty relations for optical fields in a direct way within a consistent quantum formalism. A few examples of fields generated in nonlinear optical processes are studied from the point of view of their number-phase uncertainty relations.

•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Hermitian Phase Operator of Quantized Light Fields. A Fundamental Problem of Quantum Optics.

Hiroshi Iwasawa

For a long time, about 60 years, the phase as an observable of the quantized light fields has r emained a fundamental problem with considerable difficulties on quantum mechanics and also q uantum optics.Recently, however, the hermitian phase operator and its eigenstates in a finite H ilbert space are found by Pegg and Barnett.In this paper, we provide a historical review and t he background of the problem on the phase operator, explore the Pegg-Barnett formalism, and s how the recent developements of this fields and its application to various light fields.Further problems on this formalism and other approaches are also discussed.

The Review of Laser Engineering•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations

Phase distributions of real field states

R. Tanaś, Adam Miranowicz, Ts. Gantsog

The phase distribution obtained within the Pegg–Barnett Hermitian phase formalism is compared to the phase distributions obtained from the s -parametrized quasiprobability distributions integrated over the "radial" variable for some real states of the field. Exact analytical formulas for the s -parametrized phase distributions of coherent states, squeezed states, and displaced number states are obtained. A general formula relating the s -parametrized phase distributions to the Pegg–Barnett distribution is derived. Numerical examples illustrating the similarities and differences are presented in a graphical form.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1993•30 citations

Phase distribution of nonlinear coherent states

Barnana Roy, P Roy

Using the Pegg-Barnett formalism we study phase properties of nonlinear coherent states. We compute the Pegg-Barnett phase probability distribution of nonlinear coherent states and compare it with phase distributions associated with the Q function and the Wigner function. Squeezing properties of nonlinear coherent states with respect to the number and the phase operator are also studied.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Jan 1, 1999•30 citations

Phase properties of excited coherent states

Ravinder Nath, Satish Kumar Muthu

The phase properties of states generated by excitations on a coherent state have been studied by evaluating the expression for the phase probability distribution, using the recent formalism of Pegg and Barnett in which the existence of a Hermitian optical phase operator has been shown. This distribution has been further used to evaluate the variance of the phase operator and the number - phase uncertainty product.

Quantum and Semiclassical Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Aug 1, 1996•8 citations

Unitary and Hermitian phase operators for the electromagnetic field

Yee Kin Tsui, Michael F. Reid

Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] have proposed a formalism for a Hermitian optical phase operator, constructed from the so-called phase states. In this paper we give an alternative derivation. We begin by defining a unitary phase operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ from the relationship $\stackrel{^}{a}={e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}R(\stackrel{^}{N})$ ($\stackrel{^}{a}$ is an annihilation operator for a single-mode boson field), but borrow the idea of a finite- (but arbitrarily large) dimensional space from Pegg and Barnett. Finally, we comment on an experiment to determine quantum phase uncertainty. Our analysis uses the operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$, which we feel is a more natural choice than $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$. The use of ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ also avoids the multivalued problems associated with $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1992•11 citations
We review some quantum-phase descriptions of optical fields. We focus on real fields that can be generated in practice in various nonlinear optical processes. Thus, we rather avoid discussions of phase formalisms as such and try to exploit their practical applicability in the description of optical fields. In the description of the phase properties we use two different, though related formalisms: the Pegg-Barnett Hermitian phase formalism and the formalism based on sss-parametrized phase distributions.
For a long time, about 60 years, the phase as an observable of the quantized light fields has r emained a fundamental problem with considerable difficulties on quantum mechanics and also q uantum optics.Recently, however, the hermitian phase operator and its eigenstates in a finite H ilbert space are found by Pegg and Barnett.In this paper, we provide a historical review and t he background of the problem on the phase operator, explore the Pegg-Barnett formalism, and s how the recent developements of this fields and its application to various light fields.Further problems on this formalism and other approaches are also discussed.
The phase distribution obtained within the Pegg–Barnett Hermitian phase formalism is compared to the phase distributions obtained from the s -parametrized quasiprobability distributions integrated over the "radial" variable for some real states of the field. Exact analytical formulas for the s -parametrized phase distributions of coherent states, squeezed states, and displaced number states are obtained. A general formula relating the s -parametrized phase distributions to the Pegg–Barnett distribution is derived. Numerical examples illustrating the similarities and differences are presented in a graphical form.
Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] have proposed a formalism for a Hermitian optical phase operator, constructed from the so-called phase states. In this paper we give an alternative derivation. We begin by defining a unitary phase operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ from the relationship $\stackrel{^}{a}={e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}R(\stackrel{^}{N})$ ($\stackrel{^}{a}$ is an annihilation operator for a single-mode boson field), but borrow the idea of a finite- (but arbitrarily large) dimensional space from Pegg and Barnett. Finally, we comment on an experiment to determine quantum phase uncertainty. Our analysis uses the operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$, which we feel is a more natural choice than $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$. The use of ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ also avoids the multivalued problems associated with $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$.